Internet Speeds And Costs Around The World.

"PhilD" <replytonewsgrouponly@aussient.com.au> wrote in message
news:w25Gm.50628$ze1.13801@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
"Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> wrote in message
news:00724ac7$0$26885$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...

"Doug Jewell" <ask@and.maybe.ill.tell.you> wrote in message
news:K7ydnfYzaINfOnXXnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
Don McKenzie wrote:

Internet Speeds And Costs Around The World, Shown Visually:
http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/internet-speeds-and-costs-around-the-world-shown-visually/#more-362769
Be sure to click the above image to see it in its full glory.

Yes, Australia if 5th from the right hand end of the graph.

Cheers Don...



One thing you will notice about the countries with very high speed
internet - they are all small with high population. Much easier and
cheaper to provide high speed broadband to a reasonable slab of the
population in those circumstances. I wonder what level of access people
in say rural France have though. At least in Australia, most people in
major cities have access to 8MBps (although very few opt for faster than
512K), and most people in rural towns have access to 1.5MBps. Thanks to
the government assistance, people on farms etc have access to
256-512kBps via satellite which is a damned site better than what they
could get through phone lines. We still have some way to go, but
personally I'd prefer to make 1.5MBps available to anyone who wants it,
rather than having some people in some cities with 60M and regional
areas / people with pair gain etc with 14-33K.


Fuck that, why should my internet experience be limited because of the
tiny percentage of the populus who choose to live in the middle of
nowhere?
I've never been to Perth or Hobart and only visit Adelaide roughly once a
year. Correct me if I'm wrong, but from memory none of the Capital cities
have Uranium/Gold/Iron/Coal etc mines in the middle of them and I believe
that most of the food growing areas are outside the cities. That being the
case it's hard to see what the Capital cities do other than consume our
products, produce copious pollution and provide services to support the
productive regions of Australia that keep people like you in a comfortable
lifestyle.
Which has sweet fuck all to do with my internet experience being restricted
to appease a minority group.
 
On Oct 30, 12:25 am, "Clocky" <notg...@happen.com> wrote:
"PhilD" <replytonewsgroupo...@aussient.com.au> wrote in message

news:w25Gm.50628$ze1.13801@news-server.bigpond.net.au...





"Clocky" <notg...@happen.com> wrote in message
news:00724ac7$0$26885$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...

"Doug Jewell" <a...@and.maybe.ill.tell.you> wrote in message
news:K7ydnfYzaINfOnXXnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
Don McKenzie wrote:

Internet Speeds And Costs Around The World, Shown Visually:
http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/internet-speeds-and-costs-around-th....
Be sure to click the above image to see it in its full glory.

Yes, Australia if 5th from the right hand end of the graph.

Cheers Don...

One thing you will notice about the countries with very high speed
internet - they are all small with high population. Much easier and
cheaper to provide high speed broadband to a reasonable slab of the
population in those circumstances. I wonder what level of access people
in say rural France have though. At least in Australia, most people in
major cities have access to 8MBps (although very few opt for faster than
512K), and most people in rural towns have access to 1.5MBps. Thanks to
the government assistance, people on farms etc have access to
256-512kBps via satellite which is a damned site better than what they
could get through phone lines. We still have some way to go, but
personally I'd prefer to make 1.5MBps available to anyone who wants it,
rather than having some people in some cities with 60M and regional
areas / people with pair gain etc with 14-33K.

Fuck that, why should my internet experience be limited because of the
tiny percentage of the populus who choose to live in the middle of
nowhere?
I've never been to Perth or Hobart and only visit Adelaide roughly once a
year. Correct me if I'm wrong, but from memory none of the Capital cities
have Uranium/Gold/Iron/Coal etc mines in the middle of them and I believe
that most of the food growing areas are outside the cities. That being the
case it's hard to see what the Capital cities do other than consume our
products, produce copious pollution and provide services to support the
productive regions of Australia that keep people like you in a comfortable
lifestyle.

Which has sweet fuck all to do with my internet experience being restricted
to appease a minority group.
Minority groups and crackpots are the only ones that have rights or a
voice in this society in case you havent noticed.
 
"Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> wrote in message
news:00732998$0$26928$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
"PhilD" <replytonewsgrouponly@aussient.com.au> wrote in message
news:w25Gm.50628$ze1.13801@news-server.bigpond.net.au...

"Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> wrote in message
news:00724ac7$0$26885$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...

"Doug Jewell" <ask@and.maybe.ill.tell.you> wrote in message
news:K7ydnfYzaINfOnXXnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
Don McKenzie wrote:

Internet Speeds And Costs Around The World, Shown Visually:
http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/internet-speeds-and-costs-around-the-world-shown-visually/#more-362769
Be sure to click the above image to see it in its full glory.

Yes, Australia if 5th from the right hand end of the graph.

Cheers Don...



One thing you will notice about the countries with very high speed
internet - they are all small with high population. Much easier and
cheaper to provide high speed broadband to a reasonable slab of the
population in those circumstances. I wonder what level of access people
in say rural France have though. At least in Australia, most people in
major cities have access to 8MBps (although very few opt for faster
than 512K), and most people in rural towns have access to 1.5MBps.
Thanks to the government assistance, people on farms etc have access to
256-512kBps via satellite which is a damned site better than what they
could get through phone lines. We still have some way to go, but
personally I'd prefer to make 1.5MBps available to anyone who wants it,
rather than having some people in some cities with 60M and regional
areas / people with pair gain etc with 14-33K.


Fuck that, why should my internet experience be limited because of the
tiny percentage of the populus who choose to live in the middle of
nowhere?
I've never been to Perth or Hobart and only visit Adelaide roughly once a
year. Correct me if I'm wrong, but from memory none of the Capital cities
have Uranium/Gold/Iron/Coal etc mines in the middle of them and I believe
that most of the food growing areas are outside the cities. That being
the case it's hard to see what the Capital cities do other than consume
our products, produce copious pollution and provide services to support
the productive regions of Australia that keep people like you in a
comfortable lifestyle.


Which has sweet fuck all to do with my internet experience being
restricted to appease a minority group.

I never said it was related and you should be able to get a suitable speed
internet, and so should everyone. My comments were about your view of
non-city people. If you take domestic and export production, the "minority
that live in the middle of nowhere" that you so willingly put down
contribute far more to GDP and export income than major city people ever
could. The wealth of the whole country that gives you the luxury to have
your high speed internet is dependent on a healthy economy. The ability for
business's to operate effectively with all forms of communication doesn't
just stop at the edge of the capital cities. Those mines/farms/country
towns/people further out happen to also improve their operation by getting
an effective communications system at reasonable cost.

You remind me of a child on first finding out that honey isn't just
something that magically appears on a Coles/Woolworths shelf, it actually
comes from the work of people/animals that you put down as being a "minority
group". You need a similar waking up experience, or maybe you just need to
grow up.

PhilD
 
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:15:08 +0800, Rheilly Phoull wrote:


Yeahbut if we didnt buy your stuff you would be winging about that too
Most farm produce in Australia is exported anyway.
 
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:50:33 -0700, kreed wrote:


Minority groups and crackpots are the only ones that have rights or a
voice in this society in case you havent noticed.
Well, all you have to do is look at the collective contents of our
parliaments to tell you want the majority do. Baah, baaah, baah.....
 
terryc wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:15:08 +0800, Rheilly Phoull wrote:

Yeahbut if we didnt buy your stuff you would be winging about that too

Most farm produce in Australia is exported anyway.
Most farm produce on Australian supermarket shelves is imported.

--
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ipvdBnU8F8
- KRudd at his finest.

"The Labour Party is corrupt beyond redemption!"
- Labour hasbeen Mark Latham in a moment of honest clarity.

"This is the recession we had to have!"
- Paul Keating explaining why he gave Australia another Labour recession.

"Silly old bugger!"
- Well known ACTU pisspot and sometime Labour prime minister Bob Hawke
responding to a pensioner who dared ask for more.

"By 1990, no child will live in poverty"
- Bob Hawke again, desperate to win another election.

"A billion trees ..."
- Borke, pissed as a newt again.

"Well may we say 'God save the Queen' because nothing will save the governor
general!"
- Egotistical shithead and pompous fuckwit E.G. Whitlam whining about his
appointee for Governor General John Kerr.

"SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU DUMB CUNT!"
- FlangesBum on learning the truth about Labour's economic capabilities.

"I don't care what you fuckers think!"
- KRudd the KRude at his finest again.

"We'll just change it all when we get in."
- Garrett the carrott
 
son of a bitch wrote:

But After Ruddy installs a super fast highway that
only the government will be able to afford, we're still going to be
in the same boat.
Do you really think this is going to happen?

It's all just spin - to cover their piss poor ability to meet their
election promises regarding the internet.

Rob



--
 
terryc wrote
Rheilly Phoull wrote

Yeahbut if we didnt buy your stuff you would be winging about that too

Most farm produce in Australia is exported anyway.
Like hell it is.
 
Dr. Sir John Howard, AC, WSCMoF" <""noujwas\"@yahoo.com . wrote
terryc wrote
Rheilly Phoull wrote

Yeah but if we didnt buy your stuff you would be winging about that too

Most farm produce in Australia is exported anyway.

Most farm produce on Australian supermarket shelves is imported.
Like hell it is.
 
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:36:25 +1100, Rod Speed wrote:

Dr. Sir John Howard, AC, WSCMoF" <""noujwas\"@yahoo.com . wrote
terryc wrote
Rheilly Phoull wrote

Yeah but if we didnt buy your stuff you would be winging about that
too

Most farm produce in Australia is exported anyway.

Most farm produce on Australian supermarket shelves is imported.
The Aussie farmers are good at very efficently producing most basics and
basic forms of meat. They just can not compete on what you call
"condiments" or the fiddly stuff that requires lots of hands on work.

The figures I remember of $90B exports and $125B imports for food stuff.

Like hell it is.
your ignorance is not my problem.
 
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:35:17 +1100, Rod Speed wrote:

terryc wrote
Rheilly Phoull wrote

Yeahbut if we didnt buy your stuff you would be winging about that too

Most farm produce in Australia is exported anyway.

Like hell it is.
Hey, with a snappy come back like that, you could launch a new career as
a farm consultants. Heck, the farmers would at least get a good laugh out
of you.
 
terryc wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Dr. Sir John Howard, AC, WSCMoF" <""noujwas\"@yahoo.com . wrote
terryc wrote
Rheilly Phoull wrote

Yeah but if we didnt buy your stuff you would be winging about that too

Most farm produce in Australia is exported anyway.

Most farm produce on Australian supermarket shelves is imported.

The Aussie farmers are good at very efficently producing most basics and
basic forms of meat. They just can not compete on what you call "condiments"
Its a hell of a lot more than just "condiments" that are imported.

or the fiddly stuff that requires lots of hands on work.
And that in spades.

The figures I remember of $90B exports and $125B imports for food stuff.
That is just plain wrong.

http://www.dfat.gov.au/facts/foodindustry.html

Like hell it is.

your ignorance is not my problem.
Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.
 
terryc wrote
Rod Speed wrote
terryc wrote
Rheilly Phoull wrote

Yeah but if we didnt buy your stuff you would be winging about that too

Most farm produce in Australia is exported anyway.

Like hell it is.

Hey, with a snappy come back like that, you
could launch a new career as a farm consultants.
Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.

YOU made that stupid pig ignorant claim.

YOU get to substantiate that stupid pig ignorant claim.

THATS how it works.
 
On Oct 30, 5:30 pm, terryc <newsninespam-s...@woa.com.au> wrote:
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:35:17 +1100, Rod Speed wrote:
terryc wrote
Rheilly Phoull wrote

Yeahbut if we didnt buy your stuff you would be winging about that too

Most farm produce in Australia is exported anyway.

Like hell it is.

Hey, with a snappy come back like that, you could launch a new career as
a farm consultants. Heck, the farmers would at least get a good laugh out
of you.
LMAO !!!
 
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:02:44 +1100, Rod Speed wrote:

terryc wrote
Rod Speed wrote
terryc wrote
Rheilly Phoull wrote

Yeah but if we didnt buy your stuff you would be winging about that
too

Most farm produce in Australia is exported anyway.

Like hell it is.

Hey, with a snappy come back like that, you could launch a new career
as a farm consultants.

Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.

YOU made that stupid pig ignorant claim.

YOU get to substantiate that stupid pig ignorant claim.
Those who need to know, know that it is true. Others, shrug, their
problem.
 
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:00:16 +1100, Rod Speed wrote:


The figures I remember of $90B exports and $125B imports for food
stuff.

That is just plain wrong.

http://www.dfat.gov.au/facts/foodindustry.html
Nothing there contradicts my figures. You're just looking at a subset.
 
terryc wrote
Rod Speed wrote
terryc wrote
Rod Speed wrote
terryc wrote
Rheilly Phoull wrote

Yeah but if we didnt buy your stuff you would be winging about that too

Most farm produce in Australia is exported anyway.

Like hell it is.

Hey, with a snappy come back like that, you could
launch a new career as a farm consultants.

Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.

YOU made that stupid pig ignorant claim.

YOU get to substantiate that stupid pig ignorant claim.

Those who need to know, know that it is true. Others, shrug, their problem.
Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.
 
terryc wrote
Rod Speed wrote
terryc wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Dr. Sir John Howard, AC, WSCMoF" <""noujwas\"@yahoo.com . wrote
terryc wrote

Most farm produce in Australia is exported anyway.

Most farm produce on Australian supermarket shelves is imported.

The Aussie farmers are good at very efficently producing most basics and
basic forms of meat. They just can not compete on what you call "condiments"

Its a hell of a lot more than just "condiments" that are imported.

or the fiddly stuff that requires lots of hands on work.

And that in spades.

The figures I remember of $90B exports and $125B imports for food stuff.

That is just plain wrong.

http://www.dfat.gov.au/facts/foodindustry.html

Nothing there contradicts my figures.
You're lying, as always.

You're just looking at a subset.
You're lying, as always.

And even if it was a subset, and it aint, you got the ratio backwards anyway.
 
"me here" <gloaming_agnet@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4aea6cea@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
son of a bitch wrote:

But After Ruddy installs a super fast highway that
only the government will be able to afford, we're still going to be
in the same boat.

Do you really think this is going to happen?
I think it will happen but it won't be overnight. Projects like these take
years. Probably ten years until near completion.

It's all just spin - to cover their piss poor ability to meet their
election promises regarding the internet.
There is a lot of spin but it's more to do with putting pressure on Telstra
to stop obfuscating and start cooperating. The Government and Telstra are in
negotiations about price of Telstra assets.
 
Fred wrote
me here <gloaming_agnet@hotmail.com> wrote
son of a bitch wrote

But After Ruddy installs a super fast highway that
only the government will be able to afford, we're still going to be in the same boat.

Do you really think this is going to happen?

I think it will happen but it won't be overnight. Projects like these take years. Probably ten years until near
completion.
It remains to be seen if it will even make it thru the senate.

It's all just spin - to cover their piss poor ability to meet their election promises regarding the internet.

There is a lot of spin but it's more to do with putting pressure on Telstra to stop obfuscating and start cooperating.
Yes, but it remains to be seen if that 'pressure' makes it thru the senate.

The Government and Telstra are in negotiations about price of Telstra assets.
But its very unlikely that Telstra is prepared to accept what the govt is prepared
to pay for those assets, particularly if the 'pressure' doesnt make it thru the senate.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top