How to measure the settling time for a differential opamp wi

Count wrote:
Qns as above.
There are Fet probes for fast scopes. They have minimum
load on the circuit.

Rene
--
Ing.Buero R.Tschaggelar - http://www.ibrtses.com
& commercial newsgroups - http://www.talkto.net
 
John Woodgate wrote:
The problem with Sloman's Theory of Deadpan Comedy is that people don't
even see there's a joke there.
--
Regards, John Woodgate,
Sure we do. Everything he posts is a joke! ;-)
--
9 days!


Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
 
In article <750ttv838djh8ft27ac46jcoeavd7ao84v@4ax.com>,
jjlarkin@highlandSNIPtechTHISnologyPLEASE.com says...
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 22:07:38 -0500, Keith R. Williams
krw@attglobal.net> wrote:
<snip>

DO you need a
license for these things? Does Slowman know these are legal?

They are not EC compliant, if that's what you mean.
Indeed. They don't even like the single-shot variety. Wussies!

To really resolve settling to fraction-percent levels, a Tek 7A13
differential comparator plugin is excellent, prefereably plugged into
a nice analog 7000-series mainframe. Adjust reprate for a nice image.

Oldies, but goodies. I remember staring at my first 7904, some
thirty years ago. Amazing beasties. ...and I couldn't find the
*ON* switch (a *large* bat-handle right in front of my eyes
d'oh!).

Dirt cheap on ebay these days.
Working? I'm not sure what I'd do with one though. We have the
latest stuff at work, were I to wander into the lab again (bad
career move, but fun none-the-less).

--
Keith
 
In article <0u2ttv010g70ps45m34hp1qtbmgvd75aqv@4ax.com>,
DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org says...
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 22:07:38 -0500, Keith R. Williams
krw@attglobal.net> Gave us:

...and I couldn't find the
*ON* switch (a *large* bat-handle right in front of my eyes
d'oh!).

And the stupidity has endured.
Wouldn't you know! What a maroon!

--
Keith
 
In article <3FDF06B2.7CAADB25@earthlink.net>,
mike.terrell@earthlink.net says...
John Woodgate wrote:


The problem with Sloman's Theory of Deadpan Comedy is that people don't
even see there's a joke there.
--
Regards, John Woodgate,

Sure we do. Everything he posts is a joke! ;-)
^
|
+-- sick


--
Keith
 
In article <qu2ttvgn6utn3ljtjvhnvcu1anmqbue9ma@4ax.com>,
DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org says...
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 22:08:42 -0500, Keith R. Williams
krw@attglobal.net> Gave us:


No digital storage needed, Dimbulb.

For a single pulse.. Yes. Must be captured, not just guessed at.
You guess? Figures. The rest of us know how to measure such
trivia.

You overshot, and are reflecting noise ringing, you should be
critically damped.
You haven't a clue. ...as usual.

--
Keith
 
In article <acittvckfe871sbeo2kaa55g28vvrk8cqk@4ax.com>,
DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org says...
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 21:20:46 -0800, "Mac" <foo@bar.net> Gave us:

I've never heard (or seen) the term "dipass" before. And the OP didn't say
anything about "observing" or "characterizing."

Read the title of the post again, dufus, I am not responsible for
your poorly developed vocabulary.
Of course not! You have your own inadequacies to fondle.

--
Keith
 
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 21:43:32 -0500, Keith R. Williams
<krw@attglobal.net> Gave us:

You overshot, and are reflecting noise ringing, you should be
critically damped.

You haven't a clue. ...as usual.

I was talking about YOU, not the circuit question, retard boy. YOU
need to be CRITICALLY damped. Reading troubles again? It was
obvious.

Bwuhhahaha... you are a retard!
 
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 01:06:27 +0000, DarkMatter wrote:

On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 21:20:46 -0800, "Mac" <foo@bar.net> Gave us:

I've never heard (or seen) the term "dipass" before. And the OP didn't say
anything about "observing" or "characterizing."

Read the title of the post again, dufus, I am not responsible for
your poorly developed vocabulary.
I never said you were responsible. I was telling you for your information.

I had the title clearly in mind when I composed my replies.

To measure:

"the dimensions, capacity, or amount of something ascertained by
measuring"
This is a circular definition. Where did you get it?

If that isn't "observe, and characterize" then the school you went
to needs to shoot you.

Observe.. Measure.

Characterize... determine settling time... through observation.

Doh! Gettinzeclue.
The OP still didn't say anything about observing or characterizing.

If you are reading between the lines, then you are just as guilty as I am
of jumping to conclusions.

Mac
 
In article <lmovtvcm9kij90r8kc0gaeqmig0sst4aoj@4ax.com>,
DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org says...
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 21:43:32 -0500, Keith R. Williams
krw@attglobal.net> Gave us:


You overshot, and are reflecting noise ringing, you should be
critically damped.

You haven't a clue. ...as usual.


I was talking about YOU, not the circuit question, retard boy. YOU
need to be CRITICALLY damped. Reading troubles again? It was
obvious.
You're a fool (nothing surprising here folks)! A slightly under-
damped circuit will settle faster than a critically damped
circuit, DimBulb. Not that this has anything to do with the
price of oats in your left ear (DSO's aren't needed for such
measurements fruitloop).

Bwuhhahaha... you are a retard!
As usual, you're clueless and trying to cover your pink fanny.

--
Keith
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top