F
F Murtz
Guest
fritz wrote:
every thing in the rule book is not necessarily common practice the
rules are there to cover all sorts of eventualities not only common
practice
This discussion was about trying to find a recent fault occurring in a
probably normal installation
allows."F Murtz"<haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4d625a4d@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
fritz wrote:
"F Murtz"<haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4d622c15@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
kreed wrote:
In Australia in most cases an active and neutral go from light to light
and a twin drops to the switch (active and switch wire)
So you may have to disconnect downstream wiring at the light socket.
That is rare in QLD, but have seen this once.
In this one case there was an active and a neutral at both light and
switch, and a single
dual sheathed cable (switched active) ran from switch to light.
I do not know if things have changed but in nsw they used to loop a twin+e (active neutral + earth to every lighting point or
group of lights then drop a twin to each switch,except for two way or intermediate switching when a twin strap went between
switches.
very rarely did neutral end up behind a switch except in special circumstances.
I have not looked recently so maybe they do things differently now
Just had a look at 'Australian Electrical Wiring' Pethebridge& Williams
and several possibilities for basic single-switching are shown :
1) looping-in at batten holder - twin (A+N) with earth between batten holders
and twin drop to switch
2) looping-in at switch - twin to switch, twin to batten holder with
separate earth to batten holder
3) looping-in at switch - twin and earth to switch, twin and earth to
batten holder (but a protected straight-through earth OR an approved
earth joint at the switch is required)
4) looping-in at junction box with twin and earth to batten holder and twin
to switch
5)surface conduit system - actives are looped at switch, neutrals and
earths at the batten holder.
The important thing is that all batten holders must have an earth
available - old installations did not do this.
Other possibilities are allowed as long as they comply with the SAA
wiring rules. For example, when adding a new light and switch to an
existing installation it may easier to use two junction boxes etc.
I was not discussing what is legal,I was discussing common practice.
The quoted source was (is?) widely used as a textbook for the Electrical
Trades. I provided it to indicate the common practise as electricians
are taught to do.
Electricians do not make it a practice of doing everything the rule book
every thing in the rule book is not necessarily common practice the
rules are there to cover all sorts of eventualities not only common
practice
NoI assume the installation was done legally, are you suggesting the faulty
installation was not compliant ?
Did not say they did notEconomically they did not take wires where they were not needed.
They still should have complied with the rules.
and on walls sixty years ago and has not been used for over fifty years.The discussion was about fault finding and the place to isolate further down the line is at the lighting fixture as most of the
connections are done there. Single switches usually have only two wires. Most fuse blowing faults are at the fixtures.
As in 1), 4) and 5) above,
In the days of split conduit,cabling was a bit different as single wires were used and cables went direct to where they were going
ie less connections.
The conduit I was referring was an historical reference it was used in
That is case 5), the system is called surface conduit because that's
how it is most often mounted (not inside walls etc.). Single wires
are usually used. It is all explained in the quoted source, Pethebridge
& Williams.
I think you are trying to teach your grandmother to suck eggs
This discussion was about trying to find a recent fault occurring in a
probably normal installation