HP 3310B Malfunction Generator

tm wrote:
"Robert Baer" <robertbaer@localnet.com> wrote in message
news:n4lNs.128399$Id.39557@newsfe24.iad...
tm wrote:

"rickman" <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ke1n0i$97l$1@dont-email.me...
I bought this thing some 10 years ago used and it has worked ok,
mainly as an audio generator. I fired it up the other day and the
upper ranges seem to output a funky sine wave now. The 10 kHz and 100
kHz ranges output a distorted waveform that does a direction reversal
a little bit after going negative of the midpoint. It almost looks
like a rectified sine wave, but the waveform is more than half a
cycle. I don't see any issues on the other waveforms.

I can play with the range switch and find that turning it slowly can
have an impact on the point of the waveform where the reversal occurs.
But it doesn't really feel like a switch problem. I would disassemble
the switch to see if there are mechanical issues, but it is one of
those multi-gang wafer switches with components mounted directly on it
and each gang is soldered to the board, a real nightmare to remove.
This thing was made to never break, not to be repaired.

I don't have any info on it. The circuit board has some dozens of
transistors, a couple of what are likely op amps (metal cans) and well
over a hundred passives. I don't know where to begin trying to fix
it... other than connectors and switches are the primary point of
failure. But even removing and reseating boards looks like a bear in
this thing.

Any suggestions on ways to repair this?

I saw the other thread on new units and had looked at some of the
little $8 boards on eBay. Funny that there isn't much in between the
$8 boards and the $400 boxes. I would have thought this is something
that could be done very inexpensively these days. I would use a PC
audio output but my signal is outside the 20 kHz upper limit of audio
outputs.

Maybe I'll add a simple sig-gen to the prototype circuit I'm building.
Lots more than $8 of effort, but I'll know what I'm getting.

Rick

Service manual here:

http://www.home.agilent.com/agilent/techSupport.jspx?searchT=3310b&id=3310B:epsg:pro&pageMode=OV&pid=3310B:epsg:pro&cc=US&lc=eng



As always, check the power supplies first.

Then RTFM


NOTE: The OP _only_ complained about the sine output, and mostly at
higher frequencies; definitely not PS oriented; prob is in one of the
DFG chains.


So you would not recommend first checking the power supplies on a 40+
year piece of test equipment before doing any follow-up trouble
shooting? Even when it is a well known fact that electrolytic capacitors
that old are often found degraded.

Oh well, whatever.





I did NOT say that; i mentioned where the problem was most likely to
be found.
Yes, it is possible that there may be one or two degraded
'lytics..even the old wet electrolytics lasted 20 years at best and even
then many could be recovered by adding electrolyte.
On old tube equipment, powering them up with a variac at zero and s l
o w l y raising the line voltage to full will allow most of degraded
'lytics to re-form and perform adequately at worst.
 
On 1/27/2013 11:03 PM, Michael A. Terrell wrote:
rickman wrote:

On 1/27/2013 8:12 PM, Jamie wrote:
rickman wrote:

On 1/26/2013 6:48 PM, David& Cheryl Denslow wrote:

"Jamie"<jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote in
message
news:tnZMs.134394$pV4.52265@newsfe21.iad...



Caps..and power supply.

Jamie


Operator and Service Manual for P 3310A/B is available here:
http://cp.literature.agilent.com/litweb/pdf/03310-90003.pdf



Thanks. I'll take a look at it. I guess I'm just intimidated by the
disassembly job alone.

It doesn't really look like a PSU issue to me. I would suspect the
switches, but when I work them it just doesn't feel like that's the
problem. The unit has tons of test points so that should make it
easier to see what is going on.

Rick
I am not sure the age of that unit but I hope it's newer than the tube
era :) A LCR meter would serve you will, along with a DMM.

Oh, and lets us not for get to use a scope on the power supply for cap
ripples and possible linkage in selenium devices and maybe germanium.

Jamie

Thanks for the suggestions, after several folks have said to check power
I guess I'd better do that. But what's with the selenium and germanium
devices? This thing wasn't built in the 50's I'm pretty sure. What do
you mean about "linkage"? Do you mean leakage?


Listen to Maynard Philbrick at your own risk.
Ok, I'll bite, who is Maynard Philbrick? I thought the name was
familiar, but googling it doesn't provide anything useful, mainly
genealogy pages. I can't even seem to exclude them they are so
pervasive. Linking the name to HP doesn't do it either.

The name does sound familiar. Is that a name here?


HP used germanium transistors in the '60s designs, like everyone
else, then moved to silicon. They weren't penny pinching, they were
cutting edge designs.

You should always verify the power supply is in spec on test
equipment before doing anything else. Slight errors are compounded, and
can cause you all kinds of headaches including a dead piece of
equipment. Start with the +/-25 volt outputs are right and have no
ripple. I see no Germanium transistors listed. I see are bipolar
silicon, and a few FET. The parts list is in the middle of the manual,
the manual is dated 1973, and has a lot of design changes in the back
and sorted by serial number groups. Unless you are very familiar with
troubleshooting, you may need help.
I've mainly worked on digital stuff including state of the art (at the
time of course) floating point array processors. Analog is not my
forte, but I'm comfortable with it.

It seems I am spending more time getting a new lab setup than actually
working on anything. I cleared out some old appliances and now have
room for an 8 foot workbench which I plan to build. But before I do
that I am turning my hand router and hand saw into table tools to help
with the workbench construction. The test gear is the same way, I need
this to fix that and before I can use that I need this other thing...
I've let things slide too long.

Wasn't it Lincoln who said, "Give me six hours to chop down a tree and I
will spend the first four sharpening the axe"?

I'd prefer to use a chain saw...

Rick
 
rickman wrote:
On 1/27/2013 11:03 PM, Michael A. Terrell wrote:

rickman wrote:

On 1/27/2013 8:12 PM, Jamie wrote:
rickman wrote:

On 1/26/2013 6:48 PM, David& Cheryl Denslow wrote:

"Jamie"<jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote in
message
news:tnZMs.134394$pV4.52265@newsfe21.iad...



Caps..and power supply.
??????
?????? Jamie
??????
?????
????? Operator and Service Manual for P 3310A/B is available here:
????? http://cp.literature.agilent.com/litweb/pdf/03310-90003.pdf
?????
?????
????
???? Thanks. I'll take a look at it. I guess I'm just intimidated by the
???? disassembly job alone.
????
???? It doesn't really look like a PSU issue to me. I would suspect the
???? switches, but when I work them it just doesn't feel like that's the
???? problem. The unit has tons of test points so that should make it
???? easier to see what is going on.
????
???? Rick
??? I am not sure the age of that unit but I hope it's newer than the tube
??? era :) A LCR meter would serve you will, along with a DMM.
???
??? Oh, and lets us not for get to use a scope on the power supply for cap
??? ripples and possible linkage in selenium devices and maybe germanium.
???
??? Jamie
??
?? Thanks for the suggestions, after several folks have said to check power
?? I guess I'd better do that. But what's with the selenium and germanium
?? devices? This thing wasn't built in the 50's I'm pretty sure. What do
?? you mean about "linkage"? Do you mean leakage?
?
?
? Listen to Maynard Philbrick at your own risk.

Ok, I'll bite, who is Maynard Philbrick? I thought the name was
familiar, but googling it doesn't provide anything useful, mainly
genealogy pages. I can't even seem to exclude them they are so
pervasive. Linking the name to HP doesn't do it either.

The name does sound familiar. Is that a name here?


That is 'Jamie's real name.


? HP used germanium transistors in the '60s designs, like everyone
? else, then moved to silicon. They weren't penny pinching, they were
? cutting edge designs.
?
? You should always verify the power supply is in spec on test
? equipment before doing anything else. Slight errors are compounded, and
? can cause you all kinds of headaches including a dead piece of
? equipment. Start with the +/-25 volt outputs are right and have no
? ripple. I see no Germanium transistors listed. I see are bipolar
? silicon, and a few FET. The parts list is in the middle of the manual,
? the manual is dated 1973, and has a lot of design changes in the back
? and sorted by serial number groups. Unless you are very familiar with
? troubleshooting, you may need help.

I've mainly worked on digital stuff including state of the art (at the
time of course) floating point array processors. Analog is not my
forte, but I'm comfortable with it.

Just remeber to check all the 'Backdates' at the rear of the manual
if you find something that doesn't match the schematic or parts lists.
Some HP semiconductors have replacements available from www.nteinc.com


It seems I am spending more time getting a new lab setup than actually
working on anything. I cleared out some old appliances and now have
room for an 8 foot workbench which I plan to build. But before I do
that I am turning my hand router and hand saw into table tools to help
with the workbench construction. The test gear is the same way, I need
this to fix that and before I can use that I need this other thing...
I've let things slide too long.

Wasn't it Lincoln who said, "Give me six hours to chop down a tree and I
will spend the first four sharpening the axe"?

You can make a good ax in four hours. You can sharpen a good ax in
15 minutes.


I'd prefer to use a chain saw...

I need a front end loader, after my shop roof was damaged. I've been
using a coal shovel to scoop up service manuals destroyed by water.
Next will be a rake, folled by a scraper & a push broom to clean uo the
debris where termites ate into the damp paper. There were a bunch of
new boxes of greenbar paper destroyed, as well.
 
"Robert Baer" <robertbaer@localnet.com> wrote in message
news:zzzNs.2337$Sq4.1956@newsfe14.iad...
tm wrote:

"Robert Baer" <robertbaer@localnet.com> wrote in message
news:n4lNs.128399$Id.39557@newsfe24.iad...
tm wrote:

"rickman" <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ke1n0i$97l$1@dont-email.me...
I bought this thing some 10 years ago used and it has worked ok,
mainly as an audio generator. I fired it up the other day and the
upper ranges seem to output a funky sine wave now. The 10 kHz and 100
kHz ranges output a distorted waveform that does a direction reversal
a little bit after going negative of the midpoint. It almost looks
like a rectified sine wave, but the waveform is more than half a
cycle. I don't see any issues on the other waveforms.

I can play with the range switch and find that turning it slowly can
have an impact on the point of the waveform where the reversal occurs.
But it doesn't really feel like a switch problem. I would disassemble
the switch to see if there are mechanical issues, but it is one of
those multi-gang wafer switches with components mounted directly on it
and each gang is soldered to the board, a real nightmare to remove.
This thing was made to never break, not to be repaired.

I don't have any info on it. The circuit board has some dozens of
transistors, a couple of what are likely op amps (metal cans) and well
over a hundred passives. I don't know where to begin trying to fix
it... other than connectors and switches are the primary point of
failure. But even removing and reseating boards looks like a bear in
this thing.

Any suggestions on ways to repair this?

I saw the other thread on new units and had looked at some of the
little $8 boards on eBay. Funny that there isn't much in between the
$8 boards and the $400 boxes. I would have thought this is something
that could be done very inexpensively these days. I would use a PC
audio output but my signal is outside the 20 kHz upper limit of audio
outputs.

Maybe I'll add a simple sig-gen to the prototype circuit I'm building.
Lots more than $8 of effort, but I'll know what I'm getting.

Rick

Service manual here:

http://www.home.agilent.com/agilent/techSupport.jspx?searchT=3310b&id=3310B:epsg:pro&pageMode=OV&pid=3310B:epsg:pro&cc=US&lc=eng



As always, check the power supplies first.

Then RTFM


NOTE: The OP _only_ complained about the sine output, and mostly at
higher frequencies; definitely not PS oriented; prob is in one of the
DFG chains.


So you would not recommend first checking the power supplies on a 40+
year piece of test equipment before doing any follow-up trouble
shooting? Even when it is a well known fact that electrolytic capacitors
that old are often found degraded.

Oh well, whatever.





I did NOT say that; i mentioned where the problem was most likely to be
found.
Yes, it is possible that there may be one or two degraded 'lytics..even
the old wet electrolytics lasted 20 years at best and even then many could
be recovered by adding electrolyte.
On old tube equipment, powering them up with a variac at zero and s l o
w l y raising the line voltage to full will allow most of degraded 'lytics
to re-form and perform adequately at worst.
OK then. Sorry for the comment. I miss-understood what you were implying.
And agree with your assessment.
 
"rickman" <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ke70ge$6vh$1@dont-email.me...
On 1/27/2013 11:03 PM, Michael A. Terrell wrote:

rickman wrote:

On 1/27/2013 8:12 PM, Jamie wrote:
rickman wrote:

On 1/26/2013 6:48 PM, David& Cheryl Denslow wrote:

"Jamie"<jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote in
message
news:tnZMs.134394$pV4.52265@newsfe21.iad...



Caps..and power supply.

Jamie


Operator and Service Manual for P 3310A/B is available here:
http://cp.literature.agilent.com/litweb/pdf/03310-90003.pdf



Thanks. I'll take a look at it. I guess I'm just intimidated by the
disassembly job alone.

It doesn't really look like a PSU issue to me. I would suspect the
switches, but when I work them it just doesn't feel like that's the
problem. The unit has tons of test points so that should make it
easier to see what is going on.

Rick
I am not sure the age of that unit but I hope it's newer than the tube
era :) A LCR meter would serve you will, along with a DMM.

Oh, and lets us not for get to use a scope on the power supply for cap
ripples and possible linkage in selenium devices and maybe germanium.

Jamie

Thanks for the suggestions, after several folks have said to check power
I guess I'd better do that. But what's with the selenium and germanium
devices? This thing wasn't built in the 50's I'm pretty sure. What do
you mean about "linkage"? Do you mean leakage?


Listen to Maynard Philbrick at your own risk.

Ok, I'll bite, who is Maynard Philbrick? I thought the name was familiar,
but googling it doesn't provide anything useful, mainly genealogy pages.
I can't even seem to exclude them they are so pervasive. Linking the name
to HP doesn't do it either.

The name does sound familiar. Is that a name here?


HP used germanium transistors in the '60s designs, like everyone
else, then moved to silicon. They weren't penny pinching, they were
cutting edge designs.

You should always verify the power supply is in spec on test
equipment before doing anything else. Slight errors are compounded, and
can cause you all kinds of headaches including a dead piece of
equipment. Start with the +/-25 volt outputs are right and have no
ripple. I see no Germanium transistors listed. I see are bipolar
silicon, and a few FET. The parts list is in the middle of the manual,
the manual is dated 1973, and has a lot of design changes in the back
and sorted by serial number groups. Unless you are very familiar with
troubleshooting, you may need help.

I've mainly worked on digital stuff including state of the art (at the
time of course) floating point array processors. Analog is not my forte,
but I'm comfortable with it.

It seems I am spending more time getting a new lab setup than actually
working on anything. I cleared out some old appliances and now have room
for an 8 foot workbench which I plan to build. But before I do that I am
turning my hand router and hand saw into table tools to help with the
workbench construction. The test gear is the same way, I need this to fix
that and before I can use that I need this other thing... I've let things
slide too long.

Wasn't it Lincoln who said, "Give me six hours to chop down a tree and I
will spend the first four sharpening the axe"?

I'd prefer to use a chain saw...

Rick
Hey, I like all that old HP, Tektronix, Fluke, Boonton, etc. equipment. It
is still serviceable, unlike all the new stuff. And pennies on the pound.
Although it's lots of pounds.
 
On 1/28/2013 6:28 PM, tm wrote:
OK then. Sorry for the comment. I miss-understood what you were implying.
And agree with your assessment.
I'm sorry tm, with an attitude like that, you won't be allowed to
continue posting in this group. You need to get an attitude to hang
here. Oh yeah, you need to never trim any posts too! lol

Rick
 
On 1/28/2013 6:26 PM, Michael A. Terrell wrote:
rickman wrote:

Wasn't it Lincoln who said, "Give me six hours to chop down a tree and I
will spend the first four sharpening the axe"?


You can make a good ax in four hours. You can sharpen a good ax in
15 minutes.
I didn't realize he was being literal. But then maybe part of that was
getting the grinding wheel in really good condition. lol


I'd prefer to use a chain saw...


I need a front end loader, after my shop roof was damaged. I've been
using a coal shovel to scoop up service manuals destroyed by water.
Next will be a rake, folled by a scraper& a push broom to clean uo the
debris where termites ate into the damp paper. There were a bunch of
new boxes of greenbar paper destroyed, as well.
That has got to suck! Not as bad as a fire though. With those you get
fire, smoke *and* water damage, the tri-fecta! I saw a web page once
where a guy had a terminal (it was a long time ago) start a fire. He
had all sorts of problems and gave a lot of good info on how to protect
things. Mostly it was about preventing smoke and water damage.

Rick
 
I have to admit I haven't had time to look at the schematic of this
unit, but the more I think about it, the less I think it would be the
diode function generator (DFG). That just turns the triangle wave into
a sine, right? This fault reverses the direction of the sine wave in
mid course and changes the frequency as a consequence.

But then I am not that familiar with the operation of the DFG in any
detail. If the triangle wave were to change and not go as far negative
as it should, that would produce the waveform I am describing, right?
In fact, you could consider this to be a sine wave that is clipped in
time rather than amplitude. It has a phase section clipped out of it,
maybe 210° to 330°. Without disturbing the circuit at all, the point of
clipping changes on its own a bit too. So a freq counter won't give a
stable display. I guess I should look into the time base circuit...
after checking all the supply voltages of course.

--

Rick
 
On Fri, 01 Feb 2013 19:36:44 -0500, rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote:

I have to admit I haven't had time to look at the schematic of this
unit, but the more I think about it, the less I think it would be the
diode function generator (DFG). That just turns the triangle wave into
a sine, right? This fault reverses the direction of the sine wave in
mid course and changes the frequency as a consequence.

But then I am not that familiar with the operation of the DFG in any
detail. If the triangle wave were to change and not go as far negative
as it should, that would produce the waveform I am describing, right?
In fact, you could consider this to be a sine wave that is clipped in
time rather than amplitude. It has a phase section clipped out of it,
maybe 210° to 330°. Without disturbing the circuit at all, the point of
clipping changes on its own a bit too. So a freq counter won't give a
stable display. I guess I should look into the time base circuit...
after checking all the supply voltages of course.
How about posting a scope trace of the wonky waveform in abse? or some
picture hosting site?

?-)
 
On 2/1/2013 11:14 PM, josephkk wrote:
On Fri, 01 Feb 2013 19:36:44 -0500, rickman<gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote:

I have to admit I haven't had time to look at the schematic of this
unit, but the more I think about it, the less I think it would be the
diode function generator (DFG). That just turns the triangle wave into
a sine, right? This fault reverses the direction of the sine wave in
mid course and changes the frequency as a consequence.

But then I am not that familiar with the operation of the DFG in any
detail. If the triangle wave were to change and not go as far negative
as it should, that would produce the waveform I am describing, right?
In fact, you could consider this to be a sine wave that is clipped in
time rather than amplitude. It has a phase section clipped out of it,
maybe 210° to 330°. Without disturbing the circuit at all, the point of
clipping changes on its own a bit too. So a freq counter won't give a
stable display. I guess I should look into the time base circuit...
after checking all the supply voltages of course.

How about posting a scope trace of the wonky waveform in abse? or some
picture hosting site?
Sorry this took me a while. Here is a drawing of what I see. Not
exactly like the oscope display, but shows the important stuff.

http://arius.com/stuff/HP3310B/HP3310B_malfunction.png

Note that when set for 50 kHz, the measured frequency varies around 80
kHz.

--

Rick
 
On Feb 7, 6:14 pm, rickman <gnu...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/1/2013 11:14 PM, josephkk wrote:





On Fri, 01 Feb 2013 19:36:44 -0500, rickman<gnu...@gmail.com>  wrote:

I have to admit I haven't had time to look at the schematic of this
unit, but the more I think about it, the less I think it would be the
diode function generator (DFG).  That just turns the triangle wave into
a sine, right?  This fault reverses the direction of the sine wave in
mid course and changes the frequency as a consequence.

But then I am not that familiar with the operation of the DFG in any
detail.  If the triangle wave were to change and not go as far negative
as it should, that would produce the waveform I am describing, right?
In fact, you could consider this to be a sine wave that is clipped in
time rather than amplitude.  It has a phase section clipped out of it,
maybe 210° to 330°.  Without disturbing the circuit at all, the point of
clipping changes on its own a bit too.  So a freq counter won't give a
stable display.  I guess I should look into the time base circuit...
after checking all the supply voltages of course.

How about posting a scope trace of the wonky waveform in abse?  or some
picture hosting site?

Sorry this took me a while.  Here is a drawing of what I see.  Not
exactly like the oscope display, but shows the important stuff.

http://arius.com/stuff/HP3310B/HP3310B_malfunction.png

Note that when set for 50 kHz, the measured frequency varies around 80
kHz.

--

Rick- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Weird, I understand this is a basically analog device (Not a DDS).
Then it looks like some inverter falling out of the signal chain.
Intermitent power to some section.... maybe? Does it change if you
load down the output? Have you opened it up and wiggled things?

George H.
 
On 2/7/2013 7:07 PM, George Herold wrote:
On Feb 7, 6:14 pm, rickman<gnu...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/1/2013 11:14 PM, josephkk wrote:

How about posting a scope trace of the wonky waveform in abse? or some
picture hosting site?

Sorry this took me a while. Here is a drawing of what I see. Not
exactly like the oscope display, but shows the important stuff.

http://arius.com/stuff/HP3310B/HP3310B_malfunction.png

Note that when set for 50 kHz, the measured frequency varies around 80
kHz.

--

Rick- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Weird, I understand this is a basically analog device (Not a DDS).
Then it looks like some inverter falling out of the signal chain.
Intermitent power to some section.... maybe? Does it change if you
load down the output? Have you opened it up and wiggled things?

George H.
No, I haven't loaded the output. I have probed and prodded with my
fingers. I think there was a point where it had some impact. I just
haven't taken the time to look at the docs yet. I'm thinking the ramp
generator is messing up and triggering the switch to the up ramp too soon.

--

Rick
 
"rickman" <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:kf1jev$3ml$1@dont-email.me...
On 2/7/2013 7:07 PM, George Herold wrote:
On Feb 7, 6:14 pm, rickman<gnu...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/1/2013 11:14 PM, josephkk wrote:

How about posting a scope trace of the wonky waveform in abse? or some
picture hosting site?

Sorry this took me a while. Here is a drawing of what I see. Not
exactly like the oscope display, but shows the important stuff.

http://arius.com/stuff/HP3310B/HP3310B_malfunction.png

Note that when set for 50 kHz, the measured frequency varies around 80
kHz.

--

Rick- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Weird, I understand this is a basically analog device (Not a DDS).
Then it looks like some inverter falling out of the signal chain.
Intermitent power to some section.... maybe? Does it change if you
load down the output? Have you opened it up and wiggled things?

George H.

No, I haven't loaded the output. I have probed and prodded with my
fingers. I think there was a point where it had some impact. I just
haven't taken the time to look at the docs yet. I'm thinking the ramp
generator is messing up and triggering the switch to the up ramp too soon.

--
What were your measured power supply voltages? Ripple?

+25 = ?
-25 = ?
+10 = ?
-10 = ?
 
On 2/7/2013 9:07 PM, tm wrote:
"rickman" <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:kf1jev$3ml$1@dont-email.me...
On 2/7/2013 7:07 PM, George Herold wrote:
On Feb 7, 6:14 pm, rickman<gnu...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/1/2013 11:14 PM, josephkk wrote:

How about posting a scope trace of the wonky waveform in abse? or some
picture hosting site?

Sorry this took me a while. Here is a drawing of what I see. Not
exactly like the oscope display, but shows the important stuff.

http://arius.com/stuff/HP3310B/HP3310B_malfunction.png

Note that when set for 50 kHz, the measured frequency varies around 80
kHz.

--

Rick- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Weird, I understand this is a basically analog device (Not a DDS).
Then it looks like some inverter falling out of the signal chain.
Intermitent power to some section.... maybe? Does it change if you
load down the output? Have you opened it up and wiggled things?

George H.

No, I haven't loaded the output. I have probed and prodded with my
fingers. I think there was a point where it had some impact. I just
haven't taken the time to look at the docs yet. I'm thinking the ramp
generator is messing up and triggering the switch to the up ramp too
soon.

--


What were your measured power supply voltages? Ripple?

+25 = ?
-25 = ?
+10 = ?
-10 = ?
I didn't write them all down, but they are all within 0.2 volts of
nominal and I don't see any ripple on the supplies.

On the other hand, the fact that the problem is only on the two upper
ranges indicates it is within the "High Frequency Level Detector". I
measured some voltages there and the lower half seems to be way out of
whack. There are two symmetrical circuits to generate what would seem
to be a reference voltage for the +-5 volt level detector. But I'm not
sure that is how it works really. According to the schematic notes,
changing the switch from the lower ranges to the two higher ranges
changes the "references" from +10 / -10 volts to -10.6 / +10.6 volts.
What?

Something else I don't get is one transistor in each half is reverse
biased, yes, the CB junction is reverse biased, but the BE junction is
also reverse biased by 6 volts! The emitter resistor is connected to
+10 volts, the collector is connected to -10 volts and the emitter is
supposed to be at +10.6 volts! What??? The transistor is a PNP and the
base is supposed to be at +16.8 volts. How is this supposed to work?
Have I forgotten my transistor notation? PNP is arrow pointing to base
which should be more negative than the emitter, right?

Anyway, the half that is whacked out has some random fluctuations that I
can see on the scope which don't appear on the supplies. I figure one
of the components is bad but I can't trace it to anything in particular.
The circuit all interacts somewhat and the "noise" signal appears
through nearly all of it.

Parts of the large schematic pages are missing. I assume somewhere they
tell you the conditions for taking the measurements, but I haven't found
them yet. They do have a troubleshooting section that clearly tells you
to look in this circuit.

--

Rick
 
"rickman" <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:khj0oj$c3h$1@dont-email.me...
On 2/7/2013 9:07 PM, tm wrote:

"rickman" <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:kf1jev$3ml$1@dont-email.me...
On 2/7/2013 7:07 PM, George Herold wrote:
On Feb 7, 6:14 pm, rickman<gnu...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/1/2013 11:14 PM, josephkk wrote:

How about posting a scope trace of the wonky waveform in abse? or
some
picture hosting site?

Sorry this took me a while. Here is a drawing of what I see. Not
exactly like the oscope display, but shows the important stuff.

http://arius.com/stuff/HP3310B/HP3310B_malfunction.png

Note that when set for 50 kHz, the measured frequency varies around 80
kHz.

--

Rick- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Weird, I understand this is a basically analog device (Not a DDS).
Then it looks like some inverter falling out of the signal chain.
Intermitent power to some section.... maybe? Does it change if you
load down the output? Have you opened it up and wiggled things?

George H.

No, I haven't loaded the output. I have probed and prodded with my
fingers. I think there was a point where it had some impact. I just
haven't taken the time to look at the docs yet. I'm thinking the ramp
generator is messing up and triggering the switch to the up ramp too
soon.

--


What were your measured power supply voltages? Ripple?

+25 = ?
-25 = ?
+10 = ?
-10 = ?

I didn't write them all down, but they are all within 0.2 volts of nominal
and I don't see any ripple on the supplies.

On the other hand, the fact that the problem is only on the two upper
ranges indicates it is within the "High Frequency Level Detector". I
measured some voltages there and the lower half seems to be way out of
whack. There are two symmetrical circuits to generate what would seem to
be a reference voltage for the +-5 volt level detector. But I'm not sure
that is how it works really. According to the schematic notes, changing
the switch from the lower ranges to the two higher ranges changes the
"references" from +10 / -10 volts to -10.6 / +10.6 volts. What?

Something else I don't get is one transistor in each half is reverse
biased, yes, the CB junction is reverse biased, but the BE junction is
also reverse biased by 6 volts! The emitter resistor is connected to +10
volts, the collector is connected to -10 volts and the emitter is supposed
to be at +10.6 volts! What??? The transistor is a PNP and the base is
supposed to be at +16.8 volts. How is this supposed to work? Have I
forgotten my transistor notation? PNP is arrow pointing to base which
should be more negative than the emitter, right?

Anyway, the half that is whacked out has some random fluctuations that I
can see on the scope which don't appear on the supplies. I figure one of
the components is bad but I can't trace it to anything in particular. The
circuit all interacts somewhat and the "noise" signal appears through
nearly all of it.

Parts of the large schematic pages are missing. I assume somewhere they
tell you the conditions for taking the measurements, but I haven't found
them yet. They do have a troubleshooting section that clearly tells you
to look in this circuit.

--

Rick
All the conditions for the measurements are on PDF page 71, schematic 2, at
the lower right side of the page. Look for all the waveforms just to the
right of the notes section.

What you describe cries out leaky capacitor. Since it is only doing it on
the upper two ranges, that sure points to that circuit.

All of the transistors in that circuit are 2N3904 (N) or 3906 (P) so a
shotgun approach might be worth it in case it is a leaky transistor.

Take note of Note-5.
 
On 3/10/2013 9:33 PM, tm wrote:
"rickman" <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:khj0oj$c3h$1@dont-email.me...
On 2/7/2013 9:07 PM, tm wrote:

"rickman" <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:kf1jev$3ml$1@dont-email.me...
On 2/7/2013 7:07 PM, George Herold wrote:
On Feb 7, 6:14 pm, rickman<gnu...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/1/2013 11:14 PM, josephkk wrote:

How about posting a scope trace of the wonky waveform in abse? or
some
picture hosting site?

Sorry this took me a while. Here is a drawing of what I see. Not
exactly like the oscope display, but shows the important stuff.

http://arius.com/stuff/HP3310B/HP3310B_malfunction.png

Note that when set for 50 kHz, the measured frequency varies
around 80
kHz.

--

Rick- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Weird, I understand this is a basically analog device (Not a DDS).
Then it looks like some inverter falling out of the signal chain.
Intermitent power to some section.... maybe? Does it change if you
load down the output? Have you opened it up and wiggled things?

George H.

No, I haven't loaded the output. I have probed and prodded with my
fingers. I think there was a point where it had some impact. I just
haven't taken the time to look at the docs yet. I'm thinking the ramp
generator is messing up and triggering the switch to the up ramp too
soon.

--


What were your measured power supply voltages? Ripple?

+25 = ?
-25 = ?
+10 = ?
-10 = ?

I didn't write them all down, but they are all within 0.2 volts of
nominal and I don't see any ripple on the supplies.

On the other hand, the fact that the problem is only on the two upper
ranges indicates it is within the "High Frequency Level Detector". I
measured some voltages there and the lower half seems to be way out of
whack. There are two symmetrical circuits to generate what would seem
to be a reference voltage for the +-5 volt level detector. But I'm not
sure that is how it works really. According to the schematic notes,
changing the switch from the lower ranges to the two higher ranges
changes the "references" from +10 / -10 volts to -10.6 / +10.6 volts.
What?

Something else I don't get is one transistor in each half is reverse
biased, yes, the CB junction is reverse biased, but the BE junction is
also reverse biased by 6 volts! The emitter resistor is connected to
+10 volts, the collector is connected to -10 volts and the emitter is
supposed to be at +10.6 volts! What??? The transistor is a PNP and the
base is supposed to be at +16.8 volts. How is this supposed to work?
Have I forgotten my transistor notation? PNP is arrow pointing to base
which should be more negative than the emitter, right?

Anyway, the half that is whacked out has some random fluctuations that
I can see on the scope which don't appear on the supplies. I figure
one of the components is bad but I can't trace it to anything in
particular. The circuit all interacts somewhat and the "noise" signal
appears through nearly all of it.

Parts of the large schematic pages are missing. I assume somewhere
they tell you the conditions for taking the measurements, but I
haven't found them yet. They do have a troubleshooting section that
clearly tells you to look in this circuit.

--

Rick

All the conditions for the measurements are on PDF page 71, schematic 2,
at the lower right side of the page. Look for all the waveforms just to
the right of the notes section.

What you describe cries out leaky capacitor. Since it is only doing it
on the upper two ranges, that sure points to that circuit.

All of the transistors in that circuit are 2N3904 (N) or 3906 (P) so a
shotgun approach might be worth it in case it is a leaky transistor.

Take note of Note-5.
Thanks. My copy doesn't have complete pages of the schematics. They
are cut off at the bottom and when they span two pages there is a gap in
the middle. I think I got this from the Agilent site. Is there a
better copy available somewhere else?

BTW, to make it more viewable I rearranged the schematics a bit and
rotated the vertical pages. I see notes on page 70 of 87 and this page
also has assemblies A2 and A3 and waveforms 12 through 16. Is this the
page you mean?

It includes notes 1 through 3 which is cut off a bit. I don't have
notes 4 and 5 at all. On my page 68 I see notes, but all of the data on
the right is cut off and note 5 is missing.

Wait! I found an intact set of notes on page 77. I will recheck the DC
measurements with the settings indicated. This may bring the good
section into alignment with the schematic values, but I'm sure the bad
half will still be bad. Problem is I just don't know how transistors
are expected to behave when both junctions are reverse biased like the
schematic says they should be.

I think your shotgunning idea is good, I just don't relish the idea of
taking this thing apart, but I guess it can't be too bad. When they
have front panel switches soldered to the board it makes me twinge. I'm
probably just being overly worried, I expect it is made to be repaired
as well as assembled, unlike today's stuff.

Heck, I might want to get a second one so I can use it to make a sweep
generator!

--

Rick
 
rickman wrote:
On 3/10/2013 9:33 PM, tm wrote:

"rickman" <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:khj0oj$c3h$1@dont-email.me...
On 2/7/2013 9:07 PM, tm wrote:

"rickman" <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:kf1jev$3ml$1@dont-email.me...
On 2/7/2013 7:07 PM, George Herold wrote:
On Feb 7, 6:14 pm, rickman<gnu...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/1/2013 11:14 PM, josephkk wrote:

How about posting a scope trace of the wonky waveform in abse? or
some
picture hosting site?

Sorry this took me a while. Here is a drawing of what I see. Not
exactly like the oscope display, but shows the important stuff.

http://arius.com/stuff/HP3310B/HP3310B_malfunction.png

Note that when set for 50 kHz, the measured frequency varies
around 80
kHz.

--

Rick- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Weird, I understand this is a basically analog device (Not a DDS).
Then it looks like some inverter falling out of the signal chain.
Intermitent power to some section.... maybe? Does it change if you
load down the output? Have you opened it up and wiggled things?

George H.

No, I haven't loaded the output. I have probed and prodded with my
fingers. I think there was a point where it had some impact. I just
haven't taken the time to look at the docs yet. I'm thinking the ramp
generator is messing up and triggering the switch to the up ramp too
soon.

--


What were your measured power supply voltages? Ripple?

+25 = ?
-25 = ?
+10 = ?
-10 = ?

I didn't write them all down, but they are all within 0.2 volts of
nominal and I don't see any ripple on the supplies.

On the other hand, the fact that the problem is only on the two upper
ranges indicates it is within the "High Frequency Level Detector". I
measured some voltages there and the lower half seems to be way out of
whack. There are two symmetrical circuits to generate what would seem
to be a reference voltage for the +-5 volt level detector. But I'm not
sure that is how it works really. According to the schematic notes,
changing the switch from the lower ranges to the two higher ranges
changes the "references" from +10 / -10 volts to -10.6 / +10.6 volts.
What?

Something else I don't get is one transistor in each half is reverse
biased, yes, the CB junction is reverse biased, but the BE junction is
also reverse biased by 6 volts! The emitter resistor is connected to
+10 volts, the collector is connected to -10 volts and the emitter is
supposed to be at +10.6 volts! What??? The transistor is a PNP and the
base is supposed to be at +16.8 volts. How is this supposed to work?
Have I forgotten my transistor notation? PNP is arrow pointing to base
which should be more negative than the emitter, right?

Anyway, the half that is whacked out has some random fluctuations that
I can see on the scope which don't appear on the supplies. I figure
one of the components is bad but I can't trace it to anything in
particular. The circuit all interacts somewhat and the "noise" signal
appears through nearly all of it.

Parts of the large schematic pages are missing. I assume somewhere
they tell you the conditions for taking the measurements, but I
haven't found them yet. They do have a troubleshooting section that
clearly tells you to look in this circuit.

--

Rick

All the conditions for the measurements are on PDF page 71, schematic 2,
at the lower right side of the page. Look for all the waveforms just to
the right of the notes section.

What you describe cries out leaky capacitor. Since it is only doing it
on the upper two ranges, that sure points to that circuit.

All of the transistors in that circuit are 2N3904 (N) or 3906 (P) so a
shotgun approach might be worth it in case it is a leaky transistor.

Take note of Note-5.

Thanks. My copy doesn't have complete pages of the schematics. They are
cut off at the bottom and when they span two pages there is a gap in the
middle. I think I got this from the Agilent site. Is there a better copy
available somewhere else?

BTW, to make it more viewable I rearranged the schematics a bit and
rotated the vertical pages. I see notes on page 70 of 87 and this page
also has assemblies A2 and A3 and waveforms 12 through 16. Is this the
page you mean?

It includes notes 1 through 3 which is cut off a bit. I don't have notes
4 and 5 at all. On my page 68 I see notes, but all of the data on the
right is cut off and note 5 is missing.

Wait! I found an intact set of notes on page 77. I will recheck the DC
measurements with the settings indicated. This may bring the good
section into alignment with the schematic values, but I'm sure the bad
half will still be bad. Problem is I just don't know how transistors are
expected to behave when both junctions are reverse biased like the
schematic says they should be.

I think your shotgunning idea is good, I just don't relish the idea of
taking this thing apart, but I guess it can't be too bad. When they have
front panel switches soldered to the board it makes me twinge. I'm
probably just being overly worried, I expect it is made to be repaired
as well as assembled, unlike today's stuff.

Heck, I might want to get a second one so I can use it to make a sweep
generator!

See my posting "Re: HP 3310B Malfunction Generator" in a.b.s.electronic.
 
Join the Yahoo group for HP Test Equipment. LOTS of engrs and techs have tons
of experience with the "boat anchor" HP's. I'm sure more than one has been
down this road with your particular gen.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hp_agilent_equipment

Good luck.

Dave
 
rickman wrote:
Thanks. My copy doesn't have complete pages of the schematics.

Print all the partial schematics and try piecing them together.
 
On 3/12/2013 2:00 PM, Michael A. Terrell wrote:
rickman wrote:


Thanks. My copy doesn't have complete pages of the schematics.


Print all the partial schematics and try piecing them together.
That won't generate the missing pieces. In my copy of the manual from
Agilent the schematics are not complete.

--

Rick
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top