magnetic field

Jim Thompson wrote:
On 1 Mar 2005 16:20:05 -0800, "Dave" <galt_57@hotmail.com> wrote:

Since a "shot down" missile would probably land on Canada those Canucks
better get started on an "anti-anti-missile-missile" system.

That was my point exactly. Makes you wonder how PM Martin's brain
works, if at all, by bowing out of the mutual defense agreement.

Jim Thompson
Click to expand...
You know that they won't divert funds from their "Inter City Beer
Missile" program.

--
Beware of those who post from srvinet.com!

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
 
In article <1109721625.847087.290160@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
<hhc314@yahoo.com> wrote:
Actually there is little in Toronto worth the cost of a nuclear
warhead.
Click to expand...
Do you mean they closed Rafael's burgers?



--
--
kensmith@rahul.net forging knowledge
 
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 17:11:17 -0700, Jim Thompson <thegreatone@example.com>
wrote:


...Jim Thompson

I see that you are cooking with wine again Jim.

"It is you WANT for an enemy that is the problem."
Click to expand...
Than is not even a sentence. I rest my case
--

Boris Mohar
 
When did Alaska revert back to CANADA !
North Korea is behind Alaska, on a Great Circle Route to Seattle, San
Diego, Boston, Miami and all points in between ! WE Canadians are just
Co-lateral Damage

I am following Steve Fosset's Flight on my World Globe, so this is just
a little side research. The old DEW line is pointed in the wrong
direction, so is Colorado Springs obsolete too ! and so too the "North
American Missile Defense Agreemet ! Just goes to show the quality of
research being done on Missile Defence .

Yukio YANO




John Larkin wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 16:36:45 -0700, Jim Thompson
thegreatone@example.com> wrote:


Canada has recently decided to withdraw from the North American
Missile Defense Agreement.

Today, Paul Martin, the Prime Minister of Canada, has declared we (the
USA) will have to ask permission before shooting down missiles (for
example, originating from North Korea) over Canadian airspace.

Bwahahahahaha!



"Roger, Canada, we'll get back to you on that request."

John
Click to expand...
 
In article <6o1a219he1kdmdiv56pik8orbus205pacf@4ax.com>,
Jim Thompson <thegreatone@example.com> wrote:
On 1 Mar 2005 16:20:05 -0800, "Dave" <galt_57@hotmail.com> wrote:

Since a "shot down" missile would probably land on Canada those Canucks
better get started on an "anti-anti-missile-missile" system.

That was my point exactly. Makes you wonder how PM Martin's brain
works, if at all, by bowing out of the mutual defense agreement.
Click to expand...
Maybe he sees it as publicly painting a target on his chest. Without an
agreement the US and Canada can do what they want even if it is the same
thing that the agreement spelled out.

Canada did not support the war in Iraq but Canadian troops went over when
the US deployed its troops. I think they sent 2 boy scouts and a Jeep or
in other words about 1/3 of their standing forces.

--
--
kensmith@rahul.net forging knowledge
 
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 16:46:09 -0800, Robert Monsen
<rcsurname@comcast.net> wrote:

Considering the consistent failures of tests of the 'missle shield',
this is probably a prudent move. No telling where some 'anti-missle'
will land, or what airliner it'll decide to take out. The thing would
probably do more damage when it goes out of control than some imaginary
korean nuke would ever do.
Click to expand...
Kinetic impact is a silly way to kill an incoming nuke. The sensible
thing to do is pop up a clean megaton-level warhead of our own.
Anywhere within 50 miles would do, there's much less problem about
decoys (just vaporize everything) and there's absolutely no problem
about where it might land.

John
 
"Dave" <galt_57@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:1109722805.131944.249450@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:

Since a "shot down" missile would probably land on Canada those Canucks
better get started on an "anti-anti-missile-missile" system.
Click to expand...
It would not be the first piece of radioactive stuff that's fallen in
Canada.(Soviet RORSAT)

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net
 
"Al Borowski" <al.borowski@EraseThis.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4225559f$0$19815$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
Why don't you take your lunatic fringe political BS to the appropriate
newsgroup?!

Seconded.
Click to expand...
Thirded, and seconded Gregg's and especially xray's comments.

Tim

--
"California is the breakfast state: fruits, nuts and flakes."
Website: http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms
 
Hey guys, you missed the point !

In order to Hit Mainland USA, North Korea MUST violate Alaskan airspace
before it gets to CANADA to get to mainland USA. Unless they have
figured out how to move North Korea or gotten around some of Newton's
Laws of Physics. Or USA doesn't object to having North Korean missiles
passing overhead, in Alaska on it's way to mainland USA. Otherwise they
(NK) would would have to launch on a reciprocal bearing, and then
Florida would be the nearest US target. In which case it isn't Canada's
problem anyway. SPACE INVADERS always was a stupid game anyways ! NB
the old DEW line is pointed in the wrong direction, in the wrong place
for this scenario.

Yukio YANO
 
"Tim Williams" <tmoranwms@charter.net> wrote in message
news:XFdVd.21506$KI5.18591@fe06.lga...
"Al Borowski" <al.borowski@EraseThis.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4225559f$0$19815$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
Why don't you take your lunatic fringe political BS to the
appropriate
newsgroup?!

Seconded.

Thirded, and seconded Gregg's and especially xray's comments.

Tim

--
"California is the breakfast state: fruits, nuts and flakes."
Website: http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms
Click to expand...
Hey! I represent - er, resent that! :)

Please, oh please, someone add a fourth and a fifth, etc., so we can get
this political BS to stop.
 
In article <112a8adqnh331a8@corp.supernews.com>, NOSPAM@dslextreme.com
says...
"Jim Thompson" <thegreatone@example.com> wrote in message
news:bfu9211o4l5v2ton9578o82jkscnholr4f@4ax.com...
Canada has recently decided to withdraw from the North American
Missile Defense Agreement.

Today, Paul Martin, the Prime Minister of Canada, has declared we (the
USA) will have to ask permission before shooting down missiles (for
example, originating from North Korea) over Canadian airspace.

Bwahahahahaha!

With what army will PM Martin be enforcing such a ludicrous statement?

Seems Canada's principal worry should be whether the Koreans are
sufficiently competent to CLEAR Canadian airspace!

Bye, bye, Toronto ;-)

Why don't you take your lunatic fringe political BS to the appropriate
newsgroup?!

...Jim Thompson
--
Click to expand...
The original post had a different header than you used, it had was most
definately marked "OT" it was your choice to get involved at that point.

Jim
 
Spehro Pefhany wrote:
Don't "forget" to send all the oil, gas and electricity back too. ;-)

Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
Click to expand...
Only if you send all the money back first!

--
Cyber stalking is a crime!

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
 
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 09:19:17 -0700, the renowned Jim Thompson
<thegreatone@example.com> wrote:

Yep, Canadian cities.

Actually we should just send all the beef back, quoting Spehro, that's
the way democracy works ;-)

...Jim Thompson
Click to expand...
Don't "forget" to send all the oil, gas and electricity back too. ;-)


Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
--
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com
 
Spehro Pefhany wrote:

Don't "forget" to send all the oil, gas and electricity back too. ;-)


Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
Click to expand...
Actually, all the electricity gets sent back and forth 60 times a second.
Interdependence is a wonderful thing, which is why all families are happy.

Cheers,

Phil Hobbs
 
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 07:26:51 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:

On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 21:36:44 -0500, Boris Mohar

"It is you WANT for an enemy that is the problem."

Than is not even a sentence. I rest my case

I was QUOTING someone else's nonsensical sentence back to them. Was
that you ?:)
Click to expand...
Apparently, you mass-murder-lovers skipped elementary school grammar.

This is not surprising, considering the amount of brain damage required
to align with evil.

Thanks,
Rich
 
"Spehro Pefhany" <speffSNIP@interlogDOTyou.knowwhat> wrote in message
ABM is intended to nullify the deterrent capability of weak states and
3rd-rate regional powers, not for use against terrorists.
Click to expand...
Since when do those states comply to the rule that they only use missiles ?
Koreans can fly planes too.
 
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 19:42:10 GMT, the renowned Richard the Dreaded
Libertarian <eatmyshorts@doubleclick.net> wrote:

This is not surprising, considering the amount of brain damage required
to align with evil.

Thanks,
Rich
Click to expand...
Hey, chill Rich, and have some free ice cream:
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/yahoo_birthday/



Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
--
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com
 
Jim Thompson wrote:
On 1 Mar 2005 16:20:05 -0800, "Dave" <galt_57@hotmail.com> wrote:


Since a "shot down" missile would probably land on Canada those Canucks
better get started on an "anti-anti-missile-missile" system.


That was my point exactly. Makes you wonder how PM Martin's brain
works, if at all, by bowing out of the mutual defense agreement.

...Jim Thompson
Click to expand...
Rrrrrrring!

"Hello, secretary's office of Canada."

"Hi, this is the United States calling. There will be a North-Korean nuke
flying over your backyard in about 10 seconds. Can we shoot it down, or are you
going to?"

"Uh... the Minister's office is closed today, but if you like you may leave a
voicemail message..."
 
Black wrote:
Who needs missiles when you can hijack a couple of airplanes to do the job
....

[snip]
Click to expand...

why hijack a plane when you can lease one? Hell, these crazy fuckers can
probably just buy the damn things.

Cheers
Terry
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top