Jihad needs scientists

On Sun, 04 Mar 07 12:24:46 GMT, jmfbahciv@aol.com Gave us:

Comm transfers are a completely different method based on packets
described by the several layers of protocols the comm biz has
evolved.
Click to expand...
Absolutely not. This isn't the Zmodem days you are stuck in,
dipshit.

TCP/IP governs the packets. The DOWNLOAD manager governs the
partial file resume process. They use running checksums ALL THE TIME.
That is how they begin feeding the remainder of a file. The sender
starts at the correct location of the file, and begins sending again.
It has NOTHING to do with the comm link standard being used.

You really prove again how lost you are acting like the rest world
is stuck in the bad old modem days... like you are.
 
On Sun, 04 Mar 07 12:35:48 GMT, jmfbahciv@aol.com Gave us:

Has controller functionality moved into all disk drives? That
sorta sucks. ....Do these disk drives have multi ports?
Click to expand...
IDE drives come two per channel. One drive's controller becomes the
master, and the other gets slaved to it. The connection to the
computer main board come by way of an IDE I/O interface. The
controller is on the drive, right on the parallel bus of the cable,
just like it should be.

You cannot possibly think for a moment that ANYONE here is going to
place ANY credence in ANYTHING you say after seeing here that you know
NOTHING about how things are done today.
 
On Sun, 04 Mar 07 12:35:48 GMT, jmfbahciv@aol.com Gave us:

Yes,yes. Is this hardware or software? Note, for the purposes
of this discussion, firmware is soft. Oh, and exclude optical--
I don't understand that stuff.
Click to expand...
Bwuahahahahahah!

So, you have no clue as to why logical block addressing was even
introduced?

You scream "knows nothing" with your every post!

Tell us... how many times, while you were "at the library" did you
ever visit the "wikipedea" page? Your answer will be quite revealing.
 
On Sun, 04 Mar 07 12:35:48 GMT, jmfbahciv@aol.com Gave us:

Logical!!! Then it is NOT a bit-to-bit copy. Goddammit. I
goofed and believed them on this one.
Click to expand...

You're an idiot. No matter where a file is located on a volume, it
can be copied 100% whether it contains errors or not. It can be spread
out over hundreds of locations on the drive.

Just how do you think someone downloading a file can also perform
other multi-tasking routines that involve writes to the same volume?

The downloaded file WILL be fragmented as it relates to it's
location on the drive.
 
On Sun, 04 Mar 07 12:35:48 GMT, jmfbahciv@aol.com Gave us:

[glum emoticon here] Yea, no progres has been observed.
Click to expand...
As if a zero progress twit could ever assess someone else's progress
in a realm in which you are clearly several decades behind even the
most unskilled lay person. There are gang boy retards with their pants
down past their asscrack on the bus that know more about it than you
do. That is truly sad.
 
On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 06:39:29 -0600, "nonsense@unsettled.com"
<nonsense@unsettled.com> Gave us:

What you're hearing is a peasant rendering of Shakespeare.
Click to expand...
You're still fucking peasants as far as I can see. --John Lennon
 
On Sun, 04 Mar 07 12:48:24 GMT, jmfbahciv@aol.com Gave us:

People who do the first implementations in the industry get to do the
naming. We got to do that a lot. I know IBM did an implementation.
I don't remember if the other six sisters did.
Click to expand...

Bwuahahahaha!

Name them.
 
On Sun, 04 Mar 07 13:11:42 GMT, jmfbahciv@aol.com Gave us:

In article <20dku29jsq6ahmd2ucqjrm0279atd4ll2r@4ax.com>,
MassiveProng <MassiveProng@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
On Sat, 03 Mar 07 13:22:49 GMT, jmfbahciv@aol.com Gave us:

There are plenty of data bases in today's online world that can never
be taken off-line.


You're an idiot.

You stopped thinking. Consider finance. Transportation,
especially things like trains, planes, and some ships.
Consider war objects. Consider NORAD. Consider power
generating stations. Consider the networks and telecomm.
Click to expand...
ALL have servers which are taken offline ALL THE TIME.

You really don't know how it is done these days. You prove it with
your every post.
 
On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 07:25:02 -0600, "nonsense@unsettled.com"
<nonsense@unsettled.com> Gave us:

jmfbahciv@aol.com wrote:

In article <48cku2dg872ekdnpgtu6u9phbndvhu92oo@4ax.com>,
MassiveProng <MassiveProng@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:

On Sat, 03 Mar 07 13:03:35 GMT, jmfbahciv@aol.com Gave us:


In article <f3d56$45e8681e$49ecf0e$20166@DIALUPUSA.NET>,
"nonsense@unsettled.com" <nonsense@unsettled.com> wrote:

MassiveProng wrote:

On Fri, 02 Mar 07 12:25:31 GMT, jmfbahciv@aol.com Gave us:



In article <9abb5$45e6dbbb$4fe70c3$30531@DIALUPUSA.NET>,
"nonsense@unsettled.com" <nonsense@unsettled.com> wrote:


jmfbahciv@aol.com wrote:


In article <epccu25dvaomn9ak8i5fmq0lks6prbbtuh@4ax.com>,
MassiveProng <MassiveProng@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:

Aren't you out of vital bodily fluids yet?

This is what happens when you free the serfs.

Even serfs have been toilet trained and know the best
use of those other fluids.


Your senility is showing again, witch. Don't you have a grave site
or an urn of ashes to talk to? Do you really feel so compelled to try
to talk to us? If you're such a bit god, invent something!

Well here's one that was/is incapable of learning toilet
skills.

It is clear that he needs adult supervision of the
maternal kind.

More immature petty baby bullshit. You have succeeded in letting
the Unlearned Tard drag you down to its level. Congratulations.


Your congratualtions are premature. I have yet to achieve his level
of thinking ability. It's a fine goal.

Thank you. However IMO we're merely displaced on the
same plateau.
Click to expand...

Yes... the same "plateau" as whale shit resides.
 
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007 09:54:07 -0500, krw <krw@att.bizzzz> Gave us:

In article <9ldku21o58531j21nnipbg2qorbqtc71li@4ax.com>,
MassiveProng@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org says...
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 13:38:29 -0500, krw <krw@att.bizzzz> Gave us:

If you accept that there are disk controllers controlling
controllers.


IDE controllers are ALL ON THE DRIVE.

Clueless.

The part on the MOBO is called an I/O interface, NOT a drive
controller.

You couldn't be more clueless, Dumbulb.
Click to expand...
Tell us, oh master of IDE... Where is the controller located for the
IDE/computer interface.

It is ON THE DRIVE, dipshit.
 
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007 10:08:40 -0500, krw <krw@att.bizzzz> Gave us:

I always
get confused when reading either's cache docs.
Click to expand...
Not surprising since you don't even know where the drive controller
for an IDE drive is located, and you are so retarded that you think it
is merely a cache.
 
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007 10:44:51 -0500, krw <krw@att.bizzzz> Gave us:

BTW, I had to agree to allow my employer to reach into my account to
pull money out before I could get direct deposit. At least there is
some protection there, but this will become the general case.
Click to expand...

Bullshit. The mechanism by which employers begin direct deposits
differs from employer to employer and from payroll agency to payroll
agency.

You could be a bit more clueless, just not in this life.
 
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007 17:19:51 +0000 (UTC), kensmith@green.rahul.net (Ken
Smith) Gave us:

Some fraction of the controller has been on the disk drive for a long
time. As we went ST506->EDI->fast ATA->SATA, more and more of the
workings moved into the drive.

The KiethTard seems to think the opposite, but I agree with you.
Click to expand...
 
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007 17:31:06 +0000 (UTC), kensmith@green.rahul.net (Ken
Smith) Gave us:

There is not bottle neck in that if you don't do something completely
daft. BTW: coincidental events won't overwrite each other unless you do
something also daft. Today, time stamping can be done with very high
accuracy for very little cost. The GPS system sends a very accurate clock
around the world for you. You don't have to use time packets and figure
travel times any more.

Hell, even a precision clock set to GMT when it was activated will
Click to expand...
work for years on end. We used to put them in software security
"dongles" fully epoxy potted with their five year battery.

Dallas Semi comes to mind.
 
MassiveProng wrote:
On Sun, 04 Mar 07 12:35:48 GMT, jmfbahciv@aol.com Gave us:


Has controller functionality moved into all disk drives? That
sorta sucks. ....Do these disk drives have multi ports?


IDE drives come two per channel. One drive's controller becomes the
master, and the other gets slaved to it. The connection to the
computer main board come by way of an IDE I/O interface. The
controller is on the drive, right on the parallel bus of the cable,
just like it should be.

You cannot possibly think for a moment that ANYONE here is going to
place ANY credence in ANYTHING you say after seeing here that you know
NOTHING about how things are done today.
Click to expand...
You appear to be mostly self-taught. If not, then shame on
those who taught you.
 
MassiveProng wrote:

On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 06:39:29 -0600, "nonsense@unsettled.com"
nonsense@unsettled.com> Gave us:


What you're hearing is a peasant rendering of Shakespeare.


You're still fucking peasants as far as I can see. --John Lennon
Click to expand...
Him too.
 
In article <cd7mu25du691t138q6uatnmt7jdlqqvp31@4ax.com>,
MassiveProng@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org says...
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007 09:54:07 -0500, krw <krw@att.bizzzz> Gave us:

In article <9ldku21o58531j21nnipbg2qorbqtc71li@4ax.com>,
MassiveProng@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org says...
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 13:38:29 -0500, krw <krw@att.bizzzz> Gave us:

If you accept that there are disk controllers controlling
controllers.


IDE controllers are ALL ON THE DRIVE.

Clueless.

The part on the MOBO is called an I/O interface, NOT a drive
controller.

You couldn't be more clueless, Dumbulb.

Tell us, oh master of IDE... Where is the controller located for the
IDE/computer interface.
Click to expand...
Where is the DMA BUSMASTER CONTROLLER, MassivelyWrong? You're so far
out of your league you can't even find the light switch.

It is ON THE DRIVE, dipshit.
Click to expand...
What a clueless idiot.

--
Keith
 
In article <3j7mu2d76vc5eq16p9umeq49cp8kse4msj@4ax.com>,
MassiveProng@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org says...
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007 10:08:40 -0500, krw <krw@att.bizzzz> Gave us:

I always
get confused when reading either's cache docs.


Not surprising since you don't even know where the drive controller
for an IDE drive is located, and you are so retarded that you think it
is merely a cache.

What a snip-forging clueless dolt, Dimbulb.
Click to expand...

--
Keith
 
In article <i38mu2t8oe1kr97c2ro6o23119r38cncsa@4ax.com>,
MassiveProng@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org says...
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007 17:19:51 +0000 (UTC), kensmith@green.rahul.net (Ken
Smith) Gave us:

Some fraction of the controller has been on the disk drive for a long
time. As we went ST506->EDI->fast ATA->SATA, more and more of the
workings moved into the drive.

The KiethTard seems to think the opposite, but I agree with you.

As we moved to DMA-4 -> ATA->2 ATA-345 -> SATA more and more moved
Click to expand...
back to the chipset, dumbass Dimbulb.

--
Keith
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top