Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't have to. Your country can intercept other nations to gather foreign
intelligence.
average mpg for the fleet (those acutally sold) was 21.5 mpg, up from"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:t1dbi2pob3u7ic3dp19guns746jria0n2e@4ax.com...
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:29:00 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
nobody@nowhere.com> Gave us:
importing oil to feed its ridiculous fleet of
inefficient cars
I doubt that you even have any clue as to the model and make
distribution of cars in the US population.
Over half are SUVs and pickup trucks, that all get less than about 17 mpg.
I think that's all he really needs to know to make statements like he did
about "ridiculous fleet of inefficient cars".
The EPA stats indicate that at least at the 2004 model year, the
Nothing would surprise me."Homer J Simpson" <nobody@nowhere.com> Gave us:
"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote
If you want to get snippy, consider this: there are several times more
Native Americans alive now, in the USA, than there were when Columbus
landed in the Americas.
Pure blood?
Of course, idiot. What? Now you think we raped 'em all too?
The above made perfect sense to me and it was actually very funny.On 05 Oct 2006 23:43:02 GMT, "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic@aon.at
wrote:
I think you can count up to two, or three. At four you have actualley
stucked, as many other .... unfortunately.
Who is it now? The world leader... Rusia? USA? Europe?
No, no wait... it's the Moonstation Captain speaking to you... brzzz,
breeek, pam. USA - is - the - World - Moon - Leader -.
WhY? just look to the weird people there, buying claims on the moon. I
believe you could defent taht claims, but that shows even more that the
pure moron is found in the United States of America.
Best regards,
Daniel Mandic
Daniel,
Whereas I admire your determination to converse with other engineers
(you are an engineer, aren't you?) in what is obviously not your
native tongue, you really ought to know that your writing makes no
sense at all.
John
On the contrary, targetting ObL like that probably was a smart move. WeIn article <4525A948.19062399@hotmail.com>,
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
Kurt Ullman wrote:
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
They gave up on the job.
They are still looking. Just don't have a bunch of people
delegated
to that job specifically. I am on record from soon after 9/11 as
saying
specifically targeting OBL like that was a dumb idea. Took assets away
from other more pressing issues.
What more pressing issues ?
Like all the others out there trying to do nasty things.
I know.Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> Gave us:
Keith wrote:
rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com says...
What do you think about the Vincennes shooting down an Iranian Airbus then ?
Successful missile test?
How about proof of American sailors being trigger happy dickheads ?
The simple fact that you can make a joke out of the mass slaughter of innocent ppl
is one reason why the rest of the world looks at the USA in incredulity.
911
It is you, fuckhead, that is incredulous.
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 06:42:40 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> Gave us:
Daniel Mandic wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Thompson and Terrell are amongst the lowest forms of life posting
here. JoeBloe beats them hands down though.
Graham
Ermm, is Terrell not an electronic guru?
The jury is still out on that one. Its a hung jury. I hanged them
myself. ;-)
Does an electronic guru behave well enough to fool folks thinking
they are speaking with a flesh and blood guru? :-]
Do they have rubber facial appliances to make them look better?
Do they do a better job at "Guhury"? What about spirited guhury?
Are electronic gurus going to replace all the human gurus?
I'm an atomic guru. I operate on a little Tritium sphere fusion
reactor, courtesy of Doc Oc! Just a little piece of the sun. :-]
How am I doin' so far, Mike?
Because you're stupidly happy in your profound ignorance ?On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 23:10:34 +0100, Eeyore
rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
lparker@emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote:
A lot of this anti-US fervor started with Democrat Presidential
candidates trying out their sound bytes in 2002-2004 in Europe.
/BAH
OH BS. It started with Bush invading another nation.
Actually, it started with FDR invading another nation. France,
specifically.
You're being very very silly.
Graham
I don't think so. A couple of things are at work here. One is the
military and cultural and technological and scientific dominance of
the USA as compared to Europe, which is bound to cause some
resentment. The other is expressed in the Chinese proverb, "if you
save someone's life, they will hate you forever."
You really are monumentally stupid.
You are fat, poor, unhappy, and frustrated by the state of the world.
I am none of these. Explain to me why I am the stupid one here.
WTF is that supposed to mean ?Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
So, seriously: why do you care now?
America is now threatening my way of life.
Bizarre. How?
Because of all the wars you've been pointlessly starting and you want to
start more.
Have any bombs fallen in your neighborhood?
Ignorance is bliss ? I bet that makes you feel really better !It's horrible. There's death and destruction on the news every night.
Bad news sells. Television news is crap, so don't watch it. That's one
thing you can rationally decide to do that will make you feel better.
The fuckwit Blair ordered them in.British lads are dying for America
"For America"? What did we do, press them at sea? And why did they
join a volunteer army if they didn't want to be warriors?
You're very silly. I reckon I'd rather have Russia as an ally than the USAand all you do is tell us we're wrong
to criticise.
That's certainly not "all I do." In fact, I don't do that at all.
I can assure you that the British public is getting VERY
pissed off. I was just watching 'Question Time' and there was a very
anti-US feeling from the audience.
All those MPs watch too much TV, too.
Without a change of tack, I can see the North Atlantic Alliance falling
apart in the next couple of years.
Since the Russians are fairly docile these days, and Germany is
united, and Eastern Europe is free, it may as well; NATO did its job,
and did it well, and it's time for us to spend our money elsewhere.
Send us a "thank you" card and some chocolates maybe. Unless Russia
invades Georgia... that would be nasty, but the resulting European
dynamics would be interesting, probably hilarious in a sick sort of
way.
Probably. Do you fit into any of the other categories? If you are dead, as
the sentence implies, then I suspect you may fall into several categories at
once. Or I do.
One or the other.
"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:45258C8B.9627D77F@earthlink.net...
T Wake wrote:
"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:45257252.1B92CFF9@earthlink.net...
T Wake wrote:
Ouch. You cutting wit has shamed me. I do apologise.
However, as you feel able to invade our newsgroup with crossposted
bullshit
(and imply your rules are more acceptable) I must bow to your
masterful
double standards.
Yawn.
If you spent less time trying to sling insults, you may get enough sleep
to
read through a full post.
My sleep problems are medical, and not really of any importance to
you.
I agree, they are not even slightly important or interesting to me.
On the other hand, I find it interesting you need to type out your yawning.
Most people would just yawn and continue to type.
Still, I suspect you are not most people.
Positively so. All you have left is posing as powerful know-it-alls on
the internet.
Ever tried to figure what you look like to those outside of your tight
little circle of cronies?
You should return that computer you're using. When the salesman asks
why tell him you're too stupid to use one.
Interesting phrase !Eeyore wrote:
America's only got a couple of hundred years of history.
It makes them dizzy thinking much further back.
Graham
Yes, but I like many of them.
You just have a Book (The Book), being nearly thousand years old, not
to mention the older history.
But as everywhere, you can find bad and good.
How the U.S.A. managed that 50:50 voting spectacle is out of my
imagination.
And 50:50 makes a short-circuit. The outcome we can see all over the
world :-(
We have a phrase here, it goes, "when two are struggling laughs the
third".
YAWN = Not very intersting reply to me. How long have you been on
Usenet?
Pretty crap figures it has to be said.In article <QziVg.11645$6S3.234@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net>,
lucasea@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:t1dbi2pob3u7ic3dp19guns746jria0n2e@4ax.com...
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:29:00 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
nobody@nowhere.com> Gave us:
importing oil to feed its ridiculous fleet of
inefficient cars
I doubt that you even have any clue as to the model and make
distribution of cars in the US population.
Over half are SUVs and pickup trucks, that all get less than about 17 mpg.
I think that's all he really needs to know to make statements like he did
about "ridiculous fleet of inefficient cars".
The EPA stats indicate that at least at the 2004 model year, the
average mpg for the fleet (those acutally sold) was 21.5 mpg, up from
around 17 in '82 or so. The half sold was right.
http://www.nhtsa.gov/cars/rules/CAFE/docs/Summary-Fuel-Economy-Pref-2004.
You're going to have to stop trimming so much, so we can tell which group ofYD wrote:
Positively so. All you have left is posing as powerful know-it-alls on
the internet.
I'd have some sympathy for you were you not such a blinkered war-mongeringT Wake wrote:
Probably. Do you fit into any of the other categories? If you are dead, as
the sentence implies, then I suspect you may fall into several categories at
once. Or I do.
One or the other.
According to my doctor, I am fine other than the medical problems.
No insanity, never had any problems with 95% of the people I've met.
OTOH, morons like the one who was blowing his horn and cursing at me
for walking too slow across a marked crosswalk while using my cane do
piss me off, as it should be. I had one punk try to take my cane away.
I wound his arm behind his back so tight he was begging for me to let
him go. I may be 100% disabled, but I'm no easy target. ;-)
You wouldn't know a clue if it jumped up and smacked you round the face !YD wrote:
Positively so. All you have left is posing as powerful know-it-alls on
the internet.
Ever tried to figure what you look like to those outside of your tight
little circle of cronies?
What's wrong? Did your only "friend" blow out his brains to get away
from you? I am 100% disabled, but it doesn't keep me stuck at home. I
can still do some work, some days so I do volunteer work to help other
disabled people in my area. You, on the other hand are always bitter,
and trying to slam anyone who has a clue.
"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:45258DFB.BBB5B87C@earthlink.net...
T Wake wrote:
Yes.
Are you struggling with the word choice?
I have no problems with it, but you seem to.
Really.
Let us review the information.
I object to being _forced_ to carry an ID card.
You respond with comments about my driving licence - which is based on a
_choice_ I made.
Can you explain to me where _I_ have the problem understanding the word use?
I cant really see it.