Kindling for the Fire

  • Thread starter Watson A.Name - "Watt Sun
  • Start date
I see your vocabulary has not expanded.....retard and dipshit.....So
impressive!

"DarkMatter" <DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:e1t6ov08irur24vb4vjf73b8n0575id612@4ax.com...
On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 17:38:50 GMT, "Ross Mac"
macroeng@example.invalid> Gave us:

Dark Manure runs all over the newsgroups posting obnoxious messages then
wants to cite protocol to us all.


Show me the rfc where being obnoxious is disallowed, you top posting
usenet twit!

That's what I thought... You cannot.

However plenty of them DO cite top posting as being one of the most
inconsiderate forms of ignoring usenet protocols. Do you read ass
backwards, dipshit?
 
So, Dark Manure....you must be the master of the Usenet...I will make sure
in the future to follow all your suggestions and rules....yeah right....kiss
my %$# pillow biter!!
Get an efffing life and hey...your slimy hide is all over the news
groups....and what a fool you have made of yourself...It appears your handle
is Tard Boy....
When you reach the rip old age of 14 perhaps you will gain a bit of
wisdom......get a life loser!

"DarkMatter" <DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:e1t6ov08irur24vb4vjf73b8n0575id612@4ax.com...
On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 17:38:50 GMT, "Ross Mac"
macroeng@example.invalid> Gave us:

Dark Manure runs all over the newsgroups posting obnoxious messages then
wants to cite protocol to us all.


Show me the rfc where being obnoxious is disallowed, you top posting
usenet twit!

That's what I thought... You cannot.

However plenty of them DO cite top posting as being one of the most
inconsiderate forms of ignoring usenet protocols. Do you read ass
backwards, dipshit?
 
Here we go again.....Tard Boy claims to be 43....yeah right...and his
vocabulary...yup...the same....retard and dipshit...and his reference to
school friends....well like I said...Tard Boy is in school.....hope the
little bastard learns something!
"DarkMatter" <DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:j9n6ovkoilghre36qe3675erl9804jesmv@4ax.com...
On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 17:33:07 GMT, "Ross Mac"
macroeng@example.invalid> Gave us:

Great...another 12 year old diatribe from Tard boy!

You're an idiot. YOU are the only fuck here that is of an adult
age, but has yet to actually BE an adult.

I am 43. I am also an order of magnitude smarter than your lame
ass. I have done more in the last week to make the world a better
place than your lame, wussy boy ass will accomplish in your entire
pathetic, petty life, little girl.

Such genious!

Try spelling it correctly at least, next time, retard.

Do you and your little school friends sit around and compose
this lame crap!

My school friends are college level engineers and such, and we laugh
our asses off at how retarded Usenet twits like you are.

Go back to spankin the monkey on the alt.binaries....

Again, stop projecting your little problems onto others.

The binary groups I frequent are software groups, retard boy.

At least then, your "little paws" will be busy!

I do more in one day than your lame ass will accomplish in your
entire pathetic life, boy. The products I engineer save lives.

Your lame, E-1 grade ass will NEVER measure up, dipshit.
 
On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 02:37:14 GMT, "Ross Mac"
<macroeng@example.invalid> Gave us:

I see your vocabulary has not expanded.....retard and dipshit.....So
impressive!
Interesting that your LAME ass still ignored the actual subject of
the post. The FACT that top posting is lame, and only ditzes top post.

Particularly after they were informed that it is unacceptable. You
epitomize usenet trolldom.


"DarkMatter" <DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:e1t6ov08irur24vb4vjf73b8n0575id612@4ax.com...
On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 17:38:50 GMT, "Ross Mac"
macroeng@example.invalid> Gave us:

Dark Manure runs all over the newsgroups posting obnoxious messages then
wants to cite protocol to us all.


Show me the rfc where being obnoxious is disallowed, you top posting
usenet twit!

That's what I thought... You cannot.

However plenty of them DO cite top posting as being one of the most
inconsiderate forms of ignoring usenet protocols. Do you read ass
backwards, dipshit?
 
On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 02:49:59 GMT, "Ross Mac"
<macroeng@example.invalid> Gave us:

Here we go again.....Tard Boy claims to be 43....yeah right...and his
vocabulary...yup...the same....retard and dipshit...and his reference to
school friends....well like I said...Tard Boy is in school.....hope the
little bastard learns something!
I am 43. I am an engineer, ya fuckin' 'tard.

Like I said... I have done more in the past week to make the world
a better place for mankind, than your lame, wussy boy ass will ever do
in your ENTIRE lame, pathetic cringing little milksop life.

You totally clueless bastard.
 
You really have a hard on for top posters....why, I cannot guess....I will
make sure to always reply to your lame ass ON THE TOP.......


"DarkMatter" <DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:8d57ovc9figflfeflpdb0nu317811mtr5a@4ax.com...
On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 02:37:14 GMT, "Ross Mac"
macroeng@example.invalid> Gave us:

I see your vocabulary has not expanded.....retard and dipshit.....So
impressive!


Interesting that your LAME ass still ignored the actual subject of
the post. The FACT that top posting is lame, and only ditzes top post.

Particularly after they were informed that it is unacceptable. You
epitomize usenet trolldom.


"DarkMatter" <DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in
message
news:e1t6ov08irur24vb4vjf73b8n0575id612@4ax.com...
On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 17:38:50 GMT, "Ross Mac"
macroeng@example.invalid> Gave us:

Dark Manure runs all over the newsgroups posting obnoxious messages
then
wants to cite protocol to us all.


Show me the rfc where being obnoxious is disallowed, you top posting
usenet twit!

That's what I thought... You cannot.

However plenty of them DO cite top posting as being one of the most
inconsiderate forms of ignoring usenet protocols. Do you read ass
backwards, dipshit?
 
43....huh....could fool me.....and an engineer...hmmmm...what field???......
Ya wonder bout me??? I am retired.....I made my fortune a few years back in
electronics.....
"DarkMatter" <DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:rh57ovo9520n2jj5u7gi5daetioto31mi8@4ax.com...
On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 02:49:59 GMT, "Ross Mac"
macroeng@example.invalid> Gave us:

Here we go again.....Tard Boy claims to be 43....yeah right...and his
vocabulary...yup...the same....retard and dipshit...and his reference to
school friends....well like I said...Tard Boy is in school.....hope the
little bastard learns something!

I am 43. I am an engineer, ya fuckin' 'tard.

Like I said... I have done more in the past week to make the world
a better place for mankind, than your lame, wussy boy ass will ever do
in your ENTIRE lame, pathetic cringing little milksop life.

You totally clueless bastard.
 
On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 05:13:38 GMT, "Ross Mac"
<macroeng@example.invalid> Gave us:

You really have a hard on for top posters....why, I cannot guess....I will
make sure to always reply to your lame ass ON THE TOP.......
Count yourself among the trolls, the retarded... the filtered.

Be... as lame as you can be. Oooops... too late for you.
 
Get your rocks off kid.....hope it feels good!

"DarkMatter" <DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:36c9ov0rt6oukveko3h5f882l7srjvledg@4ax.com...
On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 05:13:38 GMT, "Ross Mac"
macroeng@example.invalid> Gave us:

You really have a hard on for top posters....why, I cannot guess....I
will
make sure to always reply to your lame ass ON THE TOP.......

Count yourself among the trolls, the retarded... the filtered.

Be... as lame as you can be. Oooops... too late for you.
 
You claim to be a 43 year old engineer....Ok....I will give you the benefit
of the doubt...Let's say I have a 28 volt DC motor and want it to control a
mechanism to a tenth of a mil....what type of controller and encoding system
would you use?.....Any close answer will do.....
You won't be able to find the answer to this one on google!......show me the
intelligence!!!.........Your good bud.....Ross
"DarkMatter" <DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:36c9ov0rt6oukveko3h5f882l7srjvledg@4ax.com...
On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 05:13:38 GMT, "Ross Mac"
macroeng@example.invalid> Gave us:

You really have a hard on for top posters....why, I cannot guess....I
will
make sure to always reply to your lame ass ON THE TOP.......

Count yourself among the trolls, the retarded... the filtered.

Be... as lame as you can be. Oooops... too late for you.
 
On Thu, 09 Oct 2003 02:33:11 GMT, "Ross Mac"
<macroeng@example.invalid> Gave us:

You claim to be a 43 year old engineer....Ok....I will give you the benefit
of the doubt...Let's say I have a 28 volt DC motor and want it to control a
mechanism to a tenth of a mil....what type of controller and encoding system
would you use?.....Any close answer will do.....
You won't be able to find the answer to this one on google!......show me the
intelligence!!!.........Your good bud.....Ross

You're a retard.

I manufacture Piezo motors and control systems that operate in the
100 to 1000 micron range. The amplifier that excites them are 1.5kW,
800V
EXTREMELY low distortion amplifiers. The piezo stacks are hundreds of
wafers each, and an LVDT is used to determine position in real time,
as the lathe head it gets used on can cut optical quality surfaces on
the first pass. It can also cut a square peg from a round pin on a
spinning lathe. Use your dim wit to figure that one out.

Your little tenth of a mil baby bullshit is child's play by
comparison. Laser etched optical rules, and magnetic types are
nowhere near the resolve of these machines. They even detect and
remove backlash artifacts from the lathe head, and lathe machinery.

Gotcha! Not that *that* was any chore.

Learn how to refrain from top posting, retard boy. It is as simple
as that.
 
I think your comment on "baby bullshit" explains you quite well. Do you
behave this way at work? And the answer to the question I posed is a
non-answer. It is a description of an entirely different device. I guess you
read spec sheets for a living. Somehow I don't think you would want to
control a 28vdc motor with an 800volt amp. The question I posed to you was
simple. I tried to keep it that way as to not confuse your simple mind. I
didn't think we had to design the space shuttle! Nice try kid. You tout
yourself as an adult professional and all I see here is a childish mind.
And hey, what is this bizarre problem you have with a top post. You have to
have some serious sickness within yourself to continue on this quest.
Perhaps your handle should really be "Don Quixote" since you like to battle
windmills. Why don't you start and moderate your own newsgroup. Should we
call it alt.darkmanure.pinhead.troll ?
Get a life skippy.....Ross

"DarkMatter" <DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:0c8bovo26pc4bkbui0gfg5dpiie0eab70j@4ax.com...
On Thu, 09 Oct 2003 02:33:11 GMT, "Ross Mac"
macroeng@example.invalid> Gave us:

You claim to be a 43 year old engineer....Ok....I will give you the
benefit
of the doubt...Let's say I have a 28 volt DC motor and want it to control
a
mechanism to a tenth of a mil....what type of controller and encoding
system
would you use?.....Any close answer will do.....
You won't be able to find the answer to this one on google!......show me
the
intelligence!!!.........Your good bud.....Ross


You're a retard.

I manufacture Piezo motors and control systems that operate in the
100 to 1000 micron range. The amplifier that excites them are 1.5kW,
800V
EXTREMELY low distortion amplifiers. The piezo stacks are hundreds of
wafers each, and an LVDT is used to determine position in real time,
as the lathe head it gets used on can cut optical quality surfaces on
the first pass. It can also cut a square peg from a round pin on a
spinning lathe. Use your dim wit to figure that one out.

Your little tenth of a mil baby bullshit is child's play by
comparison. Laser etched optical rules, and magnetic types are
nowhere near the resolve of these machines. They even detect and
remove backlash artifacts from the lathe head, and lathe machinery.

Gotcha! Not that *that* was any chore.

Learn how to refrain from top posting, retard boy. It is as simple
as that.
 
"DarkMatter" <DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org>
I manufacture Piezo motors and control systems that operate in the
100 to 1000 micron range. The amplifier that excites them are 1.5kW,
800V
EXTREMELY low distortion amplifiers. The piezo stacks are hundreds of
wafers each, and an LVDT is used to determine position in real time,
as the lathe head it gets used on can cut optical quality surfaces on
the first pass. It can also cut a square peg from a round pin on a
spinning lathe. Use your dim wit to figure that one out.

Your little tenth of a mil baby bullshit is child's play by
comparison. Laser etched optical rules, and magnetic types are
nowhere near the resolve of these machines. They even detect and
remove backlash artifacts from the lathe head, and lathe machinery.

Gotcha! Not that *that* was any chore.

Learn how to refrain from top posting, retard boy. It is as simple
as that.
I think we have a winner.

Now THAT was an interesting post.


Martin
--
M.A.Poyser Tel.: 07967 110890
Manchester, U.K. http://www.fleetie.demon.co.uk
 
Look closely at the reply....he never answers the question he just starts up
his diatribe again!

"Fleetie" <fleetie@fleetie.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:9rjhb.10778$QH3.1980@newsfep4-winn.server.ntli.net...
"DarkMatter" <DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org
I manufacture Piezo motors and control systems that operate in the
100 to 1000 micron range. The amplifier that excites them are 1.5kW,
800V
EXTREMELY low distortion amplifiers. The piezo stacks are hundreds of
wafers each, and an LVDT is used to determine position in real time,
as the lathe head it gets used on can cut optical quality surfaces on
the first pass. It can also cut a square peg from a round pin on a
spinning lathe. Use your dim wit to figure that one out.

Your little tenth of a mil baby bullshit is child's play by
comparison. Laser etched optical rules, and magnetic types are
nowhere near the resolve of these machines. They even detect and
remove backlash artifacts from the lathe head, and lathe machinery.

Gotcha! Not that *that* was any chore.

Learn how to refrain from top posting, retard boy. It is as simple
as that.

I think we have a winner.

Now THAT was an interesting post.


Martin
--
M.A.Poyser Tel.: 07967
110890
Manchester, U.K.
http://www.fleetie.demon.co.uk
 
On Thu, 09 Oct 2003 20:47:36 GMT, "Ross Mac"
<macroeng@example.invalid> Gave us:

Look closely at the reply....he never answers the question he just starts up
his diatribe again!

I didn't answer your question. I did, however, put your piddly
little control technology to shame, and the goal you were after was to
query my electronic abilities. It appears that it is YOU that
attempts to circumnavigate the facts at every turn. That is true from
usenet posting protocol perspectives, all the way through the fact
that I did give an answer that should have cleared up your pussy wussy
doubts.

Face it, old man... you cannot stand the fact that you post like a
little mosh pit punk on usenet.

Got clue?
 
What made you think I was old....retired does not = old. It means I already
made my bucks and am enjoying a great lifestyle.......You are, however, are
in the rat race.....with all your genious!.If you are such a genious why do
you have to work?..A lot of rhetoric here but no answer to the
question.....if you are so smart...answer it......I know..you never
will...you will just keep posting your usual "retard" and "dipshit" remarks
.....enjoy it ....I am sure it gives you great satisfaction!
"DarkMatter" <DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:nu0covgvj2oat2vlgfe830ttdh56tu50mm@4ax.com...
On Thu, 09 Oct 2003 20:47:36 GMT, "Ross Mac"
macroeng@example.invalid> Gave us:

Look closely at the reply....he never answers the question he just starts
up
his diatribe again!


I didn't answer your question. I did, however, put your piddly
little control technology to shame, and the goal you were after was to
query my electronic abilities. It appears that it is YOU that
attempts to circumnavigate the facts at every turn. That is true from
usenet posting protocol perspectives, all the way through the fact
that I did give an answer that should have cleared up your pussy wussy
doubts.

Face it, old man... you cannot stand the fact that you post like a
little mosh pit punk on usenet.

Got clue?
 
How bout an answer genious!....It will never happen....
Call your teacher...maybe he can answer the question....the more days it
goes the more it appears you do not know your craft...

"DarkMatter" <DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:nu0covgvj2oat2vlgfe830ttdh56tu50mm@4ax.com...
On Thu, 09 Oct 2003 20:47:36 GMT, "Ross Mac"
macroeng@example.invalid> Gave us:

Look closely at the reply....he never answers the question he just starts
up
his diatribe again!


I didn't answer your question. I did, however, put your piddly
little control technology to shame, and the goal you were after was to
query my electronic abilities. It appears that it is YOU that
attempts to circumnavigate the facts at every turn. That is true from
usenet posting protocol perspectives, all the way through the fact
that I did give an answer that should have cleared up your pussy wussy
doubts.

Face it, old man... you cannot stand the fact that you post like a
little mosh pit punk on usenet.

Got clue?
 
Exactly...you did not answer the question!.....You could not...the best you
could do was to post another technology.....you called it simple...but you
never answered......
"DarkMatter" <DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:nu0covgvj2oat2vlgfe830ttdh56tu50mm@4ax.com...
On Thu, 09 Oct 2003 20:47:36 GMT, "Ross Mac"
macroeng@example.invalid> Gave us:

Look closely at the reply....he never answers the question he just starts
up
his diatribe again!


I didn't answer your question. I did, however, put your piddly
little control technology to shame, and the goal you were after was to
query my electronic abilities. It appears that it is YOU that
attempts to circumnavigate the facts at every turn. That is true from
usenet posting protocol perspectives, all the way through the fact
that I did give an answer that should have cleared up your pussy wussy
doubts.

Face it, old man... you cannot stand the fact that you post like a
little mosh pit punk on usenet.

Got clue?
 
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 01:45:36 GMT, "Ross Mac"
<macroeng@example.invalid> Gave us:

You are, however, are
in the rat race.....with all your genious!

Learn to spell, retard boy. It's genius, dumbass!
 
That's it huh?....one of your two words......retard and dipshit....
Well the answer to the simple question I posed is this:
If you really want to control a 28vdc motor you would use a 65 volt PWM amp
with a choke to dump off the excess voltage and any linear scale or rotary
encoder would do for positioning....Servo lock is obtained by balancing out
the duty cycle on the plus and minus sides of the signal..not a tough
question at all......but after all, you said you were a PE....that is 70's
technology! Tens of thousands of CNC machines are in the field with this
technology. Do you want to send me another brochure?.....That's all your
previous post was...and hey..thanks for the spelling correction....my degree
was Technical....as yours seems to not be!

"DarkMatter" <DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:tdgcovkmccq2u8sl1vu99dglp4o0n4eisd@4ax.com...
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 01:45:36 GMT, "Ross Mac"
macroeng@example.invalid> Gave us:

You are, however, are
in the rat race.....with all your genious!


Learn to spell, retard boy. It's genius, dumbass!
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top