Op amps problem Gain Calculation

[John Larkin]

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:07:43 -0500, John Fields
<jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:29:43 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 06:43:28 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:01:30 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:56:03 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 11:10:02 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:48:07 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:19:19 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:23:41 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

What are you doing, working towards a degree in social work?

---
No, but I think it's kinda like Jim said in that we all have an
obligation to make tomorrow better than today, and you seem to think
that making that happen would involve killing off everyone who disagrees
with you and can post proof positive that you're wrong.

Relax: you're quite safe.

---
That's kind of ambiguous, but since I've proved you wrong before, I
guess you're talking about the killing thing, in which case why should I
worry???

BTW, how tall are you?

JF

Not tall, not short... close to 1.0 SPunits, or roughly 0.9 PHs. Just
about right for the business I'm in and the women I like.

But, given the choice, I'd rather be a bantam rooster than two big old
hens.

---
Hmm...

"Which is why you remind me so much of Miss Denton, my matronly 6th
grade teacher."

"I'd rather be a bantam rooster than two big old hens."

Interesting how you try to belittle your opponents by feminizing them,
and it sure speaks volumes about how you think of women...

I love women, in all sorts of ways.

---
So say tou, and yet you try to use the image of them as being inferior
to further your own ends?

You're babbling again. I made no negative comments about women, and I
have no ends other than to share knowledge and amuse myself.

I do think that barnyard roosters and hens are both silly animals, but
that you and JT act more like hens.


---

All my best friends and all of my
business partners have been women. All of my wives, daughters, and
sisters, come to think of it.

---
Your father and mother too, no doubt.
Well, I guess then, you're just one of the girls.

Now who is debasing women?


San Francisco, is it?

What a surprise...
---

But if critters peck like hens and cluck like hens, they're probably
hens.

---
Or a farmer with a big knife.
---

Anyway, 6' 160 pounds is hardly a "big old hen".

Stewer.

---
Thinking of something to eat, are you???

No, I just had breakfast with my beautiful, smart, skinny wife. Now
I'm thinking about electronics [1]. You should try it some time, and
take your mind off gossiping and clucking and various fantasies about
other peoples' personal lives.

---
PKB, methinks.

What you should try sometime is growing up and owning up to a mistake
like a man instead of always starting a childish row to divert attention
away from the fact that you made a mistake.

JF

Which mistake are you referring to?

Do you keep a scrapbook of my mistakes? I'm flattered.

John

 

[Spehro Pefhany]

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:26:25 GMT, Rich Grise <richgrise@example.net>
wrote:

On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:48:07 -0500, John Fields

BTW, how tall are you?

About 5'6". I met John at one of those trade shows in LA, and got about
a half-dozen of his refrigerator magnet logo thingies. Apparently I voided
the warranty when I stuck them to my file cabinet. ;-)

He's adorable, like a friendly leprechaun.

His face wouldn't frighten children the way yours and mine do. ;-D

Hope This Helps!
Rich

http://tinyurl.com/kpt97p

 

[Jim Thompson]

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:25:41 -0400, Spehro Pefhany
<speffSNIP@interlogDOTyou.knowwhat> wrote:

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:26:25 GMT, Rich Grise <richgrise@example.net
wrote:

On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:48:07 -0500, John Fields

BTW, how tall are you?

About 5'6". I met John at one of those trade shows in LA, and got about
a half-dozen of his refrigerator magnet logo thingies. Apparently I voided
the warranty when I stuck them to my file cabinet. ;-)

He's adorable, like a friendly leprechaun.

His face wouldn't frighten children the way yours and mine do. ;-D

Hope This Helps!
Rich

http://tinyurl.com/kpt97p

I saw a very-well-endowed gal in Chandler Fashion Mall with this
T-shirt logo...

Happiness
Is A
Warm
Puppy <= Lined Out
Pussy

;-) ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.

 

[John Fields]

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:50:44 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:07:43 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:29:43 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 06:43:28 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:01:30 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:56:03 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 11:10:02 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:48:07 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:19:19 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:23:41 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

What are you doing, working towards a degree in social work?

---
No, but I think it's kinda like Jim said in that we all have an
obligation to make tomorrow better than today, and you seem to think
that making that happen would involve killing off everyone who disagrees
with you and can post proof positive that you're wrong.

Relax: you're quite safe.

---
That's kind of ambiguous, but since I've proved you wrong before, I
guess you're talking about the killing thing, in which case why should I
worry???

BTW, how tall are you?

JF

Not tall, not short... close to 1.0 SPunits, or roughly 0.9 PHs. Just
about right for the business I'm in and the women I like.

But, given the choice, I'd rather be a bantam rooster than two big old
hens.

---
Hmm...

"Which is why you remind me so much of Miss Denton, my matronly 6th
grade teacher."

"I'd rather be a bantam rooster than two big old hens."

Interesting how you try to belittle your opponents by feminizing them,
and it sure speaks volumes about how you think of women...

I love women, in all sorts of ways.

---
So say tou, and yet you try to use the image of them as being inferior
to further your own ends?

You're babbling again. I made no negative comments about women, and I
have no ends other than to share knowledge and amuse myself.

I do think that barnyard roosters and hens are both silly animals, but
that you and JT act more like hens.


---

All my best friends and all of my
business partners have been women. All of my wives, daughters, and
sisters, come to think of it.

---
Your father and mother too, no doubt.
Well, I guess then, you're just one of the girls.

Now who is debasing women?


San Francisco, is it?

What a surprise...
---

But if critters peck like hens and cluck like hens, they're probably
hens.

---
Or a farmer with a big knife.
---

Anyway, 6' 160 pounds is hardly a "big old hen".

Stewer.

---
Thinking of something to eat, are you???

No, I just had breakfast with my beautiful, smart, skinny wife. Now
I'm thinking about electronics [1]. You should try it some time, and
take your mind off gossiping and clucking and various fantasies about
other peoples' personal lives.

---
PKB, methinks.

What you should try sometime is growing up and owning up to a mistake
like a man instead of always starting a childish row to divert attention
away from the fact that you made a mistake.

JF

Which mistake are you referring to?

---
I'm not talking about any particular mistake, I'm talking about all the
silly little diversions and the dance you do when you're confronted with
the _fact_ that you made a mistake and you don't want to own up to it.
---

Do you keep a scrapbook of my mistakes?

---
You flatter yourself.
Certainly not, but I have a memory.
---

I'm flattered.

---
Don't be, there's to be flattered about.

JF

 

[John Fields]

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:23:31 -0700, Jim Thompson
<To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@My-Web-Site.com> wrote:

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:13:32 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:26:25 GMT, Rich Grise <richgrise@example.net
wrote:

On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:48:07 -0500, John Fields

BTW, how tall are you?

About 5'6". I met John at one of those trade shows in LA, and got about
a half-dozen of his refrigerator magnet logo thingies. Apparently I voided
the warranty when I stuck them to my file cabinet. ;-)

He's adorable, like a friendly leprechaun.

His face wouldn't frighten children the way yours and mine do. ;-D

Hope This Helps!
Rich

---
Yeah, it does.

Thanks!

JF

Around Christmas time, in the grocery store, little kids point at me
and say, "Ho! Ho! Ho!" ;-)

---
I usually get incredulous looks and some little kid saying: "Mommy,
look, it's Santa!"

JF

 

[John Larkin]

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:08:14 -0500, John Fields
<jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:50:44 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:07:43 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:29:43 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 06:43:28 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:01:30 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:56:03 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 11:10:02 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:48:07 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:19:19 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:23:41 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

What are you doing, working towards a degree in social work?

---
No, but I think it's kinda like Jim said in that we all have an
obligation to make tomorrow better than today, and you seem to think
that making that happen would involve killing off everyone who disagrees
with you and can post proof positive that you're wrong.

Relax: you're quite safe.

---
That's kind of ambiguous, but since I've proved you wrong before, I
guess you're talking about the killing thing, in which case why should I
worry???

BTW, how tall are you?

JF

Not tall, not short... close to 1.0 SPunits, or roughly 0.9 PHs. Just
about right for the business I'm in and the women I like.

But, given the choice, I'd rather be a bantam rooster than two big old
hens.

---
Hmm...

"Which is why you remind me so much of Miss Denton, my matronly 6th
grade teacher."

"I'd rather be a bantam rooster than two big old hens."

Interesting how you try to belittle your opponents by feminizing them,
and it sure speaks volumes about how you think of women...

I love women, in all sorts of ways.

---
So say tou, and yet you try to use the image of them as being inferior
to further your own ends?

You're babbling again. I made no negative comments about women, and I
have no ends other than to share knowledge and amuse myself.

I do think that barnyard roosters and hens are both silly animals, but
that you and JT act more like hens.


---

All my best friends and all of my
business partners have been women. All of my wives, daughters, and
sisters, come to think of it.

---
Your father and mother too, no doubt.
Well, I guess then, you're just one of the girls.

Now who is debasing women?


San Francisco, is it?

What a surprise...
---

But if critters peck like hens and cluck like hens, they're probably
hens.

---
Or a farmer with a big knife.
---

Anyway, 6' 160 pounds is hardly a "big old hen".

Stewer.

---
Thinking of something to eat, are you???

No, I just had breakfast with my beautiful, smart, skinny wife. Now
I'm thinking about electronics [1]. You should try it some time, and
take your mind off gossiping and clucking and various fantasies about
other peoples' personal lives.

---
PKB, methinks.

What you should try sometime is growing up and owning up to a mistake
like a man instead of always starting a childish row to divert attention
away from the fact that you made a mistake.

JF

Which mistake are you referring to?

---
I'm not talking about any particular mistake, I'm talking about all the
silly little diversions and the dance you do when you're confronted with
the _fact_ that you made a mistake and you don't want to own up to it.
---

Do you keep a scrapbook of my mistakes?

---
You flatter yourself.
Certainly not, but I have a memory.
---

I'm flattered.

---
Don't be, there's to be flattered about.

JF

You *really* need a life.

John

 

[John Fields]

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:50:44 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:07:43 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:29:43 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

All my best friends and all of my
business partners have been women. All of my wives, daughters, and
sisters, come to think of it.

---
Your father and mother too, no doubt.
Well, I guess then, you're just one of the girls.

Now who is debasing women?

---
Certainly not I.

I'm being sarcastically critical of _you_ by implying that, since one is
known by the company one keeps, your admitted preference for _totally_
female "peers" kind of puts you in that camp.

JF

 

[Jim Thompson]

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:50:41 -0500, John Fields
<jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:50:44 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:07:43 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:29:43 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

All my best friends and all of my
business partners have been women. All of my wives, daughters, and
sisters, come to think of it.

---
Your father and mother too, no doubt.
Well, I guess then, you're just one of the girls.

Now who is debasing women?

---
Certainly not I.

I'm being sarcastically critical of _you_ by implying that, since one is
known by the company one keeps, your admitted preference for _totally_
female "peers" kind of puts you in that camp.

JF

Wait until he says, for such a short guy, I have a big... ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.

 

[John Larkin]

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:50:41 -0500, John Fields
<jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:50:44 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:07:43 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:29:43 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

All my best friends and all of my
business partners have been women. All of my wives, daughters, and
sisters, come to think of it.

---
Your father and mother too, no doubt.
Well, I guess then, you're just one of the girls.

Now who is debasing women?

---
Certainly not I.

I'm being sarcastically critical of _you_ by implying that, since one is
known by the company one keeps, your admitted preference for _totally_
female "peers" kind of puts you in that camp.

JF

You are really losing it. Back off, count to ten, press reset, and try
to start thinking again.

I genuinely like and enormously respect women, and would rather, all
other things being equal, spend time with women than with men. But
I've never met a female circuit designer (lots of programmers,
scientists, managers, just no real circuit designers) so I do that
with guys.

So how does a preference for women friends put me "in the camp" of
people who debase women?

A lot of guys really don't like women. They want them, need them, but
don't like them. How do you rate in that respect? I've noticed that
this group seems to pile onto any woman who dares to post here, and
you tend to be part of the gang.

John

 

[John Larkin]

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:26:25 GMT, Rich Grise <richgrise@example.net>
wrote:

On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:48:07 -0500, John Fields

BTW, how tall are you?

About 5'6".

5'7.5". Maybe hard to estimate from your extreme elevation.

I met John at one of those trade shows in LA, and got about

a half-dozen of his refrigerator magnet logo thingies. Apparently I voided
the warranty when I stuck them to my file cabinet. ;-)

Your file cabinet has a warranty?

He's adorable, like a friendly leprechaun.

His face wouldn't frighten children the way yours and mine do. ;-D

Kids and dogs and women seem to like me. I work at appearing
innocuous, to make a neutral first impression until I size up a
situation. That seems to work in most business situations.

John

 

[John Fields]

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:50:44 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:07:43 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:29:43 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

I love women, in all sorts of ways.

---
So say tou, and yet you try to use the image of them as being inferior
to further your own ends?

You're babbling again. I made no negative comments about women, and I
have no ends other than to share knowledge and amuse myself.

---
By casting aspersions on males and then equating those aspersions to
what you consider to be female "characteristics", you cast aspersions on
women just for being women. Can't you see that?

Probably not, since the "knowledge" you say you share is, more often
than not, banal and "Hey, look at me! Ain't I great???"
---

I do think that barnyard roosters and hens are both silly animals, but
that you and JT act more like hens.

---
Well, if we _are_ like hens it's because we usually post our helpful
"eggs" without fanfare, while you strut around mostly crowing but doing
little else.

Your point here, with that "but" is that since you've assigned yourself
the role of banty rooster you get to rule the roost and write the rules
because the "hens" are inferior.

And why? Because they're female, of course.

JF

 

[John Larkin]

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:20:01 -0500, John Fields
<jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:50:44 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:07:43 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:29:43 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:


I love women, in all sorts of ways.

---
So say tou, and yet you try to use the image of them as being inferior
to further your own ends?

You're babbling again. I made no negative comments about women, and I
have no ends other than to share knowledge and amuse myself.

---
By casting aspersions on males and then equating those aspersions to
what you consider to be female "characteristics", you cast aspersions on
women just for being women. Can't you see that?

Geez, I hope you don't use that sort of logic when you design your 555
circuits.

I prefer broccoli to brussels sprouts, ice cream to tapioca,
picoseconds to milliseconds, women to men. Where are "aspersions" in
any of that? If I have maligned any food products or time units, it
wasn't intentional.

You didn't answer my question about if you actually like women. If you
prefer men, go for it.

John

 

[Mike Blake]

Beats me.

When you learn how to use paragraphs and sentences I might read your obsessive stuff but at the moment it's just the usual loonie rant.

Rheilly P
"Robert Bates" <r.c.bates@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:dZ-dnaDfhoX4Ug7XnZ2dnUVZ8s4AAAAA@bt.com...
CHILD ABUSE OF A FOUR YEAR OLD To begin with I am tired of holding this secret so those that are guilty will benefit from my silence. This is not an attempt at harrassment or slander of any person. The Australian police have already attempted to silence me, GO TO HELL !!! This is a factual account experienced by me of allegations made by my son James Bates against Mr Ronald Armstrong, father of Tanya Armstrong ( now Bates). Paul Armstrong, Simon Armstrong. He was to my knowledge married to Louise Armstrong. They were residents of the state of Victoria, Australia. More specifically the Mornington Penninsula, Rosebud. While a minor my son James Bates accused Ronald Armstrong of sexually assaulting him at the age of four. He was penetrated anally. As his legal guardian and the parent who had contact with the police to give consent for the investigation to go ahead, I have first hand knowledge of these allegations. James is now eighteen years old and can still remember what happened to him vividly. My ex wife Tanya Bates told me that she had been sexually abused by her father from the age of nine to nineteen. In full knowledge of what her father did to her she allowed my children James Bates, Samantha Bates, Nickolas Bates to spend time around this man. I have first hand knowledge of this as I am an eye witness to these events. As conveyed to me by the police child protection team in Lowestoft, after the investigation Mr Ronald Armstrong was sent to prison for the abuse of my ex wife but he denied the abuse of my son. I as the father of Samantha and Nickolas Bates have repeatedly been denied access to my children in Australia because my ex wife knows very well I will tell the children the truth. Late last year , 2009, I attempted to contact my children in Australia only to be told in the first phone call by my ex wife that my daughter Samantha had been abused by her ex partner Darren who was an alcoholic. I attempted to get the information out of my daughter via MSN messenger but she would not say as she had discussed things with her mother and for brodies sake, the son of the alcoholic, that they should keep things quiet. After finding this out I wrote some abusive emails to her and have been telling her friends about the abuse of my eldest son. Through interpol the Australian Police have attempted to have me charged with harrassment. I signed an unofficial warning in the Suffolk policemans notebook. The police in the UK know very well what is going on and I was treated very leniently. Hearing that your second eldest child has been abused as well would make any parent go insane. To be honest I hope that abuse victims throughout the world read this. Yes, my ex wife was abused by her father but it does not give her the moral right to abuse my children. Her father was abused as well and he is in prison. Why wasn't my ex wife charged with child neglect for knowingly allowing my children to be around a known peadophile ?

 

[Rich Grise]

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:27:25 -0700, John Larkin wrote:

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:26:25 GMT, Rich Grise <richgrise@example.net

a half-dozen of his refrigerator magnet logo thingies. Apparently I
voided the warranty when I stuck them to my file cabinet. ;-)

Your file cabinet has a warranty?

Boy, you don't remember stuff too good, do you? ;-) I took a picture of
them stuck to my file cabinet, posted it on a.b.s.e, and you said that
I'd voided the warranty. I asked, "What, by not cutting them in two?"
because you had mentioned being able to separate the saying from the
logo and address & stuff. You said, with much indignation, "They're
_REFRIGERATOR_ magnets!" (I don't remember the exact level of emphasis,
but it _was_ emphasized! ;-) )

I can't quote chapter and verse, because google doesn't archive alt.,
which I don't get any more anyway. )-;

;-)
Rich

 

[John Fields]

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:49:15 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:20:01 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:50:44 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:07:43 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:29:43 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:


I love women, in all sorts of ways.

---
So say tou, and yet you try to use the image of them as being inferior
to further your own ends?

You're babbling again. I made no negative comments about women, and I
have no ends other than to share knowledge and amuse myself.

---
By casting aspersions on males and then equating those aspersions to
what you consider to be female "characteristics", you cast aspersions on
women just for being women. Can't you see that?

Geez, I hope you don't use that sort of logic when you design your 555
circuits.

---
Now Bill...

So you _can't_ see it. Figures...
---

I prefer broccoli to brussels sprouts, ice cream to tapioca,
picoseconds to milliseconds, women to men. Where are "aspersions" in
any of that? If I have maligned any food products or time units, it
wasn't intentional.

---
More of the "Larkin shuffle", huh?

Somewhat entertaining in an annoying sort of way...
---

You didn't answer my question about if you actually like women.

---
Show me where it says I have to answer any of your questions, OK?
---

If you prefer men, go for it.

---
If I did, I would, and I certainly wouldn't need permission from you.

Well, I've had about enough of this fol-de-rol; I made my point and you
proved it, so I'll take my leave.

JF

 

[John Larkin]

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:14:20 GMT, Rich Grise <richgrise@example.net>
wrote:

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:27:25 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:26:25 GMT, Rich Grise <richgrise@example.net

a half-dozen of his refrigerator magnet logo thingies. Apparently I
voided the warranty when I stuck them to my file cabinet. ;-)

Your file cabinet has a warranty?

Boy, you don't remember stuff too good, do you? ;-)

A brain is like a file cabinet: it can only hold so much, so file the
important stuff and recycle the rest.

John

 

[John Larkin]

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:26:53 -0500, John Fields
<jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

You didn't answer my question about if you actually like women.

---
Show me where it says I have to answer any of your questions, OK?

But you just did.

John

 

[JosephKK]

On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 22:12:13 -0500, "Martin H. Eastburn"
<lionslair@consolidated.net> wrote:

They were whisker types - not PN junctions.
Ge had most - as it was high frequency and Si wasn't.

Yes there were PN diodes but mostly whisker - in the late 50's.
Limited use and not for high rel at all.

Consider the 3 transistor radio - bound to have something in it.
Martin

I brought an error very like that around here a while back. I had to
eat it. Search for it.

John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:07:46 -0500, "Martin H. Eastburn"
lionslair@consolidated.net> wrote:

First, Si diodes were not used in WW II. The PN SI diode wasn't invented yet.

Nearly all the radar first mixer diodes were silicon point-contact
types, essentially silicon schottky diodes.

See the MIT Rad Lab book, volume 15, "Crystal Rectifiers" for a bunch
of WWII (and pre-war) stuff about diode development. This is from that
book:

ftp://jjlarkin.lmi.net/RadDiode2.JPG

ftp://jjlarkin.lmi.net/RadLabDiodes.JPG


Selenium wafers and sticks were the power types
and point or whisker diodes for RF. [ I have some of these in lead cans ]

In the 60's it was still that way.

Funny, I recall using lots of silicon PN diodes (and SCRs, and
transistors, and tunnel diodes) in the early 1960's. Tek was using
GaAs diodes in their sampling scopes ca 1964.

Silicon diodes were developed by bell labs for internal telephone use
but semiconductor had to be invented first.

No. See the RadLab book.

Look at the date of the transistor. Silicon diode and Germanium diode.

I know Radar in B52's were using Selenium and Germanium for RF.

Selenium was never used in RF or radar, except maybe power supplies.
Far too slow.

John

 

[John Fields]

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:32:44 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:26:53 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:



You didn't answer my question about if you actually like women.

---
Show me where it says I have to answer any of your questions, OK?

But you just did.

---
Geez, no wonder you're having trouble finding a divide-by circuit.

I commented on your _statement_ by asking a question.

JF

 

[Rich Grise]

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:58:46 -0700, John Larkin wrote:

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:14:20 GMT, Rich Grise <richgrise@example.net
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:27:25 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:26:25 GMT, Rich Grise <richgrise@example.net

a half-dozen of his refrigerator magnet logo thingies. Apparently I
voided the warranty when I stuck them to my file cabinet. ;-)

Your file cabinet has a warranty?

Boy, you don't remember stuff too good, do you? ;-)

A brain is like a file cabinet: it can only hold so much,

My brain would beg to differ here. I remember _everything_, unless
I'm in a blackout drunk state, which I don't do very much any more.

And I'd claim that there's no theoretical limit, since "memories" and
stuff aren't held in some finite file cabinet-thing, but are stored in
patterns of synapses; you don't grow any new neurons, but there's no
known limit to the number of synapses you can grow - oh, yeah - we make
new synapses everything something makes an impact on us - I think the
expression of emotion releases hormones or enzymes or something that
stimulate synapse growth.

Ever notice that you remember stuff that was a big deal at the time, but
not mundane stuff, like what you had for lunch last week?

You remember your downhill run - do you remember the T-bar ride just
before it? ;-)

Cheers!
Rich