A
amdx
Guest
That's all, feel free to use it.
Guest
amdx <nojunk@knology.net> wrote in news:qniuqa$cku$1@dont-email.me:
More like #lyingbagofnojunk@knology.netisretrarded
More like #lyingposamdxisabagofshit
More like #lyingbagofnojunk@knology.netisretrarded
More like #lyingposamdxisabagofshit
J
John Larkin
Guest
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 16:24:30 -0500, amdx <nojunk@knology.net> wrote:
>That's all, feel free to use it.
Hillary lost. Get used to it.
>That's all, feel free to use it.
Hillary lost. Get used to it.
B
Bill Sloman
Guest
On Wednesday, October 9, 2019 at 12:23:29 PM UTC+11, John Larkin wrote:
But be more careful about Russian interventions in the US electoral process next time around. The Russians didn't support Trump because they thought that he would be a effective president.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
But be more careful about Russian interventions in the US electoral process next time around. The Russians didn't support Trump because they thought that he would be a effective president.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
B
Bill Sloman
Guest
On Wednesday, October 9, 2019 at 12:23:29 PM UTC+11, John Larkin wrote:
But be more careful about Russian interventions in the US electoral process next time around. The Russians didn't support Trump because they thought that he would be a effective president.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
But be more careful about Russian interventions in the US electoral process next time around. The Russians didn't support Trump because they thought that he would be a effective president.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
B
bitrex
Guest
On 10/8/19 9:42 PM, Bill Sloman wrote:
what makes you think Trump supporters care if Russians interfere in
every election till the end of time or run the whole goddamn country,
for that matter?
what makes you think Trump supporters care if Russians interfere in
every election till the end of time or run the whole goddamn country,
for that matter?
A
amdx
Guest
On 10/8/2019 8:23 PM, John Larkin wrote:
response to the Decadent one?
Or, do you not know who Schiff is?
I need more context
Mikek
Hey John, is that a response to me, another edict to democrats or a
response to the Decadent one?
Or, do you not know who Schiff is?
I need more context
Mikek
J
John Larkin
Guest
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 21:47:21 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
Mueller said that the Russians didn't affect the outcome of the
election. Dems need someone to blame. Read "Shattered" by Allen and
Parnes. Great fun.
Funny how the left loved the Russians when they were Communists
crushing eastern europe, forget the millions who died. Now that the
Russians are sort of capitalists, they hate Russia and love China (who
killed even more millions) and various Islamists, who treat women
badly and hack up young girls.
Weird.
I'm hoping for a Trump landslide, just to see Rachel Maddow react
again.
Mueller said that the Russians didn't affect the outcome of the
election. Dems need someone to blame. Read "Shattered" by Allen and
Parnes. Great fun.
Funny how the left loved the Russians when they were Communists
crushing eastern europe, forget the millions who died. Now that the
Russians are sort of capitalists, they hate Russia and love China (who
killed even more millions) and various Islamists, who treat women
badly and hack up young girls.
Weird.
I'm hoping for a Trump landslide, just to see Rachel Maddow react
again.
J
John Larkin
Guest
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 13:52:04 -0500, amdx <nojunk@knology.net> wrote:
It's my general reaction to the movement to impeach him, which began
before he was even inaugurated.
There was a headline somewhere recently:
Impeachment Is Boring
>Or, do you not know who Schiff is?
Pencil Neck? The Parody King?
> I need more context
Sorry.
It's my general reaction to the movement to impeach him, which began
before he was even inaugurated.
There was a headline somewhere recently:
Impeachment Is Boring
>Or, do you not know who Schiff is?
Pencil Neck? The Parody King?
> I need more context
Sorry.
C
Cursitor Doom
Guest
On Wed, 09 Oct 2019 13:12:46 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
It's not weird at all once you discover what their secret playbook is all
about.
> I'm hoping for a Trump landslide, just to see Rachel Maddow react again.
Fuck Maddow, I just want to see what Trump can do once he has settled
into the job and found his feet. Right now he is still feeling his way. I
think he deserves a second term for all his supposed faults. It would be
great to see Hillary challenge him again - and lose. Again.
--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.
It's not weird at all once you discover what their secret playbook is all
about.
> I'm hoping for a Trump landslide, just to see Rachel Maddow react again.
Fuck Maddow, I just want to see what Trump can do once he has settled
into the job and found his feet. Right now he is still feeling his way. I
think he deserves a second term for all his supposed faults. It would be
great to see Hillary challenge him again - and lose. Again.
--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.
B
bitrex
Guest
On 10/9/19 10:58 PM, Bill Sloman wrote:
The most appealing part of conspiracy theories to the paranoid and
conspiracy-theory-minded is that the less evidence there is for them the
more plausible they become.
The lack of any evidence just shows you how good "they" are at covering
their tracks! They must be pretty strong and bad to be that good at it
The most appealing part of conspiracy theories to the paranoid and
conspiracy-theory-minded is that the less evidence there is for them the
more plausible they become.
The lack of any evidence just shows you how good "they" are at covering
their tracks! They must be pretty strong and bad to be that good at it
B
Bill Sloman
Guest
On Thursday, October 10, 2019 at 10:39:25 AM UTC+11, Cursitor Doom wrote:
The idea that have have a secret playbook isn't at all weird. It's just one more demented conspiracy theory, and Cursitor Doom has yet to find one which he finds implausible. He's the gold standard gullible twit, and John Larkin is close behind.
Cursitor Doom lacks imagination. So far Trump's trade wars have severely crimped global economic growth. Give him longer to find new ways to wreck our world and a rerun of the Great Depression has to be one of the possibilities.
The last minority president - George W Bush - gave us the global financial crisis, and Trump seems to have an even poorer grasp of reality.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
The idea that have have a secret playbook isn't at all weird. It's just one more demented conspiracy theory, and Cursitor Doom has yet to find one which he finds implausible. He's the gold standard gullible twit, and John Larkin is close behind.
Cursitor Doom lacks imagination. So far Trump's trade wars have severely crimped global economic growth. Give him longer to find new ways to wreck our world and a rerun of the Great Depression has to be one of the possibilities.
The last minority president - George W Bush - gave us the global financial crisis, and Trump seems to have an even poorer grasp of reality.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
B
bitrex
Guest
On 10/9/19 4:12 PM, John Larkin wrote:
It's a "demented conspiracy theory" as someone else put it. That there
are millions of fruit-loop Trump-loving wingnuts in the US who shoot up
people and threaten to shoot people constantly isn't any conspiracy
theory it's a daily fact of modern life you can read about in any newspaper
It's a "demented conspiracy theory" as someone else put it. That there
are millions of fruit-loop Trump-loving wingnuts in the US who shoot up
people and threaten to shoot people constantly isn't any conspiracy
theory it's a daily fact of modern life you can read about in any newspaper
Guest
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 23:22:41 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
There certainly is a Deep State that sees Trump as a threat, that
hates him and wants to destroy him and has contempt for the flyover
yokels who elected him. DS is organized here and there, but really
it's the aggregate of people who turn to government for profit and
power, and those who are aggrieved by the perceived success and
happiness of others. There's a lot of energy there to be exploited.
--
John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
lunatic fringe electronics
There certainly is a Deep State that sees Trump as a threat, that
hates him and wants to destroy him and has contempt for the flyover
yokels who elected him. DS is organized here and there, but really
it's the aggregate of people who turn to government for profit and
power, and those who are aggrieved by the perceived success and
happiness of others. There's a lot of energy there to be exploited.
--
John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
lunatic fringe electronics
Guest
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 23:39:21 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
<curd@notformail.com> wrote:
Playbook? Mostly I see self-loathing and a desire to destroy.
The power players of course exploit this for fun and profit and power,
but the basic mass energy source is hatred, much of that self-hatred.
Another great book in the making.
--
John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
lunatic fringe electronics
<curd@notformail.com> wrote:
Playbook? Mostly I see self-loathing and a desire to destroy.
The power players of course exploit this for fun and profit and power,
but the basic mass energy source is hatred, much of that self-hatred.
Another great book in the making.
--
John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
lunatic fringe electronics
B
Bill Sloman
Guest
On Thursday, October 10, 2019 at 3:25:10 PM UTC+11, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
None of that would be unreasonable if there was an kind of Deep State to do it.
It's more that most rational people do see Trump as a threat - he's made quite enough foolish and destructive choices already, with his trade wars as the prime example, to excite realistic anxieties.
Nobody needs to destroy him - just getting him out of office is all that is required.
The lack of judgement that would let you vote for Trump is unfortunate, but democracy does have to cope with the fact that half the population does have below average intelligence. The kind of bad judgement that a more or less intelligent person like John Larkin shows in failing to recognise Trump's defects is contemptible, but we do have lower expectations of people with less education. Tulane may be an excuse.
It would probably be more realistic to label the top 1% of the US income distribution as a sort of deep state. They want their government to run things so that they get richer, and don't seem to have enough sense to realise that underpaying the rest of the population and short-changing them on health care, education and social welfare is reducing the productivity of their work force.
It's not so much a deep state as deeply stupid state of mind.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
None of that would be unreasonable if there was an kind of Deep State to do it.
It's more that most rational people do see Trump as a threat - he's made quite enough foolish and destructive choices already, with his trade wars as the prime example, to excite realistic anxieties.
Nobody needs to destroy him - just getting him out of office is all that is required.
The lack of judgement that would let you vote for Trump is unfortunate, but democracy does have to cope with the fact that half the population does have below average intelligence. The kind of bad judgement that a more or less intelligent person like John Larkin shows in failing to recognise Trump's defects is contemptible, but we do have lower expectations of people with less education. Tulane may be an excuse.
It would probably be more realistic to label the top 1% of the US income distribution as a sort of deep state. They want their government to run things so that they get richer, and don't seem to have enough sense to realise that underpaying the rest of the population and short-changing them on health care, education and social welfare is reducing the productivity of their work force.
It's not so much a deep state as deeply stupid state of mind.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
T
Tom Gardner
Guest
On 09/10/19 21:12, John Larkin wrote:
I was "hacked up" as an infant in the US, by a US
doctor. I believe it was (is?) standard practice.
FGM is a whole different ballpark, of course.
As is suppressing women, in any culture.
I was "hacked up" as an infant in the US, by a US
doctor. I believe it was (is?) standard practice.
FGM is a whole different ballpark, of course.
As is suppressing women, in any culture.
T
Tom Gardner
Guest
On 10/10/19 04:22, bitrex wrote:
If you have time to spare and are having a conversation
with such a person, it can be amusing to ask "is there
any evidence that would allow you to change your mind?".
The normal response is a blank incomprehending stare.
If you have time to spare and are having a conversation
with such a person, it can be amusing to ask "is there
any evidence that would allow you to change your mind?".
The normal response is a blank incomprehending stare.
B
bitrex
Guest
On 10/10/19 4:50 AM, bitrex wrote:
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissism_of_small_differences>
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissism_of_small_differences>