Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What has this ng got to do with curry? Please stay on-topic.Randy Yates wrote:
Roy McCammon <rbmccammon@mmm.com> writes:
Randy Yates wrote:
Hear, hear. Too much information, too little knowledge.
There, there, don't let it get you down.
Are you an author?
I published one article in an IEEE publication
about 20 years ago and an article about guard
rings in a trade mag about 5 years ago.
He asked me if I was an author."Roy McCammon" <rmccammon@austin.rr.com> wrote in message
news:4093F7CA.2070507@austin.rr.com...
Randy Yates wrote:
Roy McCammon <rbmccammon@mmm.com> writes:
Randy Yates wrote:
Hear, hear. Too much information, too little knowledge.
There, there, don't let it get you down.
Are you an author?
I published one article in an IEEE publication
about 20 years ago and an article about guard
rings in a trade mag about 5 years ago.
What has this ng got to do with curry? Please stay on-topic.
Not to mention the balancing onshoring (??), work done by US companiesSome outsourcing is to foreign locations, and in that case it was called
"off-shoring" to distinguish it from ordinary domestic outsourcing.
But recently, at least in the popular media, the distinction between
"outsourcing" and "offshoring" seems to have been lost.
This is unfortunate, since several economists have noted that the total
amount of offshoring (at least, currently, from the U.S.) is actually
only a small part of the total outsourcing going on.
Agreed. But watch the retaliation for "protections", either realRob Warnock wrote:
(snip)
Some outsourcing is to foreign locations, and in that case it was called
"off-shoring" to distinguish it from ordinary domestic outsourcing.
But recently, at least in the popular media, the distinction between
"outsourcing" and "offshoring" seems to have been lost.
This is unfortunate, since several economists have noted that the total
amount of offshoring (at least, currently, from the U.S.) is actually
only a small part of the total outsourcing going on.
Not to mention the balancing onshoring (??), work done by US companies
for foreign companies. Look to see where Japanese cars are built
these days, for one.
I do believe, though, that the tax laws shouldn't encourage
offshoring, which it might be that they currently do.
Oh damn -----------^ aIn article <RTwlc.22300$Ik.1617944@attbi_s53>,
gah@ugcs.caltech.edu says...
Rob Warnock wrote:
(snip)
Some outsourcing is to foreign locations, and in that case it was called
"off-shoring" to distinguish it from ordinary domestic outsourcing.
But recently, at least in the popular media, the distinction between
"outsourcing" and "offshoring" seems to have been lost.
This is unfortunate, since several economists have noted that the total
amount of offshoring (at least, currently, from the U.S.) is actually
only a small part of the total outsourcing going on.
Not to mention the balancing onshoring (??), work done by US companies
for foreign companies. Look to see where Japanese cars are built
these days, for one.
I do believe, though, that the tax laws shouldn't encourage
offshoring, which it might be that they currently do.
Agreed. But watch the retaliation for "protections", either real
or imagined. Government has shown that it is *really* bad at
assessing the "law of unintended consequences". Capitolism does
far better at allocating resources.
Further, I predict some spectacular disasters from poorly
thought-out off-shoring. The companies that can afford to open
first-class outfits abroad will do well (nothing new to them),
maybe. Those looking for cheap bodies will get exactly what
they've contracted for.
I've seen more than one dumb idea come and go. This is no
exception. You won't see the disasters on the 6:00 news but
they'll be there.