M
Michael Terrell
Guest
On Monday, March 23, 2020 at 2:03:10 PM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
Whatever gets the job done, with good results is all that matters with these cameras.
I have tried several USB microscopes, but they all had too much lag to get a good image. From the first Intel 'blue' microscope over 20 years ago. I did better with a flatbed scanner to get good images of small components and hardware for websites.
On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 10:39:46 -0700 (PDT), Michael Terrell wrote:
On Monday, March 23, 2020 at 12:42:45 PM UTC-4, John S wrote:
On 3/23/2020 11:29 AM, Michael Terrell wrote:
On Monday, March 23, 2020 at 12:14:46 PM UTC-4, John S wrote:
On 3/23/2020 12:11 AM, ehsjr wrote:
On 3/21/2020 2:31 PM, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:
snip
  The camera USB port should not only be a charging port, but should
also be a data port as well.
Yes, you are exactly right. With a good USB cable it works fine with the
PC. With the cable they send with the microscope, not so much.
Ed
I got it to connect, but what application do you use to view it on your
computer?
What do you use with USB cameras?
DUH! <forehead slap> I have two, one of which works splendidly. Thank you!
You're welcome. I have software for a USB endoscope that works with most webcams that don't use oddball commands.
I use a free thing called WebCamViewer by Bustatech. Works fine.
YAWCAM is OK too. It can dump an image periodically, which I do for
the cam at the cabin. I dump a snap of the driveway to Dropbox every
few minutes so we can admire the snow and see who is parked there.
Whatever gets the job done, with good results is all that matters with these cameras.
I have tried several USB microscopes, but they all had too much lag to get a good image. From the first Intel 'blue' microscope over 20 years ago. I did better with a flatbed scanner to get good images of small components and hardware for websites.