Looks Like That Fool Is Gonna Get His Storm...

[whit3rd]

On Monday, September 26, 2022 at 8:57:31 AM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:

On Mon, 26 Sep 2022 01:07:11 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com
wrote:

On Sunday, September 25, 2022 at 4:29:02 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 15:55:19 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com
wrote:

The \'how can you know\' question is too big for
this tiny example of language ambiguity.
Satellites and storm chaser planes are pretty recent gadgets.

\"Climate change\" is mostly instrumentation change.

No, we don\'t infer climate change because of inaccurate records of
old weather; we do it because of accurate records of old weather.

Funny. Where the accurate records of storm intensity, like peak wind
speed and mimimum pressure and size? Time span = \"ever.\"

Modern records? Just do a Google search!

The first reliable thermometer was apparently invented in 1714.
Accurate worldwide measurement and record keeping came a lot later.

That confusion serves you right, for clipping my references to garden
records; folk have been noting the blossom events in writing for centuries,
they really CARE about their plants. They\'ve also noted (business records)
ice productivity on ponds, and lots of other weather-related data.

> But 24/7 RTD measurement and logging is pretty recent.

RTD is convenient if you do electronics, but it\'s not gonna beat the
blooming daffodil at climate monitoring. Plant biochemistry is sophisticated stuff,
and even your backside has an accurate 98.6 F degree reference; that
doesn\'t have a resistive temperature detector, does it?

Temperature in particular, is VERY effective; it shows up in everything, every
written record or tree ring has a story to tell, if you pay attention.

 

[server]

John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote in
news:rto1jhtvihti7dq8o0e7tke0g3b1bsm0bj@4ax.com:

On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 15:55:19 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd
whit3rd@gmail.com
wrote:

On Sunday, September 25, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-7, John Larkin
wrote:
On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 20:30:01 -0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

... We (the globe)just saw the
biggest typhoon ever.
Ever? How can you know?

Biggest ever :== biggest ever known.

The \'how can you know\' question is too big for
this tiny example of language ambiguity.

Satellites and storm chaser planes are pretty recent gadgets.

\"Climate change\" is mostly instrumentation change.

You are truly an idiot for getting an education years ago and then
tossing it out the outhouse window for stupid decisions about what to
believe from the scientific community. A community you abviously do
not belong to.

Millions of tone of polar ice ar melting that were NOT melting in
decades AND centuries past. The mat of ice sitting on Greenland is
two miles thick. Antarctica has square mile chunks shedding off from
its \"shores\".

You could not be more abjectly stupid or self impotent if you
tried.

 

[server]

John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote in
news:imt1jhh9hepk4q3jh9aeppg02v3s8god7o@4ax.com:

On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 17:06:11 -0700, corvid <bl@ckb.ird> wrote:

On 9/25/22 16:28, John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 15:55:19 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd
whit3rd@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sunday, September 25, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-7, John Larkin
wrote:
On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 20:30:01 -0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

... We (the globe)just saw the biggest typhoon ever.
Ever? How can you know?

Biggest ever :== biggest ever known.

The \'how can you know\' question is too big for this tiny
example of language ambiguity.

Satellites and storm chaser planes are pretty recent gadgets.

\"Climate change\" is mostly instrumentation change.

Geological records haven\'t been changed by the recent gadgets.

How do geological records quantify typhoon intensity over time
span \"ever\" ?

It\'s improbable that \"the biggest typhoon ever\" happened recently.

Pedantic semantical dipshit, Larkin. That\'s what you are.

\"ever known\", you stupid fucktard.

Of course there were events prior to recorded hidstory that were
more turbulent.

 

[server]

Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in
news:81cdc572-a942-439b-98f6-cf5f0a160085n@googlegroups.com:

Mammals split from other tetrapod vertebrates about 220 millions
years ago. A a and Gnatguy may be on a devolving branch, but the
reversion back to the mean won\'t have got back to the lizards yet.
And their problem isn\'t that their perceptions are primitive, it\'s
that they perceive what they want to see, rather than anything
that has anything much to do with reality. It\'s an evolutionary
dead end, but they aren\'t dying out quite as fast as one would
wish.

This chick has put together some good videos decsribing past era and
epochs.
<https://youtu.be/g2Ygd2LEOqs>