J
John Fields
Guest
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 20:50:41 +1100, Daniel
<dxmm@nospam.albury.net.au> wrote:
Not at all. On the higher resistance ranges the ohmmeter _does_
approximate a constant current source; at least for the purpose of
this discussion.
---
Yes, but that one amp '1A', earlier, was a trypo. It should have
read: "1mA", so the math is correct as it stands. I'm surprised you
didn't catch that, since it's not likely _any_ common ohmmeter is
going to push 1 amp through the resistance it's measuring.
Even my trusty old Simpson 260 on the 'R times 1' range only puts
about 100mA through a 100mA d'Arsonval movement with an internal
resistance of 1.08 ohms.
---
It doesn't need to be fixed, though. All that needed to happen was
for the typo to be corrected, so the 5 seconds stands at 5 seconds,
which even for a relatively slow digital multimeter with an update
rate of 2 readings per second isn't "almost zero time".
--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer
<dxmm@nospam.albury.net.au> wrote:
---John Fields wrote:
---
Most of my multimeters, on the 200 ohm full scale range, supply
about 1A into a short, so if we consider the ohmmeter a constant
current source it'll take:
dv C 1V * 5E-3F
t = ------ = ------------ = 5 seconds
I 1e-3A
to charge the cap up to a volt through the ohmmeter. Not exactly
what I'd call "almost zero time"
All fine and dandy if the Ohm-meter were a constant current source and
the capacitor could just keep absorbing those electrons, but neither is
the case so your logic fails.
Not at all. On the higher resistance ranges the ohmmeter _does_
approximate a constant current source; at least for the purpose of
this discussion.
---
---(As a side note, I'll give you 5E-3F is the same as 5000 microfarads,
but 1e-3A is not the one amp you say your multimeter can supply into a
short.
Yes, but that one amp '1A', earlier, was a trypo. It should have
read: "1mA", so the math is correct as it stands. I'm surprised you
didn't catch that, since it's not likely _any_ common ohmmeter is
going to push 1 amp through the resistance it's measuring.
Even my trusty old Simpson 260 on the 'R times 1' range only puts
about 100mA through a 100mA d'Arsonval movement with an internal
resistance of 1.08 ohms.
---
---If you fix this in the workings, t = 5 milli-seconds, which I
would call "almost zero time" when talking about digital multi-meter
response time.)
It doesn't need to be fixed, though. All that needed to happen was
for the typo to be corrected, so the 5 seconds stands at 5 seconds,
which even for a relatively slow digital multimeter with an update
rate of 2 readings per second isn't "almost zero time".
--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer