Happy Flag Day US-ians.

[John Larkin]

On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 17:03:54 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote in
news:9mh7getsobk0v3v8a1embqspjmkku51fkb@4ax.com:

If someone sent you dirt on a competitor, would you shred it or read
it?


His office is not 'a competition'. And nobody said a damned thing
about 'shredding' anything, particularly evidence of attempted
tampering.

I would report it.

He said that he might. He said that is his job. That's entirely
sensible.

Speaking of sensible, so many people let their emotions totally
dominate any inclinations to think.



--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
picosecond timing precision measurement

jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com

 

John Larkin <jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> wrote in
news:l0m7geharp17eoihpamgut53dtutr13q3h@4ax.com:

On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 16:51:06 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote in
news:9mh7getsobk0v3v8a1embqspjmkku51fkb@4ax.com:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/23b6bq0dz2bum2l/Hammond_120VA.JPG?raw=
1

(Amazing transformer)

We had a 2kVA version of that. Looks so similar maybe same
vendor.
They are very nice.

This one is only 4" diameter, 120 VA.

Frequency response extends to the 100s of KHz, and leakage
inductance is absurdly low... for a 60 Hz transformer! One of my
guys is testing it.

We'll need to close a feedback loop around it, and a class-D power
amp, so we need to really understand it.

That depends on what you are going to use it for.

Sounds like not as a line transformer.

Might warm a bit too at '100s of kHz' and 120VA. Maybe a little
hysteresis distortion gets introduced too.

Make yourself one with a big ferrite core. Farnell and those guys
have them. Custom mixes too.

 

John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote in
news:9mh7getsobk0v3v8a1embqspjmkku51fkb@4ax.com:

I thought you'd never ask!

Those are someone else's soldering skills.

And blank boards are not soldered yet, dufus.

 

John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote in
news:9mh7getsobk0v3v8a1embqspjmkku51fkb@4ax.com:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/23b6bq0dz2bum2l/Hammond_120VA.JPG?raw=1

(Amazing transformer)

We had a 2kVA version of that. Looks so similar maybe same vendor.
They are very nice.

 

John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote in
news:9mh7getsobk0v3v8a1embqspjmkku51fkb@4ax.com:

I think he's being rational and honest, neither of which
Washington or the mainstream press approves of.

You have obviously never done a contract with secret clearance.

There are certain things Americans CANNOT do, and being a sworn
federal office holder pretty much means you MUST follow the rules, and
NEVER apply personal feelings toward it. His stupid son should be down
at GITMO and so should Trump for bypassing his security screening. And
that is just the beginning. He has MANY questionable staff members and
it looks like one got millions in construction contracts while owning
stocks in the company AFTER being told to get out of the investments.
That twit should go to GITMO too. I wonder where she got that acumen
from?

 

John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote in
news:9mh7getsobk0v3v8a1embqspjmkku51fkb@4ax.com:

If someone sent you dirt on a competitor, would you shred it or read
it?

His office is not 'a competition'. And nobody said a damned thing
about 'shredding' anything, particularly evidence of attempted
tampering.

I would report it.

You really are a joke as far as intellect goes, if you think there is
no problem with his remarks, his obvious feelings and non-chalantness
about and toward those which we, for decades, have put in place to keep
our nation safe from external influence.

Now, we are back at WAKE THE FUCK UP, again.

 

bitrex <user@example.net> wrote in
news:u5QME.24225$uY4.24106@fx27.iad:

On 6/14/19 12:31 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 15:48:37 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote in
news:8lf7gehkp0sjhhrc7d3jcb047le27b35f7@4ax.com:

On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 14:40:32 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote in
news:csa7ge5sgrgnapvpq7tv7uc9l034ppg2kp@4ax.com:

On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 14:04:10 -0000 (UTC), John Doe
always.look@message.header> wrote:

Here we have an Australian, one of the most active off-topic
trolls
in this group who rarely talks about electronics, bashing
someone
else for encouraging talk about electronics...

I don't think that either of them do electronics any more.

I wonder what they actually do.



For someone jumping on folks with lame mumblings about
insults
and
topicicity, you sure do enough of the stupid shit yourself.

You entertain dipshits who spend decades making top posted
retarded Usenet posts about nothing, and then you ignore the
very ELECTRONICS related posts that he made many of in the
last few
days
alone.

You are truly pathetic, and your butt buddy JohnTard DoeTard
must
really be one of YOUR sock puppets.


What do you do?



I was working on a device to assist in the detection and
destruction of Hamas tunnels.

It was on hold, but might get a new kick with all that is
happening.

So, you are like Donald J. Trump in that you lie (your comment
about Bill not discussing electronics, and then when caught
either ignore you ever did it, or toggle back to your same
bullshit.

Post another pic of your shoddy personal soldering skills.

I thought you'd never ask!

https://www.dropbox.com/s/5nlhqy7c8mt2xv3/LDP2.JPG?raw=1

https://www.dropbox.com/s/mcf1aneghx9lepp/Z338_PCB.JPG?raw=1

https://www.dropbox.com/s/cvdv0azvr0ahitv/Z368.JPG?raw=1

https://www.dropbox.com/s/7bihbjbaojvta0z/Z382_1.JPG?raw=1

Show us some of yours. Maybe Bill will grace us with some of his
pics too.



Mine are NASA quality, because the exempt equipment I work
with is
still able to use 63/37.

I did a little NASA soldering, for a box on the S1B moon rocket
first stage. It was not something I'd want to make a career of. I
do enjoy soldering my breadboards, except for nasty packages like
0402s and US8s and leadless stuff and things with power pads. And
BGAs, which I let my production people do for me.

Most of our soldering is now solder paste reflow under nitrogen,
on the p-p line. I try to keep thru-hole parts to a minimum.

Can't surface mount this:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/23b6bq0dz2bum2l/Hammond_120VA.JPG?raw=1

(Amazing transformer)


Lead free tin whiskered solder is just another thing that
dorks
like Trump remind me of.

ROHS solder takes all the joy out of a good solder joint. It's
born ugly.


This is the geekiest dick-size comparison contest ever, lol.

I'm going to show my girlfriend and her friends this thread and
tell them "this is what engineers do with their spare time."

Then we get punks like you with your holey-er than thou
assessments.

Yeah, chump... yer special.

Nobody was comparing anything, ditzo. I was talking about how he
said that bill does not talk about electronics here, and I called
him the fucking liar that he is. Then I remembered some of his bad
soldering pics in the past. He posted someone else's soldering.

Apparently, your version of Usnet is only reading a single post
then presuming a whole bunch of elemntary school level adolescent
baby bullshit about it. Yeah... show it to your girlfriend. If
she has an IQ above the jailhouse bitch crowd, she'll see where you
are the punk in this thread.

"lol" indeed, child.

 

John Robertson <spam@flippers.com> wrote in
news-ednZahitWkWp7AnZ2dnUU7-T3NnZ2d@giganews.com:

On 2019/06/14 6:23 a.m., DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org
wrote:
Yep... Our flag is the greatest.

I'll bet Trump even fucks that up though.
There will probably be a youtube video of him saying something
stupid again.

All you fucking "followers" must be KKK assholes, because he
is.
His father was. His whole family are military pussies, and he
was too, and you dumbfucks wanted to give him a button to push.

How quaint... N O T !!!

The stupid fuck has got to go. Today would be an excellent
day to
start.


I remember when the USA was respected as a symbol to the world of
what could be done to help others:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4i3LmR0K74

John

Now, we get countries so badly propagandized by Russia and others
that we are reviled in some of the very places we assist.

 

[John Larkin]

On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 17:33:54 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

John Larkin <jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> wrote in
news:nml7gehsf5cestkrgf8o1ainju8st28q4t@4ax.com:

On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 17:10:00 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

Nobody was comparing anything, ditzo. I was talking about how he
said that bill does not talk about electronics here, and I called
him the fucking liar that he is. Then I remembered some of his
bad
soldering pics in the past. He posted someone else's soldering.

Those boards were entirely built by me. Schematic, Dremeled
gold-plated FR4, soldering, cleaning. I learned to solder when I
was
literally three years old.

Of course I didn't have RMA 63/37, or a Mantis, or a Metcal then.

When will you post some of your work?


Well, if you soldered those, your work has certainly improved over
the pics you posted ten years ago and said was yours.

Got a link? I don't recall posting ugly soldering.

Soldering is art. I don't do ugly soldering.

This is about my worst. The circuit didn't work, either.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/yur6uuhytc7cfcn/D200_BB_4.JPG?raw=1


This ain't beautiful, but it did work.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/ot95e4153b7df4i/D140_Proto.JPG?raw=1

That was before I got the gold copperclad.

Show us some of yours.


--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
picosecond timing precision measurement

jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com

 

[John Larkin]

On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 11:11:57 -0700, John Robertson <spam@flippers.com>
wrote:

On 2019/06/14 10:32 a.m., John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 17:03:54 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote in
news:9mh7getsobk0v3v8a1embqspjmkku51fkb@4ax.com:

If someone sent you dirt on a competitor, would you shred it or read
it?


His office is not 'a competition'. And nobody said a damned thing
about 'shredding' anything, particularly evidence of attempted
tampering.

I would report it.

He said that he might. He said that is his job. That's entirely
sensible.

So collusion is sensible?

Reading something that someone sends is responsible and sensible.

Mueller said that there was no collusion. Sorry.

The paid-for Steele Dossier was wholesale collusion.


--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
picosecond timing precision measurement

jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com

 

[John Robertson]

On 2019/06/14 10:32 a.m., John Larkin wrote:

On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 17:03:54 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote in
news:9mh7getsobk0v3v8a1embqspjmkku51fkb@4ax.com:

If someone sent you dirt on a competitor, would you shred it or read
it?


His office is not 'a competition'. And nobody said a damned thing
about 'shredding' anything, particularly evidence of attempted
tampering.

I would report it.

He said that he might. He said that is his job. That's entirely
sensible.

So collusion is sensible? With Russia? You do know that when someone in
politics gives you dirt on an opponent that they expect something in
return...

"Sad!"

Speaking of sensible, so many people let their emotions totally
dominate any inclinations to think.

While others think of the consequences of their actions.

John

 

John Larkin <jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> wrote in
news:67m7ge52d27giqb1uqdp2k1atpnu1qss6e@4ax.com:

I have clearances so secret even I'm not allowed to know about them.

Then you would have attended an ITAR briefing. Pretty sure it is
required, even for 'engineers' as you say.

 

John Larkin <jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> wrote in
news:k3q7ged2pn71t5en47vhku67ukvlbicgdr@4ax.com:

Mueller said that there was no collusion. Sorry.

He said no such thing.

 

[John Robertson]

On 2019/06/14 11:36 a.m., John Larkin wrote:

On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 11:11:57 -0700, John Robertson <spam@flippers.com
wrote:

On 2019/06/14 10:32 a.m., John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 17:03:54 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote in
news:9mh7getsobk0v3v8a1embqspjmkku51fkb@4ax.com:

If someone sent you dirt on a competitor, would you shred it or read
it?


His office is not 'a competition'. And nobody said a damned thing
about 'shredding' anything, particularly evidence of attempted
tampering.

I would report it.

He said that he might. He said that is his job. That's entirely
sensible.

So collusion is sensible?


Reading something that someone sends is responsible and sensible.

Mueller said that there was no collusion. Sorry.

The paid-for Steele Dossier was wholesale collusion.

Mueller made a point of saying:

"As set forth in our report, after that investigation, if we had
confidence that the President clearly did not commit a crime, we would
have said that."

https://www.axios.com/mueller-statement-transcript-c1609594-ff8d-4824-abec-4f7415833129.html

How do you interpret that statement as 'no collusion'?

He also pointed out how the office of the special prosecutor could not
legally charge the President - that was up to other branches of government.

"It explains that under long-standing Department policy, a President
cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in office. That is
unconstitutional. Even if the charge is kept under seal and hidden from
public view—that too is prohibited."

...

"So that was the Justice Department policy and those were the principles
under which we operated. From them we concluded that we would not reach
a determination – one way or the other – about whether the President
committed a crime. That is the office’s final position and we will not
comment on any other conclusions or hypotheticals about the President."

Note the use of the words "would not" instead of "could not". Mr Mueller
is very precise. He certainly is no hookah-smoking caterpillar...

John

 

John Larkin <jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> wrote in
news:e568gep5ohl5tdbcgaubkndrj9slplbn71@4ax.com:

On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 12:44:35 -0700, John Robertson
spam@flippers.com> wrote:

On 2019/06/14 11:36 a.m., John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 11:11:57 -0700, John Robertson
spam@flippers.com> wrote:

On 2019/06/14 10:32 a.m., John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 17:03:54 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote in
news:9mh7getsobk0v3v8a1embqspjmkku51fkb@4ax.com:

If someone sent you dirt on a competitor, would you shred it
or read it?


His office is not 'a competition'. And nobody said a
damned thing
about 'shredding' anything, particularly evidence of
attempted tampering.

I would report it.

He said that he might. He said that is his job. That's
entirely sensible.

So collusion is sensible?


Reading something that someone sends is responsible and
sensible.

Mueller said that there was no collusion. Sorry.

The paid-for Steele Dossier was wholesale collusion.



Mueller made a point of saying:

"As set forth in our report, after that investigation, if we had
confidence that the President clearly did not commit a crime, we
would have said that."

https://www.axios.com/mueller-statement-transcript-c1609594-ff8d-
48
24-abec-4f7415833129.html

How do you interpret that statement as 'no collusion'?

He also pointed out how the office of the special prosecutor could
not legally charge the President - that was up to other branches
of government.

"It explains that under long-standing Department policy, a
President cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in
office. That is unconstitutional. Even if the charge is kept under
seal and hidden from public view—that too is prohibited."

...

"So that was the Justice Department policy and those were the
principles under which we operated. From them we concluded that we
would not reach a determination – one way or the other – about
whether the President committed a crime. That is the office’s
final position and we will not comment on any other conclusions or
hypotheticals about the President."

Note the use of the words "would not" instead of "could not". Mr
Mueller is very precise. He certainly is no hookah-smoking
caterpillar...

John

Didn't he know all this two years ago? Why didn't he say so and
save us a lot of money?

That is not how it works.

Mueller was charged with finding collusion with Russians.

No. He was charged with investigating whether criminal behavior
occurred within the Trump election campaign organization.

He found
none.

Where did you get that idea.

So he switched to slurs and innuendo, the best he could do.

Really? Robert Mueller, a battlefield decorated Marine? I do not
think so. It was Donald J. Trump whom has been attacking him, and
many others he simply puts on his "not on the Trump bandwagon" list.

Since there was no collusion, there was nothing to obstruct.

You keep speaking from a false platform.

A lot of people are screeching because they don't like Trump, or
the people who elected him.

No. Folks have always questioned Trump's character. Folks
absolutely question both the intelligence and character of any and
all of the idiots who were hypnotized by his bullshit to the point
where the idiots voted for him.

Why won't the DOJ investigate the Steele thing,

What are you mumbling about, child?

or Uranium One, or
Hunter Biden?

Wtf are you on about? Talking it up with the Russians in ANY
setting other than a formal meeting, fully monitored is a suspect
illicit meeting. That's how it is, pal. THAT is what this is
about.

> Why did Hillary get a pass on the server thing?

Still mumbling about petty bullshit. Did we find any meetings
with cold war enemies in those emails? Oh that's right...

Just how did we get those emails again? Wasn't it via some lame
treason committing former employee or such?

You really are stupid, John. Hard wired, self retarded timing
stupid.

Donald J. Trump was a mobbed up criminal in the seventies and
eighties and nineties, and now he is STILL COLLUDING with his 'old
buddies' and dipshits like you are too goddamned blind to see an NYC
shyster asshole when you look at one. He was buddies with the NYC
mob and the NYC Russian mob, which have been around since the
sixties.

And his dad was a KK member, and I would not doubt that Donald J.
Trump is a closeted member as well.

You need to wake the fuck up.

 

[John Larkin]

On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 12:44:35 -0700, John Robertson <spam@flippers.com>
wrote:

On 2019/06/14 11:36 a.m., John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 11:11:57 -0700, John Robertson <spam@flippers.com
wrote:

On 2019/06/14 10:32 a.m., John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 17:03:54 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote in
news:9mh7getsobk0v3v8a1embqspjmkku51fkb@4ax.com:

If someone sent you dirt on a competitor, would you shred it or read
it?


His office is not 'a competition'. And nobody said a damned thing
about 'shredding' anything, particularly evidence of attempted
tampering.

I would report it.

He said that he might. He said that is his job. That's entirely
sensible.

So collusion is sensible?


Reading something that someone sends is responsible and sensible.

Mueller said that there was no collusion. Sorry.

The paid-for Steele Dossier was wholesale collusion.



Mueller made a point of saying:

"As set forth in our report, after that investigation, if we had
confidence that the President clearly did not commit a crime, we would
have said that."

https://www.axios.com/mueller-statement-transcript-c1609594-ff8d-4824-abec-4f7415833129.html

How do you interpret that statement as 'no collusion'?

He also pointed out how the office of the special prosecutor could not
legally charge the President - that was up to other branches of government.

"It explains that under long-standing Department policy, a President
cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in office. That is
unconstitutional. Even if the charge is kept under seal and hidden from
public view—that too is prohibited."

...

"So that was the Justice Department policy and those were the principles
under which we operated. From them we concluded that we would not reach
a determination – one way or the other – about whether the President
committed a crime. That is the office’s final position and we will not
comment on any other conclusions or hypotheticals about the President."

Note the use of the words "would not" instead of "could not". Mr Mueller
is very precise. He certainly is no hookah-smoking caterpillar...

John

Didn't he know all this two years ago? Why didn't he say so and save
us a lot of money?

Mueller was charged with finding collusion with Russians. He found
none. So he switched to slurs and innuendo, the best he could do.

Since there was no collusion, there was nothing to obstruct.

A lot of people are screeching because they don't like Trump, or the
people who elected him.

Why won't the DOJ investigate the Steele thing, or Uranium One, or
Hunter Biden? Why did Hillary get a pass on the server thing?





--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
picosecond timing precision measurement

jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com

 

On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 08:36:06 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote:

On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 14:40:32 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote in
news:csa7ge5sgrgnapvpq7tv7uc9l034ppg2kp@4ax.com:

On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 14:04:10 -0000 (UTC), John Doe
always.look@message.header> wrote:

Here we have an Australian, one of the most active off-topic
trolls
in this group who rarely talks about electronics, bashing someone
else for encouraging talk about electronics...

I don't think that either of them do electronics any more.

I wonder what they actually do.



For someone jumping on folks with lame mumblings about insults and
topicicity, you sure do enough of the stupid shit yourself.

You entertain dipshits who spend decades making top posted
retarded Usenet posts about nothing, and then you ignore the very
ELECTRONICS related posts that he made many of in the last few days
alone.

You are truly pathetic, and your butt buddy JohnTard DoeTard must
really be one of YOUR sock puppets.


What do you do?

It's hard work being so consistently wrong.

 

[John Larkin]

On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 17:52:44 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

John Larkin <jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> wrote in
news:67m7ge52d27giqb1uqdp2k1atpnu1qss6e@4ax.com:


I have clearances so secret even I'm not allowed to know about them.


Then you would have attended an ITAR briefing. Pretty sure it is
required, even for 'engineers' as you say.

No, never have.


--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

lunatic fringe electronics

 

[John Larkin]

On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 17:39:07 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

John Larkin <jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> wrote in
news:l0m7geharp17eoihpamgut53dtutr13q3h@4ax.com:

On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 16:51:06 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote in
news:9mh7getsobk0v3v8a1embqspjmkku51fkb@4ax.com:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/23b6bq0dz2bum2l/Hammond_120VA.JPG?raw=
1

(Amazing transformer)

We had a 2kVA version of that. Looks so similar maybe same
vendor.
They are very nice.

This one is only 4" diameter, 120 VA.

Frequency response extends to the 100s of KHz, and leakage
inductance is absurdly low... for a 60 Hz transformer! One of my
guys is testing it.

We'll need to close a feedback loop around it, and a class-D power
amp, so we need to really understand it.



That depends on what you are going to use it for.

3-phase AC power supply, actually an alternator simulator. Sort of a
favor for a good customer.

Sounds like not as a line transformer.

We'll drive a "secondary" winding, up to 30 VRMS.

Might warm a bit too at '100s of kHz' and 120VA. Maybe a little
hysteresis distortion gets introduced too.

We'll run power from 50 to 1000 Hz, but we need a lot of bandwidth to
close a tight feedback loop around the transformer.

Make yourself one with a big ferrite core. Farnell and those guys
have them. Custom mixes too.

I'd sure rather buy toroids already wound. And I want to go down to 50
Hz, so ferrite is out.

That one is around $70, in the noise on this project.


--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

lunatic fringe electronics

 

John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote in
news:3ao8ge9cl6a7d7avoqjs095t3vi0dntrb2@4ax.com:

I'd sure rather buy toroids already wound. And I want to go down
to 50 Hz, so ferrite is out.

That one is around $70, in the noise on this project.

You didn't need to mention '100s of kHz then.

I would never have mentioned ferrite if I thought you were actually
using it at line frequencies.

You can't beat what they already have off the shelf then.

I thought you were making it do something other than what it was
designed for.