A
Andrew Chesters
Guest
Spehro Pefhany wrote:
SNIP
SNIP
Yep!Is that what you'd call a "Strimmer"?
Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep!Is that what you'd call a "Strimmer"?
Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
Out of interest, are US style plugs fitted with fuses?
(An extension lead running outside ought to have RCD protection anyway
of course, to negate the problem)
_FUSE?_ 1/2 of their plugs don't even have an earth!!
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:46:19 UTC, Ian Stirling
root@mauve.demon.co.uk> wrote:
Or for 60m, 8.4*10^-1 ohms, or .84 ohms.
Plus the resistance on the two connections. Not sure whether
the earth fault loop impedance is still OK...
I took that into account. (but misremembered the resistivity of
copper) See other post for correction.
Additional link:
http://www.interfacebus.com/Reference_Cable_AWG_Sizes.html
Others have discussed the current & voltage side of your post.
However, something else to concider is where you are doing this.
At 30-60m my guess is that you would be outdoors? If so, you
should be using an earth leakage circuit breaker (RCD)to supply
your extensions. This could be installed in your CU, built in
to the supply socket or a plugtop type.
Consumer Unit.On 12 Feb 2005, Andrew Chesters wrote:
Others have discussed the current & voltage side of your post.
However, something else to concider is where you are doing this.
At 30-60m my guess is that you would be outdoors? If so, you
should be using an earth leakage circuit breaker (RCD)to supply
your extensions. This could be installed in your CU, built in
to the supply socket or a plugtop type.
CU?
(IIRC, B&Q do a perfectly good one for under
100GBP) - I have one and it has paid for itself time and
time again. They weren't available at anything like that
price when I played silly games with cables.
On 17 Feb 2005, =?UTF-8?B?UGFsaW5kcuKYu21l?= wrote:
(IIRC, B&Q do a perfectly good one for under
100GBP) - I have one and it has paid for itself time and
time again. They weren't available at anything like that
price when I played silly games with cables.
This sounded interesting so I checked out B&Q's website by searching
for "generator".
I found this http://tinyurl.com/4bo8k They cost from Ł250 to Ł430!
What was the Ł100 one you are refiing to?
Perhaps this one
In article <9607A70CB733351D7E@130.133.1.4>, "Bill Woods"
woods_b@emercom.com says...
On 17 Feb 2005, =?UTF-8?B?UGFsaW5kcuKYu21l?= wrote:
(IIRC, B&Q do a perfectly good one for under
100GBP) - I have one and it has paid for itself time and
time again. They weren't available at anything like that
price when I played silly games with cables.
This sounded interesting so I checked out B&Q's website by
searching for "generator".
I found this http://tinyurl.com/4bo8k They cost from Ł250 to
Ł430!
What was the Ł100 one you are refiing to?
Perhaps this one
http://www.screwfix.com/app/sfd/cat/pro.jsp?id=43168&ts=69051
30 metres at 10 amperes isn't going to be a problem - so II am in the UK (so mains voltage is about 230V or 240V).
I have a reel of main extension cable made of 3-core 1.0 mm^2 wire
rated at 10 Amps. So the nominal power rating would be about 2,400
Watts. (Link to tech reference for the cable is below.)
Presumably the current carrying capacity or power delivery
capability of the unwound 30m length unwound is going to be a bit
less than 10 Amps/2,400 Watts due to losses along the length of the
cable itself.
Is the reduction in current/power carrying capability significant?
If so, then is there a rough guideline figure for available
current/power which I can use?
If I take *two* of these 30m reels then I can join them with the
standard UK 13 Amp plug and socket supplied on the reels. This gives
me an overall length of 60m. Taking into account losses, what would
be the current carrying or power delivery carrying capability of the
60m length if all the 60m cable is unwound?
Hey, a hedge trimmer will cut the cable cleanly in half, no matter whatOn Sat, 12 Feb 2005 10:51:00 -0800, "Watson A.Name - \"Watt Sun, the
Dark
Remover\"" <NOSPAM@dslextreme.com> wrote:
"Bob Eager" <rde42@spamcop.net> wrote in message
news:176uZD2KcidF-pn2-pgQf8dbMMKeL@rikki.tavi.co.uk...
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:46:19 UTC, Ian Stirling
root@mauve.demon.co.uk
wrote:
Or for 60m, 8.4*10^-1 ohms, or .84 ohms.
Plus the resistance on the two connections. Not sure whether the
earth
fault loop impedance is still OK...
Yeah, true. You 220VAC and 240VAC guys think you got it bad, we have
four times as much of a problem here in 120VAC land. ;-)
Those poor souls that put a hundred feet or so of 18GA (about 1mm sq)
extension cord on their weed wackers soon find that not only does it
run
slow, but the motor overheats. So we have extension cords that are
16
or 14 gauge, and can handle the extra current. But people are too
cheap
to pay double for the heavy duty extension cord, so they end up
eating
their money up in burned out motors.
And then when they get tired of doing that, they go out and buy a
weed
wacker with the gas engine. This is on the end of a long pole, so
the
engine is right up next to their face, so they go deaf from all the
engine noise. And they put the weed wacker in the garage, where the
gas
from the tank runs out and catches on fire!
--
Bob Eager
Why use anything as small as 1mm sq cable???
For 30metres I'd want to see 2.5mm sq at least, if not 4mm sq.
If not for the volt drop or lack of, for the mechanical strength and
resistance
to damage.
Peter
--
Peter & Rita Forbes
Email: diesel@easynet.co.uk
Web: http://www.oldengine.org/members/diesel
Last time we had a major failure of the batteries and rectifier it costWatson A.Name - "Watt Sun, the Dark Remover" wrote:
"Sammo" <noone@no-where.com> wrote in message
news:95FB7BA1F25441A7D4@130.133.1.4...
I am in the UK (so mains voltage is about 230V or 240V).
I'm in the U.S. and this gives me a flashback on what I was thinking
about trying a few months ago. We have a PBX at work that's on 48V
batteries, but the batteries are 9 yrs old and need replacing. They
cost a bundle so I thought it would be possible to run a power cable
underground to the big UPS we have in our computer room. Problem is
that the PBX's rectifier takes 30A max at 120VAC, or about 3.6kW.
And
the distance between is about 1300 feet or about 400m.
I would guess that the UPS output should go into a transformer and
come
out 480VAC, so the cable losses would be minimized. Then another
transf
on the PBX end to bring it back to 120VAC.
Hmmm... if you do it, just connect the PBX directly to the
480 volts. Just think how much faster the phone calls will
be at 480 vs 48!
I think installing a half mile of # 4 might be "politically" cost
prohibitive, regardless of the technical merits. And I doubt
it would be a good financial solution. How many times
can you replace the batteries for the cost of digging a
1/4 mile trench, and installing conduit, cable, fittings,
transformers, etc ?
[snip]
That's probably what will happen. But the computer room's UPS is backedehsjr@bellatlantic.net wrote:
I think installing a half mile of # 4 might be "politically" cost
prohibitive, regardless of the technical merits. And I doubt
it would be a good financial solution. How many times
can you replace the batteries for the cost of digging a
1/4 mile trench, and installing conduit, cable, fittings,
transformers, etc ?
For that money you coud buy the PBX a UPS all of its very own!
--
Cheers,
John.
Where are you from? Ever heard of Google?"Watson A.Name - "Watt Sun, the Dark Remover"" <NOSPAM@dslextreme.com
wrote
in message news:110sjq6kis36k05@corp.supernews.com...
And then when they get tired of doing that, they go out and buy a
weed
wacker with the gas engine.
One question to somebody presumably residing in the western colonies.
What's a "weed wacker"?
I don't know of any 4 volt rechargeable cell chemistry.No. These cells are 4V each, 12 in all, each is sealed. Well, except
for the one cell that's split open because of internal pressure. :-(
They must be replaced, not repaired. This is a phone system, where it
has to be online during emergencies. Batteries that are working fine,
but over 5 years old are considered unacceptable and must be replaced.
If you're going to use transformers at each end of the link, you can"Sammo" <noone@no-where.com> wrote in message
news:95FB7BA1F25441A7D4@130.133.1.4...
I am in the UK (so mains voltage is about 230V or 240V).
I'm in the U.S. and this gives me a flashback on what I was thinking
about trying a few months ago. We have a PBX at work that's on 48V
batteries, but the batteries are 9 yrs old and need replacing. They
cost a bundle so I thought it would be possible to run a power cable
underground to the big UPS we have in our computer room. Problem is
that the PBX's rectifier takes 30A max at 120VAC, or about 3.6kW. And
the distance between is about 1300 feet or about 400m.
I would guess that the UPS output should go into a transformer and come
out 480VAC, so the cable losses would be minimized. Then another transf
on the PBX end to bring it back to 120VAC. But should I expect to have
a max loss of 5% at max current, or what? I think I came up with 4GA
cable, but at 480VAC, I'm guessing that it would have to be special
insulated underground cable.
I would say 2.5kw at 30M and around 2Kw at 60M. Its not gonna makeI am in the UK (so mains voltage is about 230V or 240V).
I have a reel of main extension cable made of 3-core 1.0 mm^2 wire
rated at 10 Amps. So the nominal power rating would be about 2,400
Watts. (Link to tech reference for the cable is below.)
Presumably the current carrying capacity or power delivery
capability of the unwound 30m length unwound is going to be a bit
less than 10 Amps/2,400 Watts due to losses along the length of the
cable itself.
Is the reduction in current/power carrying capability significant?
If so, then is there a rough guideline figure for available
current/power which I can use?
If I take *two* of these 30m reels then I can join them with the
standard UK 13 Amp plug and socket supplied on the reels. This gives
me an overall length of 60m. Taking into account losses, what would
be the current carrying or power delivery carrying capability of the
60m length if all the 60m cable is unwound?
Thanks for any info.
Sammo
Technical reference for the cable is HAR type H05VV-F3 x 1.00 mm2 -
(details at http://tinyurl.com/7y5xx)
I expect you're right. Two cells in a case.On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 17:17:16 -0800, "Watson A.Name - \"Watt Sun, the
Dark Remover\"" <NOSPAM@dslextreme.com> wrote:
No. These cells are 4V each, 12 in all, each is sealed. Well,
except
for the one cell that's split open because of internal pressure. :-(
They must be replaced, not repaired. This is a phone system, where
it
has to be online during emergencies. Batteries that are working
fine,
but over 5 years old are considered unacceptable and must be
replaced.
I don't know of any 4 volt rechargeable cell chemistry.
I expect that your "4 volt cells" are actually two cell lead-acid
batteries, with each cell good for 2.1 volts.
--
Peter Bennett, VE7CEI
peterbb4 (at) interchange.ubc.ca
new newsgroup users info : http://vancouver-webpages.com/nnq
GPS and NMEA info: http://vancouver-webpages.com/peter
Vancouver Power Squadron: http://vancouver.powersquadron.ca