magnetic field

"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:45E65282.E05965AB@earthlink.net...
There are a couple colors that do work, as long as it gives a very
narrow petal on the vectorscope. If it is too broad it will be
reflected off other items and cause false switching.
Right - ANY highly-saturated color could work (which is what
the "narrow petal" requirement amounts to) for keying. Saturated
greens and blues have typically been the key colors of choice since
they would not be expected to show up often in the clothing, etc.,
of those people/objects you'll be placing in front of the color
screen. (Reds clearly are not going to work as well, given the
typical range of "flesh" tones...unless you really WANT some odd
effects re the appearance of on-camera personnel....:))

Bob M.
 
On Feb 28, 11:59 am, "Homer J Simpson" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote:
"andyb" <andyb...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:1172691365.310044.88720@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com...

You mean you can see her in front of a green screen with video in back of
her.

-- CNN reported the same thing, as well as other newscasts.

Time to wake up HJS ......

Right.

There's no such thing as a green screen.
There's no such thing as a green screen.
There's no such thing as a green screen.
There's no such thing as a green screen.
There's no such thing as a green screen.

Say it long enough and you'll believe it.

The video wasn't real time dumbass.
How can you tell she's standing in front of a "green screen"?
 
On Feb 28, 11:59 am, "Homer J Simpson" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote:
"andyb" <andyb...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:1172691365.310044.88720@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com...

You mean you can see her in front of a green screen with video in back of
her.

-- CNN reported the same thing, as well as other newscasts.

Time to wake up HJS ......

Right.

There's no such thing as a green screen.
There's no such thing as a green screen.
There's no such thing as a green screen.
There's no such thing as a green screen.
There's no such thing as a green screen.

Say it long enough and you'll believe it.

The video wasn't real time dumbass.
Hey AC Club geeks ...

The BBC has already confirmed the authenticity of the broadcast.
 
<hugochavez10@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172854172.727892.90680@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...

How can you tell she's standing in front of a "green screen"?
She was describing the towers falling down while the video showed them
standing.

Now if it was the other way around I would be interested!!
 
On 2007-03-02, hugochavez10@gmail.com <hugochavez10@gmail.com> wrote:

The video wasn't real time dumbass.

How can you tell she's standing in front of a "green screen"?
Are you suggesting she was standing infront of a window in NewYork?

green screens give better image quality than back projection as there's no
intervening optical step for the background image.

Bye.
Jasen
 
thats NOT a chroma key shot.

you can tell by looking at the wisps of hair around her neck. thats
where chroma keys become apparent, because as far as those pixels are
concerned, they do not fall into the key color range because they have
been blended with sub-pixel hairs, so you see an obvious green halo
that is juts slightly not green enough to be keyed out. One solution
to that halo is to "shrink" the keyed mask, which would eliminate the
halo AND the wisps of hair- also making the key apparent.

I've worked in video for years and i guarantee you that is not chroma
key. besides, THE BBC CONFIRMED IT IS LIVE.

THERE IS NO WAY AROUND THE IMPLICATIONS.

the fact that i'm seeing this coincidentally on this newsgroup shows
you just how big this thing is getting.

ITS TIME FOR EVERYONE TO WAKE UP AND SMELL THE THERMATE!!!!!




On Mar 2, 6:43 pm, jasen <j...@free.net.nz> wrote:
On 2007-03-02, hugochave...@gmail.com <hugochave...@gmail.com> wrote:

The video wasn't real time dumbass.

How can you tell she's standing in front of a "green screen"?

Are you suggesting she was standing infront of a window in NewYork?

green screens give better image quality than back projection as there's no
intervening optical step for the background image.

Bye.
Jasen
 
"picobot" <picobot@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172936786.486060.92840@n33g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

thats NOT a chroma key shot.

THERE IS NO WAY AROUND THE IMPLICATIONS.

ITS TIME FOR EVERYONE TO WAKE UP AND SMELL THE THERMATE!!!!!
How ARE things on the grassy knoll these days?
 
On Mar 3, 12:47 pm, "Homer J Simpson" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote:
"picobot" <pico...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:1172936786.486060.92840@n33g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

thats NOT a chroma key shot.
THERE IS NO WAY AROUND THE IMPLICATIONS.
ITS TIME FOR EVERYONE TO WAKE UP AND SMELL THE THERMATE!!!!!

How ARE things on the grassy knoll these days?

Hey Homer J ..... the clinic just called ..... your RFID chip is ready
to be
implanted...........................................................................................................................................SUCKER ;)
 
"andyb" <andybroc@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172987791.106770.110330@30g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

Hey Homer J ..... the clinic just called ..... your RFID chip is ready
to be
implanted.
Let me know how yours is working. Has Dr Who been by?
 
On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 20:47:03 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
<nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

"picobot" <picobot@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172936786.486060.92840@n33g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

thats NOT a chroma key shot.

THERE IS NO WAY AROUND THE IMPLICATIONS.

ITS TIME FOR EVERYONE TO WAKE UP AND SMELL THE THERMATE!!!!!

How ARE things on the grassy knoll these days?
Don't be silly, Homer. He wasn't on the grassy knoll. He was making
the backdrops which convince the gullible that the moon landings were
real.

--
Per ardua ad nauseam
 
On Mar 3, 12:47 pm, "Homer J Simpson" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote:
"picobot" <pico...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:1172936786.486060.92840@n33g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

thats NOT a chroma key shot.
THERE IS NO WAY AROUND THE IMPLICATIONS.
ITS TIME FOR EVERYONE TO WAKE UP AND SMELL THE THERMATE!!!!!

How ARE things on the grassy knoll these days?
Better then the place your head is usually .... which is up your ass
 
A shithead called <hugochavez10@gmail.com> drooled idiotically in message
news:1173123646.792483.318780@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...

Better then the place your head is usually .... which is up your ass
PLONK!
 
On Mar 9, 10:21 am, "John Aderseen" <j...@aderseen.com> wrote:
Hi,

Does anybody have or know where I can get :
- schematics of TECOM AH4222 adsl modem
- documentation of BroadCom's BCM96348 component.

Thank you,

John

Broadcom appear to not want to give out datasheets
unless you can convince them you are likely to be
a high volume customer. Unless you are lucky enough
to somone willing to break their NDA you are
probably out of luck.

Bob
 
On 2007-03-24, Mark Zenier <mzenier@eskimo.com> wrote:
In article <eu3enm$rc8$1@theodyn.ncf.ca>,
Michael Black <et472@FreeNet.Carleton.CA> wrote:
Once again, for the clueless, read Mark Zenier's guide to the
sci.electronics.* hierarchy,
ftp://ftp.eskimo.com/u/m/mzenier/seguide9706.txt

Comments, anyone?

Viewers Guide to the USENET sci.electronics newsgroups. [March 24, 2007]

This FAQ is a tourist's guide to the various electronics newsgroups.
good stuff!

Q. Can I post graphics images to these groups.

A. As a consideration towards small sites and users that use
automatic downloading software, the text groups in the big-8 news
hierarchies are generally off limits to binary content posts.
This is enforced by filtering software at the news servers.
Either your posting will get rejected when you try to do this,
or it will get dropped when processed as incoming news at another
news server. So a large part of your audience will most likely
never see it.

Binary content postings are allowed in the alt.binaries hierarchy.
The newsgroup alt.binaries.schematics.electronic (Note the usual
Usenet reverse polish naming convention) was set up to support
postings of images deriving from discussions in the sci.electronics.*
and other electronics newsgroups.
You appear to be misspelling Polish and misusing the term "reverse Polish"
I believe ther term you want is "heirachial" or "bass-ackwards"

If your default news server does not carry the alt.binaries groups
(due to the insane traffic volume), there are some free sites with
read only acess (see the newsgroup alt.free.newsservers), and there
are many commercial NSPs (news service providers) where (by changing
the configuration on your news server or browers) you can read and
post through them (with an account name and password). [Suggestions?]
one way is to serch on newzbot.com (but often it'll find an unsecured
server that'll later lock you out)

Try, for line drawings, to use a compressed file format. Recommended
are monochrome .pdf files or and indexed format like GIF or PNG, or TIFF.
The smallest files seem to be the formats (mono .pdf, TIFF) that use
the Group 4 CCITT fax compression algorithm, with .png and .gif being
somewhat bigger. JPG, jpeg doesn't work well on line drawings.
JPG doesn't woprk as well on line drawings, it's still 1000 times better
than posting bmp.

mention of ASCII schematics (which can be posted in any group)
and how to read them is notably missing.

Q. What's left for sci.electronics.misc?

A. Gossip, history, trivia, manufacturing, systems, standards,
announcements ...
discussing the FAQ ? :) (added)

Charters and description lines.

[...]

sci.electronics.design Electronic circuit design.

"Discussions relevant to the design of electronics circuits."
possibly add the following:
Posters here should have more than a basic understanding of
electronics otherwise ask in S.E.B.

Bye.
Jasen
 
"duty-honor-country" <dutyhonorcountry2@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1174847156.586522.239750@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...

If anyone has an RCA SOUND large cassette cartridge player, from
1950-60's era, I'm interested in buying one- stereo output with tubes
preferred, but will also consider solid state/mono machines and tapes
??? You mean an 8-track?
 
On Mar 25, 2:03 pm, "Homer J Simpson" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote:
"duty-honor-country" <dutyhonorcount...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:1174847156.586522.239750@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...

If anyone has an RCA SOUND large cassette cartridge player, from
1950-60's era, I'm interested in buying one- stereo output with tubes
preferred, but will also consider solid state/mono machines and tapes

??? You mean an 8-track?
No, he means a cassette machine that used 1/4 inch tape, cassette had
2 internal reels, cassette could be flipped over. Another wonderful
machine that died because of RCA's magical sense of marketing and
timing. (Like CED video disks, 3/4 inch home video machines, and NTSC
Compatible Color TV...oops...that one hung on a few years and
ultimately sold.
 
was: WANTED TO BUY-"RCA Sound" large cassette player-stereo model

duty-honor-country wrote:
I'm interested in buying one-
Spew:
http://groups.google.com/groups/search?filter=0&num=100&q=cartridge-player-from-1950&&enc_author=_8riIh0AAAAGrGNf6Ugb-sneFXT1m4hQLOKbRuOOj1yHOpEndAkZ0Q&scoring=d

Constantly abusing non-commercial groups:
http://groups.google.com/groups/search?filter=0&num=100&q=FA+OR+FS+OR+cgi.ebay&enc_author=_8riIh0AAAAGrGNf6Ugb-sneFXT1m4hQLOKbRuOOj1yHOpEndAkZ0Q&scoring=d
 
was: buy electronics, sell electronics , auction electronics new, used
electronics marketplace svOcl

electronics wrote:
atoncer.com
http://groups.google.com/groups/search?filter=0&num=100&q=atoncer.com&scoring=d
 
was: PARTING OUT VINTAGE RECEIVERS...

duty-honor-country wrote:
http://search.ebay.com...
Ironic username:
http://groups.google.com/groups/search?filter=0&num=100&q=FS+OR+FA+OR+ebay.com&enc_author=_8riIh0AAAAGrGNf6Ugb-sneFXT1m4hQLOKbRuOOj1yHOpEndAkZ0Q&scoring=d
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top