OT: Earth Hour

"Sylvia Else" <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote in message
news:bps8d9F3oogU1@mid.individual.net...
On 31/03/2014 3:07 PM, Dechucka wrote:

"Sylvia Else" <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote in message
news:bps62mF3c7aU1@mid.individual.net...
On 31/03/2014 1:10 PM, news13 wrote:
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 10:51:01 +1100, Sylvia Else wrote:

On 31/03/2014 6:34 AM, Dechucka wrote:

"Sylvia Else" <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote in message

Even getting the generator to run efficiently is a challenge when
you
have the kind of varying load represented by a house.

You don't use the generator to directly power the house but rather to
generate electricity to store if you use it as a long term system
long
term.

That addresses the efficiency issue, but at the very non-trivial
cost of
needing substantial storage capacity.

To date, the mains has (mostly*some sites) always been cheaper, but
increasingly there are brackets where it isn't.

There is also the reliability issue, resultant losses and recovery
ability.

Due to the "RV" market, you can get into small storage systems cheaply
before moving onto the higher investment.


The short term power requirements for a house can be quite high. Turn
on a kettle, a toaster, a microwave and a hair dryer all at once (not
so unlikely), and you're at around 6kW. Want the clothes dryer running
as well? 8kW.

Not a problem

So unless you're willing to reorganise your life, you'll need a system
capable of supplying power at that kind of level, even if not for long
periods. That quickly gets expensive, and the point of this was to
save money.

Which is what batteries can do. I run an off grid system at our holiday
house. The cost to convert to an off grid system from an on grid system
would be not worth it especially as we are running Gel-Cells. However
grid connection in our case was astronomical so it was good value, we're
running a wind and solar array with petrol generator emergency back up

Which is fine where a grid connection costs too much. But this sub-thread
is premised on the idea that one has a grid connection already, but
decides to relinquish it in favour of on-site generation in order to
reduce the cost.

Not worth it then.
 
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 18:55:31 +1100, Sylvia Else wrote:

So, the first trick is to lead a less energy expensive lifestyle.


That is not what this sub-thread is about.

Shrug, it is for me. If you want to talk about prolifigate energy, go for
it.
 
"Sylvia Else" <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote in message
news:bps62mF3c7aU1@mid.individual.net...
The short term power requirements for a house can be quite high. Turn on a
kettle, a toaster, a microwave and a hair dryer all at once (not so
unlikely), and you're at around 6kW. Want the clothes dryer running as
well? 8kW.

The main breaker will trip by the time you get to 8kW. (less if they are on
the one circuit) But franky anyone who uses a clothes dryer these days
given the cost of electricity has more money than sense, and is NOT likely
to be looking for solutions to reduce cost when the obvious one is staring
them in the face!

Trevor.
 
On 31/03/2014 6:40 PM, news13 wrote:
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 14:34:44 +1100, Sylvia Else wrote:


The short term power requirements for a house can be quite high. Turn on
a kettle, a toaster, a microwave and a hair dryer all at once (not so
unlikely), and you're at around 6kW. Want the clothes dryer running as
well? 8kW.

If you're silly enough to try and duplicate your mains lifestyle, then it
is going to be very expensive. Generally people who do it moderate/change
their life style to one less energy intensive.


So unless you're willing to reorganise your life, you'll need a system
capable of supplying power at that kind of level, even if not for long
periods. That quickly gets expensive, and the point of this was to save
money.

So, the first trick is to lead a less energy expensive lifestyle.

That is not what this sub-thread is about.

Sylvia.
 
On 2014-03-31, Trevor <trevor@home.net> wrote:
"Sylvia Else" <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote in message
news:bps62mF3c7aU1@mid.individual.net...
The short term power requirements for a house can be quite high. Turn on a
kettle, a toaster, a microwave and a hair dryer all at once (not so
unlikely), and you're at around 6kW. Want the clothes dryer running as
well? 8kW.


The main breaker will trip by the time you get to 8kW. (less if they are on
the one circuit)

Who has main breaker smaller than 35A?

--
umop apisdn


--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---
 
On Tue, 01 Apr 2014 23:38:09 +1100, Trevor wrote:

"news13" <newsthirteenspam-spam@woa.com.au> wrote in message
news:lhb65e$6sj$25@dont-email.me...

So, the first trick is to lead a less energy expensive lifestyle.

Which unfortunately does not reduce your "supply charge" by one cent,
which was my complaint in the first place! $500 a year for a meter and
drop wire is outrageous.

Who are you with?
Now with Origin and it is $280p.a.
 
"news13" <newsthirteenspam-spam@woa.com.au> wrote in message
news:lhb65e$6sj$25@dont-email.me...

> So, the first trick is to lead a less energy expensive lifestyle.

Which unfortunately does not reduce your "supply charge" by one cent, which
was my complaint in the first place! $500 a year for a meter and drop wire
is outrageous. Cost for transformers etc are load dependent and should
rightly be covered by usage costs rather than have charges reduce as usage
goes up! :-(

Trevor.
 
"Jasen Betts" <jasen@xnet.co.nz> wrote in message
news:lhdjm0$q8d$1@gonzo.reversiblemaps.ath.cx...
The short term power requirements for a house can be quite high. Turn on
a
kettle, a toaster, a microwave and a hair dryer all at once (not so
unlikely), and you're at around 6kW. Want the clothes dryer running as
well? 8kW.


The main breaker will trip by the time you get to 8kW. (less if they are
on
the one circuit)

Who has main breaker smaller than 35A?

Mine is 30A, (the inline supply fuse is 80A though I believe) and the 2 sub
circuits only 15A each. Never been a problem for me though, got rid of the
clothes dryer 30 years ago.

Trevor.
 
On Sun, 30 Mar 2014 10:41:11 +0800, Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> wrote:

On 30/03/2014 8:44 AM, Jeßus wrote:
On Sat, 29 Mar 2014 16:08:22 +1100, Sylvia Else
sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote:

While some of my neighbours foolishly turn their lights out and ignite
candles (which produce more CO2 than the lights they replace), I might
just disconnect myself from the grid for an hour, and fire up my petrol
generator instead.

'Earth Hour' eh? What PC faggot came up with that pointless concept?


Raising awareness isn't pointless in itself, but it's self-defeating if
it makes those taking part think they have done their bit for the year
by turning off a few lights for an hour.

Yes, exactly.

And there will be plenty of the twitbook generation that will think
exactly that, the fucking numpties that they are.

Agreed. They're so isolated from the real world and they don't even
know it.
 
On Sun, 30 Mar 2014 15:56:01 +1100, "Trevor" <trevor@home.net> wrote:

"Dechucka" <Dechucka_1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:SuidnUowRK20HKrOnZ2dnUVZ_oOdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
'Earth Hour' eh? What PC faggot came up with that pointless concept?

Google is your friend http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_Hour

Assumes he really cares enough to bother. I sure don't.

No, I don't. It was more a rhetorical question really.
 
On 1/04/2014 11:38 PM, Trevor wrote:
"news13" <newsthirteenspam-spam@woa.com.au> wrote in message
news:lhb65e$6sj$25@dont-email.me...

So, the first trick is to lead a less energy expensive lifestyle.

Which unfortunately does not reduce your "supply charge" by one cent, which
was my complaint in the first place! $500 a year for a meter and drop wire
is outrageous. Cost for transformers etc are load dependent and should
rightly be covered by usage costs rather than have charges reduce as usage
goes up! :-(

Costs for transformers are *peak* load dependent, so each consumer
should be paying for transformers in proportion to their contribution to
the peak load.

Usage charges do not capture peak load very well at all.

Time of use metering can better capture peak load, but it would be
difficult to sell a system where consumers don't know how much they'll
be charged for electricity until after the event.

Strictly speaking the transformer cost relates to *projected* peak load,
which complicates allocating the cost even more.

There may be no simple answer to this one, much less one that people
will actually agree is equitable.

Sylvia.
 
On Wed, 02 Apr 2014 18:09:17 +1100, Sylvia Else wrote:

On 2/04/2014 5:04 PM, Jasen Betts wrote:

In some places (France IIRC) they size the supply charge based on the
size of your main fuse

That makes some sense, although it would represent an unfair charge on
someone whose peak load occurred outside peak time.

WTF does consumption time have to do with a size of feed charge?
 
On 2014-04-01, Trevor <trevor@home.net> wrote:
"news13" <newsthirteenspam-spam@woa.com.au> wrote in message
news:lhb65e$6sj$25@dont-email.me...

So, the first trick is to lead a less energy expensive lifestyle.

Which unfortunately does not reduce your "supply charge" by one cent, which
was my complaint in the first place! $500 a year for a meter and drop wire
is outrageous. Cost for transformers etc are load dependent and should
rightly be covered by usage costs rather than have charges reduce as usage
goes up! :-(

In some places (France IIRC) they size the supply charge based on the size
of your main fuse


--
umop apisdn


--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---
 
On 2/04/2014 5:04 PM, Jasen Betts wrote:
On 2014-04-01, Trevor <trevor@home.net> wrote:

"news13" <newsthirteenspam-spam@woa.com.au> wrote in message
news:lhb65e$6sj$25@dont-email.me...

So, the first trick is to lead a less energy expensive lifestyle.

Which unfortunately does not reduce your "supply charge" by one cent, which
was my complaint in the first place! $500 a year for a meter and drop wire
is outrageous. Cost for transformers etc are load dependent and should
rightly be covered by usage costs rather than have charges reduce as usage
goes up! :-(

In some places (France IIRC) they size the supply charge based on the size
of your main fuse

That makes some sense, although it would represent an unfair charge on
someone whose peak load occurred outside peak time.

Sylvia.
 
On 2/04/2014 7:48 PM, news13 wrote:
On Wed, 02 Apr 2014 18:09:17 +1100, Sylvia Else wrote:

On 2/04/2014 5:04 PM, Jasen Betts wrote:

In some places (France IIRC) they size the supply charge based on the
size of your main fuse

That makes some sense, although it would represent an unfair charge on
someone whose peak load occurred outside peak time.

WTF does consumption time have to do with a size of feed charge?

I take it that you think it's obvious that it has nothing to do with it.
You're mistaken. I'll explain why, if you ask the question again in a
civilised way.

Sylvia.
 
On Wed, 02 Apr 2014 19:56:04 +1100, Sylvia Else wrote:

On 2/04/2014 7:48 PM, news13 wrote:
On Wed, 02 Apr 2014 18:09:17 +1100, Sylvia Else wrote:

On 2/04/2014 5:04 PM, Jasen Betts wrote:

In some places (France IIRC) they size the supply charge based on the
size of your main fuse

That makes some sense, although it would represent an unfair charge on
someone whose peak load occurred outside peak time.

WTF does consumption time have to do with a size of feed charge?


I take it that you think it's obvious that it has nothing to do with it.
You're mistaken. I'll explain why, if you ask the question again in a
civilised way.

FO, your argument. Make it or shut up.
You started this shite fight you cross posting troll.
 
On Thu, 03 Apr 2014 11:01:50 +1100, Trevor wrote:

"news13" <newsthirteenspam-spam@woa.com.au> wrote in message
news:lhehol$sbm$3@dont-email.me...
So, the first trick is to lead a less energy expensive lifestyle.

Which unfortunately does not reduce your "supply charge" by one cent,
which was my complaint in the first place! $500 a year for a meter and
drop wire is outrageous.

Who are you with?
Now with Origin and it is $280p.a.

You do realise that depends on where you live right?

So you're with Origin and in the inner city and pay more?
We were with Integral. I guess they invested in infrastructure.

>
 
On Thu, 03 Apr 2014 10:48:11 +1100, Sylvia Else wrote:

On 3/04/2014 2:31 AM, news13 wrote:
On Wed, 02 Apr 2014 19:56:04 +1100, Sylvia Else wrote:

On 2/04/2014 7:48 PM, news13 wrote:
On Wed, 02 Apr 2014 18:09:17 +1100, Sylvia Else wrote:

On 2/04/2014 5:04 PM, Jasen Betts wrote:

In some places (France IIRC) they size the supply charge based on
the size of your main fuse

That makes some sense, although it would represent an unfair charge
on someone whose peak load occurred outside peak time.

WTF does consumption time have to do with a size of feed charge?


I take it that you think it's obvious that it has nothing to do with
it.
You're mistaken. I'll explain why, if you ask the question again in a
civilised way.

FO, your argument. Make it or shut up.
You started this shite fight you cross posting troll.


To be clear, the reason I'm not providing you with the argument is that
you're not debating in a civilised manner. As things stand, you do not
have a correct understanding of the situation. That's your loss, not
mine.

I can live with that.
 
On 3/04/2014 2:31 AM, news13 wrote:
On Wed, 02 Apr 2014 19:56:04 +1100, Sylvia Else wrote:

On 2/04/2014 7:48 PM, news13 wrote:
On Wed, 02 Apr 2014 18:09:17 +1100, Sylvia Else wrote:

On 2/04/2014 5:04 PM, Jasen Betts wrote:

In some places (France IIRC) they size the supply charge based on the
size of your main fuse

That makes some sense, although it would represent an unfair charge on
someone whose peak load occurred outside peak time.

WTF does consumption time have to do with a size of feed charge?


I take it that you think it's obvious that it has nothing to do with it.
You're mistaken. I'll explain why, if you ask the question again in a
civilised way.

FO, your argument. Make it or shut up.
You started this shite fight you cross posting troll.

To be clear, the reason I'm not providing you with the argument is that
you're not debating in a civilised manner. As things stand, you do not
have a correct understanding of the situation. That's your loss, not mine.

Sylvia.
 
"news13" <newsthirteenspam-spam@woa.com.au> wrote in message
news:lhehol$sbm$3@dont-email.me...
So, the first trick is to lead a less energy expensive lifestyle.

Which unfortunately does not reduce your "supply charge" by one cent,
which was my complaint in the first place! $500 a year for a meter and
drop wire is outrageous.

Who are you with?
Now with Origin and it is $280p.a.

You do realise that depends on where you live right?

Trevor.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top