T
T Wake
Guest
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4522C5D3.C8E7A747@hotmail.com...
dissent. Afterwards people said they opposed it.

news:4522C5D3.C8E7A747@hotmail.com...
Yes, it may be different in the future but I doubt it.T Wake wrote:
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote
lucasea@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Interesting connection--and it now starts to be a little clearer why
the
UK has been the one supporter that has stood by the US since 9/11.
That's simply down to Blair. It's made him shockingly unpopular here
and
if he was to stay as PM he'd make Labour almost un-re-electable.
I very much doubt any UK government would have failed to keep step with
the
US.
We'll see about that in the future !
Well, not massively. When the invasion of Iraq was declared there was littleDespite their current protestations, the other political parties were
largely behind the conflicts.
No. The Liberal Democrats were against it
dissent. Afterwards people said they opposed it.
Like they count....and so were the SNP IIRC too.
All after the event and when things were starting to look bad.Only the
major parties only the Conservatives backed Blair and he had a tough job
selling
it to his own party with several related cabinet level resignations over a
period of time.
Absolute power....Not sure about the others.
Mnay of us hoped that Blair would be a modeating voice of reason but it
seems he
lost his head and got carried away.