Jihad needs scientists

[T Wake]

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:kp8bi29dil5b9l2ib6oakv7sn227f8450o@4ax.com...

On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 10:49:33 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> Gave us:

On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 20:48:51 +0100, Eeyore
rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:



lucasea@sbcglobal.net wrote:

jmfbahciv@aol.com> wrote in message
lparker@emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote:

Keith Olbermann had a good commentary a week or two ago about Bush
calling
a criticism "unacceptable."

Which criticism was unacceptable?

I don't understand you people; first you complain that he can't
think for himself; then, you object when he expresses his opinion
about
something.

You can't have it both ways.

Calling "criticism" "unacceptable" is not an opinion--it's an
argument-winning tactic that involves tacitly silencing anybody who
disagrees with you.

Criticism was considered unacceptable in 1930s Germany too.

---
If the parallel is valid, expect to hear someone knocking on your
door because of your antics here.

Ooooooohhhh.... That would be so.... R I G H T E O U S !!!

I'd love to see the video on Cops!

Do you deliberately conform to stereotypes? Are you infact a plant for the
left wingers to create ridicule?

 

"Ken Smith" <kensmith@green.rahul.net> wrote in message
news:eg5o4i$hr$2@blue.rahul.net...

In article <MPG.1f8efa5f98d07c31989d9a@News.Individual.NET>,
Keith <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote:
In article <eg3143$okg$2@blue.rahul.net>, kensmith@green.rahul.net
says...
In article <0cr8i2p5gcd7asiq8nsdlon8b0m6h69l5a@4ax.com>,
Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@My-Web-Site.com> wrote:
[....]

(2) "I _tried_ to get OBL...", just recently interviewed by Chris
Wallace.

Sounds like the sign of the liar to me ;-)

On (2) we have external evidence that he did try to get OBL. It was all
over the news and the Neocons yelled "wag the dog" about it.

Actually, they didn't. Most thought he didn't do enough; too many
sheets left standing in the desert. The aspirin factory raid was a
killer though.


Oh no! Someone has implanted memories in my head! I clearly remember
them doing just as I said any yet Keith says it didn't happen.

Me too. Some people will use any excuse to conveniently forget what
actually happened to justify their current point of view.

Eric Lucas

 

[Michael A. Terrell]

jmfbahciv@aol.com wrote:

In article <45253AD1.1CA92D09@hotmail.com>,
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:

It looked a heck of a lot better to me and least he was an intelligent and
articulate man, something that could never be said of Bush.

So you prefer people who can spin you a line of bullshit to
people who deal with real problems?

/BAH

Bullshit is his first language.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

 

[Michael A. Terrell]

JoeBloe wrote:

On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 02:58:42 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
nobody@nowhere.com> Gave us:


"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:fucbi29sjnq3iiboi57rpd4hifvsemhmjc@4ax.com...

Jay Leno: "Which two countries border the United States?"

Girl on the Street: "Ummm, errr, ahhh, Europe and ummm, Paris?"

Yep, that's an American all right. Like those who think Alaska is an
island.


Do you actually think that it was unrehearsed and not intentional,
dumbass?

Obviously it was unrehearsed. Apparently you can't tell the difference
between fact and fiction. Since you clearly can't tell your ass from a hole
in the ground that doesn't surprise anyone.


Idiot! When Leno goes out on the street, it is NOT *DURING* his
show it is prior to it, and the sessions last for hours, and yes
rehearsed bits get filmed, and then the editing department puts
together a little piece for the show. You really can't be that
stupid, can you?

He is Homer, do you really have to ask?


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

 

"Ken Smith" <kensmith@green.rahul.net> wrote in message
news:eg5o9p$hr$3@blue.rahul.net...

In article <45254611.542B0FC1@hotmail.com>,
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:


Ken Smith wrote:

[...]
Sounds like the sign of the liar to me ;-)

On (2) we have external evidence that he did try to get OBL. It was all
over the news and the Neocons yelled "wag the dog" about it.

The neo-cons are terminally clueless.

No, they aren't. Many of them are quite well educated and on other
subjects can think through problems very well. They are more like a PC
that has a virus installed. The program for thinking about politics is no
longer able to care through logical thought.

The problem is they refuse to admit that anybody else could have a valid
point of view. Then, when somebody presents them with evidence that their
worldview might be just a little skewed from reality, they either shoult
"fuck you", dredge up fear to make people love them, or use lies to make
people hate their opponents.

Eric Lucas

 

"Kurt Ullman" <kurtullman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:kurtullman-4FD46D.11541406102006@customer-201-125-217-207.uninet.net.mx...

In article <6KuVg.13910$7I1.13144@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>,
lucasea@sbcglobal.net> wrote:


Yeah, I hate Ohio drivers, too.

Nothing compared to those jerks from Michigan...

North till ya smell it, west till ya step in it....

Eric Lucas

 

[John Fields]

On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 21:26:05 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:

John Fields wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
JoeBloe wrote:
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 17:33:41 +0100, Eeyore Gave us:

I said I have a soft spot for readheads. Is there anything else you'd like to
introduce ?

So one downloads redheads from the binary porn groups. One does NOT
get into the groups and start chatting, dumbass.

Tell me about this chatting.
---
Slobber, slobber, drool, drool.

Right.

So youre really just a stupid kid with a fevered imagination. No great surpise.
You're a credit to your country.

---
After several questionable encounters with women in his
neighborhood, Graham's parole officer learns of it and has him go to
the psychiatrist for some ink blot tests. When the shrink flashes
the first one Graham says, "That's a picture of a spread pussy."

The shrink then shows him the next one and Graham says: "That's a
picture of a couple of tits."

After the third one, Graham says: "That's a picture of a cock in a
pussy."

The shrink, somewhat taken aback by the sexual nature of all of
Graham's responses says to him: "My, but you seem to have a fixation
with sex." To which Graham replies, "Hey Doc, _you're_ the one with
the dirty pictures!"


--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer

 

[John Fields]

On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 21:27:40 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:

John Fields wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
John Fields wrote:
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 17:09:50 +0100, Eeyore wrote:

Let me make this clearer.

Who *exactly* do you mean ?

What, you want _names_?

That would be a start. Something more coherent than 'radical islam' for
example.

---
Too bad a simple concept is so hard for you to grasp when it's other
than American.

No. It's *not* a simple concept you fuckwitted simpleton.

---
You're the only one who seems to be struggling with it
---

Who *are* these ppl ?

---
Who knows? Might be your next-door neighbors, might be mine.

--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer

 

[John Fields]

On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 21:29:04 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:

John Fields wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
JoeBloe wrote:
"Homer J Simpson" <nobody@nowhere.com> Gave us:

Facts you are unaware of?

Other national: "I feel bad so I'll talk to my friends"

American: "I feel bad so I'll murder some innocent people"

You're an idiot. Euro nations were slaughtering thousands long
before we ever did.

Most Americans are Europeans.

---
No, most Americans have ascended from European roots.

No Americans are Europeans except the ones that hold dual
citizenship in the US and also in some European state.

Obfuscation.

---

Clarification.


--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer

 

[T Wake]

"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:4525D212.AABD4DC@earthlink.net...

T Wake wrote:

Probably. Do you fit into any of the other categories? If you are dead,
as
the sentence implies, then I suspect you may fall into several categories
at
once. Or I do.

One or the other.


According to my doctor, I am fine other than the medical problems.
No insanity, never had any problems with 95% of the people I've met.

OTOH, morons like the one who was blowing his horn and cursing at me
for walking too slow across a marked crosswalk while using my cane do
piss me off, as it should be. I had one punk try to take my cane away.
I wound his arm behind his back so tight he was begging for me to let
him go. I may be 100% disabled, but I'm no easy target. ;-)

Glad to hear it. It would piss me off as well and it is sad that morons like
that still populate this planet.

 

[T Wake]

"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:4525D26C.C2FF6B64@earthlink.net...

T Wake wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:45258C8B.9627D77F@earthlink.net...
T Wake wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:45257252.1B92CFF9@earthlink.net...
T Wake wrote:

Ouch. You cutting wit has shamed me. I do apologise.

However, as you feel able to invade our newsgroup with crossposted
bullshit
(and imply your rules are more acceptable) I must bow to your
masterful
double standards.

Yawn.

If you spent less time trying to sling insults, you may get enough
sleep
to
read through a full post.


My sleep problems are medical, and not really of any importance to
you.

I agree, they are not even slightly important or interesting to me.

On the other hand, I find it interesting you need to type out your
yawning.
Most people would just yawn and continue to type.

Still, I suspect you are not most people.


YAWN = Not very intersting reply to me.

Sarcasm is obviously a British trait.

How long have you been on
Usenet?

Today, about three hours.

 

[T Wake]

"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:4525DD64.ED5DFD8A@earthlink.net...

lucasea@sbcglobal.net wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:4525D26C.C2FF6B64@earthlink.net...

YAWN = Not very intersting reply to me. How long have you been on
Usenet?

No, "not very interesting reply to me" means you just skip it and move
on.
YAWN is "I'm trying to impress you with how big/smart/important/well-hung
I
am by telling you your reply is beneath me, and screaming it at you." At
least be honest with yourself.

Eric Lucas


You have your definition, I have mine.

Yet he does have a point. In sci.physics on any given day there are three or
four hundred posts which are not interesting. Lots are replies to my posts
which I don't find interesting.

I tend to ignore them. If I posted "yawn" at everything which didn't
interest me I'd need a new keyboard pretty soon.

(IMHO Obviously) It does seem that people who post things like "I don't care
what you think" or "Yawn" or "Plonk" are just trying a bit of one-upmanship
which is very suited to under tens.

 

[T Wake]

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:mlgbi2tfos4rt8a0mdpjh2emco4up41pb0@4ax.com...

On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 20:55:32 +0100, "T Wake"
usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:

invade our newsgroup


Hahahahahaha... You're a fucking joke.

Here... in Usenet... *you* *own* NOTHING!

You are a funny guy. I love how you pretend to be a total retard. I am sure
it is an act because I can't see how some one can be a dumb as you and still
be able to type.

It is interesting that you cut the context out of the bit you are replying
do. Well done. Does it make you feel clever?

As you seem to struggle with general understanding I will repeat it for you:

"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:45243F99.4CC1801A@earthlink.net...

Yawn. You invade our newsgroup with crossposted bullshit, then you
want to set the rules? Forget it.
To which I replied:

Ouch. You cutting wit has shamed me. I do apologise.

However, as you feel able to invade our newsgroup with crossposted bullshit
(and imply your rules are more acceptable) I must bow to your masterful
double standards.


Now, why dont you go and play with knives or something else which makes the
voices go away.

Also, here, a twit like you doesn't get five seconds of fame, much
less the 15 seconds the rest of us get.

You would never know if you had 15 seconds as I very, very much doubt you
can count that high.

You have nothing with which to reply to peoples comments so you fall back on
insults and the like. I suspect you were badly bullied for most of your
life.

You misspelled your name, T Weak boy.

Really? I never noticed. I must get my birth certificate changed. On the
other hand, you seem to have misspelled your name, Idiot, and call your self
Joe Bloe. Odd that, isn't it?

 

[T Wake]

"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:4525D336.EE9277D9@earthlink.net...

YD wrote:

Positively so. All you have left is posing as powerful know-it-alls on
the internet.

Ever tried to figure what you look like to those outside of your tight
little circle of cronies?


What's wrong? Did your only "friend" blow out his brains to get away
from you? I am 100% disabled, but it doesn't keep me stuck at home. I
can still do some work, some days so I do volunteer work to help other
disabled people in my area. You, on the other hand are always bitter,
and trying to slam anyone who has a clue.

This is a logical fallacy. Everything you have said can be true and still it
would not disprove anything YD has written.

Insulting someone does not change the validity of their comments, nor does
eliciting sympathy for yourself.

 

[T Wake]

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:rvgbi2da2a2oinssu9o0sc7indb9lnqe39@4ax.com...

On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 20:56:36 +0100, "T Wake"
usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:


"YD" <ydtechHAT@techie.com> wrote in message
news:esn9i2dmt34geb4aqp39u5dknbp1bqms6p@4ax.com...

Overall damn immature, and that goes for those bothering to keep it
going too.

Sadly true. Still entertainment is where you can find it and there are
some
reasonable people (on both sides of the fence) posting in this thread.


We're ALL bozos on this bus, you retarded fuckheads. Claim that you
aren't and you lose twenty more IQ points.

I have never claimed I was not an idiot.

You really need to be careful on this issue though as losing 20 IQ points
could leave you seriously overdrawn.

 

[Michael A. Terrell]

T Wake wrote:

Inbreeding is a terrible thing.

Then stop doing it and let your family tree grow some real branches.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

 

[Michael A. Terrell]

T Wake wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:4525CE02.456E30F6@earthlink.net...
T Wake wrote:

I don't have to. Your country can intercept other nations to gather
foreign
intelligence.


Unless you are a terrorist, what are you worried about?


Interesting argument.

I work in corporate security and often work for governmental organisations,
will you please surrender to me all your bank records so I can check what
transactions take place. I also want you to record your movements and
actions at all times.

I am sure, that as you are not a terrorist, you will have no qualms against
this.

I await the data.

It wouldn't do you any good. I am on a small VA pension that barely
pays the bills. Anyway, I don't have a bank account.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

 

"Kurt Ullman" <kurtullman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:kurtullman-3B55D3.12034306102006@customer-201-125-217-207.uninet.net.mx...

In article <W%uVg.13914$7I1.8882@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>,
lucasea@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

"Kurt Ullman" <kurtullman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:kurtullman-826474.11145206102006@customer-201-125-217-207.uninet.net.mx..
.
In article <eg5l1f$sig$1@blue.rahul.net>,
kensmith@green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote:

In article <fu8bi2h0pfrimp5kfqphg8g8ner12tb8vg@4ax.com>,
JoeBloe <joebloe@nosuchplace.org> wrote:
[...]
ESPECIALLY in time of war.


No, no .... are we at war! When did this war get declared? I must
have
missed the debate in congress and the vote. When was it? What
country
is
our enemy?

You musta. Congress has passed judgement on the war in general and the
one specific to Iraq many times when funding it, authorizing the
original incursions into both Afghan and Iraq, etc. etc. etc.


...and yet, funnily enough, was *has* never been declared.

I can argue that point if you would care to. The Congress passed
a specific (actually a coupla specific) authorizations under the
requirements of the War Powers Act (an artifact of VN). Article 1,
section 8, para outlines the power of Congress to declare war (among
other things).

Yes, but they never did that.

Para 18 of the same Article gives Congress the power "to
make all laws whcih shall be necessary and proper to for carrying into
execution the aforementioned powers..."

Since they never carried out the first part, arguably their carrying out the
second part was illegitimate.

Thus the War Powers Act can be
argued to be the method Congress chose to declare war and thus it has
been done.

No, they ignored the part about actually making the declaration (Section 1).
Just because the law gives them the power to declare war, doesn't mean they
actually did it.

Eric Lucas

 

"Kurt Ullman" <kurtullman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:kurtullman-8569B2.12302206102006@customer-201-125-217-207.uninet.net.mx...

In article <dqvVg.13922$7I1.9528@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>,
lucasea@sbcglobal.net> wrote:


Uhh...it's exactly why war must be declared by Congress...so the
President
doesn't go off half-cocked and do something stupid for no reason at all.
Oops, too late, another check-and-balance of the Constitution out the
window.

If this is indeed gone by the wayside, and I would argue that it
hasn't because of the War Powers Act,

No, the War Powers Act only gives Congress the right to do what they need to
do, once they excercise their Constitutional responsibility to actually
declare war. That has never happened, no matter how you want to spin it.

this is hardly news. In fact
pre-WPA we had Korea and most of Viet Nam fought similarly.

Agreed, and look how *those* turned out. Do we *never* learn from our past?

Are you also implying that a War in Iraq justifies withdrawing
constitutional rights in CONUS?
Nope. Said nothin' about that either way because the question I
was responding to wasn't on that particular topic.

All the other Bush lemmings on here seem to think it's a *great* idea.
Guilt by association.

I had expected better out of you...

That was meant by way of apology (guilt by association is just as bad as
some of the other smear tactics on this board and in politics, so mea
culpa). So I will ask you straight out...do you support the removal of your
Constitutional right, all in the name of Bush's fear-mongering?

Eric Lucas

 

[Lloyd Parker]

In article <sgrci2h5g54ecokggeogqs8kjtqucn7vv5@4ax.com>,
Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@My-Web-Site.com> wrote:

On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 14:13:13 +0000 (UTC), kensmith@green.rahul.net (Ken
Smith) wrote:

In article <45254611.542B0FC1@hotmail.com>,
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:


Ken Smith wrote:

[...]
Sounds like the sign of the liar to me ;-)

On (2) we have external evidence that he did try to get OBL. It was all
over the news and the Neocons yelled "wag the dog" about it.

The neo-cons are terminally clueless.

No, they aren't. Many of them are quite well educated and on other
subjects can think through problems very well. They are more like a PC
that has a virus installed. The program for thinking about politics is no
longer able to care through logical thought.


But Democrats ARE dirtbags. Try and deny that ;-)

When did you stop beating your wife?

...Jim Thompson