How rising groundwater is caused by climate change...

[Flyguy]

On Thursday, August 25, 2022 at 5:00:06 AM UTC-7, a a wrote:

On Thursday, 25 August 2022 at 04:48:22 UTC+2, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
--There\'s about 6 metres of sea level rise tied up in the Greenland ice sheet,and and another 3.3 metres in the West Antarctic ice sheet.
ieee.org is all but fake
https://www.meteoblue.com/en/weather/week/vostok-station_antarctica_6620791


Weather Vostok Station
Antarctica , 78.46°S 106.84°E, 3488m asl
[Clear with few low clouds]
-71 °C
17:00
meteoblue Ad-free 9 €
point+ for paragliding champions
point+ for paragliding champions

meteoblue was presented at this year’s Czech-Bulgarian-Slovak paragliding national championships, and we gladly supported all participants with our weather data and sponsored prices.
Read on
Thu
Today
[Partly cloudy]
[Clear and few clouds]
-67 °C
-71 °C
18 km/h
-
2 h
Thursday

0300

0600

0900

1200

1500

1800

2100

0000








Temperature (°C)

-68°

-68°

-68°

-69°

-70°

-71°

-71°

-71°
Temperature felt (°C)

-75°

-75°

-75°

-76°

-78°

-79°

-79°

-78°
Wind direction

SW

SW

WSW

WSW

WSW

WSW

WSW

WSW
Wind speed (km/h)

17-21

16-19

16-25

16-26

16-19

16-17

16-21

16-23
Precipitation (mm/3h)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-
Precipitation probability

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%
Precipitation hourly


No precipitation expected
rainSPOT Precipitation distribution within 90 km








Sea/surf forecast

0300

0600

0900

1200

1500

1800

2100

0000
Significant wave height (m)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
Significant wave direction in which the waves move








Water temperature (°C)

-2°

-2°

-2°

-2°

-2°

-2°

-2°

-2°
The weather forecast has high predictability. Compare different forecasts with MultiModel.
Weather report for Vostok Station

Overnight into Thursday it is mostly cloudy, but most clouds give way in the course of day. We can see a mixture of cloudy and sunny skies. Temperatures as high as -67 °C are foreseen. Night and day a gentle breeze is expected (12 to 20 km/h). Gusts to 26 km/h are possible. Winds blowing from Southwest. The weather forecast for Vostok Station for Thursday is likely to be accurate.
sun-icon
UV 0
▲ 08:42
▼ 13:06
▲ ---
▼ ---

Pressure: 995 hPa

Timezone: GMT+06 (UTC +06:00h)
Fri
Tomorrow
[Clear and few clouds]
[Clear and few clouds]
-69 °C
-71 °C
24 km/h
-
3 h
Sat
8-27
[Mostly cloudy]
[Partly cloudy]
-60 °C
-68 °C
28 km/h
-
1 h
Sun
8-28
[Mostly cloudy]
[Partly cloudy]
-58 °C
-60 °C
27 km/h
-
1 h
Mon
8-29
[Clear and few clouds]
[Clear and few clouds]
-60 °C
-68 °C
19 km/h
-
4 h
Tue
8-30
[Clear and few clouds]
[Clear and few clouds]
-68 °C
-68 °C
20 km/h
-
5 h
Wed
8-31
[Clear and few clouds]
-67 °C
-69 °C
20 km/h
-
4 h

Weather calamities have been occurring since the origin of Earth. Recent ones are better documented than ancient events:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_floods_in_Europe
Technology helps limit the casualties of these storms, but cannot eliminate them.

 

[a a]

#sealevelriseisbusinessfake

supported by UN agencies,
especially UNFCC and SIDS at UN HQ (Small Island Developing Countries)
- island countries from Pacific region

There is no #SeaLevelRise

another fake project is called #Ice2Sea

Fly to Maledives, fly to Pacific Islands, fly to Antarctics

#SeaLevelRise is fake funded by Putin to sell more natural gas

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 5:02:30 AM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:

On Thursday, August 25, 2022 at 5:00:06 AM UTC-7, a a wrote:
On Thursday, 25 August 2022 at 04:48:22 UTC+2, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
--There\'s about 6 metres of sea level rise tied up in the Greenland ice sheet,and and another 3.3 metres in the West Antarctic ice sheet.

<snipped a a\'s fatuous irrelevance>

Weather calamities have been occurring since the origin of Earth. Recent ones are better documented than ancient events:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_floods_in_Europe
Technology helps limit the casualties of these storms, but cannot eliminate them.

Grantguy\'s list goes back to about 120 BC. You\'ve got to go a bit further back - about 55 million years - for a relevant example.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleocene%E2%80%93Eocene_Thermal_Maximum

Global temperatures increased by 5–8 °C. The temperature rise followed a rise in the carbon dioxide level in the atmosphere. We don\'t know exactly where the extra carbon came from, but there was a prominent negative excursion in carbon stable isotope (δ13C) records from around the globe; more specifically, there was a large decrease in 13C/12C ratio of marine and terrestrial carbonates and organic carbon, so it looks as the extra carbon had to have come from previously buried - that is fossil - carbon.

The fossil carbon extraction industry seems to be hell-bent on re-creating the same situation and about a hundred times faster than the presumably natural process did 55.5 million years ago.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Flyguy]

On Sunday, September 18, 2022 at 8:11:11 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:

On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 5:02:30 AM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, August 25, 2022 at 5:00:06 AM UTC-7, a a wrote:
On Thursday, 25 August 2022 at 04:48:22 UTC+2, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
--There\'s about 6 metres of sea level rise tied up in the Greenland ice sheet,and and another 3.3 metres in the West Antarctic ice sheet.
snipped a a\'s fatuous irrelevance
Weather calamities have been occurring since the origin of Earth. Recent ones are better documented than ancient events:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_floods_in_Europe
Technology helps limit the casualties of these storms, but cannot eliminate them.
Grantguy\'s list goes back to about 120 BC. You\'ve got to go a bit further back - about 55 million years - for a relevant example.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleocene%E2%80%93Eocene_Thermal_Maximum

Global temperatures increased by 5–8 °C. The temperature rise followed a rise in the carbon dioxide level in the atmosphere. We don\'t know exactly where the extra carbon came from, but there was a prominent negative excursion in carbon stable isotope (δ13C) records from around the globe; more specifically, there was a large decrease in 13C/12C ratio of marine and terrestrial carbonates and organic carbon, so it looks as the extra carbon had to have come from previously buried - that is fossil - carbon.

The fossil carbon extraction industry seems to be hell-bent on re-creating the same situation and about a hundred times faster than the presumably natural process did 55.5 million years ago.

--
Bozo Bill Sloman, Sydney

No, Bozo, CO2 increases have always FOLLOWED global temperature increases, as one would expect.

 

[whit3rd]

On Sunday, September 18, 2022 at 9:03:06 PM UTC-7, Flyguy wrote:

> ...CO2 increases have always FOLLOWED global temperature increases, as one would expect.

Name two temperature increases ( that have an established date-of-occurrence), and tell us
what CO2 levels were one year before and one year after.

Or, tell us what model or theory causes \'one would expect\' in such a case.

Data, or theory, or both: respectable.
Neither: not respectable.

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 2:03:06 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:

On Sunday, September 18, 2022 at 8:11:11 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 5:02:30 AM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, August 25, 2022 at 5:00:06 AM UTC-7, a a wrote:
On Thursday, 25 August 2022 at 04:48:22 UTC+2, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
--There\'s about 6 metres of sea level rise tied up in the Greenland ice sheet,and and another 3.3 metres in the West Antarctic ice sheet.
snipped a a\'s fatuous irrelevance
Weather calamities have been occurring since the origin of Earth. Recent ones are better documented than ancient events:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_floods_in_Europe
Technology helps limit the casualties of these storms, but cannot eliminate them.
Grantguy\'s list goes back to about 120 BC. You\'ve got to go a bit further back - about 55 million years - for a relevant example.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleocene%E2%80%93Eocene_Thermal_Maximum

Global temperatures increased by 5–8 °C. The temperature rise followed a rise in the carbon dioxide level in the atmosphere. We don\'t know exactly where the extra carbon came from, but there was a prominent negative excursion in carbon stable isotope (δ13C) records from around the globe; more specifically, there was a large decrease in 13C/12C ratio of marine and terrestrial carbonates and organic carbon, so it looks as the extra carbon had to have come from previously buried - that is fossil - carbon.

The fossil carbon extraction industry seems to be hell-bent on re-creating the same situation and about a hundred times faster than the presumably natural process did 55.5 million years ago.

No, Bozo, CO2 increases have always FOLLOWED global temperature increases, as one would expect.

That\'s a famous climate change denial fallacy. It\'s not true of the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum. It is true for Ice Age to Interglacial transitions and back again but only because the driving force there seems to be the loss or formation of reflective ice sheets. The warming or cooling that causes is amplified because CO2 in more soluble in colder oceans.

You do have to tease out cause and effect in these sorts of situations. That does require the kind of actual thinking that you can\'t manage.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[a a]

Rising groundwater is #Fake promoted by Putin fans to sell more natural gas

 

[Dean Hoffman]

On Wednesday, August 24, 2022 at 8:09:32 AM UTC-5, Fred Bloggs wrote:

Mankind just needs to pack it up and move away from the coastlines because there\'s nothing that can be done about this one. Of course all the corruption and ignorance in modern politics think it can be fixed by throwing HUGE amounts of money at it- just not going to happen. And there\'s much more to it than flooding, there is also a major issue of release of buried chemical contamination.

https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/12/13/1041309/climate-change-rising-groundwater-flooding/

\"The Earth is a watery place. But just how much water exists on, in, and above our planet? About 71 percent of the Earth\'s surface is water-covered, and the oceans hold about 96.5 percent of all Earth\'s water. Water also exists in the air as water vapor, in rivers and lakes, in icecaps and glaciers, in the ground as soil moisture and in aquifers, and even in you and your dog.\"

https://www.usgs.gov/special-topics/water-science-school/science/how-much-water-there-earth#:~:text=About%2071%20percent%20of%20the,percent%20of%20all%20Earth\'s%20water.

This might be a good example of differing definitions. Groundwater in Nebraska is mainly the Ogallala Aquifer. There are maybe a half dozen others. Lakes, streams, and such are surface water.
The aquifer has been rising here in south central Nebraska because of more efficient irrigation and maybe more rain over the years. I don\'t remember the rain part and am too lazy to look. There are controls in place that would limit irrigation if the level drops down too much. I think that is the level it hit in 1978.

There\'s a little bit here about it.
<https://www.nrdnet.org/news/06-17-2016/groundwater-levels-rise-12-feet-average-upper-big-blue-nrd>
.. Nebraska has natural resources districts to monitor it set up for that..
<https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/ne/people/partners/?cid=nrcs142p2_029750>
The NRDs are supposedly unique because they follow the river basins instead of some arbitrary line on a map.
<https://csi.nebraska.gov/markets/natural-resources-districts-nrd>
Bored yet?