OT: Calculators: Where is the reciprocal key?...

[Edward Hernandez]

The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn\'t even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has continued to post incorrectly
formatted USENET articles that are devoid of content (latest example on
Thu, 14 Apr 2022 19:47:24 -0000 (UTC) in message-id
<t39toc$3tr$2@dont-email.me>).

NOBODY likes the John Doe troll\'s contentless spam.

Further, John Doe stated the following in message-id
<svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
(UTC):

Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
except insults to this group.

Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe\'s post ratio to
USENET (**) has been 57.1% of its posts contributing \"nothing except
insults\" to USENET.

** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe has posted at
least 1017 articles to USENET. Of which 123 have been pure insults and
458 have been John Doe \"troll format\" postings.

This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even
follow the rules it uses to troll other posters.

Hu5VszhJ7KSF

 

[John Doe]

DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

In Windows, one simply enters the number then hits the
SINGLE 1/x key and the result appears.

True, but not common in Android.

A smartphone is an excellent platform for a calculator. Unlike chess or a
first-person shooter, it isn\'t heavy on CPU usage but takes advantage of the
phone\'s CPU for calculations. The whole screen is a calculator.

 

[John Doe]

Eddie wants so badly to nym-shift. That\'s a no-no here, Eddie!

Eddie has never posted anything NORMAL except when it got a spanking...

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.electronics.repair/c/MesPLcGU4BE

See also...
Peter Weiner <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
Edward H. <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com>

Eddie is an example for all newbies. Don\'t get spanked!

Spanked Eddie...

--
Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com> wrote:

Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.uzoreto.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed9.news.xs4all.nl!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx06.ams4.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com
Subject: Re: OT: Calculators: Where is the reciprocal key?
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,free.spam
References: <t36oka$9pm$3@dont-email.me> <t3774i$c6d$2@gioia.aioe.org> <t3788u$vv3$1@gioia.aioe.org> <f9ce5hl86hr1u32vu7rm4s2i2hh73jq70l@4ax.com> <t37l0p$ep4$1@dont-email.me> <t37ndg$g49$1@gioia.aioe.org> <t37r8q$o64$2@dont-email.me> <CgK5K.204432$I_K3.106036@usenetxs.com> <t39nap$nh2$1@dont-email.me> <t39qng$17ec$1@gioia.aioe.org> <t39toc$3tr$2@dont-email.me
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <3V_5K.1835399$X81.454995@usenetxs.com
X-Complaints-To: https://www.astraweb.com/aup
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 19:49:19 UTC
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 19:49:19 GMT
X-Received-Bytes: 2346
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:666153 free.spam:17947

The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

The troll doesn\'t even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has continued to post incorrectly
formatted USENET articles that are devoid of content (latest example on
Thu, 14 Apr 2022 19:47:24 -0000 (UTC) in message-id
t39toc$3tr$2@dont-email.me>).

NOBODY likes the John Doe troll\'s contentless spam.

Further, John Doe stated the following in message-id
svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
(UTC):

Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
except insults to this group.

Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe\'s post ratio to
USENET (**) has been 57.1% of its posts contributing \"nothing except
insults\" to USENET.

** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe has posted at
least 1017 articles to USENET. Of which 123 have been pure insults and
458 have been John Doe \"troll format\" postings.

This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even
follow the rules it uses to troll other posters.

Hu5VszhJ7KSF

 

[Edward Hernandez]

The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn\'t even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has itself posted yet another
incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Thu, 14 Apr 2022 19:53:42 -0000
(UTC) in message-id <t39u46$3tr$4@dont-email.me>.

Further, John Doe stated the following in message-id
<svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
(UTC):

Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
except insults to this group.

Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe\'s post ratio to
USENET (**) has been 57.2% of its posts contributing \"nothing except
insults\" to USENET.

** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe has posted at
least 1020 articles to USENET. Of which 123 have been pure insults and
460 have been John Doe \"troll format\" postings.

1k9CDrVSChUz

 

[Bertrand Sindri]

In sci.electronics.design John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote:

It\'s simple logic. If you expose nym-shifting, it\'s less likely to
continue.

The logic does not follow from what little evidence/argument you have
presented.

> The OBVIOUS reason behind nym-shifting is to hide one\'s persona.

Therefore, those posters who wish to hide their persona by nym-shifting
will continue to wish to hide their persona and so will not care that
you are \'exposing\' them. There persona is still hidden, so their
reason for nym-shifting remains in place.

And I have observed a radical decrease in nym-shifting over a long
period of time. They love(d) the masquerade. I love(d) the mystery.

Coorelation is not causation. Your \"observed radical decrease\" could
just as easily be explained by the gradual reduction in use of USENET
with the resulting few remaining members simply not being the ones that
nym-shifted (i.e., the nym-shifting trolls abandoned USENET for Reddit
or other web locales). And in fact, a reduction in nym-shifting being
caused by a substantial reduction in USENET usage is much more likely
the cause than anything you did, or did not, do yourself.

This nym-shifting troll, who never before posted to this group until this
thread, snipped the relevant portion of my post in order to make its
flimsy assertion.

Please explain what other part of your post was relevant to your
assertion.

 

[John Doe]

Arguing with a chronic liar is pointless. When you refute its lies, it
simply makes up more lies to cover those prior lies. It\'s fiction never
ends...

--
Bertrand Sindri <bertrand.sindri@yahoo.com> wrote:

Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!HQqjtrwtWYY0cW+c5n/Byw.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Bertrand Sindri <bertrand.sindri@yahoo.com
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: OT: Calculators: Where is the reciprocal key?
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 20:28:59 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <t3a06b$1hk3$3@gioia.aioe.org
References: <t36oka$9pm$3@dont-email.me> <t3774i$c6d$2@gioia.aioe.org> <t3788u$vv3$1@gioia.aioe.org> <f9ce5hl86hr1u32vu7rm4s2i2hh73jq70l@4ax.com> <t37l0p$ep4$1@dont-email.me> <t37ndg$g49$1@gioia.aioe.org> <t37r8q$o64$2@dont-email.me> <CgK5K.204432$I_K3.106036@usenetxs.com> <t39nap$nh2$1@dont-email.me> <t39qng$17ec$1@gioia.aioe.org> <t39toc$3tr$2@dont-email.me
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data=\"50819\"; posting-host=\"HQqjtrwtWYY0cW+c5n/Byw.user.gioia.aioe.org\"; mail-complaints-to=\"abuse@aioe.org\";
User-Agent: tin/2.0.1-20111224 (\"Achenvoir\") (UNIX) (Linux/3.10.17 (x86_64))
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:666161

In sci.electronics.design John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote:
It\'s simple logic. If you expose nym-shifting, it\'s less likely to
continue.

The logic does not follow from what little evidence/argument you have
presented.

The OBVIOUS reason behind nym-shifting is to hide one\'s persona.

Therefore, those posters who wish to hide their persona by nym-shifting
will continue to wish to hide their persona and so will not care that
you are \'exposing\' them. There persona is still hidden, so their
reason for nym-shifting remains in place.

And I have observed a radical decrease in nym-shifting over a long
period of time. They love(d) the masquerade. I love(d) the mystery.

Coorelation is not causation. Your \"observed radical decrease\" could
just as easily be explained by the gradual reduction in use of USENET
with the resulting few remaining members simply not being the ones that
nym-shifted (i.e., the nym-shifting trolls abandoned USENET for Reddit
or other web locales). And in fact, a reduction in nym-shifting being
caused by a substantial reduction in USENET usage is much more likely
the cause than anything you did, or did not, do yourself.

This nym-shifting troll, who never before posted to this group until this
thread, snipped the relevant portion of my post in order to make its
flimsy assertion.

Please explain what other part of your post was relevant to your
assertion.

 

[John Doe]

The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn\'t even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has itself posted yet another
incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Thu, 14 Apr 2022 21:24:51 -0000
(UTC) in message-id <t3a3f2$qro$1@dont-email.me>.

Further, John Doe stated the following in message-id
<svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
(UTC):

Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
except insults to this group.

Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe\'s post ratio to
USENET (**) has been 57.2% of its posts contributing \"nothing except
insults\" to USENET.

** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe has posted at
least 1022 articles to USENET. Of which 123 have been pure insults and
462 have been John Doe \"troll format\" postings.

This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even
follow the rules it uses to troll other posters.

byYTgq6DYYFa

 

[John Doe]

Eddie wants so badly to nym-shift. That\'s a no-no here, Eddie!

Eddie has never posted anything NORMAL except when it got a spanking...

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.electronics.repair/c/MesPLcGU4BE

See also...
John Doe <always.look@message.header> (astraweb)
Peter Weiner <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
Edward H. <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com>

Eddie is an example for all newbies. Don\'t get spanked!

Spanked Eddie...

--
John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote:

Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.mixmin.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx09.ams4.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: John Doe <always.look@message.header
Subject: Re: OT: Calculators: Where is the reciprocal key?
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,free.spam
References: <t36oka$9pm$3@dont-email.me> <t3774i$c6d$2@gioia.aioe.org> <t3788u$vv3$1@gioia.aioe.org> <f9ce5hl86hr1u32vu7rm4s2i2hh73jq70l@4ax.com> <t37l0p$ep4$1@dont-email.me> <t37ndg$g49$1@gioia.aioe.org> <t37r8q$o64$2@dont-email.me> <CgK5K.204432$I_K3.106036@usenetxs.com> <t39nap$nh2$1@dont-email.me> <t39qng$17ec$1@gioia.aioe.org> <t39toc$3tr$2@dont-email.me> <t3a06b$1hk3$3@gioia.aioe.org> <t3a3f2$qro$1@dont-email.me
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <jq06K.1104147$Sxe.879315@usenetxs.com
X-Complaints-To: https://www.astraweb.com/aup
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 21:33:03 UTC
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 21:33:03 GMT
X-Received-Bytes: 2312
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:666177 free.spam:17951

The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

The troll doesn\'t even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has itself posted yet another
incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Thu, 14 Apr 2022 21:24:51 -0000
(UTC) in message-id <t3a3f2$qro$1@dont-email.me>.

Further, John Doe stated the following in message-id
svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
(UTC):

Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
except insults to this group.

Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe\'s post ratio to
USENET (**) has been 57.2% of its posts contributing \"nothing except
insults\" to USENET.

** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe has posted at
least 1022 articles to USENET. Of which 123 have been pure insults and
462 have been John Doe \"troll format\" postings.

This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even
follow the rules it uses to troll other posters.

byYTgq6DYYFa

 

[Edward Hernandez]

The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn\'t even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has continued to post incorrectly
formatted USENET articles that are devoid of content (latest example on
Thu, 14 Apr 2022 22:55:47 -0000 (UTC) in message-id
<t3a8pi$v6c$1@dont-email.me>).

NOBODY likes the John Doe troll\'s contentless spam.

Further, Troll Doe stated the following in message-id
<svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
(UTC):

Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
except insults to this group.

Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe\'s post ratio
to USENET (**) has been 57.3% of its posts contributing \"nothing except
insults\" to USENET.

** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe has posted at
least 1024 articles to USENET. Of which 123 have been pure insults and
464 have been Troll Doe \"troll format\" postings.

This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even
follow the rules it uses to troll other posters.

GZjSBMhYfhwN

 

[Ricky]

On Thursday, April 14, 2022 at 2:46:06 PM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

Ricky <gnuarm.del...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:6ac330ed-6bcf-42f8...@googlegroups.com:
On Wednesday, April 13, 2022 at 3:09:13 PM UTC-4,
DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
John Dope <alway...@message.header> wrote in
news:t36oka$9pm$3...@dont-email.me:
Is there a single key calculation for the reciprocal of a
number on a typical scientific calculator?

Is there some symbol besides \"1/x\" to look for?

Thanks.

Enter 1 then divide then the number then equals.

Otherwise, single key IS the \"1/x\" key.
You really are getting senile.

You have the kestrokes mixed up. It would be 1, then Enter, the
number, then divide \"/\".

What sort of crazy calculator are you using?
Nope Multi-register (mantissa) calculators are real in hardware and
software. In Windows, one simply enters the number then hits the
SINGLE 1/x key and the result appears.

What sort of crazy thinks you are better than everyone else are you
using?

Sorry? Can you say that again in English?

--

Rick C.

-+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
-+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Friday, April 15, 2022 at 5:47:30 AM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:

Bertrand Sindri <bertran...@yahoo.com> wrote:
John Doe <alway...@message.header> wrote:

If it weren\'t for my \"troll format postings\", Eddie would be nym-shifting.

How do you reach the conclusion that your \"troll format postings\" are
the reason why anyone, Edward included, is not nym-shifting?

It\'s simple logic. If you expose nym-shifting, it\'s less likely to

continue. The OBVIOUS reason behind nym-shifting is to hide one\'s persona.
And I have observed a radical decrease in nym-shifting over a long period
of time. They love(d) the masquerade. I love(d) the mystery.

The \"simple logic\" depends on John Doe\'s assertion that there\'s nym-shifting going on.

He seems to understand this when he\'s being rude to Edward Hernandez, where he has been known to list other pseudonyms which he claims that that poster has used.

He hasn\'t bothered to list any other pseudonym for Bertrand Sindri, so here John Doe is just making up one more of his idiot assertions.

Actual nym-shifters may \"love the masquerade\" though most of them seem to get kicked out by their information providers and have to register with a new information provider under a different name to resume posting. The \"hiding of the persona\" is incidental. John Doe\'s \"love of the mystery\" involved seems to reflect his enthusiasm or finding implausible explanations for stuff he doesn\'t actually understand. It may be his hobby, but nobody wants to know about the stupid stories he dreams up up in the process.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Friday, April 15, 2022 at 7:24:58 AM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:

Bertrand Sindri <bertran...@yahoo.com> wrote:
In sci.electronics.design John Doe <alway...@message.header> wrote:

It\'s simple logic. If you expose nym-shifting, it\'s less likely to
continue.

The logic does not follow from what little evidence/argument you have
presented.

The OBVIOUS reason behind nym-shifting is to hide one\'s persona.

Therefore, those posters who wish to hide their persona by nym-shifting
will continue to wish to hide their persona and so will not care that
you are \'exposing\' them. There persona is still hidden, so their
reason for nym-shifting remains in place.

And I have observed a radical decrease in nym-shifting over a long
period of time. They love(d) the masquerade. I love(d) the mystery.

Coorelation is not causation. Your \"observed radical decrease\" could
just as easily be explained by the gradual reduction in use of USENET
with the resulting few remaining members simply not being the ones that
nym-shifted (i.e., the nym-shifting trolls abandoned USENET for Reddit
or other web locales). And in fact, a reduction in nym-shifting being
caused by a substantial reduction in USENET usage is much more likely
the cause than anything you did, or did not, do yourself.

This nym-shifting troll, who never before posted to this group until this
thread, snipped the relevant portion of my post in order to make its
flimsy assertion.

Please explain what other part of your post was relevant to your
assertion.

Arguing with a chronic liar is pointless.

As John Doe illustrates time and time again.

> When you refute its lies, it simply makes up more lies to cover those prior lies. It\'s fiction never end...

John Doe has never refuted any lie here. He has claimed that any number of factually correct statements are lies - which lying about them, rather than refuting them.
Granting that he\'s an obviously deluded idiot, he may think that he is \"refuting lies\" rather than denying that he\'s wrong, but he is still a liar, even if he too dim to realise it.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[server]

Ricky <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote in news:d9f367bc-5209-
47ee-8e7c-aba045ffe468n@googlegroups.com:

What sort of crazy thinks you are better than everyone else are you
using?

Sorry? Can you say that again in English?

You\'re a fucking idiot.

What sort of \"crazy (asswipe) that thinks you are better than
everyone else\" are you using.

There, fucktard. I didn\'t realize that you can spout retarded stupid
shit, but cannot grasp when the same retarded phrase you use is used to
point out that you ain\'t all that. Damn you\'re stupid, boy.

English enough for you, twerp? CCAD, dipshit.

 

[Bertrand Sindri]

Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:

On Friday, April 15, 2022 at 7:24:58 AM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
Bertrand Sindri <bertran...@yahoo.com> wrote:
In sci.electronics.design John Doe <alway...@message.header> wrote:
And I have observed a radical decrease in nym-shifting over a
long period of time. They love(d) the masquerade. I love(d) the
mystery.

Coorelation is not causation. Your \"observed radical decrease\"
could just as easily be explained by the gradual reduction in use
of USENET with the resulting few remaining members simply not
being the ones that nym-shifted (i.e., the nym-shifting trolls
abandoned USENET for Reddit or other web locales). And in fact, a
reduction in nym-shifting being caused by a substantial reduction
in USENET usage is much more likely the cause than anything you
did, or did not, do yourself.


When you refute its lies, it simply makes up more lies to cover those
prior lies. It\'s fiction never end...

John Doe has never refuted any lie here. He has claimed that any
number of factually correct statements are lies - which lying about
them, rather than refuting them. Granting that he\'s an obviously
deluded idiot, he may think that he is \"refuting lies\" rather than
denying that he\'s wrong, but he is still a liar, even if he too dim
to realise it.

And he seems to retreat to name calling anytime he is cornered and has
no way out, such as the above. It is quite conceited of him to assert
that his \'exposing\' nym-shifting is somehow singularly responsible for
his supposed observation of a reduction in the same. If anything, his
observation is more likely confirmation bias than anything. He started
expending effort in \'exposing nym-shifting\'. As a result, in order to
not feel he was wasting his time, his sub-conscious believed it also
witnessed a reduction in nym-shifting. Actual reality is his one
person jihad on \'nym-shifting\' likely had zero impact on anything, and
when presented with a logical argument to that effect, he immediately
retreats to name calling to avoid believing that he has been needlessly
expending effort for naught over all this time.

 

[corvid]

On 4/15/22 06:07, Bertrand Sindri wrote:

Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:
On Friday, April 15, 2022 at 7:24:58 AM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
Bertrand Sindri <bertran...@yahoo.com> wrote:
In sci.electronics.design John Doe <alway...@message.header> wrote:
And I have observed a radical decrease in nym-shifting over a
long period of time. They love(d) the masquerade. I love(d) the
mystery.

Coorelation is not causation. Your \"observed radical decrease\"
could just as easily be explained by the gradual reduction in use
of USENET with the resulting few remaining members simply not
being the ones that nym-shifted (i.e., the nym-shifting trolls
abandoned USENET for Reddit or other web locales). And in fact, a
reduction in nym-shifting being caused by a substantial reduction
in USENET usage is much more likely the cause than anything you
did, or did not, do yourself.


When you refute its lies, it simply makes up more lies to cover those
prior lies. It\'s fiction never end...

John Doe has never refuted any lie here. He has claimed that any
number of factually correct statements are lies - which lying about
them, rather than refuting them. Granting that he\'s an obviously
deluded idiot, he may think that he is \"refuting lies\" rather than
denying that he\'s wrong, but he is still a liar, even if he too dim
to realise it.

And he seems to retreat to name calling anytime he is cornered and has
no way out, such as the above. It is quite conceited of him to assert
that his \'exposing\' nym-shifting is somehow singularly responsible for
his supposed observation of a reduction in the same. If anything, his
observation is more likely confirmation bias than anything. He started
expending effort in \'exposing nym-shifting\'. As a result, in order to
not feel he was wasting his time, his sub-conscious believed it also
witnessed a reduction in nym-shifting. Actual reality is his one
person jihad on \'nym-shifting\' likely had zero impact on anything, and
when presented with a logical argument to that effect, he immediately
retreats to name calling to avoid believing that he has been needlessly
expending effort for naught over all this time.

The netcop wannabe is also a nym-shifting troll, banned by Google.

OT: Easiest way to make new anonymous YouTube accounts?
http://al.howardknight.net/?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3Crrdplt%249r9%241%40dont-email.me%3E

 

[John Larkin]

On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 20:28:59 -0000 (UTC), Bertrand Sindri
<bertrand.sindri@yahoo.com> wrote:

In sci.electronics.design John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote:
It\'s simple logic. If you expose nym-shifting, it\'s less likely to
continue.

The logic does not follow from what little evidence/argument you have
presented.

Really, there is an infinite supply of these nymby old hens who are
only here to cluck and pollute an electronic design group.

Ignore them!

--

If a man will begin with certainties, he shall end with doubts,
but if he will be content to begin with doubts he shall end in certainties.
Francis Bacon

 

[Phil Hobbs]

Cydrome Leader wrote:

jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 17:09:10 +0100, Martin Brown
\'\'\'newspam\'\'\'@nonad.co.uk> wrote:

On 13/04/2022 16:01, John Doe wrote:
Is there a single key calculation for the reciprocal of a number on a typical
scientific calculator?

Usually. On mine \"1/x\" is next to sin, cos, tan.

InverseTrig \"1/x\" is cuberoot!

Is there some symbol besides \"1/x\" to look for?

divide = =

Will get you a functional equivalent for a single number.

My first calc was an HP35 ($400 at the time, the cost of a Honda S90
motorcycle) so I\'m a RPN slave. I buy old 32S2\'s now.

I use a new 35s. RPN really is cool, and prevents people from borrowing
your calculator.

I need a good HP emulator for my Samsung phone. Any recommendations?

I can\'t put my finger on why, but the samsung calculator is annoying.

I just keep buying HP41s of various flavours. I\'m on my third since
1979, not bad.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

(Who wrote a lot of calculator code between 1976 and about 1983.)

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

http://electrooptical.net
http://hobbs-eo.com

 

[Ricky]

On Friday, April 15, 2022 at 9:07:37 AM UTC-4, Bertrand Sindri wrote:

Anthony William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:
On Friday, April 15, 2022 at 7:24:58 AM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
Bertrand Sindri <bertran...@yahoo.com> wrote:
In sci.electronics.design John Doe <alway...@message.header> wrote:
And I have observed a radical decrease in nym-shifting over a
long period of time. They love(d) the masquerade. I love(d) the
mystery.

Coorelation is not causation. Your \"observed radical decrease\"
could just as easily be explained by the gradual reduction in use
of USENET with the resulting few remaining members simply not
being the ones that nym-shifted (i.e., the nym-shifting trolls
abandoned USENET for Reddit or other web locales). And in fact, a
reduction in nym-shifting being caused by a substantial reduction
in USENET usage is much more likely the cause than anything you
did, or did not, do yourself.


When you refute its lies, it simply makes up more lies to cover those
prior lies. It\'s fiction never end...

John Doe has never refuted any lie here. He has claimed that any
number of factually correct statements are lies - which lying about
them, rather than refuting them. Granting that he\'s an obviously
deluded idiot, he may think that he is \"refuting lies\" rather than
denying that he\'s wrong, but he is still a liar, even if he too dim
to realise it.
And he seems to retreat to name calling anytime he is cornered and has
no way out, such as the above. It is quite conceited of him to assert
that his \'exposing\' nym-shifting is somehow singularly responsible for
his supposed observation of a reduction in the same. If anything, his
observation is more likely confirmation bias than anything. He started
expending effort in \'exposing nym-shifting\'. As a result, in order to
not feel he was wasting his time, his sub-conscious believed it also
witnessed a reduction in nym-shifting. Actual reality is his one
person jihad on \'nym-shifting\' likely had zero impact on anything, and
when presented with a logical argument to that effect, he immediately
retreats to name calling to avoid believing that he has been needlessly
expending effort for naught over all this time.

Why does anyone care? Bill has some disorder that means a primary form of entertainment for him is to argue with some of the stupidest people in this group on the Internet. His posts are seldom interesting, and are typically personal attacks on people who not only deserve such attacks (if anyone cares enough to make them), but seem to relish such attacks, since they provide an opportunity to show their intellect by responding with the Internet equivalent of \"Oh, yeah?\" Not much of a conversation usually.

John Doe has been the same twit as he presently is, for some time now. Once in a great while he posts something worth reading. The only value I get from his posts are when he shows how irritated he gets from Edward\'s bot posts in response to his one silly top posting that would seem to be what he considers a personal insult, a show of lack of respect, somehow. An inside joke with himself, perhaps?

So, why do you care about the conversation of the absurd between these two?

--

Rick C.

+- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

 

[Ricky]

On Friday, April 15, 2022 at 1:17:43 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:

On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 20:28:59 -0000 (UTC), Bertrand Sindri
bertran...@yahoo.com> wrote:

In sci.electronics.design John Doe <alway...@message.header> wrote:
It\'s simple logic. If you expose nym-shifting, it\'s less likely to
continue.

The logic does not follow from what little evidence/argument you have
presented.
Really, there is an infinite supply of these nymby old hens who are
only here to cluck and pollute an electronic design group.

Many of us do ignore you, but you keep clucking away anyhow.

--

Rick C.

++ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
++ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

 

[John Doe]

Ricky <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:

John Doe has been the same twit as he presently is, for some time now.
Once in a great while he posts something worth reading. The only value
I get from his posts are when he shows how irritated he gets from
Edward\'s bot posts

You might enjoy the disruption, but in fact it does not bother me either
way. The fact he puts no thought into his replies, or rather into whether
he replies (or not), makes coping with him easy.

I don\'t like the disruption, but I am not responsible for anybody else\'s
speech on USENET.