More Compromised Reasoning

Like trying to use the 0.5 hp example without posting the diesel
equivalent?

The example was just that; a way to show you how to do your own calculation.

But the correct calculation necessarily includes the cost of diesel.

You tried to "merely" omit the entire reason for the electric tractor.

.. . .

And then when the diesel _is_ calculated then trying to dodge the
issue? And then you ratherly stupidly tried to deny that the cost of
diesel was _the entire_ reason for the original post.

Your basic reasoning ability is compromised.

I think

Hardly. Not when your reasoning ability is compromised.

.. . .

It's very strange in that you want to impress people with _your_
fictional whiz-bang electric tractor, but _I'm_ not allowed to with a
little algebra?

That was arithmetic, not algebra. You don't know the difference?

Anyway your "calculations" applied to the enormously popular EV and
plug in technology.

If you think EVs and plug ins don't work, then why didn't you just
state it?

Your "calculations" were entirely superfluous.


Bret Cahill