Jihad needs scientists

[Daniel Mandic]

Michael A. Terrell wrote:

Amen! Good food and a good day at the range shooting Eurotrolls.
What could be better? The reason they taste like chicken? They ARE
Chickens! ;-)

Hmmmm, chickens.


Best Regards,

Daniel Mandic


P.S.: I had four Beer before. Thanks. Buuuuurrp!
--

 

[Michael A. Terrell]

T Wake wrote:

Nope. I still appear to have been spot on here. I can see how that fear
prevents you thinking though.

What do I have to fear? Surely not the likes of you or the stuffed
donkey.

Try it one day. Honestly, the voices in your head wont mind.

No voices, just severe tinnitus. I'm curious though, what do the
voices say?


You really do need to work to improve your inadequate trolling
skills.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

 

[Eeyore]

John Fields wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
John Fields wrote:
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
T Wake wrote:
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote..

That's very hypothetical but I reckon I'd fight against any tyranny
suppressing important freedoms.

Aha, you only defend "Important" freedoms. Ok.

It was meant to be emphasis about *fighting*.

---
Busted!!!

If it was, you would have written:

"That's very hypothetical but I reckon I'd fight against any tyranny
suppressing freedom."

So ?

---
You make a distinction between "important" freedoms and whatever's
left over, which must be the "non-important freedoms."

Which ones would those be?

Some ppl suggest that ID cards are an infrigement of our freedoms. I'm not
completely convinced that's the case.

I would consider the freedom to practice a faith of one's choice or no faith at
all to be totally un-negotiable however.

Graham

 

[Eeyore]

John Fields wrote:

On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 21:23:30 +0100, Eeyore
rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
John Fields wrote:
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:

The 20mA / LED is in your imagination. I *never* use that much.

---
No one gives a shit what you'd use and, besides, you're a liar.

Rubbish. I advised a lower current and a HE LED.

---
_After_ you got busted.

I *always* advise the above. Using 20mA for a led is plain crazy.

Graham

 

[Michael A. Terrell]

T Wake wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:4526BF20.A2B40FDF@earthlink.net...
T Wake wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:4526B5B1.76CA7415@earthlink.net...
T Wake wrote:

lucasea@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:huvVg.13923$7I1.3872@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...

"T Wake" <usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> wrote in message
news:Z9idnbtj5I7o67vYnZ2dnUVZ8tKdnZ2d@pipex.net...
"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:4525CE02.456E30F6@earthlink.net...
T Wake wrote:

I don't have to. Your country can intercept other nations to
gather
foreign
intelligence.


Unless you are a terrorist, what are you worried about?


Interesting argument.

And completely false.

Sadly yes. It is the worst fear-mongering argument ever. (Worst as in
"most
wrong" )

It's tantamount to "If you aren't a criminal, then why are you
worried
about me searching your basement." The authors of the Constitution
knew
that, at some point, some demagog would use this argument to violate
somebody's rights, so they put it in the constitution that, whether
you're
a criminal/terrorist or not, you don't have to worry about somebody
invading your house to have a look around, just because they don't
like
you.


I work in corporate security and often work for governmental
organisations, will you please surrender to me all your bank
records
so I
can check what transactions take place. I also want you to record
your
movements and actions at all times.

I am sure, that as you are not a terrorist, you will have no qualms
against this.

I await the data.

Well put. I wouldn't hold your breath.


I wont.... It must mean he is a terrorist though.


Typing with one hand again? Pervert!


Brilliant. You like my witty remarks so much you use them back at me.

Please, try not to leave a mess on the keyboard when you reply to my
posts.
It is never a nice thing.

Keep going with the paranoia posts though. They make me laugh.


You're cheating on your mirror? shame on you.


Oh Wow. You are so funny. Seriously, what channel do you appear on? You must
have a show of some sort with humour like that.

Either that, or you are just a sad old tit with too much time on his hands
an nothing constructive to add.

I suppose it is one or the other.

You'll never know, will you? So sad, that you feel that you have to
reply to almost everything I post on SED. It is becoming rather boring.
I already have one stalker who has telephoned threats, so either try
harder, or go away.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

 

[Eeyore]

John Fields wrote:

On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 21:26:05 +0100, Eeyore
rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
John Fields wrote:
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
JoeBloe wrote:
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 17:33:41 +0100, Eeyore Gave us:

I said I have a soft spot for readheads. Is there anything else you'd like to
introduce ?

So one downloads redheads from the binary porn groups. One does NOT
get into the groups and start chatting, dumbass.

Tell me about this chatting.
---
Slobber, slobber, drool, drool.

Right.

So youre really just a stupid kid with a fevered imagination. No great surpise.
You're a credit to your country.

---
After several questionable encounters with women in his
neighborhood, Graham's parole officer learns of it and has him go to
the psychiatrist for some ink blot tests. When the shrink flashes
the first one Graham says, "That's a picture of a spread pussy."

The shrink then shows him the next one and Graham says: "That's a
picture of a couple of tits."

After the third one, Graham says: "That's a picture of a cock in a
pussy."

The shrink, somewhat taken aback by the sexual nature of all of
Graham's responses says to him: "My, but you seem to have a fixation
with sex." To which Graham replies, "Hey Doc, _you're_ the one with
the dirty pictures!"

Like I said " you're really just a stupid kid with a fevered imagination ".

Graham

 

[Michael A. Terrell]

T Wake wrote:

Don't you have some circuit boards to play with?

I don't play with them, I either repair them, or scrap them. They go
into free computers that are given away to other disabled Veterans. I
am on usenet on another computer while I work on the donated computers,
when I can work.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

 

[Michael A. Terrell]

T Wake wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:4526C148.40E07BEA@earthlink.net...
John Larkin wrote:

Well, they do bring up some subjects that are interesting, and give me
opportunities to practice my writing styles. And, actually, conversing
with fat, unhappy European neurotics makes me appreciate my life and
my country even more!

John


Amen! Good food and a good day at the range shooting Eurotrolls.
What could be better? The reason they taste like chicken? They ARE
Chickens! ;-)

It is easy to talk big on USENET. In reality all you are doing is making it
look like you cant maintain a coherent point of view for more than about 40
seconds.

I am sure you think this makes you look good. I suspect some of the others
here think it does as well. The reality however is very different.

You wouldn't recognize reality if it walked up and introduced its
self to you. I don't give a shit what you think about anything on
Usenet. I no longer play nice to keep from hurting people's feelings.
Certainly not on usenet. I have had people screaming in my face that
they were going to kill me, and they didn't scare me any more than you
do.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

 

[Michael A. Terrell]

YD wrote:

On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 15:37:56 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:

YD wrote:

Clue to what, exactly? This far all you have done is rant about
exterminating everything outside US borders.


You really do have reading comprehension problems don't you?

So you confirm your wish to exterminate everything outside US borders
then?

Only those who want to die. They can go, but I don't think they have
a right to take others with them.

Feel free to reply with another ignorant remark like you always do.
After all, its all we expect from you anymore.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

 

[Michael A. Terrell]

YD wrote:

On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 15:39:55 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:

YD wrote:

No, just poking fun at another Amerika uber Alles dickhead.


I guess that it takes one dickhead to know another. Do you guys have
a secret handshake and pay dues like other clubs?

Do you?

I can't join your dickhead club. I don't qualify. I hear that you
belong to the dipshit club as well. As you can see in my sig file, I am
a member of the DAV.


P.S. Remove your head before replying.

--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

 

[Eeyore]

John Fields wrote:

In the case of traffic deaths, those are accidents. They result in
lives lost numbering in the tens of thousands annually, but they're
still "just" accidents.

Some would say most aren't accidents at all but simply the result of bad driving.

Graham

 

[Michael A. Terrell]

Jim Thompson wrote:

On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 18:17:20 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

No one east of Missouri knows how to drive ;-)


You would have trouble driving some of the roads I was on in Alaska.
If you drove like you do in the desert, you would have killed yourself
in a couple days, tops.

Not hardly. You forget that I'm originally a West Virginia c'untry
boy. I can drive mountain roads fast enough to ensure that you dirty
your panties ;-)

You haven't done it on those Alaska roads with over a foot of ice and
going around a mountain with a drop on one side that seasoned drivers
have gone over. High speed on that road was about 12 miles an hour. Any
faster and you didn't make the turns. The military shuttle bus went over
the side two weeks after I left Alaska, and that man had driven the road
for over ten years.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

 

[Eeyore]

John Fields wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
John Fields wrote:

Do you know when the next strike is going to occur and who the
perpetrators will be?

No-ordinary person does although our police here seem to be on the case.
That's their job.

---
See? That's part of the behind-the-scenes work that they do that
keeps that crap from happening. The "secret" work that you
pooh-poohed as 'madness'.

Police action is what's required, not military action.

Graham

 

[Eeyore]

John Fields wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
John Fields wrote:
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
Keith wrote:
rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com says...

The USA is the most two-faced nation on the planet. You regularly back one side then
declare war on them.

You are a two-faced bastard. That fact is well established by your
posts.

Show me an example of this two-facedness.

OK.

On one face you say there's no violent rhetoric in your posts and on
the other you call for the destruction of Israel.

No I haven't.

Show me where I did.

---
Trust me.

I don't.

Graham

 

[Eeyore]

lucasea@sbcglobal.net wrote:

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 23:03:20 +0100, Eeyore
rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
John Fields wrote:

Do you know when the next strike is going to occur and who the
perpetrators will be?

No-ordinary person does although our police here seem to be on the case.
That's their job.

---
See? That's part of the behind-the-scenes work that they do that
keeps that crap from happening. The "secret" work that you
pooh-poohed as 'madness'.

No, the madness that he pooh-poohed was the shenanigans in Iraq. Nobody is
arguing that nothing is being done to combat the terrorists, which was a
completely separate issue until the terrorists decided to go to Iraq after
we chose to attack it for no good reason.

Futhermore the Police are highly visible and it's no secret that they take
intelligence work very seriously.

Graham

 

[John Larkin]

On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 21:57:28 +0100, "T Wake"
<usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:4526C148.40E07BEA@earthlink.net...
John Larkin wrote:

Well, they do bring up some subjects that are interesting, and give me
opportunities to practice my writing styles. And, actually, conversing
with fat, unhappy European neurotics makes me appreciate my life and
my country even more!

John


Amen! Good food and a good day at the range shooting Eurotrolls.
What could be better? The reason they taste like chicken? They ARE
Chickens! ;-)

It is easy to talk big on USENET. In reality all you are doing is making it
look like you cant maintain a coherent point of view for more than about 40
seconds.

I am sure you think this makes you look good. I suspect some of the others
here think it does as well. The reality however is very different.

It doesn't matter how you look; that's a neurotic fallacy. What
matters is how you feel.

John

 

[Eeyore]

John Fields wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
T Wake wrote:
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message

What does the USA get out of it ? Apart from terrorist attacks ?

Well, my personal feeling is that changing your foreign policy as the
result of terrorist attacks is _always_ wrong.

You'd be insane to ignore the reasons !

The US has recognised the right of the State of Israel to exist. Why should
they stop supporting them? Supporting Israel to simply get at the Arabs is
wrong, but why stop supporting an otherwise closely allied country?

The USA didn't give a shit about Israel until the 60s.

---
So that means we shouldn't give a shit about them now?

Israel survived without your help back then. I fail to see why they couldn't do so
now.

Graham

 

[Eeyore]

John Fields wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:

Do you personally know anyone who doesn't carry some form of
identification?

What do you call a " form of identification " ?

It's not compulsory to carry a driving licence with you in the UK and I don't.

---
What do you use for identification when you use a credit card or
cash a check?

A PIN.

Actually I haven't cashed a cheque in decades. I use a card for cash.

Graham

 

[Eeyore]

John Fields wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
JoeBloe wrote:

Yes. The difference between little London streets and the
metropolises contained in this country are vast.
There would be double decker spill overs everywhere. Most places
wouldn't support them at all due to the way our traffic light/power
line systems are strung.

So, if our double deckers work fine on our 'little London streets' how are they going
to have a problem on big American ones ?

---
The steering wheel is on the wrong side.

Believe it or not they do make LHD ones too.

Graham

 

[Ken Smith]

In article <kurtullman-826474.11145206102006@customer-201-125-217-207.uninet.net.mx>,
Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> wrote:

In article <eg5l1f$sig$1@blue.rahul.net>,
kensmith@green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote:

In article <fu8bi2h0pfrimp5kfqphg8g8ner12tb8vg@4ax.com>,
JoeBloe <joebloe@nosuchplace.org> wrote:
[...]
ESPECIALLY in time of war.


No, no .... are we at war! When did this war get declared? I must have
missed the debate in congress and the vote. When was it? What country is
our enemy?

You musta. Congress has passed judgement on the war in general and the
one specific to Iraq many times when funding it, authorizing the
original incursions into both Afghan and Iraq, etc. etc. etc.

Yes, I remember all that. but I guess I was right that it has never been
declared. The US constitution, I guess must have a section or two that I
didn't know about. Can there be such a thing as a classified amendment to
the constitution?



--
--
kensmith@rahul.net forging knowledge