J
John Fields
Guest
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 18:24:20 +0200, "F. Bertolazzi"
<TOGLIeset@MAIUSCOLEtdd.it> wrote:
I hadn't noticed it.
---
Hardly, Since what Mr. Allison was doing was outlining the sequence of
events to get from volt-amperes in to watts out (or by reading it
backwards to get from watts out to VA in) without going through a
detailed analysis, which would have involved making actual
measurements or using real data, which wasn't available.
---
A question was posed, and what I did was to apprise whit3rd of his
errors regarding the use of an ammeter and the inability of being able
to get adequate voltage data from the mains using a voltmeter, and
then provide him with a clearly worked out, mathematically precise
explanation of how the differences between real and imaginary power
are established.
Here's the exchange, from an earlier post:
whit3rd:
"With ammeter only, you can establish an upper limit
of how much power is drawn (the upper limit is achieved if the
power factor is +1)."
Me:
"No, you can't.
With only an ammeter and voltmeter you never know whether you're
measuring Volt-Amperes or watts."
whit3rd:
"Huh? You can only measure Volt-Amperes that way (if you have
the Volt value from the utility standards)."
I then continued with the explanation.
BTW, notice the "Huh?" two sentences up?
In American English, this: "?" (without the quotes) indicates a
question.
As for the showing off, let's say I was. So what?
---
Ah, but notice that in my example I didn't use a laptop power supply,
I used a resistor and a capacitor, which was perfectly adequate for
the task at hand.
---
What caused me to call you an asshole.
---
I sure will, with or without your permission, but tell me, why did you
snip: "but I might be a carrier by association"?
---
_One_ newcomer.
---
And was not aimed at you. Peace.
---
OK.
---
JF
<TOGLIeset@MAIUSCOLEtdd.it> wrote:
---John Fields:
It doesn't always have to be just for the OP, but what was worthwhile
for the OP was the excellent suggestion to use a kill-a-watt, (whether
he can readily get one or not is a differennt issue)
Excuse my smile.
I hadn't noticed it.
---
---and this, from
from Mr. Allison, is first-rate and right on the money:
Which money? Given the fact that nobody cared to ask wich precision was
needed, that could have been perfect or dead wrong.
Hardly, Since what Mr. Allison was doing was outlining the sequence of
events to get from volt-amperes in to watts out (or by reading it
backwards to get from watts out to VA in) without going through a
detailed analysis, which would have involved making actual
measurements or using real data, which wasn't available.
---
---Showing off?
How would you call giving detalied and precise answer to a question that
has not been posed?
A question was posed, and what I did was to apprise whit3rd of his
errors regarding the use of an ammeter and the inability of being able
to get adequate voltage data from the mains using a voltmeter, and
then provide him with a clearly worked out, mathematically precise
explanation of how the differences between real and imaginary power
are established.
Here's the exchange, from an earlier post:
whit3rd:
"With ammeter only, you can establish an upper limit
of how much power is drawn (the upper limit is achieved if the
power factor is +1)."
Me:
"No, you can't.
With only an ammeter and voltmeter you never know whether you're
measuring Volt-Amperes or watts."
whit3rd:
"Huh? You can only measure Volt-Amperes that way (if you have
the Volt value from the utility standards)."
I then continued with the explanation.
BTW, notice the "Huh?" two sentences up?
In American English, this: "?" (without the quotes) indicates a
question.
As for the showing off, let's say I was. So what?
---
---Without knowing the required precision the answer could have been even
"It's a laptop poer supply? From 50 to 100W".
Ah, but notice that in my example I didn't use a laptop power supply,
I used a resistor and a capacitor, which was perfectly adequate for
the task at hand.
---
---Think what you like.
I sure will, with or without your permission.
It would have been nice if you hadn't taken my statement out of
context, but oh, well...
I call it good quoting. Tell me, what was missing of the original context?
What caused me to call you an asshole.
---
---In any case, I don't have the disease
Think what you like. ;-)
I sure will, with or without your permission, but tell me, why did you
snip: "but I might be a carrier by association"?
---
---Sorry for this exchange. I just meant to let you know what's the impression
a newcomer has of this NG.
_One_ newcomer.
---
And was not aimed at you. Peace.
---
OK.
---
JF