**What "scam" would that be?
**Thanks to Tony Abbott, Alan Jones, Bolt, et al, they already are.
science may not be backed up by evidence and fact.
but we knew that tweva is full of shite
In fact they're hopelessly inept compared to those before them,
The Global Warming one.
Feel free to call me a laughing stock Trev. When you have people like
If Abbott lives up to his promise of abolishing the Carbon Tax when he
I would have thought it'd be *the* most spectacular. Even Labor party
Of course.
Quoting from 2268.txt of the Climategate files:
/"\ Bernd Felsche - Innovative Reckoning, Perth, Western Australia
**Again: Citing Alan Jones as some kind of credible scientific source is
**Really? Of are you just accepting some out of context words, from
**Make no mistake: Bob Brown is a politician. Bob Brown is NOT aDon't forget your peer-reviewed science. Failure to present it will
result in you being called a laughing stock
Feel free to call me a laughing stock Trev. When you have people like
Bob Brown on your side I piss my pants all day long
**Abbott has promised to eliminate a tax that will cost the average
**Your inability to provide peer-reviewed science to back your claim is
**What the fuck are you smoking? Where do you get this crap from? The
**What "scam"? Please present your peer-reviewed science to support your
**Popular opinion is not scientific fact. It's just the opinion of a
**Why? Because they cite the facts? Yeah, that's the Catholic Church's
Oh dear, another one.On 4/12/2011 4:57 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
**What "scam" would that be?
The Global Warming one.
The one were most of the "credible" scientists in England who have
been associated with it for a number of years are now largely in
hiding after it was recently revealed that their modelling was wrong
(and they knew it) and that their principal objective was to scare
the shit out of the public to ensure continued funding.
Don't forget your peer-reviewed science. Failure to present it will
result in you being called a laughing stock
Feel free to call me a laughing stock Trev. When you have people like
Bob Brown on your side I piss my pants all day long
**Thanks to Tony Abbott, Alan Jones, Bolt, et al, they already are.
Sadly, they're no better nor worse than any government that
preceeded them.
If Abbott lives up to his promise of abolishing the Carbon Tax when he
takes office at the next election he'll be better than most.
Out of context? Jesus Trev....
Your blind faith is absolutely staggering Trevor, and to the point where
Absolute bullshit Trevor.
Uh-huh...
Which economists would these people be?
Not really an accurate comparison Trev, as the GST was a streamlining of
"Serious effects" are your words, not mine.
On 12/4/2011 11:56 PM, Noddy wrote:
On 4/12/2011 4:57 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
**What "scam" would that be?
The Global Warming one.
**Again: Citing Alan Jones as some kind of credible scientific source is
hardly appropriate. When the guys at CSIRO, NASA, The Australian Academy
of Science, the US National Academy of Science, the UK Met, The
Australian BoM, The French Academy of Science, the German Academy of
Science, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Royal Society of Canada, Royal
Danish Acadeny of Sciences and Letters, The Finnish Academy of Sciences
and Letters, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences,
Royal Society of Scotland, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, et al.
When all these guys (and a many more SCIENTIFIC organisations) tell us
that AGW is a "scam", then and only then, will I sit up and take notice.
I'll say again: Alan Jones, Andrew Bolt, George Pell and yourself, have
zero credibility as climatologists.
The one were most of the "credible" scientists in England who have been
associated with it for a number of years are now largely in hiding after
it was recently revealed that their modelling was wrong (and they knew
it) and that their principal objective was to scare the shit out of the
public to ensure continued funding.
**Really? Of are you just accepting some out of context words, from
people who have a financial gain in perpetuating the digging up of
fossil fuels?
Don't forget your peer-reviewed science. Failure to present it will
result in you being called a laughing stock
Feel free to call me a laughing stock Trev. When you have people like
Bob Brown on your side I piss my pants all day long
**Make no mistake: Bob Brown is a politician. Bob Brown is NOT a
climatologist. I don't listen to Bob Brown. I listen to the scientists.
You listen to shock jocks. Wanna bet on who is right?
**Thanks to Tony Abbott, Alan Jones, Bolt, et al, they already are.
Sadly, they're no better nor worse than any government that preceeded
them.
If Abbott lives up to his promise of abolishing the Carbon Tax when he
takes office at the next election he'll be better than most.
**Abbott has promised to eliminate a tax that will cost the average
punter less than $0.30/week. His tax will extract taxpayer funds and
give it to large companies in the hope that they will spend it wisely.
Abbott's tax will increase the size of the public service by many
thousands. Taxes will rise to accomodate his increased spending.
You tell me why you think that Abbott's completely discredited scheme
makes any sense at all. Are you an economist too? All the economists
have stated that Abbott's scheme will be costly and doomed to failure,
whereas the government's scheme will be relatively modestly priced and
will work.
The only thing amusing is watching fools like you trying to wish scientific
If Abbott lives up to his promise of abolishing the Carbon Tax when he
**What the fuck are you smoking? Where do you get this crap from? The
**What "scam"? Please present your peer-reviewed science to support your
**Popular opinion is not scientific fact. It's just the opinion of a
**Why? Because they cite the facts? Yeah, that's the Catholic Church's
Ah boy....
Uh-huh....
The problem with all you pro climate change nutbags is that for some