OT: Google/YouTube censors Judicial Watch!...

[John Doe]

Judicial watch is supported by donations, so what?

The idea Judicial Watch staff does not promote their own views is
ignorant. Apparently the poster hasn\'t watched any JW videos...

https://youtu.be/1HH_Gikr9RY?t=570 (at least ten minutes)

Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton clearly expresses his opposition to
\"the culture of death that Roe V Wade gave us\".

Judicial Watch brings many freedom of information act (FOIA) cases against
our government. What other organization forces our government to cough up
information anywhere near as much?

Cannibal leftist organizations have every right to force government to
cough up information, but they don\'t, because the cannibal left supports
the Deep State. The Deep State is \"the invisible and mischievous power
which thwarts [elected officials\'] most noble views\" and remains hidden
for good reason. Judicial Watch\'s concern about the Deep State and their
zealous promotion of FOIA lawsuits goes hand in hand.

This poster has a strange definition of \"censorship\" everybody else must
understand!

--
whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> wrote:

X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:588:b0:2f3:bca9:ea34 with SMTP id c8-20020a05622a058800b002f3bca9ea34mr13078179qtb.601.1652642297678; Sun, 15 May 2022 12:18:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:44c1:0:b0:64a:94d7:6a5a with SMTP id r184-20020a2544c1000000b0064a94d76a5amr14799336yba.396.1652642297470; Sun, 15 May 2022 12:18:17 -0700 (PDT)
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Date: Sun, 15 May 2022 12:18:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <t5q8cf$a6n$1@dont-email.me
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=209.221.140.126; posting-account=vKQm_QoAAADOaDCYsqOFDAW8NJ8sFHoE
NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.221.140.126
References: <t5q8cf$a6n$1@dont-email.me
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <fe96479e-8f1b-4b7c-b0a4-51c4efa37136n@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: OT: Google/YouTube censors Judicial Watch!
From: whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com
Injection-Date: Sun, 15 May 2022 19:18:17 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=\"UTF-8\"
X-Received-Bytes: 2368
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:669081

On Saturday, May 14, 2022 at 11:59:34 PM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:
https://youtu.be/Bv2O9lbLbm0

I might have jumped the gun before (or JW just didn\'t admit it), but there
you have it. Google/YouTube has censored Judicial Watch.

And once they get a grip on you, watch out!

What \'censor\' means, is that a government agent (judge) has commanded ...
Judicial Watch is a nonprofit (they don\'t pay taxes) that does file-cases-for-cash
service in the interests of many clients with political reasons to want a
court decision on a subject. The clients, not the JW organization, decide
the claim-of-the-day.

So, Google/YouTube is well within their rights as publisher to reject
a publication from that group, if it looks like disinformation.
Half-truths is disinformation, it\'s a judgment call when to publish;
YouTube has made one such call.

YouTube isn\'t a censor; their publication decisions have no law-enforcement
backup. That means you don\'t need to \"watch out\".

Judicial Watch (the organization) serves a variety of purposes,
as varied as their clientele, and some are valuable; YouTube still allows
them, just didn\'t host one particular offering from that source. The
tempest-in-a-teapot has been an amusement, not a threat.

 

[John Doe]

This Bozo is a textbook cannibal leftist.
It is chronic liar that cannot be reasoned with,
it supports everything destructive...

--
Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:

X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:5008:b0:45b:82:6ef with SMTP id jo8-20020a056214500800b0045b008206efmr14008123qvb.87.1652677909674; Sun, 15 May 2022 22:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a81:980c:0:b0:2f8:be8d:5100 with SMTP id p12-20020a81980c000000b002f8be8d5100mr17899122ywg.52.1652677909410; Sun, 15 May 2022 22:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Date: Sun, 15 May 2022 22:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <t5sks0$ng$6@dont-email.me
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=118.208.108.19; posting-account=SJ46pgoAAABuUDuHc5uDiXN30ATE-zi-
NNTP-Posting-Host: 118.208.108.19
References: <t5q8cf$a6n$1@dont-email.me> <cadecf55-6493-4699-aa46-71b0615f6265n@googlegroups.com> <t5qd12$67g$3@dont-email.me> <300571e3-f0b2-4caf-abc4-b70c9a296840n@googlegroups.com> <t5qe9a$err$2@dont-email.me> <Ii3gK.2086573$Z91.424579@usenetxs.com> <t5sks0$ng$6@dont-email.me
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <32087322-cf77-402e-a909-3d7b046071bdn@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: OT: Google/YouTube censors Judicial Watch!
From: Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org
Injection-Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 05:11:49 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=\"UTF-8\"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2717
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:669098


Edward Hernandez <dtga...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 2:44:55 PM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
Eddie wants so badly to nym-shift. That\'s a no-no here, Eddie!

Eddie has never posted anything NORMAL except when it got a spanking...


John Doe has this pathetic delusion that it can deliver a \"spanking\". All it can do is publish the fact that it objects to having it\'s nasty habits reviled.

Its enthusiasm for clogging up vast volumes of usernet space with its pathetic squawlling is irritating.

Edward Hernandez isn\'t much better - his rebukes don\'t seem to change John Doe antisocial behavior at all, and are almost as much of a waste of bandwidth as John Doe inappropriate twaddle. I\'ve been rude to John Doe often enough for it to have gotten to be almost as tedious and predictable.

I haven\'t complained about this specific John Doe delusion before but it\'s been irritating me for quite a while now.

Since John Doe is a practitioner of multi-faceted obnoxiousness, I\'ll probably find something new to tip me over the edge sometime soon.

Not responding creeps like him is probably the best policy, but if he didn\'t get some negative feedback he might think that he was being tolerated rather than endured.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Edward Hernandez]

The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn\'t even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has itself posted yet another
incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Mon, 16 May 2022 05:16:47 -0000
(UTC) in message-id <t5smnu$cv1$1@dont-email.me>.

Further, John Doe stated the following in message-id
<svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
(UTC):

Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
except insults to this group.

Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe\'s post ratio to
USENET (**) has been 60.7% of its posts contributing \"nothing except
insults\" to USENET.

** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe has posted at
least 1384 articles to USENET. Of which 149 have been pure insults and
691 have been John Doe \"troll format\" postings.

OEbhhdn/oXVC

 

[Edward Hernandez]

The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn\'t even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has continued to post incorrectly
formatted USENET articles that are devoid of content (latest example on
Mon, 16 May 2022 05:21:13 -0000 (UTC) in message-id
<t5sn09$cv1$3@dont-email.me>).

NOBODY likes the John Doe troll\'s contentless spam.

Further, Troll Doe stated the following in message-id
<svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
(UTC):

Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
except insults to this group.

Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe\'s post ratio
to USENET (**) has been 60.7% of its posts contributing \"nothing except
insults\" to USENET.

** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe has posted at
least 1384 articles to USENET. Of which 149 have been pure insults and
691 have been Troll Doe \"troll format\" postings.

This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even
follow the rules it uses to troll other posters.

5YQZTLOYs4Jv

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 3:16:54 PM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:

whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, May 14, 2022 at 11:59:34 PM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:

<snip>

What \'censor\' means, is that a government agent (judge) has commanded ...
Judicial Watch is a nonprofit (they don\'t pay taxes) that does file-cases-for-cash
service in the interests of many clients with political reasons to want a
court decision on a subject. The clients, not the JW organization, decide
the claim-of-the-day.

So, Google/YouTube is well within their rights as publisher to reject
a publication from that group, if it looks like disinformation.
Half-truths is disinformation, it\'s a judgment call when to publish;
YouTube has made one such call.

YouTube isn\'t a censor; their publication decisions have no law-enforcement
backup. That means you don\'t need to \"watch out\".

Judicial Watch (the organization) serves a variety of purposes,
as varied as their clientele, and some are valuable; YouTube still allows
them, just didn\'t host one particular offering from that source. The
tempest-in-a-teapot has been an amusement, not a threat.

Judicial watch is supported by donations, so what?

So was the Tea Party Faction, to such an extent that it did exactly what the Koch brothers wanted. The wrecked the Republican Party, and left it easy meat for Donald Trump, which probably wasn\'t what the Koch brother had in mind.

The idea Judicial Watch staff does not promote their own views is
ignorant. Apparently the poster hasn\'t watched any JW videos...

https://youtu.be/1HH_Gikr9RY?t=570 (at least ten minutes)

Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton clearly expresses his opposition to
\"the culture of death that Roe V Wade gave us\".

So he\'s trying to suck in money from the religious right. Roe versus Wade meant more safe legal abortion and fewer dangerous illegal abortions.
Perhaps more dead fetuses, but definitely fewer dead mothers.

Judicial Watch brings many freedom of information act (FOIA) cases against
our government. What other organization forces our government to cough up
information anywhere near as much?

Judicial Watch may bring many cases, but most of them seem to fail.

Cannibal leftist organizations have every right to force government to
cough up information, but they don\'t, because the cannibal left supports
the Deep State. The Deep State is \"the invisible and mischievous power
which thwarts [elected officials\'] most noble views\" and remains hidden
for good reason. Judicial Watch\'s concern about the Deep State and their
zealous promotion of FOIA lawsuits goes hand in hand.

Lunatic delusions about the existence of Deep State do seem provoke a lot of pointless activity.
John Doe doesn\'t boast about any particular case. most likely because there aren\'t any worth boasting about.

> This poster has a strange definition of \"censorship\" everybody else must understand!

As does John Doe. John Doe is an idiot. Whit3rd isn\'t, and he does seem to be using a generally accepted definition of censorship.

A censor is a government employee - a member of the real - visible - state, as opposed to the imaginary Deep State. YouTube isn\'t a state organisation.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[John Doe]

Eddie wants so badly to nym-shift. That\'s a no-no here, Eddie!

Eddie has never posted anything NORMAL except when it got a spanking...

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.electronics.repair/c/MesPLcGU4BE

See also...
John Doe <always.look@message.header> (astraweb)
Peter Weiner <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
Edward H. <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com>

Eddie is an example for all newbies. Don\'t get spanked!

Spanked Eddie...

--
Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com> wrote:

Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.uzoreto.com!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx07.ams4.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com
Subject: Re: OT: Google/YouTube censors Judicial Watch!
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,free.spam
References: <t5q8cf$a6n$1@dont-email.me> <cadecf55-6493-4699-aa46-71b0615f6265n@googlegroups.com> <t5qd12$67g$3@dont-email.me> <300571e3-f0b2-4caf-abc4-b70c9a296840n@googlegroups.com> <t5qe9a$err$2@dont-email.me> <Ii3gK.2086573$Z91.424579@usenetxs.com> <t5sks0$ng$6@dont-email.me> <32087322-cf77-402e-a909-3d7b046071bdn@googlegroups.com> <t5sn09$cv1$3@dont-email.me
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <IklgK.1086384$vo1.353040@usenetxs.com
X-Complaints-To: https://www.astraweb.com/aup
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 05:31:20 UTC
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 05:31:20 GMT
X-Received-Bytes: 2351
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:669105 free.spam:18285

The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

The troll doesn\'t even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has continued to post incorrectly
formatted USENET articles that are devoid of content (latest example on
Mon, 16 May 2022 05:21:13 -0000 (UTC) in message-id
t5sn09$cv1$3@dont-email.me>).

NOBODY likes the John Doe troll\'s contentless spam.

Further, Troll Doe stated the following in message-id
svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
(UTC):

Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
except insults to this group.

Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe\'s post ratio
to USENET (**) has been 60.7% of its posts contributing \"nothing except
insults\" to USENET.

** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe has posted at
least 1384 articles to USENET. Of which 149 have been pure insults and
691 have been Troll Doe \"troll format\" postings.

This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even
follow the rules it uses to troll other posters.

5YQZTLOYs4Jv