One of My High Technology Contributions to Microchip Design

legg wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 08:04:46 -0700, Jim Thompson
thegreatone@example.com> wrote:


One of My High Technology Contributions to Microchip Design...


Doesn't it bug you, the avenues open to making a living these days?

When you think of all the things that really need doing; and then even
serious work gets diverted. For example ...

A biomedical laser (portable in-office cataract surgery) ends up
being used as a high tech paint-ball on a tank.

A blood analyser ends up being used mainly for sports drugs or other
'personnel' employee security clearance work.

It doesn't matter how high tech it is, if the chimpanzee you give it
to only uses it to make noises by banging it against rocks or the bars
to it's cage.

RL
The most typical example that heard of, around 10 years ago. Sorry but I
have no references :
A brilliant research study that could result in reliable tools to
measure pain of premature babies or autists was made. Cum Laude, et coetera.
The only problem is that no research lab, great hospital, or
pharmaceutical company hired that researcher. The only employer that
he/she found was a food-industrial, who got the technique applied to the
slaughtering of cows: using the pain indicators it was possible to strip
and streamline the slaughter procedure until the point where pain was
detected.
 
fogh wrote:
legg wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 08:04:46 -0700, Jim Thompson
thegreatone@example.com> wrote:


One of My High Technology Contributions to Microchip Design...


Doesn't it bug you, the avenues open to making a living these days?

When you think of all the things that really need doing; and then
even serious work gets diverted. For example ...

A biomedical laser (portable in-office cataract surgery) ends up
being used as a high tech paint-ball on a tank.

A blood analyser ends up being used mainly for sports drugs or other
'personnel' employee security clearance work.

It doesn't matter how high tech it is, if the chimpanzee you give it
to only uses it to make noises by banging it against rocks or the
bars to it's cage.

RL

The most typical example that heard of, around 10 years ago. Sorry
but I have no references :
A brilliant research study that could result in reliable tools to
measure pain of premature babies or autists was made.
Yeah, sure....

Cum Laude, et
coetera. The only problem is that no research lab, great hospital,
Not surprising. Such a claim is completely vacuous.

or pharmaceutical company hired that researcher.
The only employer
that he/she found was a food-industrial, who got the technique
applied to the slaughtering of cows:
Who just want to appease the antivivisectionists, sure we can tell when
the cow doesn't feel pain. Like, shit they can.

using the pain indicators it was
possible to strip and streamline the slaughter procedure until the
point where pain was detected.
Cold comfort indeed for the cows. No chance in hell that this system
does as claimed.

Since there is no definition of consciousness, nor anyway to determine
if something has consciousness, it is simply impossible to construct a
"pain detector". There simply is no way of numerically knowing when a
foetus has enough neurons to constitute a feeling of pain within the
current understanding of the brain. One can only "reasonable" say that,
say prior to 3 months from conception, there are essentially no relevant
neural connections, so no pain. However, where a "reasonable" line may
be drawn after his point, is completely arbitrary guesswork.

Related stuff at http://www.anasoft.co.uk/replicators/index.html

Kevin Aylward
salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk
http://www.anasoft.co.uk
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.
 
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:38:48 +0200, fogh wrote:

legg wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 08:04:46 -0700, Jim Thompson
thegreatone@example.com> wrote:

One of My High Technology Contributions to Microchip Design...

Doesn't it bug you, the avenues open to making a living these days?

When you think of all the things that really need doing; and then even
serious work gets diverted. For example ...

A biomedical laser (portable in-office cataract surgery) ends up
being used as a high tech paint-ball on a tank.

A blood analyser ends up being used mainly for sports drugs or other
'personnel' employee security clearance work.

It doesn't matter how high tech it is, if the chimpanzee you give it
to only uses it to make noises by banging it against rocks or the bars
to it's cage.

RL

The most typical example that heard of, around 10 years ago. Sorry but I
have no references :
A brilliant research study that could result in reliable tools to
measure pain of premature babies or autists was made. Cum Laude, et coetera.
The only problem is that no research lab, great hospital, or
pharmaceutical company hired that researcher. The only employer that
he/she found was a food-industrial, who got the technique applied to the
slaughtering of cows: using the pain indicators it was possible to strip
and streamline the slaughter procedure until the point where pain was
detected.
Well, something good still came of it, maybe. An old partner told me
that when the slaughter cows, the have a contraption that drive a
rod through the brain rapidly so the cow dies fast and can't pump
adrenaline into the blood, thereby making the meat tough and gamey.
--
Best Regards,
Mike
 
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:18:45 GMT, Activ8 <reply2group@ndbbm.net>
wrote:

On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 08:10:23 GMT, Kevin Aylward wrote:

[snip]

I think I have a pretty good guess. In my view, its just about certian
that the client bought the thing lock, stock and barrel. It would make
little sense for them to do otherwise. There are plenty of independent
consultancies/companies that will do this, i.e. pretty much all of them.
The golden rule, he who has the gold, makes the rules.

Kevin Aylward
salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk
http://www.anasoft.co.uk
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.

I would've guessed that too, Kevin. It was a multipart question,
though. Settle for partial credit? :)
It was a fixed fee contract, and Kevin is right, the clients owns all
;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
 
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 03:03:16 GMT, legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 08:04:46 -0700, Jim Thompson
thegreatone@example.com> wrote:

One of My High Technology Contributions to Microchip Design...

Doesn't it bug you, the avenues open to making a living these days?

When you think of all the things that really need doing; and then even
serious work gets diverted. For example ...

A biomedical laser (portable in-office cataract surgery) ends up
being used as a high tech paint-ball on a tank.

A blood analyser ends up being used mainly for sports drugs or other
'personnel' employee security clearance work.

It doesn't matter how high tech it is, if the chimpanzee you give it
to only uses it to make noises by banging it against rocks or the bars
to it's cage.

RL
The big money has always been in consumer products.

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
 
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 23:23:21 -0700, Julie wrote:

Activ8 wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 11:06:01 -0700, Julie wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

One of My High Technology Contributions to Microchip Design...

http://www.glade.com/wisp.asp

Nice.

Just out of curiosity (I'm not after $$ figures), but how is a chip project
like that handled?

Did you design that chip specifically for SC Johnson, under contract?

On what are your payments based? Was it a fixed-amount one-time payment,
per-piece license fee? Who owns the rights to the design?

Finally, who handles your licensing/contract agreements?

Thanks for any info --

That's basically what I'd ask, but if you recall, Jim kill filed
you. Maybe you've been pardoned by now.
--
Best Regards,
Mike

Right -- I forgot. One of my raining on the OT parades.

Oh well.
Just in case Jim doesn't elaborate, IIRC the website is chipcenter,
which has a number of forums, one of which discusses consulting, so
you might poke around there.

You can find other sites, but of course they're not all related to
electronics. I even found a bunch of consulting articles from some
gal who IIRC went into management consulting. First time I ever
visited a site devoed to women, not that that's relevant.
--
Best Regards,
Mike
 
Hi John,

Ah, Yesss... the unmistakable odor of molten polysilicon charring, in
the long term, cubic yards of epoxy B...


No, I started "consuming" them around the time when I read about a
Brazilian who had successfully eaten more than half of his VW Beetle...

Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com
 
Tim Shoppa wrote:

Tim Wescott <tim@wescottnospamdesign.com> wrote in message news:<10fg1s3bl90grbf@corp.supernews.com>...

I suppose this is going to be even more volume than those cheezy $5.00
calculators


At Target last week, 8-digit-LCD-4-bangers were selling for $0.49. They'd
been reduced from $0.99.

Tim.
I wish I could figure out a way to put a PIC or an AVR into one of those
and make a real calculator out of it -- the keyboard's all there as long
as you remember that '=' means 'enter'.

--

Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
http://www.wescottdesign.com
 
Andrew VK3BFA wrote:

Jim Thompson <thegreatone@example.com> wrote in message news:<qfrff09ri4ooh4q1j6iq90sudjuo4llsil@4ax.com>...

One of My High Technology Contributions to Microchip Design...

http://www.glade.com/wisp.asp

...Jim Thompson


Wow, what a lovely piece of engineering - always suspected you were a
smart bastard! The big question - how can the rest of us hack it into
something useful that wasnt remotely envisioned(SP) in the design
brief and subsequent product?
73 de VK3BFA Andrew
For that matter, how long before they come back to you for an
internet-enabled air freshener with it's own web page, broadcasting the
state of the scent reservoir over 802.11 (for $0.10 a pop, of course).

--

Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
http://www.wescottdesign.com
 
On 18 Jul 2004 03:21:18 -0700, the renowned shoppa@trailing-edge.com
(Tim Shoppa) wrote:

Tim Wescott <tim@wescottnospamdesign.com> wrote in message news:<10fj5c4beum23e6@corp.supernews.com>...
Tim Shoppa wrote:

Tim Wescott <tim@wescottnospamdesign.com> wrote in message news:<10fg1s3bl90grbf@corp.supernews.com>...

I suppose this is going to be even more volume than those cheezy $5.00
calculators


At Target last week, 8-digit-LCD-4-bangers were selling for $0.49. They'd
been reduced from $0.99.

Tim.

I wish I could figure out a way to put a PIC or an AVR into one of those
and make a real calculator out of it -- the keyboard's all there as long
as you remember that '=' means 'enter'.

The hardest part is probably the LCD driver. The $0.49 calculator I
mentioned has about 40 wires running to the LCD which I figure means
that it's half-multiplexed (4 digits at a time). A PIC16C923 could probably
be made to fit, although it'd be tight. You'd need more than a single
1.5V cell to run it, I'm pretty sure.

Tim.
I'd use a MSP430 flash micro with LCD controller and boost the single
cell to 3V with an external converter or use two cells. Battery life
probably won't be as good, even so.

eg. http://focus.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/msp430f436.pdf

Only $9.40 each in stock at Digikey in 100 LQFP. ;-)

Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
--
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com
 
On 17 Jul 2004 23:07:10 -0700, ablight@alphalink.com.au (Andrew
VK3BFA) wrote:

Jim Thompson <thegreatone@example.com> wrote in message news:<qfrff09ri4ooh4q1j6iq90sudjuo4llsil@4ax.com>...
One of My High Technology Contributions to Microchip Design...

http://www.glade.com/wisp.asp

...Jim Thompson

Wow, what a lovely piece of engineering - always suspected you were a
smart bastard!
Actually that device is one of my most trivial designs.

What is unusual is that a design of mine got publicity in such a way
that I can even acknowledge I did it.

Most of my work is quite more complex, yet immersed in things I can
say nothing about.

The big question - how can the rest of us hack it into
something useful that wasnt remotely envisioned(SP) in the design
brief and subsequent product?
73 de VK3BFA Andrew
I didn't do the board design so I have no idea of how it ended up
being laid out. A friend of mine at Fitch sent me the URL or I
wouldn't even yet be aware that the product had been released.

(Consumer products of this sort are usually released to just a single
test market until they are sure that the product will sell in large
quantities.)

Buy lots of them ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
 
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 10:28:40 -0700, Jim Thompson
<thegreatone@example.com> wrote:


It doesn't matter how high tech it is, if the chimpanzee you give it
to only uses it to make noises by banging it against rocks or the bars
to it's cage.

RL

The big money has always been in consumer products.
Electronics is, admittedly, a rather round-about way of doing anything
of signifigance.

I keep forgeting

RL
 
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 17:00:56 GMT, legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca> wrote:

Electronics is, admittedly, a rather round-about way of doing anything
of signifigance.
But there's hardly anything of significance these days that doesn't
involve electronics. You can hardly imagine a scientific experiment
any more that doesn't use electronics and computers to manage the
experiment and gather the data.

John
 
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 11:28:12 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highlandSNIPtechTHISnologyPLEASE.com> wrote:

On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 17:00:56 GMT, legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca> wrote:

Electronics is, admittedly, a rather round-about way of doing anything
of signifigance.

But there's hardly anything of significance these days that doesn't
involve electronics. You can hardly imagine a scientific experiment
any more that doesn't use electronics and computers to manage the
experiment and gather the data.
Yeah, and electronic design is only a skill set - a tool. Without some
other kind of qualifications, you're not likely to end up being the
boffin determining how it's to be used.

At least I didn't wake up this morning with the urge to preach
hell-fire, damnation and paranoia. Tomorrow, who knows. There, but for
news2020, go us all.

RL
 
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 04:21:44 GMT, Activ8 <reply2group@ndbbm.net>
wrote:

On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 09:21:33 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:

On 17 Jul 2004 23:07:10 -0700, ablight@alphalink.com.au (Andrew
VK3BFA) wrote:

Jim Thompson <thegreatone@example.com> wrote in message news:<qfrff09ri4ooh4q1j6iq90sudjuo4llsil@4ax.com>...
One of My High Technology Contributions to Microchip Design...

http://www.glade.com/wisp.asp

...Jim Thompson

Wow, what a lovely piece of engineering - always suspected you were a
smart bastard!

Actually that device is one of my most trivial designs.

What is unusual is that a design of mine got publicity in such a way
that I can even acknowledge I did it.

Most of my work is quite more complex, yet immersed in things I can
say nothing about.

The big question - how can the rest of us hack it into
something useful that wasnt remotely envisioned(SP) in the design
brief and subsequent product?
73 de VK3BFA Andrew

I didn't do the board design so I have no idea of how it ended up
being laid out. A friend of mine at Fitch sent me the URL or I
wouldn't even yet be aware that the product had been released.

(Consumer products of this sort are usually released to just a single
test market until they are sure that the product will sell in large
quantities.)

Buy lots of them ;-)

...Jim Thompson

I suspect that the little gadget will sell. I know vendors at the
state fair that rake in big bucks on total crap merchandise. Anyone
that uses those plug-ins might upgrade. I'm assuming the timed
release of the scent as opposed to constant exposure to heat and air
would be economic. 6 mo service life and only one cell, you said?
That's good IMO. See? Even I could sell those things and that's only
2 selling points :)

I know people that will buy damned near any gadget they see.

Don't take me to a tool store, electronic store, etc. I'm like a kid
in a candy store.
The advantage is that it actually **atomizes**, which allows much
better dispersal than the heated varieties, which tend to have "hot
spots" of odor :-(

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
 
fogh wrote:
Kevin Aylward wrote:
fogh wrote:

legg wrote:


On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 08:04:46 -0700, Jim Thompson
thegreatone@example.com> wrote:



One of My High Technology Contributions to Microchip Design...


Doesn't it bug you, the avenues open to making a living these
days?
When you think of all the things that really need doing; and then
even serious work gets diverted. For example ...

A biomedical laser (portable in-office cataract surgery) ends up
being used as a high tech paint-ball on a tank.

A blood analyser ends up being used mainly for sports drugs or
other >>>'personnel' employee security clearance work.

It doesn't matter how high tech it is, if the chimpanzee you give
it >>>to only uses it to make noises by banging it against rocks or
the >>>bars to it's cage.

RL

The most typical example that heard of, around 10 years ago. Sorry
but I have no references :
A brilliant research study that could result in reliable tools to
measure pain of premature babies or autists was made.


Yeah, sure....


Cum Laude, et
coetera. The only problem is that no research lab, great
hospital,

Not surprising. Such a claim is completely vacuous.


or pharmaceutical company hired that researcher.
The only employer
that he/she found was a food-industrial, who got the technique
applied to the slaughtering of cows:


Who just want to appease the antivivisectionists, sure we can tell
when > the cow doesn't feel pain. Like, shit they can.


using the pain indicators it was
possible to strip and streamline the slaughter procedure until the
point where pain was detected.


Cold comfort indeed for the cows. No chance in hell that this
system > does as claimed.
Since there is no definition of consciousness, nor anyway to
determine > if something has consciousness, it is simply impossible
to construct a > "pain detector". There simply is no way of
numerically knowing when a > foetus has enough neurons to constitute
a feeling of pain within the > current understanding of the brain.
One can only "reasonable" say that, > say prior to 3 months from
conception, there are essentially no relevant > neural connections,
so no pain. However, where a "reasonable" line may > be drawn after
his point, is completely arbitrary guesswork.
Related stuff at http://www.anasoft.co.uk/replicators/index.html
Kevin,

you are biased and you currently assume (i.e. you are biased by an
currently source) that this research had stg to do with electronics
or systems.

We are all biased in general, but as far as scientific based, not a
chance. My opinions are based on simple and verifiable axioms.

This was a Phd study for the title of doctor in
medicine. I used the word "detector" loosely. I was talking about a
clinical procedure to look for non-obvious and non-expressed signs of
pain,
Oh...

rather than actual sensor equipment (as in thermocouple, Hall
probe ...). When you know a way to look for a set metabolic
manifestations that have been empirically related to pain,
This is not possible in principle. Tell me how a cat tells us that it is
feeling pain.

you can do
that with conventional equipment and you do not need to undertand how
the brain or neural nets function.
How the neural nets function is completely irrelevant. What maters is
*proving* that certain signals are directly related to a conscious
emotion.

It would be rather annoying if a
physician refused to serve your prescription of penicillin under the
pretext that he doesn t understand fully an down to molecular/quantum
level the interactions between host and germs.
You simply don't understand the issues involved. As I explained, it is
impossible to form a definition of pain, irrespective of what may or may
not physically causes it. There us no way to distinguish a well
programmed non conscious computer from a conscious individual. That is,
a machine can be made that to all intents and purposes duplicates the
output from a conscious individual, e.g. one feeling pain. Since this
duplicate machine can say, "I feel pain", there is no way of knowing if
in fact it does. Therefore the whole concept of a pain detector is
completely bogus. It is not possible, in principle. e.g.
http://www.anasoft.co.uk/replicators/thehardproblem.html

If you (please) restrict the discussion to those premature foetuses
that are 7 month and older. Do you or don t you find that this
research had better been used to rationalise the prescription of pain
drugs in hospitals rather than efficiency of slaughterhouses ?
Irrelevant as there is no way to prove that such a machine can in
reality detect the pain of foetuses. What to you propose the featus do,
"oh, I say, that hurts". Get real dude.

Kevin Aylward
salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk
http://www.anasoft.co.uk
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.
 
I read in sci.electronics.design that fogh <cad_support@skipthisandunder
scores.catena.nl> wrote (in <40fd47b6$0$88490$e4fe514c@dreader15.news.xs
4all.nl>) about 'still very much offtopic ! (Re: One of My High
Technology Contributions to Microchip Design)', on Tue, 20 Jul 2004:
Medical practice, and scientific practice, are full of empirical
procedures. I'm no epistemologist, but these are probably valid
scientific methods. A scientific method should not require
"understanding" (I would be even tempted to say that it rules it out),
and a theory does not "explain" either.

Let me be more formal about what I guess was the method in this study
(again: I only heard about it for a few minutes, and have no
references.)
let there be
- a group A of people who you admit have the ability to suffer, and the
ability to express that they suffer.
- a group B of people who you admit have the ability to suffer. ( I use
the term "people" rather than "person". Put there "patients" or whatever
groupname you like that can include preborn babies.)
- a the set P of physical manifestations that can be detected/measured
by medical staff.
Indeed. Elevated breathing rate (possibly indicative of non-specific
stress) and adrenalin/nor-epinephrine levels in blood, and the
appearance of heat-shock protein, I believe.
With statistical work on A, one can get correlations of P to pain. With
clinical records, it is possible to verify that those correlations hold
true for group B for every cause C (from "a set C of causes of pain"
:cool:
Precisely.
By applying that method, one can create a "pain detector" that is good
enough for medical purpose.
It does not adress the problem of a definition of pain, it does not deal
with the problem of wether a foetus has conscience. Pain is here
empirically defined by the persons in group A. Wether the foetus has
conscience or not, the medical tool is reliable as long as those
foetuses have the same physiological reaction to pain as, say, 10 month
old babies. For all you know, there may even be a well programmed
computer that sneaked into group A and participated in the implicit
definition of pain.
In the end you have a good-enough "detector", which I would be glad to
see happen and be developped in clinical practice before all those
steaks I ate give me cancer. Not to mention the radiation dosis I
receive from my CRT while flaming on c.c.c !
The human perception of pain is quite complex. There is a serious brain
condition in which the patient is aware of a pain but does not associate
it with him/herself.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top