Jihad needs scientists

On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:18:20 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> Gave us:

JoeBloe wrote:

On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 17:37:00 +0100, Eeyore
rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> Gave us:

At this level he's really a closet Islamist.

You're a goddamned idiot.

You've given it away now ! LOL. I thought as much.

What was your last nym ?
The punctuation has NO space, idiot!
 
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 21:17:12 GMT, <lucasea@sbcglobal.net> Gave us:

"T Wake" <usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> wrote in message
news:wo6dnaYdAMyDh7nYRVny3w@pipex.net...

jmfbahciv@aol.com> wrote in message
news:efvu0c$8ss_002@s811.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com...

Well, I'd like to have a few less crapolas posts so I can find
the ones were posted by thoughtful people.

Reasonable enough wish, although it carries the risk that you only read
posts which say things you already agree with.... Always seems kind of
pointless to me.

Seems that's what most people in this discussion want...and if you don't
give it to them, they'll swear at you, insult you, and even threaten
physical violence and assault. I have learned a lot from the few
*reasonable* posters in this thread, both those I agree with *and* those I
don't...and there are even a few people in the discussion with whom I
disagree but they still showed respect for my opinion. It's too bad that
everyone else is so insecure in themselves and their views that the
slightest difference of opinion brings obscenity, insults and threats of
violence instead of healthy discussion.
There have been no threats made in this thread, dumbfuck.
 
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 22:25:15 +0100, "T Wake"
<usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:

lucasea@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:sxVUg.13307$7I1.4380@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...

"T Wake" <usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> wrote in message
news:wo6dnaYdAMyDh7nYRVny3w@pipex.net...

jmfbahciv@aol.com> wrote in message
news:efvu0c$8ss_002@s811.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com...

Well, I'd like to have a few less crapolas posts so I can find
the ones were posted by thoughtful people.

Reasonable enough wish, although it carries the risk that you only read
posts which say things you already agree with.... Always seems kind of
pointless to me.

Seems that's what most people in this discussion want...and if you don't
give it to them, they'll swear at you, insult you, and even threaten
physical violence and assault. I have learned a lot from the few
*reasonable* posters in this thread, both those I agree with *and* those I
don't...and there are even a few people in the discussion with whom I
disagree but they still showed respect for my opinion. It's too bad that
everyone else is so insecure in themselves and their views that the
slightest difference of opinion brings obscenity, insults and threats of
violence instead of healthy discussion.


Sadly it is what passes for normal debate on USENET most of the time though
:)

Said the retard that claims to be so smart, yet makes posts where he
claims that someone's uncle was molesting them.

"Daily treats" he called them.

Yep. You're right up there at the top of the heap, T Weak.
 
On Sat, 07 Oct 2006 04:43:03 GMT, <lucasea@sbcglobal.net> Gave us:

Great, you're old to go along with being a stupid, redneck Joe-sixpack
sycophant. Whoop-de-doo.

I wonder if some well placed emails to battelle about a certain E.
Lucas might cause more than a little sweat on your brow.

Your best bet would be to simply disappear from Usenet.

It gets frowned on seriously. Particularly by government
contractors monitored by the NSA.
 
On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 10:22:31 +0100, "T Wake"
<usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:f7vdi2pcfgnpdem7c3d1auv1jujf9dmald@4ax.com...
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 20:21:48 +0100, "T Wake"
usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:


"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:vgdci29a8p13kfhhs2i6rnm9b36duq7r72@4ax.com...
On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 03:06:03 GMT, <lucasea@sbcglobal.net> Gave us:


"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:regbi2dpkrf103e4opion58ooto1lmft2c@4ax.com...

It is you, fuckhead, that is incredulous.

Yes, I suspect it is he who is incredulous at your idiocy. I think the
word
you wanted is "incredible", as in "not credible".


No. It was said just fine.

Nothing you say carries any credence either.

Ooh, such a big word. Did you have to look it up? Bet you had a little lie
down afterwards, didn't you?

I'd bet that I used the word many more years ago than you ever did,
and in these groups too.

Well, maybe in SED but I bet you didn't in sci.physics. Also, I bet I used
it before you did, more importantly I bet I used it in its proper context
before you first did.

You'd lose. I used it before Usenet. Back in the seventies.

If anything, all you did was abuse it... like you do Usenet.
 
On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 10:23:30 +0100, "T Wake"
<usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:l5vdi2lvneofr8ug993t476pbqc2c89jo9@4ax.com...
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 20:20:54 +0100, "T Wake"
usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:

What happened on the 9th of November?


You're an idiot.

Is 9th November "you're an idiot day?"

Wow. You must really love it. Do people buy you presents as well?

You're a total retard.
 
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 10:47:21 +0200, "Frithiof Andreas Jensen"
<frithiof.jensen@die_spammer_die.ericsson.com> Gave us:

Oh "we" Got It - Problem it that the people that make decisions for "us" all
have their own agenda; which does not involve more freedom and a better life for
"us". It does for "them", though.

You're an idiot. Your header info proves it. What? Did Ericsson
charge you too much for service such that you have to declare death
on them? You are about as retarded as it gets, little boy.
 
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 13:28:37 +0200, "Frithiof Andreas Jensen"
<frithiof.jensen@die_spammer_die.ericsson.com> Gave us:

"Homer J Simpson" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:7_UTg.6718$N4.2442@clgrps12...

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:enivh2llnec7iri7t0nd80qesmg32ca01o@4ax.com...

You idiots are representative of NOTHING except killing of civilians
in the most cowardly way there is. You don't even have the spine to
confront your enemies like real men.

"... confront your enemies like real men"

Bombing them with cruise missiles you mean????

Why not - a garage cruise missile would be a decent enough project. Make MAD
more democratic ;-)

You're both idiots.
 
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:42:13 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> Gave us:

JoeBloe wrote:

On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 04:53:35 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
nobody@nowhere.com> Gave us:

Facts you are unaware of?

Other national: "I feel bad so I'll talk to my friends"

American: "I feel bad so I'll murder some innocent people"

You're an idiot. Euro nations were slaughtering thousands long
before we ever did.

Most Americans are Europeans.

You're an idiot.
 
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 23:05:42 +0100, "T Wake"
<usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:

"Jim Thompson" <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@My-Web-Site.com> wrote in
message news:peb8i2lf4af0irq171tqukscc9n0lec541@4ax.com...
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 21:51:21 GMT, Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com
wrote:

In article <HLVUg.13315$7I1.5654@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>,
lucasea@sbcglobal.net> wrote:


I don't care. If you're listening to a phone call to which the phone in
my
living room is party, then as a citizen of the US, I demand that your
listening be carried out according to my Constitutional rights.

Probably is. Under a warrant for a phone anything that goes on over
that phone is legally admissable, even if the other person's phone
doesn't have a warrant on it. It well settled that as long as one phone
is legally tapped, any phone that calls it or is called by it is fair
game. Since there are no restrictions on tapping a phone outside of the
country, it would be legal tap. Thus anyone the phone calls or anyone
who calls the phone could be listened to as noted. Would be a rather
interesting case to make.

And it varies state-by-state... it is legal in Arizona to record all
calls on your own phone, _without_ notifying the other party.

All I need to do is push a button ;-)


It is good that you have these loopholes to circumvent civil liberties.

Fuck you, asswipe! I *SHOULD* have the right to record ANY call that
is passed on MY phone, and buyer beware to all that call it or speak
to me on it.
 
On Thu, 05 Oct 06 09:51:29 GMT, lparker@emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) Gave
us:

In article <lef8i2prust90bdlna6vmp1r0h9p7a7a95@4ax.com>,
Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@My-Web-Site.com> wrote:
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 22:52:37 GMT, Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com
wrote:

In article <peb8i2lf4af0irq171tqukscc9n0lec541@4ax.com>,
Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@My-Web-Site.com> wrote:

On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 21:51:21 GMT, Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com
wrote:

In article <HLVUg.13315$7I1.5654@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>,
lucasea@sbcglobal.net> wrote:


I don't care. If you're listening to a phone call to which the phone
in
my
living room is party, then as a citizen of the US, I demand that your
listening be carried out according to my Constitutional rights.

Probably is. Under a warrant for a phone anything that goes on over
that phone is legally admissable, even if the other person's phone
doesn't have a warrant on it. It well settled that as long as one phone
is legally tapped, any phone that calls it or is called by it is fair
game. Since there are no restrictions on tapping a phone outside of the
country, it would be legal tap. Thus anyone the phone calls or anyone
who calls the phone could be listened to as noted. Would be a rather
interesting case to make.

And it varies state-by-state... it is legal in Arizona to record all
calls on your own phone, _without_ notifying the other party.

All I need to do is push a button ;-)

There are two different things going on here. One is what you can
do as private citizen, which in AZ is that all are fair game. But we
were talking about what goverment (be it under the mantel of cop-dom or
spook-dom) can do. Whole 'nother kettle of fish..

Of course. But I can record and then hand over to the government, no
sweat, no warrant, nada.

...Jim Thompson

And it can be thrown out.

And it can be restored by the highest court... which would do so.
 
On Sat, 07 Oct 2006 02:45:09 GMT, "jenalyn" <nospam@houston.rr.com>
Gave us:

jmfbahciv@aol.com> wrote in message
news:efqje7$8ss_003@s821.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com...
In article <45206C37.EA6475DA@hotmail.com>,
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:


mmeron@cars3.uchicago.edu wrote:

Western Europe wasn't interested in getting much involved in the
anshluss, because it wasn't the target of Nazi expansionism.

All of which has zilch to do with this.

Your comment is an example of why history has to repeat itself.

/BAH

If "history" [in your terms] did not repeat itself, the gene pool would not
be as clean... not that it really is.
Gene pool? Racist twit!
 
On Sat, 07 Oct 2006 04:42:41 GMT, <lucasea@sbcglobal.net> Gave us:

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:eek:otdi29rl7eu6355m807o0m51aombh1ppg@4ax.com...
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 17:01:41 +0100, "T Wake"
usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:


"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:7fcbi2t7o8chj90omrt9n69qg4jqjiejq8@4ax.com...
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:16:44 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
nobody@nowhere.com> Gave us:


"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:ros9i2tlko096r3d7cr9usjfl8f0kg25oe@4ax.com...

Going from discussion to trying to find personal identification?
Pretty
much
the definition.

This is Usenet, dumbass. "Finger" and many other trace utilities
have been around for decades as well as the right to utilize them.

If you were any more clueless, you'd be the definition of
something... RETARDEDNESS.

Many people write letters to the editor of the local paper. Few try to
go
to
the address of the writers. Those few are stalkers.


You're an idiot. People don't stalk idiots. You prove that one
*can* be wrong *all* the time.

Doing a lookup on *your* IP address is NOT stalking, dipshit.

Do you type one handed?

I, in fact, used to develop database apps for OLTP handling, and I
could stand over the shoulder of one of my data entry girls and type
with either hand to show them how to use the screen entry form(s).

How *did* you get so talented???


So, yes, I can type one handed quite well. The brain knows where
all the keys are.

Do you have a point, dipshit?

"Typing one-handed" usually implies you have another of your body parts in
your other hand. But then that's an insult that's far too subtle for you to
get.
Don't be so sure that I didn't get what he meant, dumbfuck.

Oh... that's right. You are so fucking stupid that you actually
think you know what someone is about based on a post in Usenet.

Let's just say that you give away far more than I ever have or ever
will.
 
In article <KhuVg.13905$7I1.10490@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>,
<lucasea@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
jmfbahciv@aol.com> wrote in message
news:eg58oe$8ss_016@s831.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com...

Oh, the innumeracy. At the rate that they're doing that, it will take at
least an order of magnitude longer than all of recorded human history to
reach the stated endpoint. In the meantime, how about if we stop giving
them reasons to do so?

If you had your way, everybody would convert to Islam.

No, not even remotely. We would just stop going out of our way to do the
things that we repeatedly do that piss off the rest of the world.
Using computers is a product of Western civilization. Are you
suggesting that all business stops using them? All TV shows
have human images in them. Are you going to stop watching TV
so the rest of the world won't get pissed off? All women have
to stay home. Are you going go get the groceries? No women
may have medical care. Are you going to deliver your own babies?
Are you willing to watch somebody you love die because she is not
allowed to go to the doctor nor the hospital?


OK. Assume that.

Why should we? That would be your problem, you make too many assumptions
without data, and assumptions combined with fear-mongering lead to some
pretty untenable scenarios. You assume that Bush has all the answers.
No, I do not assume that Bush has all the answers. I know that
the Republican party is the only politcal party in the United State
who is willing to do something about this threat to our
national security. Democrats don't want to talk about it; if
they don't talk about it, they cannot deal with it.

You
assume that the Democrats will do nothing about the threat of terror.
I don't assume this. Clinton has already shown that they will not.
If these people won't talk about it, they can't have any plans about
what they're going to do if scenarios x,y, and z occur.


You
assume you know what is in the hearts and minds of a society (Islam) with
which you have no direct experience. You assume because you can interpret
the Koran to say "kill all Infidels" that the goal of Islam is to kill all
Infidels. There are lots of the parts of the Bible that, when interpreted
literally, inspire violence. By your interpretation, since the bible tells
us to cut off the hands of thieves, that Christians and Jews will go around
cutting off the hands of everyone that gets something they don't deserve.
Funny, I don't see huge numbers of people walking around one-handed, and
despite the presence of some Fundamentalist Christians in some pretty high
offices in this land, funnily enough I don't feel in danger of losing my
hand.
You assumptions about me are incorrect.

The good thing is that the vast majority of people don't interpret religious
texts literally. Yes, there is a fringe that do, and it is a *vanishingly*
small fraction of the population
It is not a small fraction in Islam.

--let's call them "the wackos", for the sake
of brevity. In order for "the wackos" to do any harm, they have to convince
a larger (but still relatively small) fraction of the population that
somebody has done them wrong, and they need to get revenge.
Sigh! In this day and age of technology, the extremists do not
have convince a large number. They can make a mess that will
cause a degeneration of all societies.

Let's call them
"the recruitees", for brevity. That's where we come in, since we repeatedly
given "the wackos" good evidence to present to "the recruitees" that we
*have* done Muslim society wrong, and this gives "the wackos" a fantastic
recruiting tool to increase the ranks of "the recruitees". Invading Iraq
for absolutely no reason is an excellent example.
There was a reason. For you to say that there wasn't is foolish.

We were not "welcomed
with open arms" as Bush assumed we would be and continued to trumpet to the
population even after it became clear that we *weren't* entirely welcome.
While some fraction of the population may have been happy we invaded, a
large fraction wasn't, especially they began to see how badly we mismanaged
the effort.
Where do you get this data from. Those CBS polls?

How can you fail to see that this just served as a recruiting
too for "the wackos" to find more "recruitees" to help them out?

Wouldn't it be nice if we didn't go out of our way to give "the wackos" more
evidence to increase the ranks of "the recruitees"? I'm not saying that we
should give them the keys to city hall.
Yes, you are. These people will not be satisfied until they get
those keys. Even then they will not be satisified; the killing
will never stop. It is a part of their religion. These
extremists have made killing one of the pillars of the religion.

What I'm saying is that maybe we
should stop running around the world like the arrogant jerks that we have
become, trying to shove *our* point of view down everybody else's throats.
You talk about being made to convert to Islam. Yes, that would be a
terrible thing. Don't you think that other societies might just think it is
just as terrible to be forced to adopt *our* way of doing things? You and I
may think that we live in the best society in the world (and I do happen to
believe that, despite my desire to tweak it a little to make it more
world-friendly). But don't you think it is *incredibly* arrogant to assume
it is what is best for everybody else?
You are mixing up our political form of government with Western
civilization. Yes, we are insisting that Western civilization
not be destroyed. The US is not insisting that the US Constitution
with its amendments be adopted by the rest of the world.


Since the factions are already killing each
other, what makes you think that they will stop killing and
murdering and destroying all infrastructure?

It's called a civil war.
Is it a civil war when the head of the most viscious is from
another country and working for an external terrorist organization
and funded and supplied by other countries?

When we had our little in-house set-to 140 years
ago, what would have made you think that we would stop killing and murdering
and destroying all infrastructure (and Sherman's march was pretty
terrifying, by all accounts)? I doubt if the rest of the world was sitting
there quaking in their boots, worrying about when we were going to go global
with our family dispute.
If we had had atomic bombs and TV satellites and airplanes and
small pox in tubes, they would have been quaking. Britain was
involved in aiding the South.

The goal
is to destroy Western infrastructure.

Data please. It is incredibly arrogant of you to assume you know what their
goal is.
Their target was the World Trade Center. World and Trade is
western civilization. Afghanistan was a small example of
kinds of things would not be allowed. All pictures are destroyed.
Women can't be touched by doctors so they don't have access to
any medical services.

If you read the posts of half of the participants in this
discussion and took them literally, then you would have to assume that that
half of the group is all busy sodomizing each other.
In the past five years, I've read about 100 books on all of this.
I made a partial list somewhere because another person assumed
that my knowledge came only from posters' opinions in newsgroups.
Do you need that book list? Or are you going dump this incorrect
assumption of where I've obtained my data.

The fact that you believe my knowledge comes from these postings
tells me that this is where you have obtained most of your knowledge.
Try reading some books instead.
This means bridges,
roads, computers, any science results and their applications,
white collar jobs, blue collar jobs, manufacturing plants,
food processing plants, etc. Do I need to think of more to
list?

If you want. But boy, you have bought into Bush's fear mongering so much
That's enough. Nobody tells me what to think. I definitely do not
allow any male to tell me what to think...especially a male because
they have nutty thinking.

that you're now off into fantasy land thinking up things that the Muslims
want to destroy. I thought I had you pegged for someone who looks at data
and evaluates the situation critically. Sorry to say, you appear to have
bought into Bush's rhetoric of fear to such an extent that you no longer
appear to be capable of that.
I merely listed what was eliminated in Afghanistan where this
extremism did become the political and economic power.

/BAH
 
In article <XdOdnQtNpOi5M7vYnZ2dnUVZ8s-dnZ2d@pipex.net>,
"T Wake" <usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> wrote:
jmfbahciv@aol.com> wrote in message
news:eg58oe$8ss_016@s831.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com...
In article <Va9Vg.19654$Ij.16215@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>,
lucasea@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

jmfbahciv@aol.com> wrote in message
news:eg2paa$8qk_011@s829.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com...
The oddity of this, which I cannot find in past history, is that
the extremists are already doing this to themselves.

Oh, the innumeracy. At the rate that they're doing that, it will take at
least an order of magnitude longer than all of recorded human history to
reach the stated endpoint. In the meantime, how about if we stop giving
them reasons to do so?

If you had your way, everybody would convert to Islam.

Sorry, where did that assumption come from?
You said to stop giving the extremists reasons; they expect
all to convert to Islam for the first step.

OK.
Assume that. Since the factions are already killing each
other, what makes you think that they will stop killing and
murdering and destroying all infrastructure? The goal
is to destroy Western infrastructure.

Says who?
The extremists say so.
More importantly, whose goal is this? Is this _all_ "they" want to do?
Apparently. It does not appear that they've given any thought
to consequences of such destruction. In Egypt, the extremists
over the past century killed and had goals of being power.
When one of their members got into power, all of sudden this
member found that the ideals couldn't be implemented in real
life.

This means bridges,
roads, computers, any science results and their applications,
white collar jobs, blue collar jobs, manufacturing plants,
food processing plants, etc. Do I need to think of more to
list?

Well, no, but some supporting evidence of this being the "goal" of "them"
would be nice.
Afghanistan. All of Bin Laden's pronouncements. Wannabe clerics.
Kids go to school and are taught how to kill and maim rather than
reading and writing and science. The absence of any protests to
this kind of behaviour from the Islamic world.

Or doesn't actions in real life count as evidence?



/BAH
 
"Y.Porat" wrote:
dont beleive a single word of T.Wake
he is a disturbed gangster and a pathologic lier

and a 'PHD of cosmology'
so let him speak about
thje influence of cosmologic radiation- on the balls of the goat

He's become so boring I've stopped reading any of his crap. :(


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
 
jmfbahciv@aol.com wrote:
If the mindset of the religious extremists are not changed and
they become successful in destroying Western civilization, the
problems that _are_ killing people today will no longer exist.
I believe you mentioned those killed in automobile accidents.
Those accidents won't happen because there won't be any autos
on the roads.

All the lost medicines and better quality foods will shorten the
average lifespan by a decade or two, so what's your point?


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
 
T Wake wrote:

This is (IMHO) the oddest thing about the jingoism over the "war on
terror." People keep talking about bombing and invading, yet the list
of countries which would have to be bombed / invaded is ludicrous.

Not to forget the uran-munition. Probably used uran, (electric power
etc. compouter and so...).

Looks like a present...., directly from the nice inhabitants of the
attacking Land.


Best Regards,

Daniel Mandic
 
JoeBloe wrote:

If anything, all you did was abuse it... like you do Usenet.

But would you countersign, that there are also full wankers to find in
usenet!?



Kind Regards,

Daniel Mandic
 
JoeBloe wrote:

Since '91, you dumbfuck, he was spending ALL of his time starving
the masses and feeding ONLY his military arm while having them build
"palaces" that he would not allow UN inspectors into. "Palaces" in
which he continued his chemical and biological arms programs in.
You do it again. You write ABSOLUTE (Believe me, absolute... if not,
then you are lying and seriously damaged in your brain) crap.

I saw videos from the time, one week before the terrorist attack had
begun.
The women (sharia is seldom there, so I could see their healthy hair)
looked good. All elite troups ran away, officially.

All what the British and US Army killed in the first week, was
cannonfodder. A fightless (forward, holding line and then talking about
their recommended capitulation) solution could have been realized easy,
and was in IMO on the order.
I still see the pictures in my mind, how the Irak Defense Army is
swiveling the white Flag.
No, you just exchanged the Iraq Army with yours.

Women in Irak do have more rights than found in many other states on
the World.

You could be a bit more retarded, but not in this life.

You are a hard-cooked fried Egg.



Best Regards,

Daniel Mandic
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top