NJ arrests woman for exercising her First Amendment rights

F

Flyguy

Guest
The Wuhan virus crisis has encouraged bureaucrats to violate the Constitution with impunity:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/apr/20/kim-pagan-new-jersey-woman-charged-for-organizing-/
 
On Monday, April 20, 2020 at 10:52:54 PM UTC-4, Flyguy wrote:
The Wuhan virus crisis has encouraged bureaucrats to violate the Constitution with impunity:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/apr/20/kim-pagan-new-jersey-woman-charged-for-organizing-/

During emergencies you no longer have your full Constitutional rights.

But the matter will be settled in court. We will find out if the order to "stay at home" is legal. This may make it to the Supreme Court.

--

Rick C.

- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
On Monday, April 20, 2020 at 8:40:28 PM UTC-7, Ricky C wrote:
On Monday, April 20, 2020 at 10:52:54 PM UTC-4, Flyguy wrote:
The Wuhan virus crisis has encouraged bureaucrats to violate the Constitution with impunity:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/apr/20/kim-pagan-new-jersey-woman-charged-for-organizing-/

During emergencies you no longer have your full Constitutional rights.

But the matter will be settled in court. We will find out if the order to "stay at home" is legal. This may make it to the Supreme Court.

--

Rick C.

- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

Hey Dude,

You ALWAYS have your Constitutional rights - there IS NO provision in the Constitution for its suspension. If you can find it, SHOW it to me.
 
On Monday, April 20, 2020 at 11:45:02 PM UTC-4, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, April 20, 2020 at 8:40:28 PM UTC-7, Ricky C wrote:
On Monday, April 20, 2020 at 10:52:54 PM UTC-4, Flyguy wrote:
The Wuhan virus crisis has encouraged bureaucrats to violate the Constitution with impunity:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/apr/20/kim-pagan-new-jersey-woman-charged-for-organizing-/

During emergencies you no longer have your full Constitutional rights.

But the matter will be settled in court. We will find out if the order to "stay at home" is legal. This may make it to the Supreme Court.

--

Rick C.

- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

Hey Dude,

You ALWAYS have your Constitutional rights - there IS NO provision in the Constitution for its suspension. If you can find it, SHOW it to me.

The Constitution is as the courts interpret it. At the time the courts allowed the imprisonment of how many thousands of US citizens of Japanese decent? The courts allow many things at different times only to find they didn't like it many years later.

Can you own and fire a howitzer? Doesn't the 2nd amendment say you can bear arms? Abraham Lincoln conceded that his unilateral suspension of habeas corpus during the Civil War was constitutionally questionable. But no court told him it was unconstitutional.

So you don't have any Constitutional rights unless the courts give them to you.

We will see what the courts say. Hell, they do all sorts of random things. You can't sue to recover your property under civil forfeiture because the action was against the property, not you. You don't have standing.

Don't argue with me. Talk to the judge.

--

Rick C.

+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
Ricky C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote in
news:d554fe98-0b9b-43af-ac4f-30be195475f1@googlegroups.com:

On Monday, April 20, 2020 at 10:52:54 PM UTC-4, Flyguy wrote:
The Wuhan virus crisis has encouraged bureaucrats to violate the
Constitution with impunity:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/apr/20/kim-pagan-new-jer
sey-woman-charged-for-organizing-/

During emergencies you no longer have your full Constitutional
rights.

But the matter will be settled in court. We will find out if the
order to "stay at home" is legal. This may make it to the Supreme
Court.

The problem I have is with being arrested. Your potential to
actually contract the virus infection goes up to 99.9% You are being
'handled' by folks (piggies) that are around others all day every day
just like store cashiers. AND THEN they stick you in a place full of
'detainees', all of which have an enormously greater chance to be
infected. All done in cop cars that are very likely NOT cleaned.

I also have a problem with idiots unable to remember their
education. BASIC education. It is a PANDEMIC. Real easy word. It
is STILL HERE.

STAY HOME. WAIT IT OUT till they get 5 minute turn test modules out.

Do not be stupid like the jackass TRUMPing up "could have been"
numbers like 1 or 2 million so his 42 thousand dead fuck up does not
look so bad. He is transparent.

The reality is that it could have been only hundreds that died, and
no 'peak' to worry about and we would already be starting back up
cautiously. But without testing and ALL the directives Trump
blatantly ignored, here we are at 42k deaths *already* and not peaked
yet. Trump and all the party nit wits dancing to his deadly tune,
all deserve prosecution.
 
Flyguy <soar2morrow@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:56438dda-7af7-4970-8cb1-f5041a3aa29e@googlegroups.com:

On Monday, April 20, 2020 at 8:40:28 PM UTC-7, Ricky C wrote:
On Monday, April 20, 2020 at 10:52:54 PM UTC-4, Flyguy wrote:
The Wuhan virus crisis has encouraged bureaucrats to violate
the Constitution with impunity:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/apr/20/kim-pagan-new-j
ersey-woman-charged-for-organizing-/

During emergencies you no longer have your full Constitutional
rights.

But the matter will be settled in court. We will find out if the
order to "stay at home" is legal. This may make it to the
Supreme Court.

--

Rick C.

- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

Hey Dude,

You ALWAYS have your Constitutional rights - there IS NO provision
in the Constitution for its suspension. If you can find it, SHOW
it to me.

Bullshit. Every military service member takes an oath and signs a
contract in which they fall under the UCMJ, NOT the US Constitution.
The moment they finish the oath. Just like Trump.

Every Federal employee as well. As far as I am concerned ANY
public service official that gets the seat they hold by way of taking
an oath, is bound by the oath ONLY. And have limited 'same rights' as
in the constitution, but not all of them.

For regular citizens IF there is ever "martial law" declared, or
whatever provisions fall under the act Trump just enacted, you will
also give those rights up. Watch out for heavy enablings of state
national guard groups that are not putting up testing facilities, but
'policing'. There should already be federal level testing facilities
sprinkled all over all of the hottest zones. We have hundreds of
inflatable hospitals. Trump FAILED. But I would not put past him
sending out the troops for the wrong reasons.

In California, the rotten bastards force folks out on bail or on
'probation' to give up their rights and be subject to search of their
person at any time, and their abode, and must "reveal" to law
enforcement upon 'contact' that they are under 4th amendment
suspension. And then the cop grapples you up, cuffs you and starts
in with the unconstitutional pig harassment.
 
Ricky C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote in news:b5442d7a-417b-
44c9-90e0-ea7f30fe9e4f@googlegroups.com:

Don't argue with me. Talk to the judge.

"Your appeal has been denied,
like you knew it would be..." -Father Guido Sarducci
 
On Monday, April 20, 2020 at 9:59:32 PM UTC-7, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
Flyguy <soar2morrow@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:56438dda-7af7-4970-8cb1-f5041a3aa29e@googlegroups.com:

On Monday, April 20, 2020 at 8:40:28 PM UTC-7, Ricky C wrote:
On Monday, April 20, 2020 at 10:52:54 PM UTC-4, Flyguy wrote:
The Wuhan virus crisis has encouraged bureaucrats to violate
the Constitution with impunity:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/apr/20/kim-pagan-new-j
ersey-woman-charged-for-organizing-/

During emergencies you no longer have your full Constitutional
rights.

But the matter will be settled in court. We will find out if the
order to "stay at home" is legal. This may make it to the
Supreme Court.

--

Rick C.

- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

Hey Dude,

You ALWAYS have your Constitutional rights - there IS NO provision
in the Constitution for its suspension. If you can find it, SHOW
it to me.

Bullshit. Every military service member takes an oath and signs a
contract in which they fall under the UCMJ, NOT the US Constitution.
The moment they finish the oath. Just like Trump.

Every Federal employee as well. As far as I am concerned ANY
public service official that gets the seat they hold by way of taking
an oath, is bound by the oath ONLY. And have limited 'same rights' as
in the constitution, but not all of them.

For regular citizens IF there is ever "martial law" declared, or
whatever provisions fall under the act Trump just enacted, you will
also give those rights up. Watch out for heavy enablings of state
national guard groups that are not putting up testing facilities, but
'policing'. There should already be federal level testing facilities
sprinkled all over all of the hottest zones. We have hundreds of
inflatable hospitals. Trump FAILED. But I would not put past him
sending out the troops for the wrong reasons.

In California, the rotten bastards force folks out on bail or on
'probation' to give up their rights and be subject to search of their
person at any time, and their abode, and must "reveal" to law
enforcement upon 'contact' that they are under 4th amendment
suspension. And then the cop grapples you up, cuffs you and starts
in with the unconstitutional pig harassment.

Hey DecayedIntellect, you are so FUCKED UP you are beyond HOPE!
 
On 4/21/2020 12:40 AM, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:
Ricky C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote in
news:d554fe98-0b9b-43af-ac4f-30be195475f1@googlegroups.com:

On Monday, April 20, 2020 at 10:52:54 PM UTC-4, Flyguy wrote:
The Wuhan virus crisis has encouraged bureaucrats to violate the
Constitution with impunity:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/apr/20/kim-pagan-new-jer
sey-woman-charged-for-organizing-/

During emergencies you no longer have your full Constitutional
rights.

But the matter will be settled in court. We will find out if the
order to "stay at home" is legal. This may make it to the Supreme
Court.

The problem I have is with being arrested. Your potential to
actually contract the virus infection goes up to 99.9% You are being
'handled' by folks (piggies) that are around others all day every day
just like store cashiers. AND THEN they stick you in a place full of
'detainees', all of which have an enormously greater chance to be
infected. All done in cop cars that are very likely NOT cleaned.

I also have a problem with idiots unable to remember their
education. BASIC education. It is a PANDEMIC. Real easy word. It
is STILL HERE.

STAY HOME. WAIT IT OUT till they get 5 minute turn test modules out.

He doesn't do anything but post OT threads here all day why OP isn't out
there with them standing up for freedom is anyone's guess. I hope he go
find a big crowd of them to kiss and hug and play with all day, instead.
 
On Monday, April 20, 2020 at 8:54:11 PM UTC-7, Ricky C wrote:
On Monday, April 20, 2020 at 11:45:02 PM UTC-4, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, April 20, 2020 at 8:40:28 PM UTC-7, Ricky C wrote:
On Monday, April 20, 2020 at 10:52:54 PM UTC-4, Flyguy wrote:
The Wuhan virus crisis has encouraged bureaucrats to violate the Constitution with impunity:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/apr/20/kim-pagan-new-jersey-woman-charged-for-organizing-/

During emergencies you no longer have your full Constitutional rights..

But the matter will be settled in court. We will find out if the order to "stay at home" is legal. This may make it to the Supreme Court.

--

Rick C.

- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

Hey Dude,

You ALWAYS have your Constitutional rights - there IS NO provision in the Constitution for its suspension. If you can find it, SHOW it to me.

The Constitution is as the courts interpret it. At the time the courts allowed the imprisonment of how many thousands of US citizens of Japanese decent? The courts allow many things at different times only to find they didn't like it many years later.

Can you own and fire a howitzer? Doesn't the 2nd amendment say you can bear arms? Abraham Lincoln conceded that his unilateral suspension of habeas corpus during the Civil War was constitutionally questionable. But no court told him it was unconstitutional.

So you don't have any Constitutional rights unless the courts give them to you.

We will see what the courts say. Hell, they do all sorts of random things. You can't sue to recover your property under civil forfeiture because the action was against the property, not you. You don't have standing.

Don't argue with me. Talk to the judge.

--

Rick C.

+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

Hey Dolt, just because the courts get it wrong - and they DO - DOESN'T mean you don't have those rights as guaranteed by the Constitution.
 
Flyguy <soar2morrow@yahoo.com> wrote in news:bad8ca80-76e2-4690-8992-
2c42cbaf2fe9@googlegroups.com:

Hey DecayedIntellect, you are so FUCKED UP you are beyond HOPE!

Hey, FlyShit. I am human. You are FlyShit.

I served. You are a TrumpLikeŠ pussy.
 
On Tuesday, April 21, 2020 at 12:40:34 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence..org wrote:
Ricky C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote in
news:d554fe98-0b9b-43af-ac4f-30be195475f1@googlegroups.com:

On Monday, April 20, 2020 at 10:52:54 PM UTC-4, Flyguy wrote:
The Wuhan virus crisis has encouraged bureaucrats to violate the
Constitution with impunity:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/apr/20/kim-pagan-new-jer
sey-woman-charged-for-organizing-/

During emergencies you no longer have your full Constitutional
rights.

But the matter will be settled in court. We will find out if the
order to "stay at home" is legal. This may make it to the Supreme
Court.

The problem I have is with being arrested. Your potential to
actually contract the virus infection goes up to 99.9%

Yeah, but I think actual arrests for this are very rare. Bottom line is I'm sure they give you the option of dispersing and avoiding arrest. If you want to stand up for your rights it is up to you. You can always opt to not be arrested and file in court to challenge the dispersal.

Let's be real about this. While you have every right to stand up for yourself, you need to be practical about it. Your goal should be getting to court, not getting in jail.


You are being
'handled' by folks (piggies) that are around others all day every day
just like store cashiers. AND THEN they stick you in a place full of
'detainees', all of which have an enormously greater chance to be
infected. All done in cop cars that are very likely NOT cleaned.

Yep, I'm sure a police car/jail is the worst place to be in this pandemic other than an emergency room.


I also have a problem with idiots unable to remember their
education. BASIC education. It is a PANDEMIC. Real easy word. It
is STILL HERE.

Don't know what you are complaining about here. Is it spelling or not using the right word?


STAY HOME. WAIT IT OUT till they get 5 minute turn test modules out.

Do not be stupid like the jackass TRUMPing up "could have been"
numbers like 1 or 2 million so his 42 thousand dead fuck up does not
look so bad. He is transparent.

The number of dead are going to be a lot lower than could have been because of the actions we have taken. I would hope intelligent people understand this rather than believe any of the nonsense we have heard.

It is actually painful to think about all the misinformation spread by Trump and how it must have made this crisis so much worse. We really need a leader who can say clearly what we need to do and be consistent about it. It was mind boggling the way he dismissed the pandemic early on and then very abruptly changed his tune in a couple of days once someone got across to him that thousands were going to die and he could not do anything about it other than help prevent millions from dying. Now he is back to not worrying about how many die.


The reality is that it could have been only hundreds that died, and
no 'peak' to worry about and we would already be starting back up
cautiously. But without testing and ALL the directives Trump
blatantly ignored, here we are at 42k deaths *already* and not peaked
yet. Trump and all the party nit wits dancing to his deadly tune,
all deserve prosecution.

Blaming the testing problems on Trump are a bit weak. Yeah, he was the guy in charge and he may have diminished our ability to cope with this pandemic, but the testing problem was all the CDC from what I've read. They mucked up big time.

One thing Trump has to take all the blame for is being xenophobic about helping others and accepting help from others. When our testing crapped out we could have worked with other countries to adapt their test kits and gotten back on track. Instead we wasted I'm not sure how many weeks when we were unable to get test kits out. That was a crucial failure that will obviously be cited as causing many, many deaths once the post mortem is done.

People say this is not the time to criticize, but I honestly feel it doesn't matter what we do other than observe the restrictions. This has been so bungled that it is hard to make it worse.

I still don't get why our new infection rates are not falling at any reasonable rate. Draw a least squares fit to the new cases data from April 1 until now and the rate is only dropping off at 100 per day out of 30,000. That rate will take how many years to reach zero? Larkin seems to think this is a good rate! It's pissing in the wind. We still need to take tougher action and some states are already taking action to open up activities. Florida decided to make wrestling an "essential" activity. Really? Wrestling???

--

Rick C.

-- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
-- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
On Tuesday, April 21, 2020 at 2:57:37 AM UTC-4, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, April 20, 2020 at 8:54:11 PM UTC-7, Ricky C wrote:
On Monday, April 20, 2020 at 11:45:02 PM UTC-4, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, April 20, 2020 at 8:40:28 PM UTC-7, Ricky C wrote:
On Monday, April 20, 2020 at 10:52:54 PM UTC-4, Flyguy wrote:
The Wuhan virus crisis has encouraged bureaucrats to violate the Constitution with impunity:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/apr/20/kim-pagan-new-jersey-woman-charged-for-organizing-/

During emergencies you no longer have your full Constitutional rights.

But the matter will be settled in court. We will find out if the order to "stay at home" is legal. This may make it to the Supreme Court.

--

Rick C.

- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

Hey Dude,

You ALWAYS have your Constitutional rights - there IS NO provision in the Constitution for its suspension. If you can find it, SHOW it to me.

The Constitution is as the courts interpret it. At the time the courts allowed the imprisonment of how many thousands of US citizens of Japanese decent? The courts allow many things at different times only to find they didn't like it many years later.

Can you own and fire a howitzer? Doesn't the 2nd amendment say you can bear arms? Abraham Lincoln conceded that his unilateral suspension of habeas corpus during the Civil War was constitutionally questionable. But no court told him it was unconstitutional.

So you don't have any Constitutional rights unless the courts give them to you.

We will see what the courts say. Hell, they do all sorts of random things. You can't sue to recover your property under civil forfeiture because the action was against the property, not you. You don't have standing.

Don't argue with me. Talk to the judge.

--

Rick C.

+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

Hey Dolt, just because the courts get it wrong - and they DO - DOESN'T mean you don't have those rights as guaranteed by the Constitution.

LOL That's *exactly* what it means!!! God you can be so dense.

That's like saying if someone takes your money and spends it at the track and slots and women, that it's still your money. Ok, fine, it's your money. Enjoy it.

Whatever.

--

Rick C.

-+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
-+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
On Tuesday, April 21, 2020 at 2:57:37 AM UTC-4, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, April 20, 2020 at 8:54:11 PM UTC-7, Ricky C wrote:
On Monday, April 20, 2020 at 11:45:02 PM UTC-4, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, April 20, 2020 at 8:40:28 PM UTC-7, Ricky C wrote:
On Monday, April 20, 2020 at 10:52:54 PM UTC-4, Flyguy wrote:
The Wuhan virus crisis has encouraged bureaucrats to violate the Constitution with impunity:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/apr/20/kim-pagan-new-jersey-woman-charged-for-organizing-/

During emergencies you no longer have your full Constitutional rights.

But the matter will be settled in court. We will find out if the order to "stay at home" is legal. This may make it to the Supreme Court.

--

Rick C.

- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

Hey Dude,

You ALWAYS have your Constitutional rights - there IS NO provision in the Constitution for its suspension. If you can find it, SHOW it to me.

The Constitution is as the courts interpret it. At the time the courts allowed the imprisonment of how many thousands of US citizens of Japanese decent? The courts allow many things at different times only to find they didn't like it many years later.

Can you own and fire a howitzer? Doesn't the 2nd amendment say you can bear arms? Abraham Lincoln conceded that his unilateral suspension of habeas corpus during the Civil War was constitutionally questionable. But no court told him it was unconstitutional.

So you don't have any Constitutional rights unless the courts give them to you.

We will see what the courts say. Hell, they do all sorts of random things. You can't sue to recover your property under civil forfeiture because the action was against the property, not you. You don't have standing.

Don't argue with me. Talk to the judge.

--

Rick C.

+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

Hey Dolt, just because the courts get it wrong - and they DO - DOESN'T mean you don't have those rights as guaranteed by the Constitution.

Those God given rights require people to do more than bitch on the internet to assert them. many years ago those God-given rights were fought for by men with real bloodshed
 
On Tuesday, April 21, 2020 at 10:07:52 AM UTC-4, blo...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
On Tuesday, April 21, 2020 at 2:57:37 AM UTC-4, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, April 20, 2020 at 8:54:11 PM UTC-7, Ricky C wrote:
On Monday, April 20, 2020 at 11:45:02 PM UTC-4, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, April 20, 2020 at 8:40:28 PM UTC-7, Ricky C wrote:
On Monday, April 20, 2020 at 10:52:54 PM UTC-4, Flyguy wrote:
The Wuhan virus crisis has encouraged bureaucrats to violate the Constitution with impunity:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/apr/20/kim-pagan-new-jersey-woman-charged-for-organizing-/

During emergencies you no longer have your full Constitutional rights.

But the matter will be settled in court. We will find out if the order to "stay at home" is legal. This may make it to the Supreme Court.

--

Rick C.

- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

Hey Dude,

You ALWAYS have your Constitutional rights - there IS NO provision in the Constitution for its suspension. If you can find it, SHOW it to me.

The Constitution is as the courts interpret it. At the time the courts allowed the imprisonment of how many thousands of US citizens of Japanese decent? The courts allow many things at different times only to find they didn't like it many years later.

Can you own and fire a howitzer? Doesn't the 2nd amendment say you can bear arms? Abraham Lincoln conceded that his unilateral suspension of habeas corpus during the Civil War was constitutionally questionable. But no court told him it was unconstitutional.

So you don't have any Constitutional rights unless the courts give them to you.

We will see what the courts say. Hell, they do all sorts of random things. You can't sue to recover your property under civil forfeiture because the action was against the property, not you. You don't have standing.

Don't argue with me. Talk to the judge.

--

Rick C.

+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

Hey Dolt, just because the courts get it wrong - and they DO - DOESN'T mean you don't have those rights as guaranteed by the Constitution.

Those God given rights require people to do more than bitch on the internet to assert them. many years ago those God-given rights were fought for by men with real bloodshed

Please go ahead and shed your blood so someone can get a haircut during a pandemic where thousands are dying. I want to see someone's blood shed. Yes, get your name on a monument in front of the courthouse for dying in the great haircut protest of 2020.

Any volunteers? Who's a patriot?!

--

Rick C.

+- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
Ricky C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote in
news:afaf3a64-47df-410b-b37e-15cce460ab6c@googlegroups.com:

Let's be real about this. While you have every right to stand up
for yourself, you need to be practical about it. Your goal should
be getting to court, not getting in jail.

No. If they are out, their goal is to make blatant asses of
themselves as they smear Trump fecal cream all over their faces, except
this time AS they endanger the lives of fellow citizens with a
nonchalant dismissal of science, all the while claiming to be the
smarter party. The only thing more stupid than Donald John Trump is a
Trump supporter.

It does not get any more twilight zone than that.

"The Monsters Are Due On Maple Street" S1 E22
 
On Monday, April 20, 2020 at 9:59:32 PM UTC-7, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

Bullshit. Every military service member takes an oath and signs a
contract in which they fall under the UCMJ, NOT the US Constitution.

The UCMJ confers the same right to jury of peers, and my peers all took
an oath to protect and defend the US Constitution.

So, "Bullshit" is an appropriate title line for that tirade.
 
whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> wrote in
news:7fbd726c-0419-4ecf-aa2f-71bd903e3f87@googlegroups.com:

On Monday, April 20, 2020 at 9:59:32 PM UTC-7,
DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

Bullshit. Every military service member takes an oath and
signs a
contract in which they fall under the UCMJ, NOT the US
Constitution.

The UCMJ confers the same right to jury of peers,

You ain't real bright, chucko. At least not in this. Court
martials are not jury trials.

and my peers all
took an oath to protect and defend the US Constitution.

You must not have read what I wrote.

A serviceman or woman fights for the rights of the citizens of the
United States of America. Not their own... not while *in service*.

While in that service, they relinquish theirs, and thus fall under
the UCMJ. IF one is on leave or liberty and one commits a crime and
one gets caught, one gets processed under the civilian laws, falling
AWOL from one's duty station, and once one's civil matter is past,
one must then report back to one's duty station and face whatever
charges they have for one.



So, "Bullshit" is an appropriate title line for that tirade.

Nope. You lie in a court martial, whether against you or another,
they'll send your ass to leavenworth. They do not fuck around.
 
On 04/21/2020 04:48 AM, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:
Flyguy <soar2morrow@yahoo.com> wrote in news:bad8ca80-76e2-4690-8992-
2c42cbaf2fe9@googlegroups.com:

Hey DecayedIntellect, you are so FUCKED UP you are beyond HOPE!



Hey, FlyShit. I am human. You are FlyShit.

I served.

Incarcerated? You did disappear for a long while.
 
On Tuesday, April 21, 2020 at 9:24:44 PM UTC-7, Ricky C wrote:
On Wednesday, April 22, 2020 at 12:11:47 AM UTC-4, Flyguy wrote:

How many tests per day to they have reach before you say they have the problem solved?

It's not about tests, it's about newly infected individuals.

Before we exit the lockdown, we need to get the new infection rate to a point where we can do contact tracing on everyone infected and know that we have every infected individual in the country either in medical care or in quarantine.

That will require a lot of testing. But mostly it will require a level of isolation that exceeds what we are doing now since we largely are not reducing the new infection counts. They are either increasing, level or dropping at a painfully slow rate.

I agree that we can't stay in lockdown forever. But clearly we need to do it a lot better before we can exit or the exponential increasing infection rate will return, no matter what the Larkin denialist says.

For me this lockdown is not about flattening the curve. I was the goddamn disease exterminated! If we only flatten the curve, in a couple of months after exiting lockdown it will ramp up again and what? Do we do this all over again???

--

Rick C.

++ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
++ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

Yes, it IS about tests - the more tests that are performed will reveal more infected individuals. It is well known that there are far more infected than have been confirmed due to limited testing capabilities.

Right now we are locking down more than we need to. As testing expands we will get a better idea of the number that have moderate symptoms and get over it quickly. Dr. Birx's plan of testing first responders will allow us to get a better handle on this.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top