interesting inductor

On Monday, 19 August 2019 13:08:53 UTC+1, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, August 19, 2019 at 9:08:26 PM UTC+10, tabby wrote:
On Monday, 19 August 2019 04:38:01 UTC+1, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sun, 18 Aug 2019 12:52:03 -0700 (PDT)) it happened
tabbypurr wrote in
9d9073d4-1beb-40ca-b7ab-1045cad9a623@googlegroups.com>:
On Sunday, 18 August 2019 17:53:53 UTC+1, Jan Panteltje wrote:

What makes a lot of noise is my 400 kV (bogus more like 40 kV) ebay
Tesla coil:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/141077605344
Have not found a practical use for it yet.

Violet ray. Good at killing surface bugs & for vacuum work.


NT

Yes, that would work, ozone,,
I use an EPROM erase tube for that:
http://panteltje.com/pub/UV_EPROM_erase_tube_IMG_7110.JPG

I noticed somebody on TV using it to purify water,
this sort of product:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147789391500174X

VRs are good for most skin issues.
Water can be sterilised just by putting it in a plastic bottle in the sun.

Ultraviolet rays are also good creating melanomas in your skin.

You should know enough to know the difference between UVA and UVB if you want to give useful advice, which is beyond NT's capabilities, if not perhaps beyond the capabilities he claims.

https://www.skincancer.org/risk-factors/uv-radiation/

Violet rays don't emit ultraviolet. Fool.


NT
 
On Sunday, August 18, 2019 at 9:53:53 AM UTC-7, Jan Panteltje wrote:

What makes a lot of noise is my 400 kV (bogus more like 40 kV) ebay
Tesla coil:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/141077605344
Have not found a practical use for it yet.

If you have a fluorescent fixture that won't start, hold the output end up to the tubes.
I've gotta replace the tubes and/or ballast eventiually, but the Zerostat (another kind of sparker)
is still starting my basement lights at need.
 
On Monday, August 19, 2019 at 9:08:26 PM UTC+10, tabb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, 19 August 2019 04:38:01 UTC+1, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sun, 18 Aug 2019 12:52:03 -0700 (PDT)) it happened
tabbypurr wrote in
9d9073d4-1beb-40ca-b7ab-1045cad9a623@googlegroups.com>:
On Sunday, 18 August 2019 17:53:53 UTC+1, Jan Panteltje wrote:

What makes a lot of noise is my 400 kV (bogus more like 40 kV) ebay
Tesla coil:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/141077605344
Have not found a practical use for it yet.

Violet ray. Good at killing surface bugs & for vacuum work.


NT

Yes, that would work, ozone,,
I use an EPROM erase tube for that:
http://panteltje.com/pub/UV_EPROM_erase_tube_IMG_7110.JPG

I noticed somebody on TV using it to purify water,
this sort of product:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147789391500174X

VRs are good for most skin issues.
Water can be sterilised just by putting it in a plastic bottle in the sun.

Ultraviolet rays are also good creating melanomas in your skin.

You should know enough to know the difference between UVA and UVB if you want to give useful advice, which is beyond NT's capabilities, if not perhaps beyond the capabilities he claims.

https://www.skincancer.org/risk-factors/uv-radiation/

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
Tim Williams wrote:

> A few uJ at best.

The compact nanoperm-based ones saturate at even lower currents than
those wound on a ferrite core. This crazy permeability doesn't come for
free. And their hi-freq permeability sucks even more.

Look, I get it, you don't work with these things on a daily basis. But
you are still aware that saturation is a thing, right..?

}:->

Best regarads, Piotr
 
jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

I want an inductive DAC, namely a series of steps of inductance made
from inductors and relays. One of these could get me 2.5 uH, or 10 uH
with the windings in series. Two of the same part gives 0, 2.5, 5, 10,
and 20 mH, plus the oddball 12.5.

For this application air-core coils would be best. They melt, but not
saturate. You can minimise their count by tapping. 250uH made of 1mm
wire is not very big, 4cm OD or so. I wound several of them for surge
suppression. The small inductance ones can even be air-core toroids.

Best regards, Piotr
 
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 14:54:22 +0200, Piotr Wyderski
<peter.pan@neverland.mil> wrote:

jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

I want an inductive DAC, namely a series of steps of inductance made
from inductors and relays. One of these could get me 2.5 uH, or 10 uH
with the windings in series. Two of the same part gives 0, 2.5, 5, 10,
and 20 mH, plus the oddball 12.5.

For this application air-core coils would be best. They melt, but not
saturate. You can minimise their count by tapping. 250uH made of 1mm
wire is not very big, 4cm OD or so. I wound several of them for surge
suppression. The small inductance ones can even be air-core toroids.

Best regards, Piotr

OK, I'll try some math on air-cores.

Looks like drum cores might work:

https://www.digikey.com/product-detail/en/bourns-inc/1140-102K-RC/1140-102K-RC-ND/2534469

Lots of air gap, lots of cooling area, Isat>Irms. It will spray
h-field in all directions, but that would be OK in my application.
It's BIG.

I'm thinking about a single 1 mH coil, then synthesizing the rest of
the inductance.

A couple of off-the-shelf toroids in series would hit 1 mH with that
sort of saturation. Then I could offer 500uH or 1 mH as the switched
"real" inductances.

Lots of inductors are like ceramic caps, only providing the specified
reactance at a fraction of the rated voltage or current.
 
On Monday, August 19, 2019 at 10:32:32 PM UTC+10, tabb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, 19 August 2019 13:08:53 UTC+1, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, August 19, 2019 at 9:08:26 PM UTC+10, tabby wrote:
On Monday, 19 August 2019 04:38:01 UTC+1, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sun, 18 Aug 2019 12:52:03 -0700 (PDT)) it happened
tabbypurr wrote in
9d9073d4-1beb-40ca-b7ab-1045cad9a623@googlegroups.com>:
On Sunday, 18 August 2019 17:53:53 UTC+1, Jan Panteltje wrote:

What makes a lot of noise is my 400 kV (bogus more like 40 kV) ebay
Tesla coil:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/141077605344
Have not found a practical use for it yet.

Violet ray. Good at killing surface bugs & for vacuum work.


NT

Yes, that would work, ozone,,
I use an EPROM erase tube for that:
http://panteltje.com/pub/UV_EPROM_erase_tube_IMG_7110.JPG

I noticed somebody on TV using it to purify water,
this sort of product:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147789391500174X

VRs are good for most skin issues.
Water can be sterilised just by putting it in a plastic bottle in the sun.

Ultraviolet rays are also good creating melanomas in your skin.

You should know enough to know the difference between UVA and UVB if you want to give useful advice, which is beyond NT's capabilities, if not perhaps beyond the capabilities he claims.

https://www.skincancer.org/risk-factors/uv-radiation/

Violet rays don't emit ultraviolet. Fool.

Obviously not. The violet end of the spectrum extends into the ultraviolet.

The violet band that you can see isn't exactly active, so the foolishness is all yours - as usual. More transparently so than usual.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
"Piotr Wyderski" <peter.pan@neverland.mil> wrote in message
news:qje6d2$1avh$2@gioia.aioe.org...
The compact nanoperm-based ones saturate at even lower currents than those
wound on a ferrite core. This crazy permeability doesn't come for free.
And their hi-freq permeability sucks even more.

Although they make some that they claim higher saturation current (like up
to 40mAt) for; or rather, a softer B-H curve.

There's also square B-H varieties for magamp use.

The HF permeability sucks in that it begins dropping at quite low
frequencies: a half-corner ~10kHz, then a full corner ~1MHz.
https://www.seventransistorlabs.com/Images/CurveFit1.png
https://www.seventransistorlabs.com/Images/CurveFit2.png
The half-corner corresponds to the skin depth of the material (hence the
characteristic sqrt(f) diffusion slope), and the full corner corresponds to
the capacitance between laminations, so, the width and spacing of them.

It's overall better than any ferrite, particularly at low frequencies. And
if you have a lot of noise to handle, Bmax is also much higher. Awesome
stuff. :)

Tim

--
Seven Transistor Labs, LLC
Electrical Engineering Consultation and Design
Website: https://www.seventransistorlabs.com/
 
jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

> Looks like drum cores might work:

I've also used a drum. If you fill this with TIW 1mm, you'll get 250uH.
This is 42mm in diameter, is it big? Don't know your criteria.

https://www.tme.eu/pl/en/details/cp-p42_29/coil-formers-and-accessories/ferroxcube/

https://www.digikey.com/product-detail/en/bourns-inc/1140-102K-RC/1140-102K-RC-ND/2534469

About the size of mine and the saturation current is only 6.5A.
Is it worth playing with the ferrite at all? Double the number
of turns of mine and you'll get your 1mH.
Lots of inductors are like ceramic caps, only providing the specified
reactance at a fraction of the rated voltage or current.

All non-air core ones are like this. Alloy powder are particularly
notorious, but it is not a problem, if you design taking it into
account. My last PSU uses one with 4:1 swing and this is even an advantage.

Best regards, Piotr
 
On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 09:31:05 -0700, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com
wrote:

https://www.digikey.com/products/en?keywords=RN%20242-6-02-1M8

That is technically a commmon-mode choke - which makes it cheap - but
is probably useful for a real-inductor need that we have now.

It's spec'd at 1.8 mH per winding, but my AADE meter says about 2.5. I
should measure it some other ways to be sure.

(K seems to be over 0.99, so it would be a good common-mode filter but
not good for diff mode noise.)

I want an inductive DAC, namely a series of steps of inductance made
from inductors and relays. One of these could get me 2.5 uH, or 10 uH
with the windings in series. Two of the same part gives 0, 2.5, 5, 10,
and 20 mH, plus the oddball 12.5.

With 3 amps DC on both windings in series, it didn't get detectably
warm.

What I need to do, or actually delegate, is to measure L better, and
then L vs current. Need to hack up some rigs to do that.

Nice small PCB footprint. I can envision using this as a real
transformer, in power applications.

Working with one 2.5 mH coil of the Schaffner inductor, it loses about
half its inductance at 90 mA DC. Not good enough for my application,
but still an interesting part.

As a pulse transformer, 50:50 ohm rise time is about 200 ns! Could be
a gate driver.
 
On a sunny day (Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:22:20 -0700) it happened John Larkin
<jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in
<12mlledvimvb209p2q7k7mnrc11nttpgv6@4ax.com>:

On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 09:31:05 -0700, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com
wrote:


https://www.digikey.com/products/en?keywords=RN%20242-6-02-1M8

That is technically a commmon-mode choke - which makes it cheap - but
is probably useful for a real-inductor need that we have now.

It's spec'd at 1.8 mH per winding, but my AADE meter says about 2.5. I
should measure it some other ways to be sure.

(K seems to be over 0.99, so it would be a good common-mode filter but
not good for diff mode noise.)

I want an inductive DAC, namely a series of steps of inductance made
from inductors and relays. One of these could get me 2.5 uH, or 10 uH
with the windings in series. Two of the same part gives 0, 2.5, 5, 10,
and 20 mH, plus the oddball 12.5.

With 3 amps DC on both windings in series, it didn't get detectably
warm.

What I need to do, or actually delegate, is to measure L better, and
then L vs current. Need to hack up some rigs to do that.

Nice small PCB footprint. I can envision using this as a real
transformer, in power applications.

Working with one 2.5 mH coil of the Schaffner inductor, it loses about
half its inductance at 90 mA DC. Not good enough for my application,
but still an interesting part.

As a pulse transformer, 50:50 ohm rise time is about 200 ns! Could be
a gate driver.

they make pulse transformers etc..
https://www.schaffner.com/nc/products/configurator/
 
On Monday, 19 August 2019 15:05:53 UTC+1, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, August 19, 2019 at 10:32:32 PM UTC+10, tabb wrote:
On Monday, 19 August 2019 13:08:53 UTC+1, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, August 19, 2019 at 9:08:26 PM UTC+10, tabby wrote:
On Monday, 19 August 2019 04:38:01 UTC+1, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sun, 18 Aug 2019 12:52:03 -0700 (PDT)) it happened
tabbypurr wrote in
9d9073d4-1beb-40ca-b7ab-1045cad9a623@googlegroups.com>:
On Sunday, 18 August 2019 17:53:53 UTC+1, Jan Panteltje wrote:

What makes a lot of noise is my 400 kV (bogus more like 40 kV) ebay
Tesla coil:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/141077605344
Have not found a practical use for it yet.

Violet ray. Good at killing surface bugs & for vacuum work.


NT

Yes, that would work, ozone,,
I use an EPROM erase tube for that:
http://panteltje.com/pub/UV_EPROM_erase_tube_IMG_7110.JPG

I noticed somebody on TV using it to purify water,
this sort of product:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147789391500174X

VRs are good for most skin issues.
Water can be sterilised just by putting it in a plastic bottle in the sun.

Ultraviolet rays are also good creating melanomas in your skin.

You should know enough to know the difference between UVA and UVB if you want to give useful advice, which is beyond NT's capabilities, if not perhaps beyond the capabilities he claims.

https://www.skincancer.org/risk-factors/uv-radiation/

Violet rays don't emit ultraviolet. Fool.

Obviously not. The violet end of the spectrum extends into the ultraviolet.

The violet band that you can see isn't exactly active, so the foolishness is all yours - as usual. More transparently so than usual.

time wasting idiot plonked
 
On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 at 8:26:34 AM UTC+10, tabb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, 19 August 2019 15:05:53 UTC+1, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, August 19, 2019 at 10:32:32 PM UTC+10, tabb wrote:
On Monday, 19 August 2019 13:08:53 UTC+1, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, August 19, 2019 at 9:08:26 PM UTC+10, tabby wrote:
On Monday, 19 August 2019 04:38:01 UTC+1, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sun, 18 Aug 2019 12:52:03 -0700 (PDT)) it happened
tabbypurr wrote in
9d9073d4-1beb-40ca-b7ab-1045cad9a623@googlegroups.com>:
On Sunday, 18 August 2019 17:53:53 UTC+1, Jan Panteltje wrote:

<snip>

Violet rays don't emit ultraviolet. Fool.

Obviously not. The violet end of the spectrum extends into the ultraviolet.

The violet band that you can see isn't exactly active, so the foolishness is all yours - as usual. More transparently so than usual.

time wasting idiot plonked

NT doesn't like being outed as a twit.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
Tim Williams wrote:

Although they make some that they claim higher saturation current (like
up to 40mAt) for; or rather, a softer B-H curve.

My measurements of the 16mm cores indicate about this saturation
current, so it is an experimentally confirmed value.

> There's also square B-H varieties for magamp use.

Have never been able to buy one for prototyping.
The 3R1 is all I have, but my experiments show
that low-signal magamps work tollerably well even
with normal ferrites like the F938. Very forgiving
technology.

> The half-corner corresponds to the skin depth of the material

Oh, so *that* is the reason! Makes sense, thanks!

Best regards, Piotr
 
On a sunny day (Tue, 20 Aug 2019 09:28:34 +0200) it happened Piotr Wyderski
<peter.pan@neverland.mil> wrote in <qjg7dq$7n3$1@gioia.aioe.org>:

Tim Williams wrote:

Although they make some that they claim higher saturation current (like
up to 40mAt) for; or rather, a softer B-H curve.

My measurements of the 16mm cores indicate about this saturation
current, so it is an experimentally confirmed value.

There's also square B-H varieties for magamp use.

Have never been able to buy one for prototyping.
The 3R1 is all I have, but my experiments show
that low-signal magamps work tollerably well even
with normal ferrites like the F938. Very forgiving
technology.

The half-corner corresponds to the skin depth of the material

Oh, so *that* is the reason! Makes sense, thanks!

Best regards, Piotr

Magamps or 'transductors' were in practially every old CRT based color set over here.

There should be zilions around in the old TV dump,
Philips used those in their color sets, holds some patents.....

Those were used to correct the horizontal deflection amplitude
'pin cussion' distortion.
So they regulated the 15625 Hz(Europe) scan amplitude,
and were controlled by the 50 Hz (Europe) vertical scan.
(Use different frequencies for US.)

https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-dow1s92HswE/WiKB_vuRe2I/AAAAAAAAaJk/nxI7wmhMWIQJVmK57sq51IUd9mqo0pF2ACK4BGAYYCw/s320/ITT-THYRISTOR-DEFL-FIG6__TVMS.jpg
 
"Piotr Wyderski" <peter.pan@neverland.mil> wrote in message
news:qjg7dq$7n3$1@gioia.aioe.org...
There's also square B-H varieties for magamp use.

Have never been able to buy one for prototyping.
The 3R1 is all I have, but my experiments show
that low-signal magamps work tollerably well even
with normal ferrites like the F938. Very forgiving
technology.

You may have some and not know it! The old school ATX power supplies
derived the 3.3V supply from the transformer's 5V taps, using one tap
directly and the other tap controlled with a magamp and TL431. That's why
the 3.3V is so damn accurate (within 10s of mV) while everything else is a
sausage!

Typically the component is black ferrite, or plastic-cased nanocrystalline
strip, 4-5 turns, and may be wrapped in heat-shrink.

Tim

--
Seven Transistor Labs, LLC
Electrical Engineering Consultation and Design
Website: https://www.seventransistorlabs.com/
 
Tim Williams wrote:

You may have some and not know it!  The old school ATX power supplies
derived the 3.3V supply from the transformer's 5V taps, using one tap
directly and the other tap controlled with a magamp and TL431.

That's most likely the 3R1:

https://ferrite.qutic.com/pdf/3r1.pdf

I would not expect a nanocrystaline ribbon in a Chinese PSU. Would
probaby constitute a half of its price. :->

Best regards, Piotr
 
"Piotr Wyderski" <peter.pan@neverland.mil> wrote in message
news:qjhghi$19v$1@gioia.aioe.org...
That's most likely the 3R1:

https://ferrite.qutic.com/pdf/3r1.pdf

I would not expect a nanocrystaline ribbon in a Chinese PSU. Would probaby
constitute a half of its price. :-

Maybe. Or maybe the supplies I took apart weren't sourced from China, who
knows. Here's a few, with some other specimens for reference:
https://www.seventransistorlabs.com/Images/FerritesAndMagamps.jpg

I don't think I have any square ferrites in here (actually, I probably do,
but haven't measured them to be sure, and none that are obviously gooped
with varnish), but I have a few beheatshrinked inductors in another box that
appear to be ferrite, most likely the 3R1 or something closely related.
I've seen both, definitely.

The amorphous/nanocrystalline cores can be easy to miss; the black one is
thick and square and has a middle seam, but could easily be mistaken at a
glance for black ferrite, especially with the varnish gooped on it.

That's probably a 15k mu ferrite, top left. Apparently they'll put ferrites
in plastic boxes too (presumably for the creepage distance to core?). So I
included that too, without the box obviously.

Tim

--
Seven Transistor Labs, LLC
Electrical Engineering Consultation and Design
Website: https://www.seventransistorlabs.com/
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top