J
Jan Panteltje
Guest
On a sunny day (Wed, 6 Apr 2022 10:20:25 -0400) it happened Ralph Mowery
<rmowery42@charter.net> wrote in
<MPG.3cb76bb730946ade989c2a@news.eternal-september.org>:
I just measured 42 per minute when sitting on a chair in front of the table looking at the laptop doing nothing.
But if I really relax its lower.
So it seems I am slower than you earthlings,
I know about some doctor who could control his heart beat.
<rmowery42@charter.net> wrote in
<MPG.3cb76bb730946ade989c2a@news.eternal-september.org>:
In article <MPG.3cb77f6e2b5215d59896ac@usenet.plus.net>,
gravity@mjcoon.plus.com says...
Yes, that looks like the typical RST waveform of the heart. The heart
often beats near 60 Hz.
Although I believe my pacemaker is set to let me get a bit slower before
it starts geeing me up...
The 60 beats is just a number near the average. For people that are in
very good health and do a lot of physical activity the heart may beat
slower than the \'nornal average\' when at rest, others may beat faster if
not very active and in good physical shape. I think mine is mnore like
70 some BPM.
From what I see this is a simple decvice and maybe has only 2 leads.
The heart monitors I am familiar with has 3 leads where the internal
circuits filter out the stray electrical noise picked up by the monitor.
Big difference in a device under $ 100 and the professional devices.
Then there are the multilead devices.
I just measured 42 per minute when sitting on a chair in front of the table looking at the laptop doing nothing.
But if I really relax its lower.
So it seems I am slower than you earthlings,
I know about some doctor who could control his heart beat.