Jihad needs scientists

[JoeBloe]

On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:17:53 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> Gave us:

US aid is frequently accompanied by compulsory 'trade concessions' that favour the
USA.

Funny, I don't recall us ever asking Russia for anything for the
millions of tons of wheat we have sent them over the last several
decades.

There are many more examples.

You're still a liar and a troll, and no claimed "truth" you ever
mumble "hurts" me in any way.

 

[JoeBloe]

On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:17:53 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> Gave us:

Your Northern neighbour Canada
gets 6th btw.

Funny. I'd bet that we export more thousands of tons of wheat a
year than they do too.

 

[JoeBloe]

On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:17:53 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> Gave us:

but the *SMALLEST* among developed countries as a
percentage of its GDP

Whoopie fuckin doo. That proves that we are a prosperous nation and
we still beat everyone else on the tab. That is what being a free
nation is all about, idiot. We can have a great life, give away a
small bit of it, and still beat everyone else on the whole. This even
despite this new globalization of the economies knocking us back quite
a bit. You think we aren't helping. You have been reading the wrong
web pages again, boy. We ARE the help.

Life is grand, and when WE finally do reduce the numbers of underfed
nations in the world yet again, I'll think of you and laugh...
again. You pathetic, cringing little milksop.

 

[JoeBloe]

On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:21:17 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> Gave us:

JoeBloe wrote:

On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 09:14:33 +0100, Eeyore Gave us:
mmeron@cars3.uchicago.edu wrote:

You may have noted that 9/11 was way before the invasion of Iraq.

Does Palestine ring any bells ?

The real demon is the State of Israel.

Graham

The real demon is the law that keeps people like me from shooting
fucking idiots like you.

I wondered how long it would be before your American love of guns as a
'solution' to anything would surface.

On you... I'd use a slingshot. There are many more things in the
world that have been around a lot longer for you to be shot with,
idiot. Many of them were embraced by your end of the world far longer
than they have been here. It ain't about guns, idiot.

You're a brain dead gun-loving fuckwit.

I do not even own a gun. I studied ballistics back in the sixties
though, and I'd love to see a fast moving hunk of lead enter and exit
your head.

I hope Al Qaeda get you !

Yet another poorly punctuated hate rally call by the America hating
idiot. You are transparent, Chucko.

You
deserve each other.

You deserve not to be around to see it. Oh well.

 

[JoeBloe]

On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:22:04 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> Gave us:

JoeBloe wrote:

On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 09:24:57 GMT, mmeron@cars3.uchicago.edu Gave us:
In article <4520D8A3.4083F074@hotmail.com>, Eeyore writes:
mmeron@cars3.uchicago.edu wrote:
In article <4520CA69.C0BBA60B@hotmail.com>, Eeyore writes:
mmeron@cars3.uchicago.edu wrote:

You may have noted that 9/11 was way before the invasion of Iraq.

Does Palestine ring any bells ?

The real demon is the State of Israel.

You should note that Al Queda hardly ever mentioned Palestine before
9/11 either.

Al Qaeda wasn't really known about prior to 9/11 so your point is moot.

Al Queda was known for at least a decade before 9/11. "Not paid
attention to" is not the same thing as "not known". And Al Queda
itself is just an offshot of earlier movements.

Why even converse with that stupid idiot?

He was wrong anyway.

You're full of shit.

 

[JoeBloe]

On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 07:33:14 -0700, Jim Thompson
<To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@My-Web-Site.com> Gave us:

That's why we should discontinue all aid except to developing nations
needing food and health assistance.

And burn the UN to the ground.

Have you ever heard that little piece by Robin Williams about us
simply stopping all we do for others? It is very funny as it were.

 

[JoeBloe]

On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 14:35:19 +0000 (UTC), kensmith@green.rahul.net (Ken
Smith) Gave us:

In article <c7WdncygLPPv3r3YRVnytQ@pipex.net>,
T Wake <usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> wrote:
[...]
The western world bandies the term "war" around much too easily. (War on
Terror, War on Drugs, War on Obesity etc.)

It is time for a war on the improper use of the term "war on".

War on, dude!

 

[JoeBloe]

On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 15:51:01 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> Gave us:

JoeBloe wrote:

The real demon is the law that keeps people like me from shooting
fucking idiots like you.

Let me see now.....

You complain about the fact that if you criticise Islam for being
irrational and violent, they respond with violence and death threats.

I criticise the USA for being irrational and violent and you respond
with the threat of violence and death too.

There is no threat, you illiterate retard.

Seems like you have a lot in common with the Islamists.

Sorry, chump. No threat was made, and I am nothing like the fuck
extreme idiots that are fucking up an otherwise peaceful religion.

 

[JoeBloe]

On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 15:57:00 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> Gave us:

Very different. The outcome could be similar though. This is why the USA needs
to be halted in its current idiotic behaviour.

More like, YOU DO. You epitomize what can go wrong with an
otherwise functional information receptacle.

 

[JoeBloe]

On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 15:05:00 GMT, <lucasea@sbcglobal.net> Gave us:

Ignoring the blemishes, which is
what most of the Joe Sixpack 'Murc'n rednecks like yourself choose to do

Hahahah... I drink better beers than your retarded ass does. I
also work on more sophisticated gear than you do. I make the world a
better place. What's your excuse for wasting Oxygen, boy?

Oh... yeah... blemishes... Yes, I choose to ignore you and your
stupidity.

 

[JoeBloe]

On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 16:37:07 +0100, "T Wake"
<usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:

If AQ called themselves the Banana Splits would it be a fruit salad instead
of a war?

No. Their TV show would get canceled, and nobody would go to any
concerts they did.

 

[Lloyd Parker]

In article <eft9s4$8ss_002@s888.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>,
jmfbahciv@aol.com wrote:

In article <xA9Ug.7703$GR.5123@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>,
lucasea@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4520F44A.881C5E16@hotmail.com...


mmeron@cars3.uchicago.edu wrote:

In article <efqje7$8ss_003@s821.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>,
jmfbahciv@aol.com writes:
In article <45206C37.EA6475DA@hotmail.com>,
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
mmeron@cars3.uchicago.edu wrote:

Western Europe wasn't interested in getting much involved in the
anshluss, because it wasn't the target of Nazi expansionism.

All of which has zilch to do with this.

Your comment is an example of why history has to repeat itself.

Yes, exactly.

There is no exactly about it.

It's just that the American fundamentalist Right has only scare tactics to
resort to and
nothing of substance whatever.


....and if one chooses to draw parallels between our actions in the Middle
East and 1933-1939 Germany, one parallel is the fact that Bush is using
similar scare tactics to retain power,

The anti-Bushers keep saying this and it makes absolutely no sense.
What do you mean "retain power"? He has a term in office which
will end. He won't retain any powers after the Inaugeration in 2009.

People probably mean keep Republican control of Congress -- without that
Bush's powers will be quite curtailed.

take away peoples' rights, and kill a
segment of the world population, in much the same propagandistic way that
Hitler did.

You've been listening to Democrats without thinking. Everything
coming out of their mouths is campaign speeches for 2004. This
is not a typo...I meant four.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that Bush is the next
Hitler, just that there *are* parallels between their misanthropic behavior,
if hugely different in degree and consequence.

You are excoriating Bush for doing one of his primary jobs which
is national security. I suppose you long for the days of the
Clintons where the goal was to breakdown all national security.

Yes, that nightmare of peace and prosperity. How glad we are it's over!

 

[Lloyd Parker]

In article <jqhUg.45399$bf5.39370@edtnps90>,
"Homer J Simpson" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message
news:hu33i2tqjfg6nfvg8d5o1krhaq0lr1umhi@4ax.com...

The issue is whether non-US-citizens have Constitutional rights when
they are not physically in the USA, or whether US citizens have such
rights when captured in a foreign country while fighting against our
military.

The US believes that US law applies everywhere in the world, but US
constitutional rights don't apply to anyone who isn't the 'right sort of
person'.

Tell me how many times the Bill of Rights says "people" and how many times it
says "citizens."

 

[Lloyd Parker]

In article <p1iUg.9199$e66.6609@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>,
<lucasea@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:452198F0.A71D16AC@hotmail.com...


John Fields wrote:

You miss no opportunity to lambaste the US, its population, its
government, its institutions, and you hate its very existence, so
what do you expect me to think, that you're a benevolent soul trying
to help with constructive criticism?

I thought it was fine under Clinton !

Yes, but you see, if he denigrates your point of view by labelling you as
someone that could never say anything good about the US, then he doesn't
have to take your point of view seriously and try to understand that perhaps
it might even be a valid point of view, that an intelligent person may be
capable of coming to through independent thought. It's the same thing the
Bush administration does by labelling everyone that disagrees with it a
"traitor" (under the *extremely* liberal interpretations that disagreeing
with your government is tantamount to aiding the enemy.) What they seem to
fail to understand is that the Constitution gives every US citizen is given
the *responsibility* to question its government *every single* day of their
lives. It really is sad that the Bush administration has seen fit to
legitimize this sort of anti-American behavior.

Eric Lucas

Keith Olbermann had a good commentary a week or two ago about Bush calling a
criticism "unacceptable."

 

[Michael A. Terrell]

jmfbahciv@aol.com wrote:

The anti-Bushers keep saying this and it makes absolutely no sense.
What do you mean "retain power"? He has a term in office which
will end. He won't retain any powers after the Inaugeration in 2009.

take away peoples' rights, and kill a
segment of the world population, in much the same propagandistic way that
Hitler did.

You've been listening to Democrats without thinking. Everything
coming out of their mouths is campaign speeches for 2004. This
is not a typo...I meant four.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that Bush is the next
Hitler, just that there *are* parallels between their misanthropic behavior,
if hugely different in degree and consequence.

You are excoriating Bush for doing one of his primary jobs which
is national security. I suppose you long for the days of the
Clintons where the goal was to breakdown all national security.

The Republicans are in a real panic here in Florida over Mark Foley.
They are afraid that the Democrats will get the seat he just vacated
because of the scandal.

<http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLD,GGLD:2004-04,GGLD:en&q=mark+foley>


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

 

[John Fields]

On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 03:26:20 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
<nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

lucasea@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:y3kUg.19044$Ij.9984@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...

Sadly, not long enough, but we have made strides. As those who grew up,
for example, when it was tacitly OK to blow up a church, die off,
gradually this type of behavior becomes less and less acceptable. It will
be a *long* road, however, since there are so many other, more endemic,
ways in which racism expresses itself. Attitudes change slowly, it's
human nature.

And yet ....

Three Girls Killed in Pennsylvania School Shooting

A gunman has shot and killed three girls in a small Amish school in the
eastern U.S. state of Pennsylvania.

Police say seven other people were injured Monday morning, some seriously,
before the gunman took his own life. A police official described the crime
scene as "horrendous." He said the gunman walked into the school, sent the
boys and some females outside, then tied up and shot the girls.

---
And that has _what_ to do with racism???


--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer

 

[John Fields]

On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 03:26:44 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
<nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message
news:r0k3i2515kq9t03o9l9bqe9mdberpp4jlj@4ax.com...

The US believes that US law applies everywhere in the world, but US
constitutional rights don't apply to anyone who isn't the 'right sort of
person'.

Preposterous.

But still true.

---
Just saying that it's true doesn't make it so.

Prove your point if you expect to be believed.


--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer

 

[Eeyore]

John Fields wrote:

On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 19:59:42 +0100, "T Wake" wrote:
"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message

So what? With world domonation as its goal, one would expect it
would strike world-wide, as the opportunity arose.


Whose goal? "It" isn't really appropriate to define the long term aims of a
disparate group of organisations. Are "they" trying to dominate the world or
destroy western society or convert every one or...
---
"It" being radical Islam, the goal, in my opinion, would be to
convert everyone to Islam and have them be subject to control by
Muslim jurists, the goal being total world domination by Islam.

Refusal to convert would result in death.

There is no entity called 'radical Islam'.

Who exactly do you mean ?

Graham

 

[Eeyore]

John Fields wrote:

On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 20:01:40 +0100, Eeyore wrote:
John Fields wrote:
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 10:11:54 +0100, Eeyore wrote:
mmeron@cars3.uchicago.edu wrote:
In article <4520C55D.7B2F988C@hotmail.com>, Eeyore writes:

You need to do some reading. OBL for example.

I'm doing my reading. It is your reading that appears quite
superficial. Try following memri.org for a while, and that's just for
starters.

I see they mention the Muslim Brotherhood. They're the ppl you really should be scared about. >> >Not
Islam generally.

---
Probably _you_ should be afraid. I don't think they've forgotten
the Crusades yet.

Afraid of what exactly ?

---
Convert or die.

What gives you the utterly fuckwitted idea I'd ever be in such a position ? Moslems only account for a tiny
percentage of the population if you hadn't noticed.

Graham

 

[Eeyore]

John Fields wrote:

On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 20:13:49 +0100, Eeyore wrote:
John Fields wrote:
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 15:57:00 +0100, Eeyore wrote:
lucasea@sbcglobal.net wrote:

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that Bush is the next
Hitler, just that there *are* parallels between their misanthropic behavior,
if hugely different in degree and consequence.

Very different. The outcome could be similar though. This is why the USA needs
to be halted in its current idiotic behaviour.

---
And just how do you propose to do that?

There's this thing called public opinion and it affects this other thing called
politics.

---
Definitions aren't answers.

I'll ask you again: "Just how do you propose to do that?"

If you don't have any idea how individuals can influence things there's no point
answering.

Graham