Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe they did a pretty good job of engineering it to not have affect
on those with Chinese Genetics. ;-)
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 19:14:25 -0600, amdx <am...@knology.net> wrote:
Maybe they did a pretty good job of engineering it to not have affect
on those with Chinese Genetics. ;-)
No, they just did a better job of \'engineering\' their death
statistics.
fredag den 4. december 2020 kl. 10.38.21 UTC+1 skrev David Brown:
On 03/12/2020 21:56, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:
torsdag den 3. december 2020 kl. 21.33.16 UTC+1 skrev
gnuarm.del...@gmail.com:
On Thursday, December 3, 2020 at 1:45:58 PM UTC-5, lang...@fonz.dk
wrote:
torsdag den 3. december 2020 kl. 19.14.31 UTC+1 skrev David
Brown:
On 03/12/2020 18:08, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
OK, Pompeo/Trump 2024. Pompeo would be a good president
with Trump\'s help.
Pence seems to be a very decent guy, but too quiet for the US
voters who like drama.
Pence won\'t even trust himself to have dinner with a woman
without a chaperon, and you think he should be trusted to run a
country?
where did you get the idea that it is himself he doesn\'t trust?
LOL! I needed that. I actually laughed out loud. Yes, Pence is such
an animal that his magnetism would make any woman desire him
uncontrollably. THAT\'S why he IS Presidential material.
you are missing the point, he doesn\'t want to be accused of anything
because these days that is guilty until proven guilty. For a man in
his position I\'d say it is a pretty smart precaution
It is not /remotely/ a smart precaution.
I realise that in the world of American politics, it\'s important not to
give the gutter press or your political enemies any suggestion of
wrong-doing, because a mere accusation can be as bad as a conviction.
He has publicly announced that he won\'t dine alone with a woman (other
than his wife) because it would be inappropriate. This will immediately
give the media the idea that he\'d be likely to act inappropriately with
a woman if he /did/ get them alone - and that any time he does happen to
be alone with a woman, he is fair game for any mud-slinging, rumour
mongering, gossip press, or conspiracy theory around.
And he is saying publicly that he doesn\'t view woman as people in the
same way as men - he can\'t have a professional relationship with them,
or a friendship with them, because he sees them primarily as sex objects
- or as weaker beings that must be protected by gallant gentlemen, like
something out of a Victorian novel. It is a pathetic state of affairs
that this person has risen to the prominence he has.
so he is either guilty or guilty...
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 10:38:11 +0100, David Brown
david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote:
And he is saying publicly that he doesn\'t view woman as people in the
same way as men - he can\'t have a professional relationship with them,
or a friendship with them, because he sees them primarily as sex objects
- or as weaker beings that must be protected by gallant gentlemen, like
something out of a Victorian novel. It is a pathetic state of affairs
that this person has risen to the prominence he has.
Did he say all that? Got a link?
I certainly don\'t view women in the same way as men.
On 05/12/2020 00:48, John Larkin wrote:
On Frii,i 4 Dec 2020 10:38:11 +0100, David Brown
davidi...@hesbynett.no> wrote:
ii
And he is saying publicly that he doesn\'t view woman as people in the
same way as men - he can\'t have a professional relationship with them,
or a friendship with them, because he sees them primarily as sex objects
- or ais weaker beings that must be protected by gallant gentlemen, like
something out of a Victorian novel. It is a pathetic state of affairs
that this person has risen to the prominence he has.
i
Did he say all that? Got a link?
He said he won\'t dine alone with a woman other than his wife. He is
happy to dine alone with another man. The difference in gender is what
matters to him - it is misogyny. He thinks people will assume he is
having an affair, and a person will only reason like that if he himself
thinks women are sex objects.
I certainly don\'t view women in the same way as men.
Of course there are differences between men and women. But there are no
differences that are relevant to having a meal together, unless you are
actually out on a date.
On 05/12/2020 00:48, John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 10:38:11 +0100, David Brown
david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote:
And he is saying publicly that he doesn\'t view woman as people in the
same way as men - he can\'t have a professional relationship with them,
or a friendship with them, because he sees them primarily as sex objects
- or as weaker beings that must be protected by gallant gentlemen, like
something out of a Victorian novel. It is a pathetic state of affairs
that this person has risen to the prominence he has.
Did he say all that? Got a link?
He said he won\'t dine alone with a woman other than his wife. He is
happy to dine alone with another man. The difference in gender is what
matters to him - it is misogyny. He thinks people will assume he is
having an affair, and a person will only reason like that if he himself
thinks women are sex objects.
On Saturday, December 5, 2020 at 8:55:24 AM UTC-5, David Brown
wrote:
On 05/12/2020 00:48, John Larkin wrote:
On Frii,i 4 Dec 2020 10:38:11 +0100, David Brown
davidi...@hesbynett.no> wrote: ii
And he is saying publicly that he doesn\'t view woman as people
in the same way as men - he can\'t have a professional
relationship with them, or a friendship with them, because he
sees them primarily as sex objects - or ais weaker beings that
must be protected by gallant gentlemen, like something out of
a Victorian novel. It is a pathetic state of affairs that this
person has risen to the prominence he has.
i
Did he say all that? Got a link?
He said he won\'t dine alone with a woman other than his wife. He is
happy to dine alone with another man. The difference in gender is
what matters to him - it is misogyny. He thinks people will assume
he is having an affair, and a person will only reason like that if
he himself thinks women are sex objects.
I certainly don\'t view women in the same way as men.
Of course there are differences between men and women. But there
are no differences that are relevant to having a meal together,
unless you are actually out on a date.
You see the world as binary. The world is much more complex than
that. I usually agree with you, but in this case I do not.
On 05/12/2020 15:51, dca...@krl.org wrote: anotheranother
On Saturday, December 5, 2020 at 8:55:24 AM UTC-5, David Brown
wrote:
On 05/12/2020 00:48, John Larkin wrote: another
On Frii,i 4 Dec 2020 10:38:11 +0100, David Brown another
davidi...@hesbynett.no> wrote: ii
And he is saying publicly that he doesn\'t view woman as people another
in the same way as men - he can\'t have a professional another
relationship with them, or a friendship with them, because he another
sees them primarily as sex objects - or ais weaker beings that
must be protected by gallant gentlemen, like something out of
a Victorian novel. It is a pathetic state of affairs that this
person has risen to the prominence he has. another
i
Did he say all that? Got a link?
He said he won\'t dine alone with a woman other than his wife. He is
happy to dine alone with another man. The difference in gender is
what matters to him - it is misogyny. He thinks people will assume
he is having an affair, and a person will only reason like that if
he himself thinks women are sex objects.
another
I certainly don\'t view women in the same way as men.
Of course there are differences between men and women. But there
are no differences that are relevant to having a meal together,
unless you are actually out on a date.
You see the world as binary. The world is much more complex than
that. I usually agree with you, but in this case I do not.
The world is indeed complex (and the division of people into \"male\" or
\"female\" is an oversimplification in itself). But in this case, I am
clear - if the guy is unable to have a dinner with a woman without being
overwhelmingly concerned with her gender, or even just overwhelmingly
concerned with what other people will think about him having dinner with
a woman, then he is not fit for officeanother
On 05/12/2020 15:51, dcaster@krl.org wrote:
On Saturday, December 5, 2020 at 8:55:24 AM UTC-5, David Brown
wrote:
On 05/12/2020 00:48, John Larkin wrote:
On Frii,i 4 Dec 2020 10:38:11 +0100, David Brown
davidi...@hesbynett.no> wrote: ii
And he is saying publicly that he doesn\'t view woman as people
in the same way as men - he can\'t have a professional
relationship with them, or a friendship with them, because he
sees them primarily as sex objects - or ais weaker beings that
must be protected by gallant gentlemen, like something out of
a Victorian novel. It is a pathetic state of affairs that this
person has risen to the prominence he has.
i
Did he say all that? Got a link?
He said he won\'t dine alone with a woman other than his wife. He is
happy to dine alone with another man. The difference in gender is
what matters to him - it is misogyny. He thinks people will assume
he is having an affair, and a person will only reason like that if
he himself thinks women are sex objects.
I certainly don\'t view women in the same way as men.
Of course there are differences between men and women. But there
are no differences that are relevant to having a meal together,
unless you are actually out on a date.
You see the world as binary. The world is much more complex than
that. I usually agree with you, but in this case I do not.
The world is indeed complex (and the division of people into \"male\" or
\"female\" is an oversimplification in itself). But in this case, I am
clear - if the guy is unable to have a dinner with a woman without being
overwhelmingly concerned with her gender, or even just overwhelmingly
concerned with what other people will think about him having dinner with
a woman, then he is not fit for office.
With a suggestion from someone else, found problem was in the layout.Robert,
Once you get your system running again, you may want to download the
MozBackup (Mozilla Backup) utility. It will save not only your profile
but also other user data (you select which) such as address books,
bookmarks, certificates, cookies, email settings, saved passwords,
emails, and more. MozBackup allows you to easily back up, transfer, or
re-install all the associated scattered user settings and data for
Seamonkey, Firefox, Thunderbird and many other programs in a single
operation. Invaluable for setting up multiple machines to a common
configuration and a lifesaver for recovering a corrupted profile.
Bert
Paul wrote:
Robert Baer wrote:
 When i open Win7 SeaMonkey 2.49.5 now, i get nothing useful..no
list of newsgroups, or anything else.
 Content list of top bar: File, Edit, View, Go,Message, Tools,
Window, Help    All greyed out.
 Content list of second bar: GetMsgs, Compose, [greyed out]] Reply,
Reply all, Forward //need i go on rest greyed out.
 Content of last bar: View: (pulldownlist)  Greyed out.
 Since i cannot see any newsgroups, posting a response is not of any
use to me.
 Please use email to robertbaer@localnet.com and give guide how to
restore this blankie.
  Thanks
application data or Appdata
     Mozilla
        seamonkey
           profiles.ini
           Profiles
              abcd5678
              efgh1234 <=== make a new one
You will likely need to edit profiles.ini to get
the new profile added to the list of profiles.
When a new profile hasn\'t been set up, and you
launch from inside Seamonkey (which you can\'t do at the
moment), then the profile would be \"Default User\"
instead of \"default\".
Then, in Command Prompt
cd Program Files
cd Seamonkey
./seamonkey -P \"Default User\"Â Â Â Â <=== this is the assumed name of the
new profile
If you want a sexy name for the profile, edit the profiles.ini.
Here, I\'m adding a reference to my new profile. You could even
move the Default=1 down to the second profile here, so that it
starts automatically, without even using Command Prompt.
[General]
StartWithLastProfile=1
[Profile0]
Name=default
IsRelative=1
Path=Profiles/abcd5678.default
Default=1
[Profile1]
Name=TestProfileEFGH1234
IsRelative=1
Path=Profiles/efgh1234
cd /d C:\\Program Files\\Seamonkey
./seamonkey.exe -P \"TestProfileEFGH1234\"Â Â Â Â <=== Now am using the new
one by name
The idea is, to create a new profile.
You\'ll need to migrate stuff eventually, like bookmarks.
   Paul