B
Bret Cahill
Guest
Show your calculations.
Pathetic.
Ain't gonna happen
Nuke
Pathetic.
Ain't gonna happen
Nuke
R
rlbell.nsuid@gmail.com
Guest
On Jul 29, 12:22 pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:
never provide, yourself. When you give sources for your bald
assertions, then you can demand specificity and hard numbers from
others. Right now, everytime you demand to see the calculations, it
is an instance of the pot calling the kettle black.
You do want people to not dismiss you out of hand?
Stop being such a hypocrite. You cannot demand from others what you
never provide, yourself. When you give sources for your bald
assertions, then you can demand specificity and hard numbers from
others. Right now, everytime you demand to see the calculations, it
is an instance of the pot calling the kettle black.
You do want people to not dismiss you out of hand?
T
T. Keating
Guest
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:05:43 +1000, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
TMI Unit 2 went into meltdown less than four months after going
on-line for the first time!!!.. (Dec 1978 ->March 1979).. That's
one hell of a rate of return.. NOT...
And the operators released over two million curries into the local
environment. Sending several thousand area residents to early deaths
and scores of others facing increased occurances of radiation related
illnesses.
http://www.tmia.com/history/tmilegalhistory.html
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
Let's see..
TMI Unit 2 went into meltdown less than four months after going
on-line for the first time!!!.. (Dec 1978 ->March 1979).. That's
one hell of a rate of return.. NOT...
And the operators released over two million curries into the local
environment. Sending several thousand area residents to early deaths
and scores of others facing increased occurances of radiation related
illnesses.
http://www.tmia.com/history/tmilegalhistory.html
E
Eeyore
Guest
"T. Keating" wrote:
My data (American Academy of Sciences) says there are NO early deaths
predicted in the general population surrounding TMI IIRC.
I suspect some of the operators may not be so lucky.
Graham
Must have been shocking Indian cooks they used !
My data (American Academy of Sciences) says there are NO early deaths
predicted in the general population surrounding TMI IIRC.
I suspect some of the operators may not be so lucky.
Graham
T
T. Keating
Guest
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:18:43 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
And what organization is that..
P.S.. The NAS changed their basic position on ionizing radiation in
2005.. Has anyone bothered to take a second look since then???
Hah... And a doubling of the neonatal mortality rate isn't a clue??
That's over a hundred deaths just in that one statistic..
http://www.tmia.com/history/tmilegalhistory.html
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
And what organization is that..
P.S.. The NAS changed their basic position on ionizing radiation in
2005.. Has anyone bothered to take a second look since then???
^^^^^^^^^^
Hah... And a doubling of the neonatal mortality rate isn't a clue??
That's over a hundred deaths just in that one statistic..
http://www.tmia.com/history/tmilegalhistory.html
J
John Fields
Guest
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:53:49 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill
<BretCahill@aol.com> wrote:
Guess what, Brat?
This is USENET (Well, it is for those of us who don't play baby games
through Google groups) where anyone is free to read your posts and, if
they feel like it, to comment in any way they want to.
And guess what else?
There's not one goddam thing you can do about it except jump up and
down and whine and cry and stamp your little feet and hold your breath
until you turn blue in the face, LOL!
JF
<BretCahill@aol.com> wrote:
---
Guess what, Brat?
This is USENET (Well, it is for those of us who don't play baby games
through Google groups) where anyone is free to read your posts and, if
they feel like it, to comment in any way they want to.
And guess what else?
There's not one goddam thing you can do about it except jump up and
down and whine and cry and stamp your little feet and hold your breath
until you turn blue in the face, LOL!
JF
B
Bret Cahill
Guest
BINGO!
This guy must have an IQ above single digits!
He figgered it out!
Here, I'll spell out the obvious:
If you don't like my posts, then don't read them.
Don't respond to them.
Go to alt.conspiracy with all the other nut jobs.
Bret Cahill
B
Bret Cahill
Guest
Cite?
Show your work.
Huge.
J
John Fields
Guest
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:17:02 -0500, Kris Krieger <me@dowmuff.in>
wrote:
I can't speak for anyone else, of course, but the reason I don't is
because I'm having fun rattling his cage.
Cruel, perhaps, but these uppity monkeys have to be reminded of their
place, dontcha know.
---
Au contraire!
Lately he's taken to replying to posts to which he can't refute with:
"Huge.
Cite?
Show your calculations."
Or variants thereof.
Clearly a sign of panic leading to retreat, a severance of diplomatic
ties, and perhaps the first sign of a crack in the dam...
---
But I enjoy the sport of it and don't mind using up some of my life
jousting, so what's wrong with that?
---
What makes you think _I'm_ not the troll?
---
It would be if he meant it, but what he's really saying is: "Don't
post if you disagree with me."
JF
wrote:
---
I can't speak for anyone else, of course, but the reason I don't is
because I'm having fun rattling his cage.
Cruel, perhaps, but these uppity monkeys have to be reminded of their
place, dontcha know.
---
---
Au contraire!
Lately he's taken to replying to posts to which he can't refute with:
"Huge.
Cite?
Show your calculations."
Or variants thereof.
Clearly a sign of panic leading to retreat, a severance of diplomatic
ties, and perhaps the first sign of a crack in the dam...
---
---
But I enjoy the sport of it and don't mind using up some of my life
jousting, so what's wrong with that?
---
---
What makes you think _I'm_ not the troll?
---
---
It would be if he meant it, but what he's really saying is: "Don't
post if you disagree with me."
JF
T
T. Keating
Guest
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:16:33 +1000, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
All previous predictions & claims, (prior to 2005), based on
exposure to ionizing radiation were INVALIDATED by the NAS's no
threshold dose adoption, The new position also recognized that many
other aliments can be the result of ionizing radiation exposure.
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
Just the truth...
All previous predictions & claims, (prior to 2005), based on
exposure to ionizing radiation were INVALIDATED by the NAS's no
threshold dose adoption, The new position also recognized that many
other aliments can be the result of ionizing radiation exposure.
Guest
On Jul 29, 1:34 pm, "rlbell.ns...@gmail.com" <rlbell.ns...@gmail.com>
wrote:
He is a sockpuppet for the corpwhore neoconspiracy,
who want leftards to be laughingstocks.
wrote:
No, he DOES want people to dismiss him out of hand.
He is a sockpuppet for the corpwhore neoconspiracy,
who want leftards to be laughingstocks.
B
Bret Cahill
Guest
Exactly!
I'm opposed to censorship so we all know I cannot eliminate my
readership altogether.
But if we all work together we can reduce it.
Now this will take will power in the beginning but after a couple of
weeks you won't even notice it.
Bret Cahill
B
Bret Cahill
Guest
I'm still waiting for an explanation on how anyone could believe that
circular furrows are impossible.
Bret Cahill
circular furrows are impossible.
Bret Cahill
B
Bret Cahill
Guest
On Jul 30, 1:49�pm, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:17:02 -0500, Kris Krieger <m...@dowmuff.in
wrote:
John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote in
news:an1194dqj2qulg5jp55155fjurc2l155dt@4ax.com:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:53:49 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill
BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:
You do want people to not dismiss you out of hand?
BINGO!
This guy must have an IQ above single digits!
He figgered it out!
Here, I'll spell out the obvious:
If you don't like my posts, then don't read them.
Don't respond to them.
Go to alt.conspiracy with all the other nut jobs.
---
Guess what, Brat?
This is USENET (Well, it is for those of us who don't play baby games
through Google groups) where anyone is free to read your posts and, if
they feel like it, to comment in any way they want to.
And guess what else?
There's not one goddam thing you can do about it except jump up and
down and whine and cry and stamp your little feet and hold your breath
until you turn blue in the face, LOL!
JF
Er, why don't y'all just plonk him...?
---
I can't speak for anyone else, of course, but the reason I don't is
because I'm having fun rattling his cage.
Cruel, perhaps, but these uppity monkeys have to be reminded of their
place, dontcha know.
---
You know you can't change his mind, which means that trying to do so is a
waste of time and energy. ďż˝
---
Au contraire!
Lately he's taken to replying to posts to which he can't refute with:
"Huge.
Cite?
Show your calculations."
Or variants thereof.
Clearly a sign of panic leading to retreat, a severance of diplomatic
ties, and perhaps the first sign of a crack in the dam...
---
Life is too short to waste it on such unconstructive games
---
But I enjoy the sport of it and don't mind using up some of my life
jousting, so what's wrong with that?
---
- and every time you reply, it means you've allowed
him ot get you worked up to some degree, and no matter how small that
degree migh tbe, it means you're allowing him to manipulate you into
playing his games on his terms. �Does that really make any sense?
---
What makes you think _I'm_ not the troll?
---
He keeps telling people to stop reading his posts. �I figure that the only
polite (and sensible) thing to do is oblige him.
---
It would be if he meant it, but what he's really saying is: "Don't
post if you disagree with me."
JF- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
B
Bret Cahill
Guest
I've been mocking you for two days and you are too clueless to figure
it out.
LOL!
Cite?
Show your calculations.