Looking for CRT monitor repairer in Sydney

[Mr.T]

"Ken Taylor" <ken123@xxxxtra.co.nz> wrote in message
news:xeINf.690$JZ1.52246@news.xtra.co.nz...

Quite different from quality photographic printing purposes probably.

I'd expect so. The photographic stuff is going to be *way* less
detailed, coloured and 'realistic'. People get funny about doctors
needing to see the cancers clearly.

You have this back to front. Doctors/scientists use *enhanced* or false
colors, or increased contrast to better identify similar areas under
investigation.
More "realistic" is *not* part of their requirement. I suppose using dies on
microscope slides is to increase realism in your opinion!
Maybe you consider an X-ray photo to be more "realistic" than a normal photo
too?

And no, I couldn't name the models, but they certainly wouldn't be
available for home or general business use. But the technology is there,
so eventually it'll trickle down.

Ah, that's the point. Even the crap LCD's are more expensive than a CRT at
present.
I too look forward to the day when a cheap flat panel display outperforms a
CRT, and yes it will probably happen sometime. (note I did not say LCD
though)
In the meantime I am quite happy to use both, as required.

MrT.

 

[The Real Andy]

On Fri, 3 Mar 2006 13:22:59 +1100, "Mr.T" <MrT@home> wrote:

"Ken Taylor" <ken123@xxxxtra.co.nz> wrote in message
news:xeINf.690$JZ1.52246@news.xtra.co.nz...
Quite different from quality photographic printing purposes probably.

I'd expect so. The photographic stuff is going to be *way* less
detailed, coloured and 'realistic'. People get funny about doctors
needing to see the cancers clearly.

You have this back to front. Doctors/scientists use *enhanced* or false
colors, or increased contrast to better identify similar areas under
investigation.
More "realistic" is *not* part of their requirement. I suppose using dies on
microscope slides is to increase realism in your opinion!
Maybe you consider an X-ray photo to be more "realistic" than a normal photo
too?

And no, I couldn't name the models, but they certainly wouldn't be
available for home or general business use. But the technology is there,
so eventually it'll trickle down.

Ah, that's the point. Even the crap LCD's are more expensive than a CRT at
present.
I too look forward to the day when a cheap flat panel display outperforms a
CRT, and yes it will probably happen sometime. (note I did not say LCD
though)

TO buy a decent CRT display is in the same league as a decent LCD
these days. At least the LCD stays in focus.

In the meantime I am quite happy to use both, as required.

MrT.

 

[Fred]

TO buy a decent CRT display is in the same league as a decent LCD
these days. At least the LCD stays in focus.

How about $7500 for an Eizo ColorEdge CG220 22.2" LCD Display?
http://www.cyrachrome.com.au/view_products.asp?CATEGORY=7

BTW my 22" Mitsubishi Diamondtron crt monitor still has excellent focus,
contrast and brightness when coupled to a Matrox graphics card.
It cost a lot less than a current top quality lcd, but of course takes up a
lot of space and has probably been discontinued.

In the meantime I am quite happy to use both, as required.

MrT.

 

Hello & Welcome,
It may be less expensive to get a new one.
You may view our Free
Guide to Flat Panel TV's as well as browse our direct from the
manufacturer models.
Go to
http://www.pmbbay.com
or www.pmbbay.com

Feel free to email us if you need assistance.
Good Luck!
PMBBAY

 

[The Real Andy]

On Sun, 05 Mar 2006 11:56:35 +1000, The Real Andy
<will_get_back_to_you_on_This@> wrote:

On Fri, 3 Mar 2006 19:04:45 +1030, "Fred" <bluser@gmail.com> wrote:


TO buy a decent CRT display is in the same league as a decent LCD
these days. At least the LCD stays in focus.

How about $7500 for an Eizo ColorEdge CG220 22.2" LCD Display?
http://www.cyrachrome.com.au/view_products.asp?CATEGORY=7

Now find a decent CRT monitor for that price, that is providing you
can find one at all. Dont forget, if you want to compare the eizo, we
are talking about monitors than can replace the need for hardcopy
proofs.

Actually, i have just been told that one can still purchase the Sony
Artisan (CRT) for around US$2000. I did not know that these could
still be had.

I just dumped my sony 21" because the anti reflective coating on it
was stuffed and the focus was out.

BTW my 22" Mitsubishi Diamondtron crt monitor still has excellent focus,
contrast and brightness when coupled to a Matrox graphics card.
It cost a lot less than a current top quality lcd, but of course takes up a
lot of space and has probably been discontinued.

I bet your mitsu monitor will be outperformed by the eizo. I beleive
eizo have discontinued there CRT models now, so this must be saying
something for LCD.





In the meantime I am quite happy to use both, as required.

MrT.