OT: Bush Says Terrorists Are Fighting "Vociferously" in Iraq

[Rich Grise]

On Monday 11 October 2004 10:04 am, Winfield Hill did deign to grace us with
the following:

Fred Bloggs wrote...

http://www.businessinteriors.ca/pdf/cp/aer_cp.pdf

Ahh- nice. Good choice.

Indeed.

I just checked- and even UNICOR dropped my chair- so now it is a
collector's item. Any chair is comfortable enough if you would
just sit up straight with feet flat on the floor.

For about 15 minutes.

Fred appears to be one of those ramrod-up-the-spine kind of guys,

who thinks "comfort" is for wimps and wussies and democrats or
something. It might have something to do with some kind of "work
ethic," or some such nonsense. The poor fellow simply has no clue. ;-)

Cheers!
Rich

 

[Fred Bloggs]

Tom Seim wrote:

Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message news:<416A6272.2060903@nospam.com>...

Tom Seim wrote:

Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message news:<41695485.5000301@nospam.com>...


Tom Seim wrote:


Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message news:<41604CE7.8060505@nospam.com>...



Tom Seim wrote:



It was a real surprise, especially when Kerry said he would do what Bush did
but better.

THAT IS MORE OF YOUR LIES!!! YOU ARE A PAID BUSH CAMPAIGN OPERATIVE.





How does one respond when your opponent completely agrees with
you?

There is no strategy agreement on Iraq. You are deceitful liar! Lies,
deception, innuendo- these are all "core values" of the Bush campaign.

[[[,snip garbage]]]


Now if Fred had gone to college he would know that ad hominem attacks
are completely discredited in debate circles.

It is in fact a *lie* to state that Kerry's plan for Iraq is the same as
Bush's. It is also a fact that this allegation has been a Bush campaign
slogan for quite some time now. The alignment of Seim and RogerGT with
the Bush campaign rhetoric is more than obvious to everyone. It is
therefore a fact that you are Bush campaign operatives who deceitfully
present yourselves as ordinary observers just raising questions. There
is no *debate* here, and I am not particularly concerned about etiquette
or any other pseudo-social constraint that "girly-men" like you use for
a shield. The time for debate is clearly over- there has been too much
abuse of process- and it is time to act.




Fred sees lies where
there is truth, truth were there is lies.

I *know* the truth about you.


How much money are you willing to wager on this "truth" (not much, I'll bet)?

What's the matter, phony? Afraid to put together more than one or two
sentences of complete thought? Your presence on this NG is not welcome-
nearly every regular here knows what you are. We have caught you in
numerous lies and you have been shot down numerous times. You have
little interest, enthusiasm, or capability for the application of
electronics- and you were a complete NG non-entity until you began
soiling the place with your low-brained propaganda. Senior Research
Scientist IV- is just a typical grandiose government lackey title. Why
don't you give everyone a REAL GOOD LAUGH and post a copy of your
position description? LOL- that will be the last nail in the coffin of
your credibility- you are 100% unadulterated horse manure.


How much money are you willing to wager: NONE, you sanctimonious
blowhard. Not willing to put your money were your big mouth is, I see.
I doubt that you have any to wager, but I am willing to put up
whatever you are stupid enough to put up. You won't bet anything
because you know you are totally full of crap, to put it politely.
Case closed, Fred "The Blowhard" Bloggs.

Riiii...ght- just keep up with your weakling personal attacks. You are
an absolute zero- you do nothing- and you produce nothing. You sit in a
cushy chair all day with your feet propped up on the desk while you read
the Wall Street Journal and scan all the internet business reports. Then
once a fiscal quarter or so a VIP, aka clueless DOE management
bureaucrat, comes through and you break out your tired old slide show,
along with an small army of similarly worthless frauds, to put on your
high-energy specious flash-and-dazzle sales pitch. You are a total piece
of worthless carp! Do you deny this is an accurate assessment of exactly
what you are? You are worse than a welfare fraud.


Just as I thought: your mouth is larger than your wallet on an
astronomical scale. Some day maybe you'll get a job and close the
chasm a few millimeters.

A few millimeters is the thickness of your wallet when packed with your
net worth in twenties. You are a salaried schlepp- get lost. You're a
pathetic loser even by your own standard.

I doubt that your resume would make it past
the first screening here, however. You'll have to look someplace where
they are less discriminating, like .... Hey, I can't think of one!

How did you get a job there then, bullshit artist? Screening? Don't make
me laugh! Bagging groceries has more prestige than what you are, which
is a lying, loitering, cheat- you spend all your day doing nothing
except figuring out how to invest that big salary paid for with taxpayer
dollars- and giving nothing in return. You really are scum.

 

[Fred Bloggs]

Rich Grise wrote:

On Monday 11 October 2004 12:52 pm, Tom Seim did deign to grace us with the
following:


Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message


I *know* the truth about you.


How much money are you willing to wager on this "truth" (not much,
I'll bet)?


Riiii...ght- just keep up with your weakling personal attacks. You are

Just as I thought: your mouth is larger than your wallet on an
astronomical scale. Some day maybe you'll get a job and close the
chasm a few millimeters. I doubt that your resume would make it past
the first screening here, however. You'll have to look someplace where
they are less discriminating, like .... Hey, I can't think of one!


Yeah, Fred - he's calling your bluff. How many dollars will you put
up that say you know the "truth" about Tom Siem?

And, what is this "truth" other than the same "you're an idiot" crap.
I think that's been fairly well established that you believe that's the
truth.

How would we check? And who wins?

Thanks,
Rich

Why don't you shut your asswipe mouth, moron. You might get a clue that
the loitering, overpaid, welfare cheat keeps trying to divert attention
away from my claims about him. And speaking about "crap"- that would be
a good characterization of your posting history- you are a good for
nothing ignorant p.o.s. the newsgroup could do without.