OT: If Bush is Elected

[Fred Bloggs]

Rolavine wrote:
[...snip babble...]

How dumb are you, rocks for brains? "Brian" is Clarence. Get a clue.

 

[Rich Grise]

On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:34:31 -0500, Brian wrote:

Iraq is like a giant vacuum, sucking in all those terrorests, so we
can
kill them there.

So, God's voice in your head is instructing you to go forth and kill
people?

This is scary.

Thanks,
Rich

 

[Rich Grise]

On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:44:15 +0000, Rolavine wrote:

From: "Brian" bellis350@comcast.net

I repeat, where did "he himself" get this information?
Brian

Again, if you find my statements factually flawed please let me know, because
sometimes they are, and I rather be corrected that continue to sound like a
fool! In that I'm close to the exact opposite of the President.

Heh! Yeah, like a Bush minion is going to look up any verifiable facts!

Their card house is getting more and more fragile every day - any one of
the facts could bring it down, if any of them ever come out of their
trance.

Cheers!
Rich

 

[Rich Grise]

On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 01:11:54 +0000, Fred Bloggs wrote:

Product developer wrote:



I had a feeling you were on welfare. Anyone that has this much time to
post so many immature and unstimulating posts had to be both
unemployable and stupid.

Take a look at your boys Seim and Clarence (Gathright), both on
government handouts , and both with worthless p.o.s. posts. Then there
is the flag-waver contingent in yourself, loser.

Y'know, I just realized - that's a pretty serious accusation! It's
tantamount to calling me a communist, as a matter of fact. ME!!!
A COMMUNIST!!! HAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!! Product developer is clearly not
of sound mind.

Cheers!
Rich

 

[Rolavine]

From: Fred Bloggs nospam@nospam.com

Rolavine wrote:
[...snip babble...]

How dumb are you, rocks for brains? "Brian" is Clarence. Get a clue.

I know it gets confusing with all the little >'s but I think you got the wrong

perp!

Rocky

 

[Clarence]

"Rolavine" <rolavine@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041020164634.15036.00005292@mb-m02.aol.com...

From: Fred Bloggs nospam@nospam.com

Rolavine wrote:
[...snip babble...]

How dumb are you, rocks for brains? "Brian" is Clarence. Get a clue.

I know it gets confusing with all the little >'s but I think you got the
wrong
perp!

Rocky

Really? I then redirect it to the real writer.

Sorry about the error.

Since I do not see Fred, it does get confusing when some of his trash shows up
in a reply.

 

[Brian]

"Rolavine" <rolavine@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041018213629.08241.00002111@mb-m10.aol.com...

From: "Brian" bellis350@comcast.net

"James Beck" <jim@reallykillersystems.com> wrote
rolavine@aol.com says...
I will have to listen to an idiot that says things like:

"Of course I know Osama Bin Laden attacked us, I know that."

Or we have captured or killed 75% of Al Qaida Leadership.

You know if you want a president that is totally out of touch and a
total
failure to boot then Bush is your man!

In a recent Gallop poll 50% of Republicans said that Saddam was in
on
the
planning of 9/11. As long as this shitwits are allowed to vote
we're
doomed!



Yeah, what we need is a guy with a "Plan".
LOL


Yeah, like we could believe anything this guy with a "Plan" says,
other
than give me all your money, so he can make the government much bigger.
Yea, Right!

Well maybe it's just me but I do a lot of planning, When I bid a project
it's
all a plan, when I decide what part to do first and when, or when to
order the
parts or do the documentation. Given a choice of a guy that plans and a
guy
that don't for president, I'll take the planner.

You actually believe he has a plan? His plan is whatever the polls show
that day.
I think he's nothing but a phony.

By the way we have some real problems in this country that someone
should stop
ignoreing and maybe even try to fix?

What does Kerry have to say about that, other than Bush is doing
everything wrong
and that he has a plan.

Better a plan than a guy that just waits for the voice in his head he
calls
Jesus to tell him what country to invade next.

If you don't understand something, then you criticize it.

 

[Mike Ng]

Brian wrote:

"James Beck" <jim@reallykillersystems.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1bddf34fe047b62c989a30@news.west.earthlink.net...
In article <20041018161737.11769.00002531@mb-m29.aol.com>,
rolavine@aol.com says...
I will have to listen to an idiot that says things like:

"Of course I know Osama Bin Laden attacked us, I know that."

Or we have captured or killed 75% of Al Qaida Leadership.

You know if you want a president that is totally out of touch and a
total
failure to boot then Bush is your man!

In a recent Gallop poll 50% of Republicans said that Saddam was in on
the
planning of 9/11. As long as this shitwits are allowed to vote we're
doomed!



Yeah, what we need is a guy with a "Plan".
LOL


Yeah, like we could believe anything this guy with a "Plan" says, other
than give me all your money, so he can make the government much bigger.
Yea, Right!

But the current guy made the government bigger.

 

[Rich Grise]

On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 19:06:27 -0700, Product developer wrote:

toor@iquest.net (John S. Dyson) wrote in message news:<cl1e4a$ab6$2@news.iquest.net>...
In article <3t98n01fhii48jnapnp69j62i91bdde5o4@4ax.com>,
John Larkin <jjlarkin@highSNIPlandTHIStechPLEASEnology.com> writes:
On 18 Oct 2004 20:17:37 GMT, rolavine@aol.com (Rolavine) wrote:

As long as this shitwits are allowed to vote we're doomed!


Right! We should go back to literacy testing and poll taxes, like in
the good ol' days. You can probably find a few retired Mississippi
politicians to show you how it's done.

Given even MINIMAL literacy testing (ignoring the poll taxes), that would
eliminate most of the Democrat voters. There'll still be the
pseudo-intelligent Democrat advocates (those who are indeed expert in
a certain field, but DEFINITELY not in politics or common sense.) There'll
also still be the errsatz-intelligent Democrat advocates (J Garafolo, Stuart
Smelly, etc) who are simply not really very smart in general, but have
a good schtick where they have been trained to 'look smart'. Also, we
have the perversely intelligent Democrat advocates (e.g. Bill Marr), where
they have some intellect, but an obviously twisted mind. (Actually,
Stuart Smalley looks mentally deficient, until he wears his costumes,
and then he looks more like a typical Democrat, who probably doesn't
achieve the goals of personal hygiene.

When talking about the Democrat voters, we basically have the minimally
intelligent people like the advocates above, but when considering those
who could really pass a non-trivial literacy test, we'd lose a much
much larger portion of the Democrat voters than GOPers. Geesh, to gain
success, the Dem party even depends upon the felon vote. For one half
of the Senators in Mass, we have an actual killer of a gal-pal.

John

Well said. The democrats are notorious for getting anyone with a pulse
to vote. Remember the "motor voter bill" where they wanted people to
register at the DMV.

Democrats want the biggest turnout while the Republicans only want an
informed or minimal turnout.

The solution to this problem is to prevent anyone with a conflict of
interest from voting, eliminating all those on the public teat like
welfare recipients, Government employees, Teachers, and anyone else
part of the self perpetuating machine of self indulgence.

Yeah! That's the solution! Keep everybody from voting except the ones
that are gonna vote for your guy! Yeah that's it! The New American Way!

Fuck You. Go to hell along with your master.

Rich

 

[Rolavine]

From: "Brian" bellis350@comcast.net

"Rich Grise" <rich@example.net> wrote in message

On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 01:49:45 +0000, Rolavine wrote:

From: "Brian" bellis350@comcast.net

Are you saying we shouldn't have added homeland security and TSA.
Let Kerry get in and see how big the government will get, if he has
his
way.

Kerry has a record of being a fiscal conservative, you should take a
look at
that before you buy into BS!

Bush has grown govenment but national security has only cost about 30
billion.

The cost in loss of liberty and crippling of the American Dream is
incalculable.

Thanks anyway, but take your homeland security and sell it to the
gestapo.

Good Luck,
Rich

How incalculable would the loss be, if a terrorest set off a WMD here?

That would be bad, however even the Bush Admin has said it's not a matter of
if, it's a matter of when. And for the Patriot act I believe the current score
is Ashcroft 5000 investigations with 0 convictions!

It strikes me that homeland security and the new multi billion $ star wars anti
missile system have something in common, every time they are tested they fail!

This country has not been attacked since 9/11 because we have been lucky, real
homeland security would cost a lot, I mean really a lot, I mean as much as the
war in Iraq. And because of the war in Iraq, we need it worse.

Please join me in sending Bush into obscurity where he can only do a little
more harm. Given his actions, statements, and the extent of the lies he is
telling I can only guess that he wants to be sent home where he can relax and
finish 'My Pet Goat'.

 

[Rolavine]

From: "Brian" bellis350@comcast.net

Iraq is like a giant vacuum, sucking in all those terrorests, so we can
kill them there.

Prove it, find me some info about the number of domestic vs. imported
insurgents fighting in Iraq? I can't find it, I've looked. Everything I've
found indicates we are mostly fighting domestics, domestics that weren't
terrorsts before we invaded, so that would make you Wrong, right?. This is an
easy thing to say and the Bush admin has kind of skirted it, but we all know
they are lying sacks o' shit!

Yes, a little luck but mostly a lot of hard work.

No it's easy to make up a myth and express it as reality, heck it's all your
side has, a bunch of myths thinner that the skins of balloons!

We need
to hold off the terrorests as long as we can. This gives us more time to
find them and shut them down. Please join me in sending Kerry back to his
little cubby hole, where he belongs. Kerry would be even less effective than
Clinton (I never thought I would >imply something nice about Clinton),

Clinton's admin was very effective at anti terrorist activities! The right has
made up some myths about that too but again, lying sacks o' shit!

words don't work with terrorests.

I see so if words don't work we need an all out breeding program for them, how

enlightened! That's only fair because according to you savior Saint Bush we
have captured or killed 75% of Al Qaida's leaders, one more time 'lying sacks
o' shit'!

Send Bush home to read 'My Pet Goat'!

Rocky

 

[Rich Grise]

On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 08:14:55 -0700, Product developer wrote:

I had a feeling you were on welfare.

A feeling, huh? Is that like George Bush's gut-level feelings that tell
him he's supposed to be masterminding the extermination of the Islam
peoples?

Anyone that has this much time to
post so many immature and unstimulating posts had to be both
unemployable and stupid.

Thank you for illuminating this issue! Your incisive, insightful
commentary has broadened my horizons immensely. Thank you, thank
you from the bottom of my heart.

But, you had the insight to figure out that anyone who has to work hard
enough to be a land owner would vote for the right party and those who
feed at the public trough would vote for your guy. You may be a tard,
^^^^

Which, whether I am or not, is really irrelevant to my charge that you
want to restrict voting to those who have already expressed loyalty to
der fuehrer.

but you nailed this one.

I usually do.

Now, please go follow your nazi master to hell.

Thanks,
Rich