S
server
Guest
whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> wrote in
news:a1f619c6-a968-4964-84c9-e162c6be455dn@googlegroups.com:
Spot on for you as usual.
news:a1f619c6-a968-4964-84c9-e162c6be455dn@googlegroups.com:
On Thursday, January 13, 2022 at 11:15:25 PM UTC-8, Flyguy wrote:
On Friday, January 7, 2022 at 9:39:40 PM UTC-8, Beeper wrote:
On 1/7/22 10:25 AM, John Larkin wrote:
10x over budget and 20 years late.
How so? Please provide citation to a credible source supporting
your claims that documents the original projected budget and
expected delivery/launch date.
Yes, that is a lie. Actually it was 20x over budget and 22 years
late.
Not true.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Webb_Space_Telescope
\"Development began in 1996 for a launch that was initially
planned for 2007 with a US$500 million budget.[21] There were
many delays and cost overruns, including a major redesign in
2005...
It\'s not the same project that was discussed in the initial plan.
That\'s what \'major redesign\' means.
So, finished in 2021 instead of 2007: that\'s not \'22 years late\',
at all. 2021 - 2007 = 14 years
It also was never planned to launch the Webb in 2007; the space
telescope design was under review until 2010, and only then did
they know what to build and test. The 1996 project schedule
wasn\'t the guide for this work.
Readiness to launch after build-and-test was about a year over
first scheduled.
Spot on for you as usual.