nightmare

J

John Larkin

Guest
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/09/02/microsoft_roundup/

How could something this crazy happen?


--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc trk

jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com
 
John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote:

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/09/02/microsoft_roundup/

How could something this crazy happen?

I'm immune. I'm running XP as my main os, and Win7 to watch Youtube.

Using VirtualBox to run both simultaneously.

Not running Outlook. Using a plain ASCII email client so I am immune to
phishing and other malware in emails.

Using disposable email addresses from E4ward so I can destroy any sites that
try tricks. So no problems with malware from sites.

3 minute backup on XP. So I can backup often and recover instantly if I do
something stupid.

Can send byte-identical copies of the VDI files to other computers so they
are running identical software as my main computer.

So Microsoft can cough and sputter. I merely grin at the poor suckers who
have to go through updates.
 
On Mon, 02 Sep 2019 08:53:26 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote:

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/09/02/microsoft_roundup/
How could something this crazy happen?

It's actually quite simple. With Windoze 10, Microsoft does little in
the way of testing. The test staff has been re-assigned to other
duties while most testing is now the responsibility of the customers.
Welcome to customer tested software.

Microsoft Insiders are suppose to do some testing. However, there
seems to be problems with Microsoft either not acting on bugs that
they find, or simply ignoring bugs in order to stay on schedule. I
suspect a big part of this problem is that Microsoft also lacks the
staff to sift through the feedback from developers, insiders,
employees, telemetry, pundits, and the press. With 700 million
machines now running Windoze 10, the amount of feedback that needs to
be sifted and sorted is probably overwhelming.

Most of the testing is done by users. Problems are allegedly reported
back to Microsoft by telemetry. Without the spying, telemetry would
be a great and economical way to develop new software, if it worked.
So far, indications are that it's not an improvement over the old in
house testing system and possibly responsible for the general
reduction in release quality.

As for the muddle in version numbers and release dates, that's what I
would expect from lack of communications and coordination between
departments. I'm not surprised that something like this happened.
However, I am surprised that the explanations from Microsoft
spokes-people tend to blame the users for failing to comprehend how
the release system works, offer nothing in the way of promises that it
will be fixed, and hinting that the muddle might be permanent.

If this is the prelude for "Software as a Service", methinks the road
ahead is actually a mine field.

--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
 
mandag den 2. september 2019 kl. 17.53.36 UTC+2 skrev John Larkin:
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/09/02/microsoft_roundup/

How could something this crazy happen?

isn't that just for people silly enough to be guinea pigs for
not yet tested future releases?
 
On 9/2/19 3:21 PM, bitrex wrote:
On 9/2/19 2:15 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Mon, 02 Sep 2019 08:53:26 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote:

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/09/02/microsoft_roundup/
How could something this crazy happen?

It's actually quite simple.  With Windoze 10, Microsoft does little in
the way of testing.  The test staff has been re-assigned to other
duties while most testing is now the responsibility of the customers.
Welcome to customer tested software.

Software companies in general always pushing some new feature or other
and the shit from 5 years ago still don't even work right.

For literally 8 years the goofy Germans Native Instruments have known
about an interface bug that causes external MIDI devices with more than
one output to randomly latch up when assigned to their software, they
know it's their fault cuz every other similar kind of software does it
properly.

for 8 years they ain't fixed it. There's a thread on their forum 35
pages long about it lol
 
On 9/2/19 2:15 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Mon, 02 Sep 2019 08:53:26 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote:

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/09/02/microsoft_roundup/
How could something this crazy happen?

It's actually quite simple. With Windoze 10, Microsoft does little in
the way of testing. The test staff has been re-assigned to other
duties while most testing is now the responsibility of the customers.
Welcome to customer tested software.

Software companies in general always pushing some new feature or other
and the shit from 5 years ago still don't even work right.

Microsoft Insiders are suppose to do some testing. However, there
seems to be problems with Microsoft either not acting on bugs that
they find, or simply ignoring bugs in order to stay on schedule. I
suspect a big part of this problem is that Microsoft also lacks the
staff to sift through the feedback from developers, insiders,
employees, telemetry, pundits, and the press. With 700 million
machines now running Windoze 10, the amount of feedback that needs to
be sifted and sorted is probably overwhelming.

Most of the testing is done by users. Problems are allegedly reported
back to Microsoft by telemetry. Without the spying, telemetry would
be a great and economical way to develop new software, if it worked.
So far, indications are that it's not an improvement over the old in
house testing system and possibly responsible for the general
reduction in release quality.

As for the muddle in version numbers and release dates, that's what I
would expect from lack of communications and coordination between
departments. I'm not surprised that something like this happened.
However, I am surprised that the explanations from Microsoft
spokes-people tend to blame the users for failing to comprehend how
the release system works, offer nothing in the way of promises that it
will be fixed, and hinting that the muddle might be permanent.

If this is the prelude for "Software as a Service", methinks the road
ahead is actually a mine field.
 
On 9/2/19 11:53 AM, John Larkin wrote:
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/09/02/microsoft_roundup/

How could something this crazy happen?

The Feb update broke a previously working audio/visual hardware/software
suite of mine, the mfgr says "talk to Microsoft" and Microsoft says
"talk to the mfgr"

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
On 02/09/19 19:15, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
If this is the prelude for "Software as a Service", methinks the road
ahead is actually a mine field.

Those of us with a clue have long known that would
become the case.

Oldies can remember the curse of the "timesharing bureaux",
and why PCs were welcomed with open arms.

Principal reasons:
- your data was under your control
- your data and processing weren't held hostage
by high priests in white coats

History doesn't repeat, but it does rhyme.
 
On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 15:21:32 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 9/2/19 2:15 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Mon, 02 Sep 2019 08:53:26 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote:

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/09/02/microsoft_roundup/
How could something this crazy happen?

It's actually quite simple. With Windoze 10, Microsoft does little in
the way of testing. The test staff has been re-assigned to other
duties while most testing is now the responsibility of the customers.
Welcome to customer tested software.

Software companies in general always pushing some new feature or other
and the shit from 5 years ago still don't even work right.

Yep.

Customers are willing to pay for new features, but expect bug and
security fixed to be free. Therefore, any "quality" release or update
has to include some new features. Since these new features now take
priority over bug fixes, the programs tend to grow larger with useless
features, while the bugs remain intact. Since new features also
include new bugs, the bug list grows. The new features also tend to
slow the program down or require more resources (diskspace, RAM,
network bandwidth, etc). The trend is for features and functions to
be added faster than bugs get fixed, resulting in a bloated and buggy
product.

--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
 
On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 15:16:23 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 9/2/19 11:53 AM, John Larkin wrote:

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/09/02/microsoft_roundup/

How could something this crazy happen?



The Feb update broke a previously working audio/visual hardware/software
suite of mine, the mfgr says "talk to Microsoft" and Microsoft says
"talk to the mfgr"

Ż\_(?)_/Ż

A recent Firefox update got tangled with Windows access permissions.
That cost me a few hours of IT consultant time to repair. He basically
fiddled until it got fixed. Better him than me.

We are in the dark ages of computing.




--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc trk

jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com
 
On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 15:16:23 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 9/2/19 11:53 AM, John Larkin wrote:

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/09/02/microsoft_roundup/

How could something this crazy happen?



The Feb update broke a previously working audio/visual hardware/software
suite of mine, the mfgr says "talk to Microsoft" and Microsoft says
"talk to the mfgr"

Ż\_(?)_/Ż
2 weeks ago they broke Office365 (outlook), they fixed it 2 weeks
later.

Cheers
 
On 9/2/19 4:22 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 15:16:23 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 9/2/19 11:53 AM, John Larkin wrote:

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/09/02/microsoft_roundup/

How could something this crazy happen?



The Feb update broke a previously working audio/visual hardware/software
suite of mine, the mfgr says "talk to Microsoft" and Microsoft says
"talk to the mfgr"

ÂŻ\_(?)_/ÂŻ

A recent Firefox update got tangled with Windows access permissions.
That cost me a few hours of IT consultant time to repair. He basically
fiddled until it got fixed. Better him than me.

We are in the dark ages of computing.

Tesla customers locked out of our cars...unknown error. Customer service
says they don't know root cause and are all hands on deck to resolve.
People stranded all over the country. Key card and fob work so if you
have that with you, you are in luck. Call center is blowing up.

https://twitter.com/anagrace/status/1168689591387209728

Oops
 
Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in
news:0ydbF.178225$QR4.40320@fx01.am4:

On 02/09/19 19:15, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
If this is the prelude for "Software as a Service", methinks the
road ahead is actually a mine field.

Those of us with a clue have long known that would
become the case.

Oldies can remember the curse of the "timesharing bureaux",
and why PCs were welcomed with open arms.

Principal reasons:
- your data was under your control
- your data and processing weren't held hostage
by high priests in white coats

History doesn't repeat, but it does rhyme.

Sounds cool if you play the backward B side too.

That is a white coat joke in case you missed it.
 
On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 2:52:49 PM UTC-4, Tom Gardner wrote:
On 02/09/19 19:15, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
If this is the prelude for "Software as a Service", methinks the road
ahead is actually a mine field.

Those of us with a clue have long known that would
become the case.

Oldies can remember the curse of the "timesharing bureaux",
and why PCs were welcomed with open arms.

Principal reasons:
- your data was under your control
- your data and processing weren't held hostage
by high priests in white coats

History doesn't repeat, but it does rhyme.

And that's precisely the argument for limited central government,
keeping most functions local. In both cases centralized controllers
lack the bandwidth to perform their necessary functions, and are
open to catastrophic single-point failures.

I trace the decline in programming ethos (and Western civilization)
to Bill Gates, who made selling fixes to his own bugs into a business
model. Before Gates shipping bugs was unthinkable; now it's a profit
center.

Cheers,
James Arthur
 
On 03/09/2019 03:22, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 15:16:23 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 9/2/19 11:53 AM, John Larkin wrote:

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/09/02/microsoft_roundup/

How could something this crazy happen?



The Feb update broke a previously working audio/visual hardware/software
suite of mine, the mfgr says "talk to Microsoft" and Microsoft says
"talk to the mfgr"

ÂŻ\_(?)_/ÂŻ

A recent Firefox update got tangled with Windows access permissions.
That cost me a few hours of IT consultant time to repair. He basically
fiddled until it got fixed. Better him than me.

We are in the dark ages of computing.
No , we are not. I have been using Linux since 2000, first Redhat, then
openSuse. It is only the 8-Million-flies-can't-be-wrong people who
suffer. Making a billion $ business out of viruses who should not be
possible in the first place is brilliant marketing but shit engineering.

werner Dahn
 
On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 22:11:41 +0700, aioe usenet <hirni47@yahoo.com>
wrote:

On 03/09/2019 03:22, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 15:16:23 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 9/2/19 11:53 AM, John Larkin wrote:

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/09/02/microsoft_roundup/

How could something this crazy happen?



The Feb update broke a previously working audio/visual hardware/software
suite of mine, the mfgr says "talk to Microsoft" and Microsoft says
"talk to the mfgr"

Ż\_(?)_/Ż

A recent Firefox update got tangled with Windows access permissions.
That cost me a few hours of IT consultant time to repair. He basically
fiddled until it got fixed. Better him than me.

We are in the dark ages of computing.




No , we are not. I have been using Linux since 2000, first Redhat, then
openSuse. It is only the 8-Million-flies-can't-be-wrong people who
suffer. Making a billion $ business out of viruses who should not be
possible in the first place is brilliant marketing but shit engineering.

werner Dahn

I agree that viruses should be impossible.


--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc trk

jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com
 
On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 4:22:22 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 15:16:23 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 9/2/19 11:53 AM, John Larkin wrote:

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/09/02/microsoft_roundup/

How could something this crazy happen?



The Feb update broke a previously working audio/visual hardware/software
suite of mine, the mfgr says "talk to Microsoft" and Microsoft says
"talk to the mfgr"

Ĺť\_(?)_/Ĺť

A recent Firefox update got tangled with Windows access permissions.
That cost me a few hours of IT consultant time to repair. He basically
fiddled until it got fixed. Better him than me.

We are in the dark ages of computing.

I am a little confused. You often describe your technique of designing as what amounts to fiddling... running some spice sims, breadboarding something to try an idea, swapping parts to see what happens.

How is this different?

A PC operating system has some 100 billion bits. Which one do you want changed?

--

Rick C.

- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
On 9/3/19 4:03 PM, Rick C wrote:
On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 4:22:22 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 15:16:23 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 9/2/19 11:53 AM, John Larkin wrote:

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/09/02/microsoft_roundup/

How could something this crazy happen?



The Feb update broke a previously working audio/visual hardware/software
suite of mine, the mfgr says "talk to Microsoft" and Microsoft says
"talk to the mfgr"

Ĺť\_(?)_/Ĺť

A recent Firefox update got tangled with Windows access permissions.
That cost me a few hours of IT consultant time to repair. He basically
fiddled until it got fixed. Better him than me.

We are in the dark ages of computing.

I am a little confused. You often describe your technique of designing as what amounts to fiddling... running some spice sims, breadboarding something to try an idea, swapping parts to see what happens.

How is this different?

A PC operating system has some 100 billion bits. Which one do you want changed?

Sometimes older guys wax nostalgic about the big iron they used in their
teens and 20s in the fashion that you know they thought it was really
something else at the time.

You won't find me waxing nostalgic much about any "In my day" computers
because in the same time period for me what the kids had available was
early Pentiums and some Mac Quadras and stuff. These machines were
unpleasant to use the operating systems stunk they were under-powered,
overpriced, and generally sucked balls.
 
On 9/3/19 4:03 PM, Rick C wrote:
On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 4:22:22 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 15:16:23 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 9/2/19 11:53 AM, John Larkin wrote:

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/09/02/microsoft_roundup/

How could something this crazy happen?



The Feb update broke a previously working audio/visual hardware/software
suite of mine, the mfgr says "talk to Microsoft" and Microsoft says
"talk to the mfgr"

Ĺť\_(?)_/Ĺť

A recent Firefox update got tangled with Windows access permissions.
That cost me a few hours of IT consultant time to repair. He basically
fiddled until it got fixed. Better him than me.

We are in the dark ages of computing.

I am a little confused. You often describe your technique of designing as what amounts to fiddling... running some spice sims, breadboarding something to try an idea, swapping parts to see what happens.

How is this different?

A PC operating system has some 100 billion bits. Which one do you want changed?

my impression of the average tech dude's sort-of "philosophy" of
technological progress is that "cutting edge" tech becomes "dark ages"
as soon as one non-tech person with a much lower net worth can afford to
buy a widget with about the same capabilities as theirs at a much lower
price.

Sort of like being big into that one indie band before they became cool
but then everybody decided they liked them too so it wasn't cool anymore.

In the case of the older guys you just know they were flipping switches
on an Altair or PDP-8 at one time in their 20s and thought those
glorified desktop calculators with 1k of memory were just about the
coolest thing ever at the time. oh but it's the "dark ages" now okay.
 
On Wed, 4 Sep 2019 11:11:20 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 9/3/19 4:03 PM, Rick C wrote:
On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 4:22:22 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 15:16:23 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 9/2/19 11:53 AM, John Larkin wrote:

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/09/02/microsoft_roundup/

How could something this crazy happen?



The Feb update broke a previously working audio/visual hardware/software
suite of mine, the mfgr says "talk to Microsoft" and Microsoft says
"talk to the mfgr"

?\_(?)_/?

A recent Firefox update got tangled with Windows access permissions.
That cost me a few hours of IT consultant time to repair. He basically
fiddled until it got fixed. Better him than me.

We are in the dark ages of computing.

I am a little confused. You often describe your technique of designing as what amounts to fiddling... running some spice sims, breadboarding something to try an idea, swapping parts to see what happens.

How is this different?

A PC operating system has some 100 billion bits. Which one do you want changed?


Sometimes older guys wax nostalgic about the big iron they used in their
teens and 20s in the fashion that you know they thought it was really
something else at the time.

It was the best thing around, when slide rules were what most everyone
used. Why not always work with the best available technology? A PDP-8
allowed me to simulate steamship propulsion systems and get business
and go out on sea trials with a private cabin, at the age of 20. Why
not?


You won't find me waxing nostalgic much about any "In my day" computers
because in the same time period for me what the kids had available was
early Pentiums and some Mac Quadras and stuff. These machines were
unpleasant to use the operating systems stunk they were under-powered,
overpriced,

I can't help having a lot of experience. I've been fascinated with
electronics and girls all my life.

>and generally sucked balls.

Of course, some people have different interests.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top