Jihad needs scientists

[T Wake]

<jmfbahciv@aol.com> wrote in message
news:eg7tss$8qk_007@s968.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com...

In article <P6-dnSajh_Dt4LvYnZ2dnUVZ8qudnZ2d@pipex.net>,
"T Wake" <usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> wrote:

jmfbahciv@aol.com> wrote in message
news:eg5el9$8qk_011@s831.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com...
In article <452634AB.3341D603@hotmail.com>,
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:


jmfbahciv@aol.com wrote:

"T Wake" <usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> wrote:

That said, you are nitpicking in the same manner. More than ten times
as
many people die every year as died as a result of the 11 Sep 01
attack.
That
is TEN attacks of that scale (and that was a large scale attack by
anyone's
standards) every single year. Year in, year out and accepted as a
normal
risk in life.

Amazing really.

So much for mess prevention. So how many people does Bin Laden
have to kill before you deal with this problem? 300,000?
3,000,000? 300,000,000? A billion?

What makes you think any of the above are even remotely possible ?

Because I can think of one that will kill a billion in less
than 1/2 year. If I can think it, they certainly can. They
were brought in a culture that admires killing; I wasn't.

I can think about space aliens invading and making everyone die their hair
red. Doesn't mean it is going to happen.

You can deal with things you _think_ will happen or deal with things which
are happening.

I know which makes more sense to me.

I understand what makes more sense to you. I was brought up to
take action if I can see that a big mess is about to be made
if nothing is done.

I still think this is a difference between males and females.

You have become fixated with this "mess prevention" and, at best, it is a
very poor analogy. In reality, the efforts being taken to prevent the "big
mess" are causing a bigger mess. It is a bit like throwing a hand grenade
into your living room to stop the carpet getting dirty.

Bringing in some irrelevant comment about gender difference does nothing to
support your argument. You have no idea as to the real gender of the people
you are conversing with.

 

[T Wake]

<jmfbahciv@aol.com> wrote in message
news:eg7u2a$8qk_008@s968.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com...

In article <eg5tpm$70s$13@leto.cc.emory.edu>,
lparker@emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote:
In article <eg57l7$8ss_011@s831.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>,
jmfbahciv@aol.com wrote:
In article <P4Kdnb9ApIGR47jYRVnyrw@pipex.net>,
"T Wake" <usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> wrote:

"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in
message
news:qkrai2hvpp43t4lpu1ttca9tpq8ueb94qr@4ax.com...
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:03:17 GMT, <lucasea@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

Which one would that be, the dangers of driving on the nation's
highways?
That's at least 3 orders of magnitude greater of a real threat to
every
person in the country than is terrorism.

3000 people died at the WTC. Three orders of magnitude from that is 3
million. We kill about 40K people a year in car accidents.


3000 people (not all of whom were US citizens) have been killed by
Islamic
terrorist attacks on the Mainland US in (shall we say 80 years). How
many
have died in car accidents in that time?

That said, you are nitpicking in the same manner. More than ten times as
many people die every year as died as a result of the 11 Sep 01 attack.
That
is TEN attacks of that scale (and that was a large scale attack by
anyone's
standards) every single year. Year in, year out and accepted as a normal
risk in life.

Amazing really.

So much for mess prevention. So how many people does Bin Laden
have to kill before you deal with this problem? 300,000?
3,000,000? 300,000,000? A billion?


So why aren't we devoting all our resources to getting him?

Because this intent to destroy all traces of Western civilization
is not isolated to one human being.

No, the intent is not isolated to _one_ human being. It is not just Asians,
Muslims, Men or any other sub group of humanity you wish to stereotype which
harbours people intent on destroying that which you hold dear. How will you
decide where to draw the line?

 

[T Wake]

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:g18fi2top03iiecdujaqer6n5bv7af6pss@4ax.com...

On Sat, 07 Oct 2006 04:42:41 GMT, <lucasea@sbcglobal.net> Gave us:


"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
newsotdi29rl7eu6355m807o0m51aombh1ppg@4ax.com...
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 17:01:41 +0100, "T Wake"
usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:


"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:7fcbi2t7o8chj90omrt9n69qg4jqjiejq8@4ax.com...
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:16:44 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
nobody@nowhere.com> Gave us:


"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:ros9i2tlko096r3d7cr9usjfl8f0kg25oe@4ax.com...

Going from discussion to trying to find personal identification?
Pretty
much
the definition.

This is Usenet, dumbass. "Finger" and many other trace utilities
have been around for decades as well as the right to utilize them.

If you were any more clueless, you'd be the definition of
something... RETARDEDNESS.

Many people write letters to the editor of the local paper. Few try to
go
to
the address of the writers. Those few are stalkers.


You're an idiot. People don't stalk idiots. You prove that one
*can* be wrong *all* the time.

Doing a lookup on *your* IP address is NOT stalking, dipshit.

Do you type one handed?

I, in fact, used to develop database apps for OLTP handling, and I
could stand over the shoulder of one of my data entry girls and type
with either hand to show them how to use the screen entry form(s).

How *did* you get so talented???


So, yes, I can type one handed quite well. The brain knows where
all the keys are.

Do you have a point, dipshit?

"Typing one-handed" usually implies you have another of your body parts in
your other hand. But then that's an insult that's far too subtle for you
to
get.


Don't be so sure that I didn't get what he meant, dumbfuck.

Oh... that's right. You are so fucking stupid that you actually
think you know what someone is about based on a post in Usenet.

Let's just say that you give away far more than I ever have or ever
will.

Oh wow. With each post your mental age seems to diminish. Do you have a
response fundamentally different than I Know What You Are But What Am I?

 

[T Wake]

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:574fi2hilri6ib7i7r5pkm3fuokhvbaap4@4ax.com...

On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 10:03:20 +0100, "T Wake"
usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:


"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:g6udi2h3s876tsd4igje6qo10872ndlq2t@4ax.com...
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 18:09:56 +0100, "T Wake"
usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:

You would never know if you had 15 seconds as I very, very much doubt
you
can count that high.

I can juggle 15 imaginary numbers around, while you piddle fart

I can juggle imaginary elephants. Beat that.

around with counting the digits of one hand.

Wow. Good comeback.

Try again, asswipe.

Ok, what other imaginary things shall we pretend we can juggle?


I knew that you wouldn't get it, dumbfuck. Oooops! One of your
elephants just fell on you. Shame it was unable to crush that geode
skull of yours.

It is ok, it was an imaginary elephant. In the real world, imaginary things
cant hurt you. As an aside, I know what imaginary numbers *are* and I also
know there is no way *you* are juggling them.

You are possibly one of the more idiotic people who posts on USENET. I am
surprised you aren't a regular on sci.physics along with all the other
semi-literate cranks. Do you have some theories of your own on the mass of a
photon or two-way light speed or any of the other crankbait topics?

Actually, I probably know the answer to that. You don't have any ideas of
your own.

 

[T Wake]

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:nf4fi251mtt9t5luo92tva6a7ftb222rkt@4ax.com...

On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 16:07:04 GMT, <lucasea@sbcglobal.net> Gave us:

You are a living stereotype.


You are a living retard. There should be a law.

There should be a law against you posting idiocy on USENET. There should be
a law against people who cant structure a sentence properly. Either would
get you locked up.

 

[T Wake]

<lucasea@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:6JQVg.14045$7I1.5221@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:jt4fi2hpqhls5ujcahaasrq2jvcle25rhe@4ax.com...
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 21:59:40 GMT, <lucasea@sbcglobal.net> Gave us:

Yep. And isn't it also ironic that the ouster of those very commies has
been one of the destabilizing forces in the world that may well have
furthered the current mess?


You're an idiot.

Ya gotta love his nuanced and repetitive view of the world, ladies and
gentlemen.

He has made a lot of posts, he must be getting to the limit of words he can
use. This explains the repeating cycles.

 

[T Wake]

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:jv4fi2dv8pn3rk9ii4b82fh6g89ikgcao2@4ax.com...

On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 10:05:23 +0100, "T Wake"
usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:


"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:sludi21v218aau83uue1nhpk001333skb4@4ax.com...
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 19:26:17 +0100, "T Wake"
usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:

Sadly, you are a...

Sadly, you are still no more than an idiot.

IKYABWAI.

Even being an idiot I am orders of magnitude above you.

Only on the idiot ranking board.

Yeah, you aren't even very good as an idiot.

 

[T Wake]

<lucasea@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:GpOVg.9781$GR.2722@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...

"T Wake" <usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> wrote in message
news:sPGdnWhqqOyW7LrYRVnyrw@pipex.net...

lucasea@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:xfGVg.11941$6S3.9608@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...

"Ken Smith" <kensmith@green.rahul.net> wrote in message
news:eg72np$a4m$5@blue.rahul.net...
In article <4525651A.5E36C356@hotmail.com>,
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:


lucasea@sbcglobal.net wrote:

So how many prisons will we need to build, and what fraction of the
GDP will
go into staffing/supporting/maintaining them, in order to imprison
100
million people?

That would most likely sap the entire GDP of the USA.

No, not since it doesn't have to happen. I only spoke of the fear of
life
in prison being a deterent. If a crime is detered, it doesn't happen
and
the jail isn't needed.


We've killed 200,000 Iraqis, and it hasn't deterred a damn thing. We're
going to have to imprison a helluva lot more than that, if we want to
convince anybody to do anything we want. So, now please go back and
answer the question.

Doesn't that imply killing them is not a deterrent?

No, it actually comes out and says it.

Fair one

The problem is we are killing Iraqis and the terrorist are Syrians. If
the Jihadists thought they would be jailed for life and have to suffer
eighty years before they were martyred it would take a fair bit of steam
out of their sails. (IMHO of course)

I'm not any sort of expert on either terrorists or any of the ethnicities
in the Middle East, but I doubt that would make much of a difference. I
think the terrorist leadership is good at convincing their minions that
none of that matters. We'd have to imprison a hell of a lot of them in
order for it to sink in that they might have a reasonable chance of being
put in jail. In order for imprisonment to be any sort of deterrent, a
significant fraction of criminals must actually be imprisoned, in order
for the criminals to think they have any chance of being punished.
Something like half of murderers have to be put in jail...and yet murder
still happens. And I would argue that terrorists have a much stronger
impetus to commit terrorism, than other more run-of-the-mill murderers
have to commit murder.

I seem to remember reading a Dutch study several years ago saying the main
deterrent for criminals was the chance of arrest, not the severity of
punishment (I tried to find it on Google now and couldn't so I may have made
it up or got something crucially wrong).

While, broadly, I agree with what you are saying there is an issue of
*something* has to be done. While the good stuff of changing the environment
the bombers come from etc., is going on the current crop of murderous c**ts
has to be dealt with. They can be treated as enemy soldiers and killed (what
is not working now), or they can be treated as criminal scum and punished.

 

[T Wake]

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
newsg5fi2d1ds6gigkd2n99bu8jd2868nt0j3@4ax.com...

On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 10:18:24 +0100, "T Wake"
usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:


lucasea@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:XeGVg.11929$6S3.5416@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:aasdi21rrd3aj4cj4va9rh5vtdn25lgb9n@4ax.com...

Yes, as good as Iraq had WMD.

They did, you ditzo.

Uhh...no...not since 1991. You really do need to get yourself educated,
and not just listen to Bush soundbites.

Sadly, you've asked for something impossible. It would be easier to invent
a
perpetual motion device than get JoeBloe and education.

You cannot even construct a sentence properly, and you declare that
not only do I need an education, but that I would not be able to
garner anything from it.

How rich.

Yes, shame I put an extra "d" in there. Oh well. I will hang my head in
shame for a few minutes.

The only positive thing I can take from this, is comfort in the knowledge
that even when I make mistakes, you are still retarded.

 

[T Wake]

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
newsb5fi2p4ovsp6rp448m92mjtoh38isluq2@4ax.com...

On Sat, 07 Oct 2006 04:42:31 GMT, <lucasea@sbcglobal.net> Gave us:


"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:aasdi21rrd3aj4cj4va9rh5vtdn25lgb9n@4ax.com...

Yes, as good as Iraq had WMD.

They did, you ditzo.

Uhh...no...not since 1991. You really do need to get yourself educated,
and
not just listen to Bush soundbites.


Since '91, you dumbfuck, he was spending ALL of his time starving
the masses and feeding ONLY his military arm

Really? Normally people cant go 12 years without food. Did the Iraqi people
discover something new?

In reality, Iraq was very progressive by Islamic nation standards and the
state of affairs you describe here exists only in fevered fantasy lands.

while having them build
"palaces" that he would not allow UN inspectors into. "Palaces" in
which he continued his chemical and biological arms programs in.

Still, it is amazing how well he managed to get rid of the evidence come the
invasion. If only he had used that skill for the UN inspectors the war would
never have happened.

You could be a bit more retarded, but not in this life.

As if you have _any_ frame of reference with which you can make that
statement.

 

[T Wake]

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:sj5fi2htp69cul1put6332d9mbiuqil3qc@4ax.com...

On Sat, 07 Oct 2006 04:42:58 GMT, <lucasea@sbcglobal.net> Gave us:


"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:h1vdi2t5quk2uvbtcogbq0nburnajq4356@4ax.com...
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 20:09:43 +0100, "T Wake"
usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:


"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
newsabbi21hj1om31j3avpn3mm32vdur9mo0n@4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 13:22:17 -0400, Keith <krw@att.bizzzz> Gave us:

You're in a fantasy land. ONE SENTENCE of the NIE report was
leaked by the Democrats to try to discredit Bush. The four pages
around that one sentence, later released, say exactly the opposite.
Please get your "news" from someone other than Franken.

Good one.

Sycophant.

Agreeing with someone does NOT make me a sycophant, you Usenet total
retard.

Sycophant.

ERic Lucas, the Usenet retard from Battelle

I bet they'd rid themselves of your retarded ass after seeing the
CRAP you post on Usenet.

Oh look. It really is groundhog day.

 

[T Wake]

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:jm5fi25qgjsb3ocj4inrcvbd6vdnjkmloj@4ax.com...

On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 10:19:05 +0100, "T Wake"
usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:


"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:h1vdi2t5quk2uvbtcogbq0nburnajq4356@4ax.com...
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 20:09:43 +0100, "T Wake"
usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:


"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
newsabbi21hj1om31j3avpn3mm32vdur9mo0n@4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 13:22:17 -0400, Keith <krw@att.bizzzz> Gave us:

You're in a fantasy land. ONE SENTENCE of the NIE report was
leaked by the Democrats to try to discredit Bush. The four pages
around that one sentence, later released, say exactly the opposite.
Please get your "news" from someone other than Franken.

Good one.

Sycophant.

Agreeing with someone does NOT make me a sycophant, you Usenet total
retard.

No, it doesn't. There are lots of people here I agree with. Because you
cant
see the different, it makes you an idiotic sycophant.

You declaring that I can't see or know something has all the
markings of the oldest type of troll in Usenet.

Yet you cant see the difference. If you could your response would be
different.

They were wrong then, and you are wrong now, troll boy.

IKWYABWAI

 

[T Wake]

<jmfbahciv@aol.com> wrote in message
news:eg820j$8qk_003@s968.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com...

In article <p6adnUf13uDVN7vYRVnyrg@pipex.net>,
"T Wake" <usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> wrote:

jmfbahciv@aol.com> wrote in message
news:eg57vi$8ss_013@s831.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com...
In article <45253CB2.A36CCD05@hotmail.com>,
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:


jmfbahciv@aol.com wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:

You can't accept that Islam isn't a threat to your lifestyle ?

Not only is it a threat, but it has already begun to
alter my lifestyle. My goal is to ensure that it
alter 100% of my lifestyle, if I'm allowed to exist.

Tell me more about this threat you perceive.

What exactly is it that you're afraid of ?

Loss of enough knowledge of how to do things that it will
take another 1000 years to reinvent the wheel.

Then we need to have a War on Faith Schools in the west. We can add a War
against the Arts and Humanities departments as well.

Your facetious answer so you can ignore the issue is noted.

There is no issue to ignore and I was being serious. You have created a
phantom fear (or mess to use your quaint terminology) which you want to
defend against.

The west is already throwing away knowledge. Look at the debates over
teaching creationism in schools - the court rulings tried to overturn
accepted definitions of science to enable it. That is scary madness. We have
the same problem in the UK so don't think I am being anti-American here. In
the UK science departments are closing all over, just so more students can
study arts and humanities.

The Islamic extremists don't have to attack us, we do it to ourselves. Stop
being frightened of the invisible monster under the bed and fight the real
problems.

 

[T Wake]

<jmfbahciv@aol.com> wrote in message
news:eg806n$8qk_001@s968.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com...

If Bush had given his January, 2006 speech before going into Iraq,
would you have understood his reasoning? I don't think so because
you don't seem to comprehend it today.

If he had waited until 2006 it would have made more sense. It is nice
though, that a world leader gets nearly three years after the act to justify
himself.

 

[T Wake]

<jmfbahciv@aol.com> wrote in message
news:eg82da$8qk_005@s968.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com...

In article <udydnWLuFcYHN7vYRVnytQ@pipex.net>,
"T Wake" <usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> wrote:

Sorry, aren't you the person who advocated spending billions to get Usma
Bin
Laden because he _may_ kill more people as opposed to spending billions
solving the problems which _are_ killing people?

If the mindset of the religious extremists are not changed and
they become successful in destroying Western civilization, the
problems that _are_ killing people today will no longer exist.
I believe you mentioned those killed in automobile accidents.
Those accidents won't happen because there won't be any autos
on the roads.

This is heading far out into the leftfield of logic. It is true there are
Islamic extremists who would like to create a Taliban like state out of the
western hemisphere. In a similar vein, there are Christian extremists who
would like to see an overturn of western decadence.

Only one Islamic nation was as even slightly as extreme as you describe -
the Taliban in Afghanistan. The worst the current crop of exported
terrorists look for is the imposition of Sharia law (ala Iran).

Can you remind me which Islamic nations don't have cars?

Your posts advocate through implication the killing of those you deem a
potential threat to the US. This is one of the most circular lines of
reasoning imaginable.

Critically, the threat of Islamic extremists destroying Western civilisation
is farcical. How could they do it?

 

[T Wake]

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:926fi2t3afahiclgk82ntu0lodlr7pqu20@4ax.com...

On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 22:25:15 +0100, "T Wake"
usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:


lucasea@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:sxVUg.13307$7I1.4380@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...

"T Wake" <usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> wrote in message
news:wo6dnaYdAMyDh7nYRVny3w@pipex.net...

jmfbahciv@aol.com> wrote in message
news:efvu0c$8ss_002@s811.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com...

Well, I'd like to have a few less crapolas posts so I can find
the ones were posted by thoughtful people.

Reasonable enough wish, although it carries the risk that you only read
posts which say things you already agree with.... Always seems kind of
pointless to me.

Seems that's what most people in this discussion want...and if you don't
give it to them, they'll swear at you, insult you, and even threaten
physical violence and assault. I have learned a lot from the few
*reasonable* posters in this thread, both those I agree with *and* those
I
don't...and there are even a few people in the discussion with whom I
disagree but they still showed respect for my opinion. It's too bad
that
everyone else is so insecure in themselves and their views that the
slightest difference of opinion brings obscenity, insults and threats of
violence instead of healthy discussion.


Sadly it is what passes for normal debate on USENET most of the time
though


Said the retard that claims to be so smart, yet makes posts where he
claims that someone's uncle was molesting them.

"Daily treats" he called them.

Yep. You're right up there at the top of the heap, T Weak.

Yeah, sorry. I just assumed your uncle was giving you daily treats. Do you
have a different term for it?

 

[T Wake]

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:h06fi2h5leoluq39o9cmq8k7jf23eqiug8@4ax.com...

On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 21:17:12 GMT, <lucasea@sbcglobal.net> Gave us:


"T Wake" <usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> wrote in message
news:wo6dnaYdAMyDh7nYRVny3w@pipex.net...

jmfbahciv@aol.com> wrote in message
news:efvu0c$8ss_002@s811.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com...

Well, I'd like to have a few less crapolas posts so I can find
the ones were posted by thoughtful people.

Reasonable enough wish, although it carries the risk that you only read
posts which say things you already agree with.... Always seems kind of
pointless to me.

Seems that's what most people in this discussion want...and if you don't
give it to them, they'll swear at you, insult you, and even threaten
physical violence and assault. I have learned a lot from the few
*reasonable* posters in this thread, both those I agree with *and* those I
don't...and there are even a few people in the discussion with whom I
disagree but they still showed respect for my opinion. It's too bad that
everyone else is so insecure in themselves and their views that the
slightest difference of opinion brings obscenity, insults and threats of
violence instead of healthy discussion.


There have been no threats made in this thread, dumbfuck.

Yes there have, both implied and actual. You have assumed all threats
involve physical violence.

As always, each post you make breaks another irony meter and highlights
_just_ how thick you are.

Keep up the good work, sir.

 

[T Wake]

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:376fi21gpl8932m4hcib1aj8vbu3m8u75g@4ax.com...

On Sat, 07 Oct 2006 04:43:03 GMT, <lucasea@sbcglobal.net> Gave us:

Great, you're old to go along with being a stupid, redneck Joe-sixpack
sycophant. Whoop-de-doo.


I wonder if some well placed emails to battelle about a certain E.
Lucas might cause more than a little sweat on your brow.

Implied threat. (re: msgid: h06fi2h5leoluq39o9cmq8k7jf23eqiug8@4ax.com)

Your best bet would be to simply disappear from Usenet.

Implied threat. (re: msgid: h06fi2h5leoluq39o9cmq8k7jf23eqiug8@4ax.com)

It gets frowned on seriously. Particularly by government
contractors monitored by the NSA.

Implication being that he has no freedom of speech. You are subversive
element and should be arrested forthwith.

 

[T Wake]

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:4b6fi2ts3kabetgp7c3sopigg48eu7nke6@4ax.com...

On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 10:22:31 +0100, "T Wake"
usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:


"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:f7vdi2pcfgnpdem7c3d1auv1jujf9dmald@4ax.com...
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 20:21:48 +0100, "T Wake"
usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:


"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:vgdci29a8p13kfhhs2i6rnm9b36duq7r72@4ax.com...
On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 03:06:03 GMT, <lucasea@sbcglobal.net> Gave us:


"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:regbi2dpkrf103e4opion58ooto1lmft2c@4ax.com...

It is you, fuckhead, that is incredulous.

Yes, I suspect it is he who is incredulous at your idiocy. I think
the
word
you wanted is "incredible", as in "not credible".


No. It was said just fine.

Nothing you say carries any credence either.

Ooh, such a big word. Did you have to look it up? Bet you had a little
lie
down afterwards, didn't you?

I'd bet that I used the word many more years ago than you ever did,
and in these groups too.

Well, maybe in SED but I bet you didn't in sci.physics. Also, I bet I used
it before you did, more importantly I bet I used it in its proper context
before you first did.

You'd lose. I used it before Usenet. Back in the seventies.

Yeah, but you still didn't know what it meant. In the seventies I was busy
fighting terrorists so may not have used it in print, but I certainly did
know what it meant and how to use it.

So, actually, you'd lose as there is a fair chance I used it in school in
the 1960's.

If anything, all you did was abuse it... like you do Usenet.

Hahahaha. Nice one. You are a funny guy. It must be a bit of a shame knowing
you will never grow up though.

 

[T Wake]

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:kd6fi2heq1oq7ks06tf52n9btgbktar43l@4ax.com...

On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 10:23:30 +0100, "T Wake"
usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:


"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:l5vdi2lvneofr8ug993t476pbqc2c89jo9@4ax.com...
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 20:20:54 +0100, "T Wake"
usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:

What happened on the 9th of November?


You're an idiot.

Is 9th November "you're an idiot day?"

Wow. You must really love it. Do people buy you presents as well?

You're a total retard.

Oh boy, you are a real card aren't you. What do you do for an encore? Eat
your own vomit?