magnetic field

[John Fields]

On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:44:49 -0400, "Frank S."
<items4sale@nospam.bellsouth.net> wrote:

Since when!

---
Since this group was started.
---

I use a newsgroup server from my ISP.

---
So what?
You're not supposed to SPAM non-sales newsgroups, period.
---

I 'm sorry for the multi posts, I only posted the revised post once

---
Learn to use your newsreader.


--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer

 

[John Fields]

On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:46:35 -0400, "Frank S."
<items4sale@nospam.bellsouth.net> wrote:

I might revise it once a day!
If not interested, don read it!

---
It would be better if you didn't post SPAM at all.

That way you wouldn't be upsetting anyone and we wouldn't have to
tell you what a stupid son of a bitch you are and complain to your
ISP, who'll probably TOS you if you keep it up.

Also, learn to bottom post, ya goddam moron.



--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer

 

[jasen]

On 2006-08-27, Marco Licetti <Stanis@prodigy.net> wrote:

remove "death2spammers" strings in my

(i did...)

Posted on Ebay, item# 330xxxxxxxxx

Kind of ironic that post spam...

Bye.
Jasen

 

[Michael A. Terrell]

Marco Licetti wrote:



--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

 

[Sjouke Burry]

Marco Licetti wrote:

HP/AGILENT
Oho here we go again, spa......???

 

[jasen]

On 2006-09-05, Sjouke Burry <burrynulnulfour@ppllaanneett.nnlll> wrote:

Marco Licetti wrote:
HP/AGILENT
Oho here we go again, spa......???

mmm.

forwards it to spam@ebay.com and they'll cancel the sale.
Tends to discourage repeat offenders,
talking about it discourages new ones.

Bye.
Jasen

 

[JW]

On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 05:07:39 GMT "Michael A. Terrell"
<mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote in Message id:
<44FBB488.D813B6F8@earthlink.net>:

Marco Licetti wrote:

And every one of your followups to them doubles the S/N ratio.

Something to think about...

 

[Michael A. Terrell]

JW wrote:

On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 05:07:39 GMT "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote in Message id:
44FBB488.D813B6F8@earthlink.net>:

Marco Licetti wrote:

And every one of your followups to them doubles the S/N ratio.

Something to think about...

The point is to give the IP lookup information to report them. I'm
not the only person doing it. All you have to do is kill the thread and
not bother with any replies if you don't want to report them. If we
don't police the groups they are overrun with spam and porn. Some
newsgroups are no longer usable because 95% or more of the posts are off
topic spam.

Or are you a spammer, too?


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

 

[JW]

On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 02:02:35 GMT "Michael A. Terrell"
<mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote in Message id:
<44FE2C2E.86DFA546@earthlink.net>:

JW wrote:

On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 05:07:39 GMT "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote in Message id:
44FBB488.D813B6F8@earthlink.net>:

Marco Licetti wrote:

And every one of your followups to them doubles the S/N ratio.

Something to think about...


The point is to give the IP lookup information to report them.

<ahem>

Forgetting for a moment that you *didn't* do that, anybody who is capable
of reading headers can get them for themselves, if they wish to report the
spam. So what's the point of following up to every one of them?

I'm
not the only person doing it.

Ah yes, two wrongs DO make a right...

*rolls eyes*

All you have to do is kill the thread and
not bother with any replies if you don't want to report them. If we
don't police the groups they are overrun with spam and porn. Some
newsgroups are no longer usable because 95% or more of the posts are off
topic spam.

Fine. Police the groups if you want, but it is not necessary to follow up
every spam. You're supposed to email their provider.

Or are you a spammer, too?

*snort*

Actually, I'm wondering if your follow-ups consisting of substantively
identical posts have reached BI>20 yet?

You DO know what the definition of cancelable spam is, don't you?
http://www.killfile.org/~tskirvin/faqs/spam.html

 

[Steve]

In article <edp2f8$4ou$1@inews.gazeta.pl>, diverse8@gazeta.pl (N Cook)
wrote:

*Subject:* Re: Digibox digital UHF versus analogue UHF
*From:* "N Cook" <diverse8@gazeta.pl
*Date:* Thu, 7 Sep 2006 13:14:20 +0100

skyclad <g.barnes@rmplc.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1157618082.791405.78970@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
With freeview on air you need to have a clean signal no ghosting
and
not too weak and not too strong. You may find an attenuator may
help to
stop the box locking up. I had a similar problem with a Pace unit
which
was fixed by a 6db attenuator. The cable needs to be proper 75ohm
Lowloss as well. If your using old cable its worth changing.

http://www.sunseekerit.co.uk


So you've seen exactly this latch up to zero sound and vision on a
different
make ?
With this one it coincided with the same week removing a mains
powered
aerial booster that was still there for getting a viewable but not
perfect
weekest analogue UHF signal ( the digital version is now perfect) ,
the
partial dropouts on the week digital channels became much improved
but it
would seem the strong digital channels could become prone to this
total
dropout problem.



AAMOI which transmitter are you pointing at? Have you tried Rowridge,

which should be more or less due south of you.


- Steve

 

[Stuart Brorson]

In sci.electronics.cad Jim Thompson <Jim-T@golana-will-get-you.com> wrote:
: In a moment of mental weakness this afternoon I updated my Win2K to
: the latest Service Packs/Security Levels.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/56/32925.html

: Anyone know of a way to uninstall it, or at least render it neutered?

Time to start using Linux . . . . Come to the Penguin!

Stuart

 

[John Woodgate]

In message <12gero3k45nleaa@corp.supernews.com>, dated Wed, 13 Sep 2006,
Stuart Brorson <sdb@cloud9.net> writes

In sci.electronics.cad Jim Thompson <Jim-T@golana-will-get-you.com> wrote:
: In a moment of mental weakness this afternoon I updated my Win2K to
: the latest Service Packs/Security Levels.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/56/32925.html

: Anyone know of a way to uninstall it, or at least render it neutered?

Time to start using Linux . . . . Come to the Penguin!

Stuart


Swen.A is old - it was discovered on 18 September 2003, as the Symantec

link form the URL you cited indicates. Is someone re-distributing it?

The Symantec page has a link to a 'download remover' tool.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
There are benefits from being irrational - just ask the square root of 2.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

 

[Jim Thompson]

On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 02:37:55 -0000, Stuart Brorson <sdb@cloud9.net>
wrote:

In sci.electronics.cad Jim Thompson <Jim-T@golana-will-get-you.com> wrote:
: In a moment of mental weakness this afternoon I updated my Win2K to
: the latest Service Packs/Security Levels.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/56/32925.html

: Anyone know of a way to uninstall it, or at least render it neutered?

Time to start using Linux . . . . Come to the Penguin!

Stuart

Wow!

My message was posted before 7/30/2004 (when I last purged the Agent
outbox).

You must have a helluva slow news server ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.

 

Most of us find electric motors to be a component that is hard to
become excited about, just like resistors.

Still, good luck.

Harry C.


Infolytica Corp. wrote:

MotorSolve
(http://www.infolytica.com/en/products/motorsolvepreview2.asp), the
forthcoming electric motor design software from Infolytica Corporation,

will make it's first appearance at a special sneak peak demo to be held

during the Electrical Manufacturing Expo. The demo will take place
September 18th, 2006 at 1:30pm in the company's booth.

This demo will be the first opportunity for the public to see the
highly anticipated software in action and get a taste of the
easy-to-use FEA-based design environment. By taking full advantage of
today's high-performance computing capabilities, MotorSolve promises to

deliver unmatchable accuracy.


The entire Infolytica suite will be featured at the show, and with
significant additions such as enhanced loss calculations and transient
electromechanical simulations with convective cooling modeling means
all attendees should take the time to see what is new in MagNet,
ThermNet and OptiNet.


MotorSolve Sneak Peak Demo
If you are interested in watching the MotorSolve Sneak Peak Demo,
please stop by the Infolytica Corporation booth (#115) on September
18th, 2006 at 1:30 pm. No sign up is required.


If you are unable to attend the Electrical Manufacturing Expo, please
visit the company's website for the latest product information.


About Infolytica Corporation (www.infolytica.com)


Infolytica offers state-of-the-art CAE software for magnetic, electric,

and thermal analyses. Engineers from a wide range of industries use
Infolytica's software to design and analyze applications such as
electromechanical devices, non-destructive testing (NDT), induction
heating, power electronics, sensors, and industrial transformers.

 

[Homer J Simpson]

<hhc314@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1158209141.929941.54490@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

Most of us find electric motors to be a component that is hard to
become excited about, just like resistors.

I find electric motors quite interesting - unlike the original post which I
find incoherent.

 

[JW]

On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 07:51:19 -0700 Jim Thompson
<To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@My-Web-Site.com> wrote in Message id:
<bk6gg2drv60j8oqahaq69vct2r7ejn25lv@4ax.com>:

On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 02:37:55 -0000, Stuart Brorson <sdb@cloud9.net
wrote:

In sci.electronics.cad Jim Thompson <Jim-T@golana-will-get-you.com> wrote:
: In a moment of mental weakness this afternoon I updated my Win2K to
: the latest Service Packs/Security Levels.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/56/32925.html

: Anyone know of a way to uninstall it, or at least render it neutered?

Time to start using Linux . . . . Come to the Penguin!

Stuart


Wow!

My message was posted before 7/30/2004 (when I last purged the Agent
outbox).

You must have a helluva slow news server ;-)

He's using Supernews - I know they have great retention, but I didn't know
it was THAT good! For some reason, your original message is not on GG, but
the responses are dated from mid Sept. 2003. Interesting that it's almost
exactly 3 years to the day!

http://groups.google.es/group/sci.electronics.design/msg/b94f29bf92da64ee?dmode=source&hl=%C2%AD

 

[The Real Andy]

On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 02:37:55 -0000, Stuart Brorson <sdb@cloud9.net>
wrote:

In sci.electronics.cad Jim Thompson <Jim-T@golana-will-get-you.com> wrote:
: In a moment of mental weakness this afternoon I updated my Win2K to
: the latest Service Packs/Security Levels.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/56/32925.html

: Anyone know of a way to uninstall it, or at least render it neutered?

Time to start using Linux . . . . Come to the Penguin!

Stuart

Speaking of hard to use OS'es. I installed the RC of Vista the other
day.

Compared to Mac, still got the mutihardware support thing that you can
beat by buying a Mac.

Compared to linux, well... You install the OS and it works. Getting
close to MAC. I only had to install the sound card driver.

I also installed the Office 2007 beta, nice. The geeks wont like it,
its too graphical, not 'VI' enough. (but then i like high res porn
pics, not ascii porn or japanese anime, so I am biased).


So at the end of the day, when it comes to simple, just effing work
with no effing around, I rate OS's like so:

1. Mac (probably biased because of the limited hardware thing)
2. Vista
3. XP SP2
4. Linux
5. Prior crap versions of Windows.
6. OS2 and variants
7. Mainframe CRAP (blinking screens where you type in wierd
letter/number combinatations depending on how the programmer thought
it should be on any given day)

I probably should also include DOS and CPM and shite, but them was too
long ago.

 

[Chuck Harris]

The Real Andy wrote:

Speaking of hard to use OS'es. I installed the RC of Vista the other
day.

Compared to Mac, still got the mutihardware support thing that you can
beat by buying a Mac.

Compared to linux, well... You install the OS and it works. Getting
close to MAC. I only had to install the sound card driver.

I also installed the Office 2007 beta, nice. The geeks wont like it,
its too graphical, not 'VI' enough. (but then i like high res porn
pics, not ascii porn or japanese anime, so I am biased).


So at the end of the day, when it comes to simple, just effing work
with no effing around, I rate OS's like so:

1. Mac (probably biased because of the limited hardware thing)
2. Vista
3. XP SP2
4. Linux

If you limit the hardware on your PC to use only devices where the
manufacturer provided complete programming specifications, Linux works
out of the box with no fiddling... just like a MAC. The only time linux
gets into trouble is with hardware that was made by asshat companies that
keep their programing information proprietary.

Level the playing field, and be like a MAC user: Buy only the hardware
your linux distribution lists as being supported.

-Chuck

 

[The Real Andy]

On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 08:09:31 -0400, Chuck Harris
<cf-NO-SPAM-harris@erols.com> wrote:

The Real Andy wrote:

Speaking of hard to use OS'es. I installed the RC of Vista the other
day.

Compared to Mac, still got the mutihardware support thing that you can
beat by buying a Mac.

Compared to linux, well... You install the OS and it works. Getting
close to MAC. I only had to install the sound card driver.

I also installed the Office 2007 beta, nice. The geeks wont like it,
its too graphical, not 'VI' enough. (but then i like high res porn
pics, not ascii porn or japanese anime, so I am biased).


So at the end of the day, when it comes to simple, just effing work
with no effing around, I rate OS's like so:

1. Mac (probably biased because of the limited hardware thing)
2. Vista
3. XP SP2
4. Linux

If you limit the hardware on your PC to use only devices where the
manufacturer provided complete programming specifications, Linux works
out of the box with no fiddling... just like a MAC. The only time linux
gets into trouble is with hardware that was made by asshat companies that
keep their programing information proprietary.

Level the playing field, and be like a MAC user: Buy only the hardware
your linux distribution lists as being supported.

-Chuck

If you limit the hardware then all OS's would have an advantage, not
just linux. This IS the reason why MAC is far better in this regard.
BTW, I am not a MAC user.

 

[Chuck Harris]

The Real Andy wrote:

If you limit the hardware on your PC to use only devices where the
manufacturer provided complete programming specifications, Linux works
out of the box with no fiddling... just like a MAC. The only time linux
gets into trouble is with hardware that was made by asshat companies that
keep their programing information proprietary.

Level the playing field, and be like a MAC user: Buy only the hardware
your linux distribution lists as being supported.

-Chuck


If you limit the hardware then all OS's would have an advantage, not
just linux.

I believe that was my point. The MAC limits the hardware to a very small
subset.... so does Sun.

By comparing the MAC, with its extremely constrained hardware subset, with
linux, and microslop, with their open hardware sets, you are comparing,
well, apples to oranges.

-Chuck