Next Intel's processor using FTL data transmission technolog

M

Mathew Orman

Guest
................run at least 10 times faster with at least 10 times less
power consumption.

Also see the auction details of the first ever made commercial sample of FTL
Data Transmission Line
serial number 001, at:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2564677419&category=361

Sincerely,

Mathew Orman
www.ultra-faster-than-light.com
www.radio-faster-than-light.com
 
Mathew Orman wrote:
...............run at least 10 times faster with at least 10 times less
power consumption.
Click to expand...
Do you have a reputable source for your claim? Have Intel made any press
releases?

Ben
--
I'm not just a number. To many, I'm known as a String...
 
"Ben Pope" <spam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bmooo2$ppe7k$1@ID-191149.news.uni-berlin.de...
Mathew Orman wrote:
...............run at least 10 times faster with at least 10 times less
power consumption.

Do you have a reputable source for your claim? Have Intel made any press
releases?

Ben
--
I'm not just a number. To many, I'm known as a String...
Click to expand...
It is all in the process of technology transfer.
All news to come shortly.

Sincerely,

Mathew Orman
www.ultra-faster-than-light.com
www.radio-faster-than-light.com
 
Mathew Orman wrote:
"Ben Pope" <spam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bmooo2$ppe7k$1@ID-191149.news.uni-berlin.de...
Mathew Orman wrote:
...............run at least 10 times faster with at least 10 times
less power consumption.

Do you have a reputable source for your claim? Have Intel made any
press releases?

Ben
--
I'm not just a number. To many, I'm known as a String...



It is all in the process of technology transfer.
All news to come shortly.
Click to expand...
And pigs will fly.

Kevin Aylward
salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk
http://www.anasoft.co.uk
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.
 
Kevin Aylward wrote:
And pigs will fly.
Click to expand...
And data will travel down a wire faster than light!

:p

Ben
--
I'm not just a number. To many, I'm known as a String...
 
.............LTspice.

Clink on this link to download it:
http://ltspice.linear.com/software/swcadiii.exe

Long Live Linear Technology!

Sincerely,

Mathew Orman
www.ultra-faster-than-light.com
www.radio-faster-than-light.com
 
In article <bmo8o1$miv$1@news.onet.pl>, orman@nospam.com says...

...............run at least 10 times faster with at least 10 times less
power consumption.

Also see the auction details of the first ever made commercial sample of FTL
Data Transmission Line
serial number 001, at:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2564677419&category=361
Click to expand...
Are you a descendant of P.T. Barnum, perchance?

*PLONK!*

--
Dr. Anton Squeegee, Director, Dutch Surrealist Plumbing Institute
(Known to some as Bruce Lane, KC7GR)
kyrrin a/t bluefeathertech d-o=t c&o&m
"Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati" (Red Green)
 
So Mathew, looking at your web pages, I'm curious, what could possibly
compel you to:

* Try an experiment that has been done 1000's of times, with clear
unambiguous result that well, signals propagate at light-speed times rho.

* Notice the scope display indicates zero propagation time.

* Not try a control experiment, with like say a zero-length line,

* Not check out the scope's settings, with like a known calibrated delay
line.

* Not check out the scope's calibration, with like a known calibrated delay
line.

* Not try the experiment with equipment better suited for measuring wire
delay, like say, a TDR? Even the very serviceable HP 1818A TDR I picked up
for under $100 shows wire delay to the centimeter.

* Not have a smidgen of theory or curiosity why, for you, a plain old wire
is showing zero delay, but for everybody else in the world, they find delay.

* Still keep your ridiculous schematic up for months, months after others
have pointed out the major world-class bloopers in termination, MPF102's Ft,
transconductance, biasing, etc..
 
"George R. Gonzalez" <grg@umn.edu> wrote in message
news:bmpd9d$ca2$1@lenny.tc.umn.edu...
So Mathew, looking at your web pages, I'm curious, what could possibly
compel you to:

* Try an experiment that has been done 1000's of times, with clear
unambiguous result that well, signals propagate at light-speed times rho.

* Notice the scope display indicates zero propagation time.

* Not try a control experiment, with like say a zero-length line,

* Not check out the scope's settings, with like a known calibrated delay
line.

* Not check out the scope's calibration, with like a known calibrated
delay
line.

* Not try the experiment with equipment better suited for measuring wire
delay, like say, a TDR? Even the very serviceable HP 1818A TDR I picked
up
for under $100 shows wire delay to the centimeter.

* Not have a smidgen of theory or curiosity why, for you, a plain old wire
is showing zero delay, but for everybody else in the world, they find
delay.

* Still keep your ridiculous schematic up for months, months after others
have pointed out the major world-class bloopers in termination, MPF102's
Ft,
transconductance, biasing, etc..
Click to expand...
That is a number of false statements.
You knowledge is terminated with lack of practical experience.
What was pointed out?
Other ware so inexperienced that they interpreted waveform distortion as
negative time delay.
None of the posted had bother to find out that Electrically Short Open Ended
transmission lines
have the same property as the equivalent RLC lump circuit!
What do you know about me to make such a foolish statements.
If you want to prove that you have real knowledge of transmission line
theories than please
provide a short description of Electrically Short transmission lines.

Sincerely,

Mathew Orman
www.ultra-faster-than-light.com
www.radio-faster-than-light.com
 
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 22:08:08 +0200, "Mathew Orman" <orman@nospam.com>
wrote:

None of the posted had bother to find out that Electrically Short Open Ended
transmission lines
have the same property as the equivalent RLC lump circuit!
Click to expand...

Of course they do. Delay per unit length is just sqrt(L*C), and the
discrete model is an accurate representation of a transmission line so
long as the modeled segments aren't too gross relative to the
risetime. But the trick is that Mother Nature won't allow you to make
a real transmission line that has L*C per-unit-length products below
some minimum, and that minimum limits propagation velocity to C;
Maxwell knew this about 150 years ago.

Spice, of course, is not bound by the structure of this universe.

John
 
"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highSNIPlandTHIStechPLEASEnology.com> wrote in
message news:cjk0pvsi2ddhjijal3t23rifnmoemgdm6s@4ax.com...
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 22:08:08 +0200, "Mathew Orman" <orman@nospam.com
wrote:

None of the posted had bother to find out that Electrically Short Open
Ended
transmission lines
have the same property as the equivalent RLC lump circuit!


Of course they do. Delay per unit length is just sqrt(L*C), and the
discrete model is an accurate representation of a transmission line so
long as the modeled segments aren't too gross relative to the
risetime. But the trick is that Mother Nature won't allow you to make
a real transmission line that has L*C per-unit-length products below
some minimum, and that minimum limits propagation velocity to C;
Maxwell knew this about 150 years ago.

Spice, of course, is not bound by the structure of this universe.

John
Click to expand...
False!
Unterminated RLC circuit do not delay signals by value that is defined by
terminated and impedance matched ones!
Maxwell had no idea of coax transmission lines
they had not been invented yet!
Coax does not propagates EM waves it propagates electrical waveforms!

Sincerely,

Mathew Orman
www.ultra-faster-than-light.com
www.radio-faster-than-light.com
 
* Still keep your ridiculous schematic up for months, months after others
have pointed out the major world-class bloopers in termination, MPF102's
Ft,
transconductance, biasing, etc..
Click to expand...

Does this qualify for inclusion as a "bad ideas" circuit in the next rev of
AofE?
:)
 
"Mathew Orman" <orman@nospam.com> wrote:

"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highSNIPlandTHIStechPLEASEnology.com> wrote in
message news:cjk0pvsi2ddhjijal3t23rifnmoemgdm6s@4ax.com...
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 22:08:08 +0200, "Mathew Orman" <orman@nospam.com
wrote:

None of the posted had bother to find out that Electrically Short Open
Ended
transmission lines
have the same property as the equivalent RLC lump circuit!


Of course they do. Delay per unit length is just sqrt(L*C), and the
discrete model is an accurate representation of a transmission line so
long as the modeled segments aren't too gross relative to the
risetime. But the trick is that Mother Nature won't allow you to make
a real transmission line that has L*C per-unit-length products below
some minimum, and that minimum limits propagation velocity to C;
Maxwell knew this about 150 years ago.

Spice, of course, is not bound by the structure of this universe.

John



False!
Unterminated RLC circuit do not delay signals by value that is defined by
terminated and impedance matched ones!
Maxwell had no idea of coax transmission lines
they had not been invented yet!
Click to expand...
This statement doesn't make any sense. Things don't need to exist in
order to describe them. For instance, logical algebra was invented
long before the first digital circuit (IIRC before 1900)!

--
Reply to nico@nctdevpuntnl (punt=.)
Bedrijven en winkels vindt U op www.adresboekje.nl
 
"Nico Coesel" <nico@puntnl.niks> wrote in message
news:3f907b12.8292924@news.planet.nl...
"Mathew Orman" <orman@nospam.com> wrote:


"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highSNIPlandTHIStechPLEASEnology.com> wrote in
message news:cjk0pvsi2ddhjijal3t23rifnmoemgdm6s@4ax.com...
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 22:08:08 +0200, "Mathew Orman" <orman@nospam.com
wrote:

None of the posted had bother to find out that Electrically Short Open
Ended
transmission lines
have the same property as the equivalent RLC lump circuit!


Of course they do. Delay per unit length is just sqrt(L*C), and the
discrete model is an accurate representation of a transmission line so
long as the modeled segments aren't too gross relative to the
risetime. But the trick is that Mother Nature won't allow you to make
a real transmission line that has L*C per-unit-length products below
some minimum, and that minimum limits propagation velocity to C;
Maxwell knew this about 150 years ago.

Spice, of course, is not bound by the structure of this universe.

John



False!
Unterminated RLC circuit do not delay signals by value that is defined by
terminated and impedance matched ones!
Maxwell had no idea of coax transmission lines
they had not been invented yet!

This statement doesn't make any sense. Things don't need to exist in
order to describe them. For instance, logical algebra was invented
long before the first digital circuit (IIRC before 1900)!

--
Reply to nico@nctdevpuntnl (punt=.)
Bedrijven en winkels vindt U op www.adresboekje.nl
Click to expand...
The first digital circuit didn't use logical algebra but simple decimal
arithmetic operation.
If something was not invented than it didn't existed.

In order for physicist to model physical phenomena the phenomena must
physically exist!

Sincerely,

Mathew Orman
www.ultra-faster-than-light.com
www.radio-faster-than-light.com
 
Mathew Orman wrote:
"Nico Coesel" <nico@puntnl.niks> wrote in message
news:3f907b12.8292924@news.planet.nl...
"Mathew Orman" <orman@nospam.com> wrote:

Reply to nico@nctdevpuntnl (punt=.)
Bedrijven en winkels vindt U op www.adresboekje.nl

The first digital circuit didn't use logical algebra but simple
decimal arithmetic operation.
If something was not invented than it didn't existed.

In order for physicist to model physical phenomena the phenomena must
physically exist!
Click to expand...
You just haven't got a clue do you.

How about tachyons? i.e. FTL objects. Fully modelled
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Tachyon.html, yet we have not
know if they do exist or not.

Or Black Holes, extensively researched from a theoretical of view,
before any physical evidence suggested that they existed. Or string
theory...The list is endless.

Kevin Aylward
salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk
http://www.anasoft.co.uk
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.
 
"Kevin Aylward" <kevindotaylwardEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk> wrote in message
news:dr5kb.32$uG3.3@newsfep3-gui.server.ntli.net...
Mathew Orman wrote:
"Nico Coesel" <nico@puntnl.niks> wrote in message
news:3f907b12.8292924@news.planet.nl...
"Mathew Orman" <orman@nospam.com> wrote:

Reply to nico@nctdevpuntnl (punt=.)
Bedrijven en winkels vindt U op www.adresboekje.nl

The first digital circuit didn't use logical algebra but simple
decimal arithmetic operation.
If something was not invented than it didn't existed.

In order for physicist to model physical phenomena the phenomena must
physically exist!


You just haven't got a clue do you.

How about tachyons? i.e. FTL objects. Fully modelled
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Tachyon.html, yet we have not
know if they do exist or not.

Or Black Holes, extensively researched from a theoretical of view,
before any physical evidence suggested that they existed. Or string
theory...The list is endless.

Kevin Aylward
salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk
http://www.anasoft.co.uk
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.
Click to expand...
Since Einsteins allow them self to postulate a physical property,
now everyone else does it!

Biurocracy and fraud in science is a serious social problem!

Sincerely,

Mathew Orman
www.ultra-faster-than-light.com
www.radio-faster-than-light.com
 
"Mathew Orman" <orman@nospam.com> wrote in message news:bmqojm$i62$1@news.onet.pl...

Since Einsteins allow them self to postulate a physical property,
now everyone else does it!

Biurocracy and fraud in science is a serious social problem!

Sincerely,

Mathew Orman
Click to expand...
Its funny that you should say that :)

But no, I do believe that you really believe in this FTL thing.

And I know that no matter what the test results are, even if the
God Allmighty himself sent them to you, you'd still keep on with
your FTL yada.

I know and respect a ultra stubborn person with the same kind of "disorder".
I just have to avoid getting into any kind of technical or political debate
with him. I have a strong feeling that you are from the same group.

SioL
 
"SioL" <no-spam@spam2.com> wrote in message
news:VP7kb.4658$2B6.848493@news.siol.net...
"Mathew Orman" <orman@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:bmqojm$i62$1@news.onet.pl...

Since Einsteins allow them self to postulate a physical property,
now everyone else does it!

Biurocracy and fraud in science is a serious social problem!

Sincerely,

Mathew Orman

Its funny that you should say that :)

But no, I do believe that you really believe in this FTL thing.

And I know that no matter what the test results are, even if the
God Allmighty himself sent them to you, you'd still keep on with
your FTL yada.

I know and respect a ultra stubborn person with the same kind of
"disorder".
I just have to avoid getting into any kind of technical or political
debate
with him. I have a strong feeling that you are from the same group.

SioL
Click to expand...
False assumptions!

Sincerely,

Mathew Orman
www.ultra-faster-than-light.com
www.radio-faster-than-light.com
 
"Mathew Orman" <orman@nospam.com> wrote in message news:bmr3v4$cm2$1@news.onet.pl...
"SioL" <no-spam@spam2.com> wrote in message
news:VP7kb.4658$2B6.848493@news.siol.net...
"Mathew Orman" <orman@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:bmqojm$i62$1@news.onet.pl...

Since Einsteins allow them self to postulate a physical property,
now everyone else does it!

Biurocracy and fraud in science is a serious social problem!

Sincerely,

Mathew Orman

Its funny that you should say that :)

But no, I do believe that you really believe in this FTL thing.

And I know that no matter what the test results are, even if the
God Allmighty himself sent them to you, you'd still keep on with
your FTL yada.

I know and respect a ultra stubborn person with the same kind of
"disorder".
I just have to avoid getting into any kind of technical or political
debate
with him. I have a strong feeling that you are from the same group.

SioL



False assumptions!
Click to expand...
He would say the same

Siol
 
"SioL" <no-spam@spam.com> wrote in message
news:SL8kb.4660$2B6.848591@news.siol.net...
"Mathew Orman" <orman@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:bmr3v4$cm2$1@news.onet.pl...

"SioL" <no-spam@spam2.com> wrote in message
news:VP7kb.4658$2B6.848493@news.siol.net...
"Mathew Orman" <orman@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:bmqojm$i62$1@news.onet.pl...

Since Einsteins allow them self to postulate a physical property,
now everyone else does it!

Biurocracy and fraud in science is a serious social problem!

Sincerely,

Mathew Orman

Its funny that you should say that :)

But no, I do believe that you really believe in this FTL thing.

And I know that no matter what the test results are, even if the
God Allmighty himself sent them to you, you'd still keep on with
your FTL yada.

I know and respect a ultra stubborn person with the same kind of
"disorder".
I just have to avoid getting into any kind of technical or political
debate
with him. I have a strong feeling that you are from the same group.

SioL



False assumptions!

He would say the same

Siol
Click to expand...
You are trolling!
Do not expect any more replies from me!

Sincerely,

Mathew Orman
www.ultra-faster-than-light.com
www.radio-faster-than-light.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top