Monitoring the signal going into a non-grounded speaker?

All this ado about not much......

First of all just float the scope. For the signal levels and impedances you are dealing with just don't worry about it. Now of course this requires diligence to keep Murphy's law from being enforced, but in my 30+ years on the bench I have determined that it is usually better not to have things grounded on the bench.

What's more you don't even have to do that. This is all fine for an academic discussion but in reality there are a few things to consider before getting one's bonnet in a beehive. At least 99.999999 % of the time the same thing is going to be on the + and - side of that speaker, just inverted. If not you likely have a problem in the output stage after the phase splitter. If it is OK from that poit you can measure either speaker wire and derive anything you want, just do a little mental math.

Now since we are such the academic group here, there are some things about measuring speaker current which makes this inductive pickup method not so desirable. Unless this is some wierd tube (valve) amp with no damp(er)ing factor at all, the output is a voltage source. That means the voltage at the output is supposed to follow the voltage at the input, relatively regardless of the specific current drain at any given frequency. On the other hand the speaker is a complex load, in a bass bin or subwoofer it will be inductive with some resistive component. This affects the current drain at varying frequencies and makes measurements of amplifier perfomance near useless.

In practice the inductive component of the woofer(s) partially copensates for the fact that the radiating surface is much smaller then the wave it radiates. The lower the frequency, the less efficient it is, however the lower the frequency the higher current the voice coil draws. It somewhat offsets..

Tell you what, test the +/- theory just by getting two resistors, say a thousand ohms or so and put them in series across the speaker wires. Stick a scope at their junction and crank that baby up. If you see relatively a flat line and hear sound that means the output stage is OK and you can proceed. Now just scope one side or the other, doesn't matter. If you need to calculate output power just double whatever voltage you read, or quadruple the calculated wattage.

When dealing with this type of audio, I recommend aa 1 Khz square wave. It can tell you alot about frequency response. Any decent amp should reproduce it quite faithfully, at least at a glance. To get an idea how to read it, put it through an audio equalizer and watch the effect. You will get the idea of what it looks like when low frequency response is lacking, or whatever. Looking at the flat parts of the output waveform is almost like looking at a frequency response curve in reverse. That is with the highest frequencies showing at the beginning and the lowest at the end. Looking for these characteristics with the scope should allow you to isolate which stage is causing the problem.

If this is like most of this modern junk it probably has eighty-one digital preset EQs that are modelled after some blues player's amps from 1956 or some shit, but if the response deficiency is in all of them, the problem is most not within that little universe/mess. It would also be nice to know if the problem came on all at once or gradually.

People who write regulations are not techs. I do not want anything earthed on my bench. Nothing. I have good reasons for that which are numerous. I can understand the concerns of people who believe that every square inch of this world should be safe enough for a four year old to play unsupervised but I do not espouse that bullfuckingshit. This is my bench and keep your hands off. If you happen to get shocked, see rule number one. In fact you guys are lucky with the single ended 240 volt mains, over here we have to deal with voltage doublers which make floating anything much more exciting. I try not to do it, but I will do it when needed. Suffice it to say that isolation transformers are needed more in the US for a couple of reasons.

I would like to float everything, even the antenna/cable lines in the shop. Put an isolator on each one. In my plug mold I not only didn't connect the grounds, I cut the green wires between each and every outlet. Of course this was at my shop, where I am now doesn't have that luxury and I am too lazy to do it.

Maybe I am crazy, but it hasn't killed me yet.
 
I tried a solenoid but not enough output and poor at sub 100Hz. Do you
know
what the response is like below 100Hz on your pass-thru Tx ?
Your findings are as I predicted, and no more or less than I would have
expected. I've never swept the CT that I'm using, but when I'm mending sub
amps, I normally test at 80 Hz and 40 Hz, and it produces plenty of output
at those frequencies. I would guess that it's probably specced for use at
mains frequencies anyway. I do actually use one for mains sensing on my
shower pump, to ensure that the shower room extractor fan comes on, and it
works just fine, producing plenty of output. When I designed that circuit, I
did a lot of trials with various loads, and it produced enough output to
switch a 4000 series CMOS gate, with less than 30 watts of load and one leg
of the cable passing straight through. If you take a single 'proper' turn
through the hole, then the sensitivity increases. The project is detailed on
Wiki somewhere. John Rumm on uk.d-i-y put it up there. I guess searching
'current operated switch' or some such would find it.

When I'm mending general amplifiers as opposed to subs, My 'standard' test
frequencies are 800 Hz and 8kHz, and again, the CT produces plenty of output
at those frequencies as well. If I get time over the weekend, I'll sweep it
for you, and see just how flat it is.


Dug out a couple of microphone Tx and checked they worked down to 40Hz ,
taking readings, less response but not too much. Then some more important
jobs came in.
One for the phones out line ( so same f response) and one with series 1K
or
so over the speaker, should work fed to a normal dual channel scope
Not sure how they are going to help you, though. Even the low Z side of
those is a proper winding, and will likely upset the output stage that you
hook it in series with. As I said, I tried all sorts of DIY 'solutions'
before settling on the current transformer. Some of these were attempts to
repurpose various transformers and coils, and as soon as you put a few
'primary' turns on, it interacts with the output stage, sometimes making it
oscillate, and sometimes giving you a misleadingly distorted waveform across
the secondary. Aside from this, I would have thought that the current
handling capability of a microphone transformer was very small, both from
burny - burny let go the magic smoke, and core saturation angles.

At the end of the day, I've told you what works well. I've been using it
daily for some years, and it just does the job, without issue. In the time
that's been spent discussing it and trying to come up with DIY alternatives,
you could have had one ordered, and ready to drop on your doormat early next
week ... :)

Arfa
 
Mic Tx and dropper worked well, no difference other than amplitude between
line out and speaker input in normal low colouration amp types (perhaps
10Kdropper for a more powerful amp). I will not be subbing the speaker as
the owner went through the same thinking process as me, thinking the "shape"
switch disabled any type selection.
Not only that but he usually uses this amp flat with no reverb or effects,
with an acoustic bass. To switch out reverb and flanger etc is a matter of
turning the pots fully ACW in this DSP amp. He did the same with amp type
following the same reasoning (plus shape off) but ACW selects the octave
bass , an effect rather than colouration and the source of the non existent
problem.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top