OT: Bush Says Terrorists Are Fighting "Vociferously" in Iraq

On Thursday 30 September 2004 08:53 pm, Fred Bloggs did deign to grace us
with the following:

Doesn't he wish they were only vociferous.
And, of course, nobody's allowed to officially notice that the emperor has
no brain. ;-)

Cheers!
Rich
 
Rich Grise wrote:
On Thursday 30 September 2004 08:53 pm, Fred Bloggs did deign to grace us
with the following:


Doesn't he wish they were only vociferous.


And, of course, nobody's allowed to officially notice that the emperor has
no brain. ;-)

Cheers!
Rich
It runs deeper than that- Bush looks very much like the kind of people
that are hauled before judges to be declared legally incompetent to
handle their own affairs. It is time to end this charade and send him
back to the rehab ranch in Texas for a good long rest- like for the rest
of his pathetic life.
 
On Friday 01 October 2004 04:48 am, Fred Bloggs did deign to grace us with
the following:

Rich Grise wrote:
On Thursday 30 September 2004 08:53 pm, Fred Bloggs did deign to grace us
with the following:


Doesn't he wish they were only vociferous.


And, of course, nobody's allowed to officially notice that the emperor
has no brain. ;-)

Cheers!
Rich


It runs deeper than that- Bush looks very much like the kind of people
that are hauled before judges to be declared legally incompetent to
handle their own affairs. It is time to end this charade and send him
back to the rehab ranch in Texas for a good long rest- like for the rest
of his pathetic life.
Lahf is lahk uh bawx uh chawclits. Yuh nevuh know whatcha gonna git.

Guh-hyuk!
Rich

Until you bite into it!
- Rich
 
On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 11:48:58 GMT, Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com>
wrote:


It runs deeper than that- Bush looks very much like the kind of people
that are hauled before judges to be declared legally incompetent to
handle their own affairs.
I didn't watch the whole debate, but have to agree. Bush looked
decidedly uneasy when Kerry got on to the war situation. You could
practically see him gulp! I'm most surprised he allowed his facade to
slip on such an important occasion. He needs coaching in maintaining a
poker face at such times.
--

"What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793.
 
On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 19:54:12 GMT, "Clarence" <no@No.com> wrote:


It was a real surprise, especially when Kerry said he would do what Bush did
but better. How does one respond when your opponent completely agrees with
you? Then Kerry began to hedge by suggesting the UN would take some
responsibility for the normalization. The UN NEVER takes responsibility for
any of it's mistakes!
I'm terribly sorry, I was under the impression that this was *one*
mistake the UN couldn't be blamed for!
--

"What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793.
 
bogax wrote:
Now if Fred had gone to college he would know that ad hominem attacks
are completely discredited in debate circles. Fred sees lies where
there is truth, truth were there is lies.


I wonder if anybody (else) sees the irony in these little diatribes?
And what exactly is the irony?
 
"bogax" <henk@access1.net> wrote in message
news:811bdbb6.0410031048.5af01c7a@posting.google.com...
Now if Fred had gone to college he would know that ad hominem attacks
are completely discredited in debate circles. Fred sees lies where
there is truth, truth were there is lies.

I wonder if anybody (else) sees the irony in these little diatribes?
Almost everyone!
 
In article <PI18d.198140$3l3.28491@attbi_s03>,
Robert Monsen <rcsurname@comcast.net> writes:
John S. Dyson wrote:
Perhaps
some of this hate does result from dysinformation and dyseducation -- but
I like your spelling. Freudian slip?

It is meant to imply 'dysfunction' on the part of the hate filled leftist
idiots, and quite purposeful.

John
 
On Monday 04 October 2004 05:30 am, John S. Dyson did deign to grace us with
the following:

In article <PI18d.198140$3l3.28491@attbi_s03>,
Robert Monsen <rcsurname@comcast.net> writes:
John S. Dyson wrote:
Perhaps
some of this hate does result from dysinformation and dyseducation --
but
I like your spelling. Freudian slip?

It is meant to imply 'dysfunction' on the part of the hate filled leftist
idiots, and quite purposeful.

I thought that word was coined by a person from New Jersey complaining to
his doctor about a sexual performance problem: "Ya see, doc, I gotta prollem
wit dysfunction..."

It's not clear why the term "datfunction" hasn't caught on as well.

;-)
Rich
 
I read in sci.electronics.design that Rich Grise <null@example.net>
wrote (in <qdi8d.4998$r3.3855@trnddc05>) about 'A VOTE FOR BUSH IS A
VOTE *AGAINST* AMERICA', on Mon, 4 Oct 2004:

Actually, I think they're from Ahriman, the god of power. It's time for
him to step down, so the god of Love can reclaim her right place.
But gods don't have elections, do they? And they can serve at least ten
million consecutive terms, of course.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
 
I read in sci.electronics.design that Rich Grise <null@example.net>
wrote (in <Ubi8d.4984$r3.3266@trnddc05>) about 'A VOTE FOR BUSH IS A
VOTE *AGAINST* AMERICA', on Mon, 4 Oct 2004:

only you can
save yourself from the clutches of the prince of death.
Sounds a bit like the Albigensian Heresy.

http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01267e.htm
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
 
I read in sci.electronics.design that Rich Grise <null@example.net>
wrote (in <_4i8d.4929$r3.3288@trnddc05>) about 'A VOTE FOR BUSH IS A
VOTE *AGAINST* AMERICA', on Mon, 4 Oct 2004:

It's not clear why the term "datfunction" hasn't caught on as well.
Because DAT didn't function at all as a consumer product.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
 
I read in sci.electronics.design that Rich Grise <null@example.net>
wrote (in <2AA8d.4744$Sl2.3836@trnddc09>) about 'A VOTE FOR BUSH IS A
VOTE *AGAINST* AMERICA', on Tue, 5 Oct 2004:

Just wait a while - it is all being revealed. I'm just sort of an
advance scout.
Should we call you 'Rich the Baptist' then? How are you on locusts and
wild honey?
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
 
John S. Dyson wrote:
In article <PI18d.198140$3l3.28491@attbi_s03>,
Robert Monsen <rcsurname@comcast.net> writes:

John S. Dyson wrote:

Perhaps
some of this hate does result from dysinformation and dyseducation -- but

I like your spelling. Freudian slip?


It is meant to imply 'dysfunction' on the part of the hate filled leftist
idiots, and quite purposeful.

John
Dyson
Dysinformation
Dyseducation

Coincidence? I think not.
 
John S. Dyson wrote:
Perhaps
some of this hate does result from dysinformation and dyseducation -- but
I like your spelling. Freudian slip?
 
On Monday 04 October 2004 01:47 pm, John Woodgate did deign to grace us with
the following:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Rich Grise <null@example.net
wrote (in <Ubi8d.4984$r3.3266@trnddc05>) about 'A VOTE FOR BUSH IS A
VOTE *AGAINST* AMERICA', on Mon, 4 Oct 2004:

only you can
save yourself from the clutches of the prince of death.

Sounds a bit like the Albigensian Heresy.

http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01267e.htm
--
Nah. They got it almost exactly upside-down. The physical isn't wired
to do evil - it needs to be enslaved by a cold, calculating, heartless,
unfeeling mind to do anything beyond its own survival. And _that_ is
where the evil lies - the overriding of the Will, the perversion of
the survival instinct into something that can rationalize murder.

Just wait a while - it is all being revealed. I'm just sort of an advance
scout. The Age of Aquarius just got a little delayed in transit. ;-)

http://www.godchannel.com

Cheers!
Rich
 
Fred Bloggs wrote...
... You sit in a cushy chair all day with your feet propped
up on the desk while ...
Hey Fred, nothing wrong with a cushy chair. Maybe you should
get yourself a new chair. Go down to your neighborhood store,
Relax the Back, Healthy Back or whatever, and treat yourself.

Recommended.


--
Thanks,
- Win

(email: use hill_at_rowland-dotties-org for now)
 
Fred Bloggs wrote...
http://www.businessinteriors.ca/pdf/cp/aer_cp.pdf

Ahh- nice. Good choice.
Indeed.

I just checked- and even UNICOR dropped my chair- so now it is a
collector's item. Any chair is comfortable enough if you would
just sit up straight with feet flat on the floor.
For about 15 minutes.


--
Thanks,
- Win

(email: use hill_at_rowland-dotties-org for now)
 
On Tuesday 12 October 2004 05:07 am, Fred Bloggs did deign to grace us with
the following:
Rich Grise wrote:
How would we check? And who wins?

Thanks,
Rich


Why don't you shut your asswipe mouth, moron. You might get a clue that
the loitering, overpaid, welfare cheat keeps trying to divert attention
away from my claims about him. And speaking about "crap"- that would be
a good characterization of your posting history- you are a good for
nothing ignorant p.o.s. the newsgroup could do without.
Thank you, Fred, I don't know how I ever got along without this vital
information!

Cheers!
Rich
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top