Liberal members readying for another attack on gun owners

[John-Melb]

On May 13, 2:40 pm, keithr <kei...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

You made your point, you laboured your point, you wore your point out,
now move on.

It's interesting that's the first time you admitted that I had made my
point.

 

[John-Melb]

On May 15, 11:35 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

yes john, you made your point, you laboured your point, you wore your
point out, now move on.

The only recent irrelevant posts either pro or anti gun in
aus.electronics have been from you, so now you are doing exactly what
you were complaining about trevor doing. That is hypocrisy, or do we
have to hold you to a lesser standard than that which you demand others
to be held by?

I expect Trevor, when he is spanked on a gun related forum, to scurry
away to a non-gun related forum a spew his word vomit there, hoping
that no-one will know enough of the subject, (or perhaps be too
intimidated by his "long standing and highly valued poster" status) to
take him up on it. Prior to aus.electronics, he's previously done the
same thing on rec.audio.opinion and aus.hi-fi.

What I do not expect, and what really gets up my nose, is people who
don't have an issue with anti-gun word vomit being posted, but who the
get all upset and go feral about an alternative viewpoint appearing.
I'm sorry if it offends you Keithr, but this is one redneck who won't
shut the fuck up and sit in the corner when he see's this going on.

As for you hypocrite label, you can label me anything you like, I
don't care for you opinions one way or the other.

 

[John-Melb]

On May 15, 11:31 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

In fact you weren't even asked to stop posting in the original thread
(stun guns) it was only when you started irrelevant threads that you
were asked to desist

So, I demonstrated previously that Trevor used aus.electronics at
least four times to spray his anti-gun word vomit around prior to my
first ever post there, and no-one asked him to desist. I start a
thread in response to this and get told to pull my head in.

"Asked to desist", I seem to recall you lot weren't quite so polite at
the time.

 

[John-Melb]

On May 16, 11:42 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

John-Melb wrote:
On May 15, 11:35 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

yes john, you made your point, you laboured your point, you wore your
point out, now move on.

The only recent irrelevant posts either pro or anti gun in
aus.electronics have been from you, so now you are doing exactly what
you were complaining about trevor doing. That is hypocrisy, or do we
have to hold you to a lesser standard than that which you demand others
to be held by?

I expect Trevor, when he is spanked on a gun related forum, to scurry
away to a non-gun related forum a spew his word vomit there, hoping
that no-one will know enough of the subject, (or perhaps be too
intimidated by his "long standing and highly valued poster" status) to
take him up on it. Prior to aus.electronics, he's previously done the
same thing on rec.audio.opinion and aus.hi-fi.

And when was the last time trevor posted anything about guns on
aus.electronics? When was the last time you did?

What is the relevance to this discussion with that question?
Who "chose the field?",
Who "fired the first shots" there?,
Who decided that aus.electronics was a suitable place for such
discussion to take place?

What is it about trevor that you find so threatening? Nobody else takes
what he says about guns with any seriousness at all. Why does he scare
you so much?

Threatening no, entertaining yes, what I find offensive is the belief
that Trevor has the right to post his anti-gun word vomit there, but I
"apparently" do not have the right to reply? Why is that Keithr? What
do you anti-gun idiots over at aus.electronics find so scary that your
prepared to have Trevor post his anti-gun word vomit all over the
place, but get all upset when alternative viewpoint appears? Does the
though of a redneck having the right to be heard really scare you that
much?

What I do not expect, and what really gets up my nose, is people who
don't have an issue with anti-gun word vomit being posted, but who the
get all upset and go feral about an alternative viewpoint appearing.
I'm sorry if it offends you Keithr, but this is one redneck who won't
shut the fuck up and sit in the corner when he see's this going on.

You aren't a redneck john just an everyday common arsehole.

Thank you, that fact that someone like you thinks I'm an arsehole,
obviously means I'm doing something right.

As for you hypocrite label, you can label me anything you like, I
don't care for you opinions one way or the other.

The evidence suggests otherwise, they do seem to upset you
Maybe I find you almost as entertaining as you long standing and

highly respected poster, Trevor?