C
Carl
Guest
On 3/13/23 20:05, John Larkin wrote:
I was thinking of using a relatively large foil of each type for the
junction, all at constant temperature, and then a small wire leading off
to the next junction in the opposite temperature region to reduce the
thermal leakage.
--
Regards,
Carl
On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 18:19:30 -0400, Carl <carl.ijamesxx@yyverizon.net
wrote:
On 3/13/23 14:26, Mike Monett VE3BTI wrote:
Mike Monett VE3BTI <spamme@not.com> wrote:
(First search result for \"joule thief jfet\".)
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
Wow! I gotta build one. What is the core? Is it critical, or just about
anything will do?
The jfet is more difficult. How about a chopper?
1. explore different configurations to find the lowest starting voltage
Oscillator with super low supply voltage
http://www.dicks-website.eu/fetosc/enindex.htm
2. typical low voltage JT do not deliver any power
Low voltage Joule thief - exotic transistors?
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/projects/low-voltage-joule-thief-exotic-
transistors/
2A. The LTC3108, available in either a 3 mm à 4 mm à 0.75 mm 12-pin DFN or
16-pin SSOP package, solves the energy harvesting problem for ultra-low
input voltage applications. It provides a compact, simple, highly
integrated monolithic power management solution for operation from input
voltages as low as 20 mV. This unique capability enables it to power
wireless sensors from a thermoelectric generator (TEG), harvesting energy
from temperature differentials (?T) as small as 1°C. Using a small (6 mm Ã
6 mm), off-the-shelf step-up transformer and a handful of low cost
capacitors, it provides the regulated output voltages necessary for
powering todayâs wireless sensor electronics.
3. this ic harvests energy from thermoelectric generators
Ultra-Low Voltage Energy Harvester Uses Thermoelectric Generator for
Battery-Free Wireless Sensors
https://www.digikey.com/en/articles/ultra-low-voltage-energy-harvester-
uses-thermoelectric-generator-for-battery-free-wireless-sensors
https://octopart.com/search?q=LTC3108¤cy=USD&specs=0
The voltage of a thermocouple junction is determined by the properties
of the two materials and the temperature difference,
Not exactly, but close.
but what determines
how much current is available?
The loop resistance. T/C wire tends to have a lot of resistance
compared to copper. Fatter and shorter wire allows more current but
conducts more heat so is harder to force a temperature difference
across.
I was thinking of using a relatively large foil of each type for the
junction, all at constant temperature, and then a small wire leading off
to the next junction in the opposite temperature region to reduce the
thermal leakage.
Just wondering if it\'s the
cross-sectional area of the junction, and if so which is better for a
given amount of thermocouple material: lots of small junctions in
series to give higher voltage but very small current (standard
thermopile), or a small number of high-area junctions feeding a Joule
thief circuit?
Probably lots of little ones in series. That\'s easier to use.
--
Regards,
Carl