OT: Epstein: 'Conspiracy theorists' proved right again

Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in news:da28548d-a5ea-4f79-
8f7e-078480a320d6@googlegroups.com:

It would seem to convict someone on criminal
charges you actually need some.

Several incidents of Trump personally obstructing are out there.
Take off the horse blinders, dipshit.

And him bypassing security screening on Kushner was also criminal and
forcing them to give him a clearance was also criminal. That's how
things like treason gets conspired on and carried out. That's why it
is a crime to circumnavigate it.

Wake the fuck up, America!

 

Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:da28548d-a5ea-4f79-8f7e-078480a320d6@googlegroups.com:

You ranted on about how Hillary wasn't negligent in handling
classified information, how the poor dear couldn't even remember
how to handle classified info because her brain is small and new
stuff just keeps overwriting old stuff. And you're a Republican?

No, I never said that. That was *your* retarded take on what I
said. Big difference, you retarded little piece of shit.

You are so into words yet have no clue what information overload
is, because your feeble life, led by your feeble brain never afforded
you any stress.

Yes, I am a Republican, you stupid twerp. I simply do not go
around like you tea party throwback dumbfucks blaming the other party
and individuals in it for everything. You appear immature when you
do that, and the correct indication is that you are immature. Good
job, shithead.

You are fucking stupid, boy.

 

Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in news:da28548d-a5ea-4f79-
8f7e-078480a320d6@googlegroups.com:

I am a
republican. A true republican. Unlike immature dopey little
lardassed retarded punks like you blaming folks and calling folks
'libs' as if that has some meaning other than to show your lack of
depth.

Well, that's quite amazing that you don;t understand the meaning of
'lib', which is slang for 'liberal". You deny that the word
liberal
has any meaning in a political context? And you're a Republican?

You do not get it. You using it in your remarks shows lack of
depth and has no meaning. Not the word itself, tard. I am fairly
confident that my vocabulary exceeds yours.

 

Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> wrote in
news:qj6tj7$8ad$2@dont-email.me:

On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 13:04:53 +0800, Rheilly Phoull wrote:

On 16/08/2019 12:42 pm, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org
wrote:

Or post your name and address, and I will stop by some time
and we
can discuss it for a few seconds. I promise the meeting will be
a one time thing and that afterwards you will never have another
worry.

Another *virtual* "tough guy" LOL! :-D

Only because you are *virtually* and *actually* too pussified to
*really* post your info. Laugh out loud indeed.

 

[Whoey Louie]

On Saturday, August 17, 2019 at 6:26:22 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in news:da28548d-a5ea-4f79-
8f7e-078480a320d6@googlegroups.com:

It would seem to convict someone on criminal
charges you actually need some.

Several incidents of Trump personally obstructing are out there.
Take off the horse blinders, dipshit.

Like what? Allegedly calling up the WH lawyer and telling him to fire
Mueller? It would be Trump's account versus McGhann. And even more
compelling, McGhann had no authority whatever to fire Mueller. Mueller
did not work for McGhanh, he doesn't report to him. Trump could say that
he was just blowing off steam, McGhann misinterpreted what he said.
McGhann took no action, no one interfered with Mueller and Mueller himself
said that. So, good luck proving that case. Same with the rest of it.
Is what Trump did wrong? Sure. But impeaching him would go nowhere,
it would just be another spectacle to divide the country, probably
increase the support for Trump and the Senate
isn't going to remove him. Do you actually think you're going to get
66 Senators to vote to remove on that kind of case? The solution is there,
the 2020 election.

And him bypassing security screening on Kushner was also criminal and
forcing them to give him a clearance was also criminal.

Cite for us the statutes. The president can give a security clearance to
anyone he wants to. I don't think Kushner is fit for any position, but
you're going nowhere on that silly angle.




That's how

things like treason gets conspired on and carried out. That's why it
is a crime to circumnavigate it.

Wake the fuck up, America!

You're the one who needs to wake up.

 

[Whoey Louie]

On Saturday, August 17, 2019 at 6:22:27 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:da28548d-a5ea-4f79-8f7e-078480a320d6@googlegroups.com:

You ranted on about how Hillary wasn't negligent in handling
classified information, how the poor dear couldn't even remember
how to handle classified info because her brain is small and new
stuff just keeps overwriting old stuff. And you're a Republican?

No, I never said that. That was *your* retarded take on what I
said. Big difference, you retarded little piece of shit.

OK, to be fair you never said her brain is so small, but you said that
she can't remember how to handle classified information because that's
been replaced in her mind with other stuff. Happy now? Same thing.
And what kind of Republican comes up with a lame, stupid excuse like
that for Hillary?

You are so into words yet have no clue what information overload
is, because your feeble life, led by your feeble brain never afforded
you any stress.

Yes, I am a Republican, you stupid twerp. I simply do not go
around like you tea party throwback dumbfucks blaming the other party
and individuals in it for everything. You appear immature when you
do that, and the correct indication is that you are immature. Good
job, shithead.

You are fucking stupid, boy.

I don't blame the other party for everything, never have. When I blame
them, it's specific to something they do. Like currently being the party
of open borders, standing up for illegal aliens, sanctuary cities, comparing
ICE detention facilities to concentration camps, refusing to do anything to
stop the flow of illegal aliens, proposing free healthcare for illegal
aliens. Capiche? And I'm not a member of the Tea Party either, it's
another false allegation you just got pulled out of the air.

 

[Whoey Louie]

On Saturday, August 17, 2019 at 6:17:59 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in news:da28548d-a5ea-4f79-
8f7e-078480a320d6@googlegroups.com:

I am a
republican. A true republican. Unlike immature dopey little
lardassed retarded punks like you blaming folks and calling folks
'libs' as if that has some meaning other than to show your lack of
depth.

Well, that's quite amazing that you don;t understand the meaning of
'lib', which is slang for 'liberal". You deny that the word
liberal
has any meaning in a political context? And you're a Republican?


You do not get it. You using it in your remarks shows lack of
depth and has no meaning. Not the word itself, tard. I am fairly
confident that my vocabulary exceeds yours.

I'm totally confident that you're an idiot. I use the term lib, when it
applies, like in that your buddy Bill is a lib, because that is what he
is. I have not called you a
lib. It's not clear WTF you are. You claim to be a Republican, yet you
just went on a long, bizarre defense of Hillary being given a pass for
negligently handling classified information, creating her home brew server.
You went so far as the explain that things like how to handle classified
info aren't in her brain, because they get pushed out by newer, more
important stuff. ROFL. I've never heard any 'Republican", make such a
stupid excuse pitch.

 

[Whoey Louie]

On Friday, August 16, 2019 at 11:56:15 PM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:

On Saturday, August 17, 2019 at 5:29:00 AM UTC+10, Whoey Louie wrote:
On Friday, August 16, 2019 at 2:42:37 PM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 16:46:52 -0700, Whoey Louie wrote:

No, you're lying as every honest person knows the libs have been howling
about Trump colluding with Russia since 2016. And if KRW said you're a
lying lib, he's right.

snipped Cursitor Doom beign as silly as Trader4

Well, whatever he is, he's a real piece of work. To deny that the libs
here in the US have been howling about Trump and Russian collusion since
2016 is obviously lying and incredibly stupid lying at that.

For Trader4's definition of lying, which is the same as krw's - disagreeing with him

no, no, no. It really is you lying. Like when you deny that the libs here
have been howling about Trump and Russia collusion since 2016. It's like
saying the sun doesn't come up in the morning. A lie is a lie.

He thinks I need to prove it.

No. I keep asking him to post an example of it.

Like asking for an example of the sun coming up, stupid.

 

Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:c8f5188f-5d22-4b6f-93d7-a963b9b8c4b6@googlegroups.com:

You claim to be a Republican, yet you
just went on a long, bizarre defense of Hillary being given a pass
for negligently handling classified information,

No. It was a short, simple defense, not that a retard like you
would be capable of gauging a simple statement.

Oh and the information overload 'pitch' is not mine, it is hers.

More proof that you observed nothing at the time or you would
remember.

Her "offense" is not so 'egregious'.

The chinese national 'employee' of LANL that 'lost' the hard drive,
which was later found behind a drinking fountain should have been
charged, but was not. A far more egregious breech took place there.

A Washington official that had their own email server operating
back then wsa not all that uncommon. Once it came to the fore with
the whistleblowers, all of those folks have since straightened out
their act too. Don't see none of them being scrutinized for their
ignorance of the protocols.

All one needs to do is examine your posts over the last 8 months.
Any psychologist would determine that you have serious party hatred
issues.

You seem to want to exclude many 'classes' of people.

Funny, that... I would immediately exclude you.

In such a way that would make a school of piranha happy.

Or maybe in a tank with just a few, such to prolong the event of
your life so you can savor the effects of their feeding...
...as you pass.

Now *that* would make a great youtube video.

 

Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in news:8cdec535-bf38-431d-
b020-8193753e85f2@googlegroups.com:

The president can give a security clearance to
anyone he wants to.

Not true, you retarded fuck.

 

Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:8b4c8984-08eb-4fbd-a84f-ac582fcc8411@googlegroups.com:

On Saturday, August 17, 2019 at 6:22:27 AM UTC-4,
DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:da28548d-a5ea-4f79-8f7e-078480a320d6@googlegroups.com:

You ranted on about how Hillary wasn't negligent in handling
classified information, how the poor dear couldn't even
remember how to handle classified info because her brain is
small and new stuff just keeps overwriting old stuff. And
you're a Republican?

No, I never said that. That was *your* retarded take on what I
said. Big difference, you retarded little piece of shit.


OK, to be fair you never said her brain is so small, but you said
that she can't remember how to handle classified information
because that's been replaced in her mind with other stuff. Happy
now? Same thing. And what kind of Republican comes up with a
lame, stupid excuse like that for Hillary?




You are so into words yet have no clue what information
overload
is, because your feeble life, led by your feeble brain never
afforded you any stress.

Yes, I am a Republican, you stupid twerp. I simply do not go
around like you tea party throwback dumbfucks blaming the other
party and individuals in it for everything. You appear immature
when you do that, and the correct indication is that you are
immature. Good job, shithead.

You are fucking stupid, boy.

I don't blame the other party for everything, never have. When I
blame them, it's specific to something they do. Like currently
being the party of open borders, standing up for illegal aliens,
sanctuary cities, comparing ICE detention facilities to
concentration camps, refusing to do anything to stop the flow of
illegal aliens, proposing free healthcare for illegal aliens.
Capiche? And I'm not a member of the Tea Party either, it's
another false allegation you just got pulled out of the air.

You do not have to 'be a member' to have and utter publicly, their
inane mentality. And you do that very well and so often as to be
incessant.

Looks like a duck... Just one too stupid to see that his retarded
diatribe matches the same shit they drummed up.

 

Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in news:0bb53091-94d2-484c-
b4f1-9d7cad24a031@googlegroups.com:

I don't recall Hillary making such an excuse, but is she did,
here you are claiming to be a "Republican" and accepting that BS,
repeating it?

I have five feet of an NYPD broomstick handle to go up in your ass
with repeatedly... Till it comes out that other asshole you have above
your chin.

 

Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in news:0bb53091-94d2-484c-
b4f1-9d7cad24a031@googlegroups.com:

Yes, that's what Republicans do, make up excuses for Hillary.
ROFL

You are an idiot, and no excuse in the world will provide you escape
velocity from that factual moniker.

 

[Whoey Louie]

On Saturday, August 17, 2019 at 5:42:29 PM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:c8f5188f-5d22-4b6f-93d7-a963b9b8c4b6@googlegroups.com:

You claim to be a Republican, yet you
just went on a long, bizarre defense of Hillary being given a pass
for negligently handling classified information,

No. It was a short, simple defense,

Yes, that's what Republicans do, make up excuses for Hillary.
ROFL

not that a retard like you

would be capable of gauging a simple statement.

Oh and the information overload 'pitch' is not mine, it is hers.

I don't recall Hillary making such an excuse, but is she did,
here you are claiming to be a "Republican" and accepting that BS,
repeating it?

More proof that you observed nothing at the time or you would
remember.

Her "offense" is not so 'egregious'.

Neither was that poor schmuck sailor's, but he went to prison, Mr. Republican.

The chinese national 'employee' of LANL that 'lost' the hard drive,
which was later found behind a drinking fountain should have been
charged, but was not. A far more egregious breech took place there.

A Washington official that had their own email server operating
back then wsa not all that uncommon.

That's a lie. Name for us the DC officials that had set up their own
private email server systems. Nothing will be forthcoming, because
as usual, it's wrong, all wrong.


Once it came to the fore with
> the whistleblowers,

It didn't come out because of any whistleblowers, it came out because
Hillary got caught. Congress asked the State Dept for her emails and
they didn't have them. Doh!



all of those folks have since straightened out

their act too. Don't see none of them being scrutinized for their
ignorance of the protocols.

Not a single one ever set up a private server under their own control.
Neither did they exclusively use systems other than the govt email
systems. Nor did they ever have anything classified in any private
email exchanges. A couple of others did use their own private emails
on commercial services for some limited govt emails.

All one needs to do is examine your posts over the last 8 months.
Any psychologist would determine that you have serious party hatred
issues.

You seem to want to exclude many 'classes' of people.

That's another lie. YOU are the one that regularly threatens to kill
people.

Funny, that... I would immediately exclude you.

Bingo, how's that for stupid hypocrisy?

In such a way that would make a school of piranha happy.


Or maybe in a tank with just a few, such to prolong the event of
your life so you can savor the effects of their feeding...
...as you pass.

Now *that* would make a great youtube video.

Thanks for proving my point.

 

[Whoey Louie]

On Saturday, August 17, 2019 at 5:47:03 PM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:8b4c8984-08eb-4fbd-a84f-ac582fcc8411@googlegroups.com:

On Saturday, August 17, 2019 at 6:22:27 AM UTC-4,
DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:da28548d-a5ea-4f79-8f7e-078480a320d6@googlegroups.com:

You ranted on about how Hillary wasn't negligent in handling
classified information, how the poor dear couldn't even
remember how to handle classified info because her brain is
small and new stuff just keeps overwriting old stuff. And
you're a Republican?

No, I never said that. That was *your* retarded take on what I
said. Big difference, you retarded little piece of shit.


OK, to be fair you never said her brain is so small, but you said
that she can't remember how to handle classified information
because that's been replaced in her mind with other stuff. Happy
now? Same thing. And what kind of Republican comes up with a
lame, stupid excuse like that for Hillary?




You are so into words yet have no clue what information
overload
is, because your feeble life, led by your feeble brain never
afforded you any stress.

Yes, I am a Republican, you stupid twerp. I simply do not go
around like you tea party throwback dumbfucks blaming the other
party and individuals in it for everything. You appear immature
when you do that, and the correct indication is that you are
immature. Good job, shithead.

You are fucking stupid, boy.

I don't blame the other party for everything, never have. When I
blame them, it's specific to something they do. Like currently
being the party of open borders, standing up for illegal aliens,
sanctuary cities, comparing ICE detention facilities to
concentration camps, refusing to do anything to stop the flow of
illegal aliens, proposing free healthcare for illegal aliens.
Capiche? And I'm not a member of the Tea Party either, it's
another false allegation you just got pulled out of the air.


You do not have to 'be a member' to have and utter publicly, their
inane mentality. And you do that very well and so often as to be
incessant.

Why don't you explain to us what Tea Party positions are inconsistent
with Republican positions and why they matter so much that you call
the Tea Party inane throwback dumbfucks?

 

Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:0bb53091-94d2-484c-b4f1-9d7cad24a031@googlegroups.com:

Neither was that poor schmuck sailor's, but he went to prison, Mr.
Republican.

Navy Submariners know about rules, and they know what their rules
are.

He went to prison for blatant disregard of the rules to teach him
*that* lesson. It does not matter what the technical charge was.

The fucktard blatantly ignored the rules, and for that, one can
spend a bit of time in Leavenworth. It is not about the actual act
he committed. It is about the fact that he did so blatantly and
insubordinately with full disregard for the rules, and therefore the
entire UCMJ. Not a good choice in a realm where sharp discipline is
the OOTD.

Hillary's situation was quite different. Not that a 100%
previously biased "the other party is always wrong" abject idiot like
you would understand even the tiniest bit of that is not surprising.

You are the schmuck, jackass.

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Sunday, August 18, 2019 at 10:30:48 PM UTC+10, Whoey Louie wrote:

On Saturday, August 17, 2019 at 10:12:33 PM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, August 18, 2019 at 2:24:02 AM UTC+10, Whoey Louie wrote:
On Friday, August 16, 2019 at 11:37:52 PM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, August 17, 2019 at 12:30:29 AM UTC+10, Whoey Louie wrote:
On Thursday, August 15, 2019 at 11:14:21 PM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Friday, August 16, 2019 at 12:10:32 PM UTC+10, Whoey Louie wrote:
On Thursday, August 15, 2019 at 8:39:45 PM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in news:c64bd557-2d08-49e8-
854e-0eaa43556f33@googlegroups.com:

Well, obviously they were wrong.

No, they were not. Obviously you make shit up.

He committed the crime and the crime of him asking them to do so in public is enough. Crime is crime. Trump is a foreign enemy of the state colluder. He should face a firing squad.

Maybe that's the source of much of your anger? You hate Trump so much, yet you just told us that you are a Republican? Wow, that's something that would have you hating yourself and angry. Trump IS the Republican Party, he hijacked it and anyone who is still a Republican is just enabling him.

Actually the Koch brothers hijacked the Republican Party first - remember the Tea Party, which was a Koch-funded astro-turfing operation - and got rid of anybody who wasn't a repulsive right-wing lunatic.

Actually the Republican Party became more conservative and fed up with
candidates who claim to be Republicans, but when elected act like
Democrats. The Democratic Party has gone far, extreme lib left, but
I don't see you bitching about that or blaming George Soros.

Obviously not, mainly because it is right wing nonsense. The idea that George Soros is spending money on subverting the Democrats in the way that the Koch brothers did with the Tea Party movement may appeal to right wingers because they saw it happen to what used to be the Republican Party, but there's zero evidence that anything like this has happened.

ROFL. So typical, when it happens in the GOP, well it's one thing, a bad
thing. When the same happens in the Democratic Party,

But there's absolutely no evidence that it is happening.

ROFL. More lying and denying.

Trader4 is enthusiastic about reposting his original assertions.

He seems totally incapable of coming up with anything that might look like supporting evidence. Not even a link to some other demented right-winger who might share that particular bizarre delusion.

<snipped the rest>

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Whoey Louie]

On Sunday, August 18, 2019 at 9:01:57 AM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:

Obviously not, mainly because it is right wing nonsense. The idea that George Soros is spending money on subverting the Democrats in the way that the Koch brothers did with the Tea Party movement may appeal to right wingers because they saw it happen to what used to be the Republican Party, but there's zero evidence that anything like this has happened.

ROFL. So typical, when it happens in the GOP, well it's one thing, a bad
thing. When the same happens in the Democratic Party,

But there's absolutely no evidence that it is happening.

ROFL. More lying and denying.

Trader4 is enthusiastic about reposting his original assertions.

He seems totally incapable of coming up with anything that might look like supporting evidence. Not even a link to some other demented right-winger who might share that particular bizarre delusion.

snipped the rest

--

You're such a pathetic liar. I bring up the FACTS, like that Tom Steyer and
George Soros are the Democrat equivalent of the Koch brothers. It's just
that you're a lying lib that denies, denies, denies. You even have the balls
to deny that the libs here have been howling about Trump and Russian collusion
since 2016! I mean, how stupid and pathetic is that lie?

BTW, Google still broken down under or you to busy humping kangaroos?

 

[Whoey Louie]

On Sunday, August 18, 2019 at 8:42:27 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:0bb53091-94d2-484c-b4f1-9d7cad24a031@googlegroups.com:

Neither was that poor schmuck sailor's, but he went to prison, Mr.
Republican.



Navy Submariners know about rules, and they know what their rules
are.

Sec of State, of all people, know the rules for handling classified
information, especially since they have figure out what new information
needs to be classified that they encounter as part of their daily jobs.
Even Hillary knew the rules, new the laws, she just decided to disregard
them because having an email server under her control, where she could
delete whatever she wanted to, not maintain the required preservation as
required by law was what she valued, not national security.

He went to prison for blatant disregard of the rules to teach him
*that* lesson. It does not matter what the technical charge was.

And Hillary got a pass for negligently handling classified information.
Two very similar things, one gets sent to prison, the other gets a pass.
Thank you for proving my point.

The fucktard blatantly ignored the rules, and for that, one can
spend a bit of time in Leavenworth.

Except of course if you're Hillary.



It is not about the actual act
> he committed.

So, the actual laws no longer matter in the American system of justice.
That's a new one. Just go after someone and put them in prison, it's not
about what they actually did or didn't do.



It is about the fact that he did so blatantly and
> insubordinately with full disregard for the rules,

Change that to "she" and you have Hillary. But of course being a true
Republican, you defend Hillary and her emails. First 'Republican" I've
ever seen anywhere do that. And how bizarre. While making stupid excuses
for Hillary, you're still a member of the party of Trump!

 

Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:e8320194-bde0-48a4-ab96-3cc255d35d66@googlegroups.com:

It is not about the actual act
he committed.

So, the actual laws no longer matter in the American system of
justice. That's a new one. Just go after someone and put them in
prison, it's not about what they actually did or didn't do.

You really are one thick skulled fucktard, LardyAss4.

His crime was bringing the phone into the secure compartment.
*That* was "the actual act". He *also* took a picture, and *that* is
what they charged him with because it carried a greater sentence,
which is what they wanted so as to teach a lesson to all other naval
personnel thinking about ignoring the rules with their fucking
personal phones when occupying a security controlled compartment.

So he was cited but not for everything he did, just for the one
that was a proven conviction, evidence in hand.