half wave rectifier...

On Friday, June 30, 2023 at 10:25:41 PM UTC+10, Clive Arthur wrote:
On 29/06/2023 23:37, TTman wrote:
As part of an experiment with solar, I want to drive my 220V 3kW
immersion heater with a suitable diode so that the effective power is
~1.5kW and can be driven by a smart switch so that it doesn\'t suck too
much out of the 9.5kWh battery or solar panels.. What diode? This is UK
spec.

A big fuck-off Variac is what you need, if you can find/borrow one.

** Why not a series capacitor bank with the needed value?

C = 1/ ( 2.pi.50.18) = 175uF

No heat losses and clean current waveform.


..... Phil
 
On Friday, June 30, 2023 at 9:53:05 PM UTC-4, Phil Allison wrote:
On Friday, June 30, 2023 at 10:25:41 PM UTC+10, Clive Arthur wrote:
On 29/06/2023 23:37, TTman wrote:
As part of an experiment with solar, I want to drive my 220V 3kW
immersion heater with a suitable diode so that the effective power is
~1.5kW and can be driven by a smart switch so that it doesn\'t suck too
much out of the 9.5kWh battery or solar panels.. What diode? This is UK
spec.

A big fuck-off Variac is what you need, if you can find/borrow one.

** Why not a series capacitor bank with the needed value?

C = 1/ ( 2.pi.50.18) = 175uF

No heat losses and clean current waveform.

Whacked out power factor.

--

Rick C.

--+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
--+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
Ricky wrote:
--------------------
A big fuck-off Variac is what you need, if you can find/borrow one.

** Why not a series capacitor bank with the needed value?

C = 1/ ( 2.pi.50.18) = 175uF

No heat losses and clean current waveform.
Whacked out power factor.

** LOL - what complete nonsense.


....... Phil
 
On Friday, June 30, 2023 at 10:16:45 PM UTC-4, Phil Allison wrote:
Ricky wrote:
--------------------


A big fuck-off Variac is what you need, if you can find/borrow one.

** Why not a series capacitor bank with the needed value?

C = 1/ ( 2.pi.50.18) = 175uF

No heat losses and clean current waveform.
Whacked out power factor.

** LOL - what complete nonsense.

So, another topic we\'ve found that Phil A. knows nothing about.

It is not uncommon to add capacitance to mitigate inductive loads, restoring the power factor to close to 1.0. I\'ve never heard of adding inductors to mitigate capacitive power factors. I guess that\'s because there are so few large capacitive loads, and they would likely be countered by other inductive loads.

The reason a power factor not close to 1.0 is undesired, is that it means the current is flowing out of phase with the voltage, resulting in larger current flow than is needed to transmit the \"real\" power, with excess power losses in the wiring. The power company doesn\'t like losing power in their wires. They only bill for the power delivered to your meter, and only the real power at that.

--

Rick C.

-+- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
-+- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
Mad Ricky wrote:
---------------------------
Phil Allison wrote:
Clive Arthur wrote:

A big fuck-off Variac is what you need, if you can find/borrow one.

** Why not a series capacitor bank with the needed value?

C = 1/ ( 2.pi.50.18) = 175uF

No heat losses and clean current waveform.

Whacked out power factor.

** LOL - what complete nonsense.

So, another topic we\'ve found that Phil A. knows nothing about.

** FFS you do LOVE making idiotic assumptions.

Using a cap in series to get 1/2 power produces a PF of 0.7, which is not \"wacked out\" - whatever that means.
The 3 posted ways to half the power (using a diode, triac or cap) have the same PF, making nonsense of your claim.

PF = true power / VA where V and A are rms values.

The true power, is 1500W in each case.
The rms current value is also the same since the load is a fixed resistance.
The current wave is the same in the load and the supply each time.



........ Phil
 
On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 3:38:59 AM UTC-4, Phil Allison wrote:
Mad Ricky wrote:
---------------------------
Phil Allison wrote:

Clive Arthur wrote:

A big fuck-off Variac is what you need, if you can find/borrow one.

** Why not a series capacitor bank with the needed value?

C = 1/ ( 2.pi.50.18) = 175uF

No heat losses and clean current waveform.

Whacked out power factor.

** LOL - what complete nonsense.

So, another topic we\'ve found that Phil A. knows nothing about.
** FFS you do LOVE making idiotic assumptions.

Using a cap in series to get 1/2 power produces a PF of 0.7, which is not \"wacked out\" - whatever that means.
The 3 posted ways to half the power (using a diode, triac or cap) have the same PF, making nonsense of your claim.

PF = true power / VA where V and A are rms values.

The true power, is 1500W in each case.
The rms current value is also the same since the load is a fixed resistance.
The current wave is the same in the load and the supply each time.

You ignored using a series resistor, which has zero impact on the power factor.

The utility does not care about YOUR real power. They care about THEIR imaginary power which wastes power in the power line. With a power factor of 0.7, the power company would see significantly higher line losses.

\"For example, if the load power factor were as low as 0.7, the apparent power would be 1.4 times the real power used by the load.\" Current would be 1..4 times higher, with the line losses doubled. No, the power company does not like that!

\"Utilities typically charge additional costs to commercial customers who have a power factor below some limit, which is typically 0.9 to 0.95.\"

Both quotes from Wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_factor#Importance_in_distribution_systems
 
On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 3:38:59 AM UTC-4, Phil Allison wrote:
Mad Ricky wrote:
---------------------------
Phil Allison wrote:

Clive Arthur wrote:

A big fuck-off Variac is what you need, if you can find/borrow one.

** Why not a series capacitor bank with the needed value?

C = 1/ ( 2.pi.50.18) = 175uF

No heat losses and clean current waveform.

Whacked out power factor.

** LOL - what complete nonsense.

So, another topic we\'ve found that Phil A. knows nothing about.
** FFS you do LOVE making idiotic assumptions.

Using a cap in series to get 1/2 power produces a PF of 0.7, which is not \"wacked out\" - whatever that means.
The 3 posted ways to half the power (using a diode, triac or cap) have the same PF, making nonsense of your claim.

PF = true power / VA where V and A are rms values.

The true power, is 1500W in each case.
The rms current value is also the same since the load is a fixed resistance.
The current wave is the same in the load and the supply each time.

I should also point out that your analysis is faulty, but it will be harder to explain it to you, since it involves complex math, which I\'m guessing you don\'t understand.

While the current in the cap and resistor are the same, also the same as the current in the line, the voltage from the line is not on the resistor. The resistor voltage is E = I * R. However, the voltage on the cap is 90° out of phase with the current. The complex sum of the capacitor voltage and resistor voltage are equal to the line voltage. This is equivalent to the three sides of a right triangle, where the hypotenuse is the line voltage, the cap and resistor voltages are the other two sides with the right angle between them.

The current is in phase with the voltage on the resistor, and so, out of phase with the line voltage. This means the product of the RMS of the current and the RMS of the line voltage are higher than the power in the resistor.. The excess power is flowing in and out of the capacitor, out of phase with the real power. This extra power causes line loses significantly larger than if a real load were being powered.

If this doesn\'t make sense to you, try reading some source on power factor, or maybe you need to learn more about complex math?

Good luck,

--

Rick C.

-++ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
-++ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
Mad Ricky wrote:
-------------------------------

> You ignored using a series resistor,

** You should too - fuckwit.



.... Phil
 
Mad Ricky wrote:
---------------------------
Phil Allison wrote:

Clive Arthur wrote:

A big fuck-off Variac is what you need, if you can find/borrow one.

** Why not a series capacitor bank with the needed value?

C = 1/ ( 2.pi.50.18) = 175uF

No heat losses and clean current waveform.

Whacked out power factor.

** LOL - what complete nonsense.

So, another topic we\'ve found that Phil A. knows nothing about.
** FFS you do LOVE making idiotic assumptions.

Using a cap in series to get 1/2 power produces a PF of 0.7, which is not \"wacked out\" - whatever that means.
The 3 posted ways to half the power (using a diode, triac or cap) have the same PF, making nonsense of your claim.

PF = true power / VA where V and A are rms values.

The true power, is 1500W in each case.
The rms current value is also the same since the load is a fixed resistance.
The current wave is the same in the load and the supply each time.
I should also point out that your analysis is faulty,

** No it fucking is not.
The current is in phase with the voltage on the resistor, and so, out of phase with the line voltage.
This means the product of the RMS of the current and the RMS of the line voltage are higher than the power in the resistor.
The excess power is flowing in and out of the capacitor, out of phase with the real power.
This extra power causes line loses significantly larger than if a real load were being powered.

** FFS you just over explained how the VA becomes greater than the true watts.

Take you long to Google that ?


.... Phil
 
On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 5:15:54 AM UTC-4, Phil Allison wrote:
Mad Ricky wrote:
---------------------------
Phil Allison wrote:

Clive Arthur wrote:

A big fuck-off Variac is what you need, if you can find/borrow one.

** Why not a series capacitor bank with the needed value?

C = 1/ ( 2.pi.50.18) = 175uF

No heat losses and clean current waveform.

Whacked out power factor.

** LOL - what complete nonsense.

So, another topic we\'ve found that Phil A. knows nothing about.
** FFS you do LOVE making idiotic assumptions.

Using a cap in series to get 1/2 power produces a PF of 0.7, which is not \"wacked out\" - whatever that means.
The 3 posted ways to half the power (using a diode, triac or cap) have the same PF, making nonsense of your claim.

PF = true power / VA where V and A are rms values.

The true power, is 1500W in each case.
The rms current value is also the same since the load is a fixed resistance.
The current wave is the same in the load and the supply each time.
I should also point out that your analysis is faulty,
** No it fucking is not.

The current is in phase with the voltage on the resistor, and so, out of phase with the line voltage.
This means the product of the RMS of the current and the RMS of the line voltage are higher than the power in the resistor.
The excess power is flowing in and out of the capacitor, out of phase with the real power.
This extra power causes line loses significantly larger than if a real load were being powered.

** FFS you just over explained how the VA becomes greater than the true watts.

Take you long to Google that ?

As usual. You can\'t understand what is being said, so you use ridicule, rather than trying to discuss it.

We all know you are just a profane loser. You can\'t even use Google to find some web pages that will explain it to you. Hell, I gave you a link to one page that explains it pretty well. I guess you are just too lazy to even try to understand. Whatever. It\'s not like you will ever do any work where you actually need to know electronics.

--

Rick C.

+-- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+-- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
On 30/06/2023 23:08, Ricky wrote:
On Friday, June 30, 2023 at 5:31:50 PM UTC-4, TTman wrote:
On 30/06/2023 16:39, Ricky wrote:
On Friday, June 30, 2023 at 7:54:26 AM UTC-4, TTman wrote:
P = E^2 / R

If you string two heaters in series, you have the same voltage, but twice the resistance, so half the power.

No, you don\'t understand this english stuff. Twin heaters are rare in the UK

Not sure what you are talking about. You want to rig a diode to create half wave AC to drive a heater. That\'s not exactly \"standard\" practice anywhere.
Correct. Not standard. Read my original post that explains why.

If you have mechanical limitations, that\'s what you have. Electrically, this makes sense.
No mechanical limitations.

You could add a resistance in series. It would need to be about 30% of the resistance of the heater. The main element would dissipate half of the original heat. The heat in this added resistance would be about 22% of the heat dissipated in the original heating element. One nice thing about this is that you can tailor the heat in the main element to other than half the original heat level.

No chance. 3kW = ~18 Ohms. Where do I get 18 Ohms 1.5kW rating?

You don\'t design much electronics, do you? You need about 600 ohms at 700 watts. Six 1 ohm, 150 watt resistors will do the job.
I used to. Back in the day, 250V @3kW = 12Amps. Also R = V/I so 250/12 =
20 Ohms ish, give or take a bit. So, back in the day, to halve the
power, one had to double the resistance. Still with me ? So double 20 =
40. Correct? So what I need is a 20 ohm resistor capable of dissipating
half the power.i.e. 1500 watts in series with the 3kW heater. 1500 watts
will go in heat into the resistor, the other 1500 watts in the 3kW
heater element will go to heat the water.
Have things changed so much in modern technology that the basic
equations have been repaced with garbage ? P=ZxI and V=I/R back in the day.
So what are these new equations that tell me I need 600 Ohms at 700 watts ?


https://www.digikey.com/en/products/filter/chassis-mount-resistors/54?s=N4IgjCBcoExaBjKAzAhgGwM4FMA0IB7KAbXAAYyA2ATgHYR8wywbqHyYYBWNxqsgMwAOdmDGUKosABZaYXuDBCYlSqOllqVdWKFd1QiXEZcytLmpO0Bp0ZRjTK%2BxvaHUIL6RePhly57600oaibrQqotQCDmSRQtLSAuwwzPLSyWDCIfgwYOHUPpxcwrE5Ata0liDclAJiyfZc0oVO1NIe1dYCssnmeSI55gJmvaryozRVMJXhAdOUfb2VCUuqc7SV1FMbQnnJhpTj%2BMNkQkKlIMPDWuxXPFVXThfDjpQDl2SOdOxv7T6sGh%2B1Gou3Y4VSYJSXHo%2BHC3XSsPBAQ2MHKYNmMJAGwKPlo8TAPiEAlUCJAei4TXYwLomJkzAp6g2R3AFj8oRSegydS4HVRqmJIAAuvgAA4AFygIAAymKAE4ASwAdgBzEAAXxyp300BASEgaCweEIJHAAAIAPIACwAtpghaKJZAQABVRXysXm5AAWWwqEwAFdZdh1RqQGodfKACaSnziyUyhUq9higCeIuDTr9SDVaqAA


The equations are all the same. But you have to apply them correctly. Maybe I don\'t understand your setup, but my mental image is a resistance heater built into a pot of some sort. You want to heat the pot at half power. Your calculations are figuring the power in the entire load. Only the power in the pot heater is useful. The power in the added resistors is waste heat, no?

My calculations give you half power in the pot heater. Please remember that the added resistor will cut both the voltage and the current to the pot heater. If you are trying to do something else, I have no understanding of it at this point.
It\'s absolutely clear to me, and no doubt to many others on here that
you have no idea. Which part of 3kW heater running off 250V don\'t you
understand ? I want to halve the power in the 3kW heater. Show me the
maths...

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
 
On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 3:38:59 AM UTC-4, Phil Allison wrote:
Mad Ricky wrote:
---------------------------
Phil Allison wrote:

Clive Arthur wrote:

A big fuck-off Variac is what you need, if you can find/borrow one.

** Why not a series capacitor bank with the needed value?

C = 1/ ( 2.pi.50.18) = 175uF

No heat losses and clean current waveform.

Whacked out power factor.

** LOL - what complete nonsense.

So, another topic we\'ve found that Phil A. knows nothing about.
** FFS you do LOVE making idiotic assumptions.

Using a cap in series to get 1/2 power produces a PF of 0.7, which is not \"wacked out\" - whatever that means.
The 3 posted ways to half the power (using a diode, triac or cap) have the same PF, making nonsense of your claim.

PF = true power / VA where V and A are rms values.

The true power, is 1500W in each case.
The rms current value is also the same since the load is a fixed resistance.
The current wave is the same in the load and the supply each time.

Capacitor and inductor series reactive elements are out of the question because the 1500 W heater draws about 10 A- making those components very pricey. A second-hand variac should be doable, but in this VA range it will be kind of big. If all he wants is a 1500 W immersion heater, Walmart carries one for USD$9.99. For some reason aliexpress brings up ridiculous search results.

....... Phil
 
On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 5:33:42 AM UTC-7, TTman wrote:

It\'s absolutely clear to me, and no doubt to many others on here that
you have no idea. Which part of 3kW heater running off 250V don\'t you
understand ? I want to halve the power in the 3kW heater. Show me the
maths...

If you want to halve the power in a heater, use an electric oven control
knob. Those are available as repair parts, and they cycle the heating
element they control, to give proportional heat control.

Every broken down cooktop has four of those, and three of \'em will work.
 
On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 8:33:42 AM UTC-4, TTman wrote:
On 30/06/2023 23:08, Ricky wrote:
On Friday, June 30, 2023 at 5:31:50 PM UTC-4, TTman wrote:
On 30/06/2023 16:39, Ricky wrote:
On Friday, June 30, 2023 at 7:54:26 AM UTC-4, TTman wrote:
P = E^2 / R

If you string two heaters in series, you have the same voltage, but twice the resistance, so half the power.

No, you don\'t understand this english stuff. Twin heaters are rare in the UK

Not sure what you are talking about. You want to rig a diode to create half wave AC to drive a heater. That\'s not exactly \"standard\" practice anywhere.
Correct. Not standard. Read my original post that explains why.

If you have mechanical limitations, that\'s what you have. Electrically, this makes sense.
No mechanical limitations.

You could add a resistance in series. It would need to be about 30% of the resistance of the heater. The main element would dissipate half of the original heat. The heat in this added resistance would be about 22% of the heat dissipated in the original heating element. One nice thing about this is that you can tailor the heat in the main element to other than half the original heat level.

No chance. 3kW = ~18 Ohms. Where do I get 18 Ohms 1.5kW rating?

You don\'t design much electronics, do you? You need about 600 ohms at 700 watts. Six 1 ohm, 150 watt resistors will do the job.
I used to. Back in the day, 250V @3kW = 12Amps. Also R = V/I so 250/12 =
20 Ohms ish, give or take a bit. So, back in the day, to halve the
power, one had to double the resistance. Still with me ? So double 20 =
40. Correct? So what I need is a 20 ohm resistor capable of dissipating
half the power.i.e. 1500 watts in series with the 3kW heater. 1500 watts
will go in heat into the resistor, the other 1500 watts in the 3kW
heater element will go to heat the water.
Have things changed so much in modern technology that the basic
equations have been repaced with garbage ? P=ZxI and V=I/R back in the day.
So what are these new equations that tell me I need 600 Ohms at 700 watts ?


https://www.digikey.com/en/products/filter/chassis-mount-resistors/54?s=N4IgjCBcoExaBjKAzAhgGwM4FMA0IB7KAbXAAYyA2ATgHYR8wywbqHyYYBWNxqsgMwAOdmDGUKosABZaYXuDBCYlSqOllqVdWKFd1QiXEZcytLmpO0Bp0ZRjTK%2BxvaHUIL6RePhly57600oaibrQqotQCDmSRQtLSAuwwzPLSyWDCIfgwYOHUPpxcwrE5Ata0liDclAJiyfZc0oVO1NIe1dYCssnmeSI55gJmvaryozRVMJXhAdOUfb2VCUuqc7SV1FMbQnnJhpTj%2BMNkQkKlIMPDWuxXPFVXThfDjpQDl2SOdOxv7T6sGh%2B1Gou3Y4VSYJSXHo%2BHC3XSsPBAQ2MHKYNmMJAGwKPlo8TAPiEAlUCJAei4TXYwLomJkzAp6g2R3AFj8oRSegydS4HVRqmJIAAuvgAA4AFygIAAymKAE4ASwAdgBzEAAXxyp300BASEgaCweEIJHAAAIAPIACwAtpghaKJZAQABVRXysXm5AAWWwqEwAFdZdh1RqQGodfKACaSnziyUyhUq9higCeIuDTr9SDVaqAA


The equations are all the same. But you have to apply them correctly. Maybe I don\'t understand your setup, but my mental image is a resistance heater built into a pot of some sort. You want to heat the pot at half power. Your calculations are figuring the power in the entire load. Only the power in the pot heater is useful. The power in the added resistors is waste heat, no?

My calculations give you half power in the pot heater. Please remember that the added resistor will cut both the voltage and the current to the pot heater. If you are trying to do something else, I have no understanding of it at this point.

It\'s absolutely clear to me, and no doubt to many others on here that
you have no idea.

I don\'t know why you need to be rude, just because you don\'t understand what I\'m saying. You keep saying you want to cut the power in the 3 kW pot heater, and I\'m showing you how to do that. Instead of saying you don\'t under stand how adding a smaller resistor does that, you try to insult me. How does that make sense?


Which part of 3kW heater running off 250V don\'t you
understand ? I want to halve the power in the 3kW heater. Show me the
maths...

I already did, but here it is again.

P = E^2 / Rh, you want to reduce the voltage on the heater by adding a resistor in series, i.e. replace Rh with Rh + Rs, where Rs is the added resistor. So, how large does Rs need to be for the power in Rh to be half the original value (1,500 W vs. 3,000 W)?

So, now we have Ph = Eh^2 / Rh. Since Ph is 1/2 * P from above, 2 * Eh^2 / Rh = E^2 / Rh.

Multiply by Rh / Eh^2 to get, √ 2 = E / Eh = 1.414, Eh = E * 0.707.

So now, we know the voltage needed on the heater for it to dissipate half the original power.

Easy to get the required added resistance, Es = E * Rs / (Rs + Rh), E * 0..293 = E * Rs / (Rs + Rh), 0.293 = Rs / (Rs + Rh). 0.293 Rs + 0.293 Rh = Rs, 0.293 Rh = 0.707 Rs, Rs = Rh * 0.293 / 0.707 = Rh * 0.414.

Rh can be found from P = E^2 / Rh, Rh = E^2 / P = 16.133 ohms, so Rh = 6.6861 ohms.

Was there any part you didn\'t follow?

I would point out that anyone familiar with using dB to compare power levels has likely discovered that -3 dB is half power, but 0.707 of the voltage and current. Most designers simply know this off the top of their heads. I take it you don\'t use such calculations very often.

--

Rick C.

+-+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+-+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 1:45:10 PM UTC-4, whit3rd wrote:
On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 5:33:42 AM UTC-7, TTman wrote:

It\'s absolutely clear to me, and no doubt to many others on here that
you have no idea. Which part of 3kW heater running off 250V don\'t you
understand ? I want to halve the power in the 3kW heater. Show me the
maths...
If you want to halve the power in a heater, use an electric oven control
knob. Those are available as repair parts, and they cycle the heating
element they control, to give proportional heat control.

Every broken down cooktop has four of those, and three of \'em will work.

I\'ve never seen an oven or stove control that gave proportional control. Every one I\'ve seen was an on/off switch with some hysteresis, around 10-15 degrees. What am I missing?

--

Rick C.

++- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
++- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
On 7/1/2023 8:33 AM, TTman wrote:
On 30/06/2023 23:08, Ricky wrote:
On Friday, June 30, 2023 at 5:31:50 PM UTC-4, TTman wrote:
On 30/06/2023 16:39, Ricky wrote:
On Friday, June 30, 2023 at 7:54:26 AM UTC-4, TTman wrote:
P = E^2 / R

If you string two heaters in series, you have the same voltage,
but twice the resistance, so half the power.

No, you don\'t understand this english stuff. Twin heaters are
rare in the UK

Not sure what you are talking about. You want to rig a diode to
create half wave AC to drive a heater. That\'s not exactly
\"standard\" practice anywhere.
Correct. Not standard. Read my original post that explains why.

If you have mechanical limitations, that\'s what you have.
Electrically, this makes sense.
No mechanical limitations.

You could add a resistance in series. It would need to be about
30% of the resistance of the heater. The main element would
dissipate half of the original heat. The heat in this added
resistance would be about 22% of the heat dissipated in the
original heating element. One nice thing about this is that you
can tailor the heat in the main element to other than half the
original heat level.

No chance. 3kW = ~18 Ohms. Where do I get 18 Ohms 1.5kW rating?

You don\'t design much electronics, do you? You need about 600 ohms
at 700 watts. Six 1 ohm, 150 watt resistors will do the job.
I used to. Back in the day, 250V @3kW = 12Amps. Also R = V/I so 250/12 =
20 Ohms ish, give or take a bit. So, back in the day, to halve the
power, one had to double the resistance. Still with me ? So double 20 =
40. Correct? So what I need is a 20 ohm resistor capable of dissipating
half the power.i.e. 1500 watts in series with the 3kW heater. 1500 watts
will go in heat into the resistor, the other 1500 watts in the 3kW
heater element will go to heat the water.
Have things changed so much in modern technology that the basic
equations have been repaced with garbage ? P=ZxI and V=I/R back in
the day.
So what are these new equations that tell me I need 600 Ohms at 700
watts ?


https://www.digikey.com/en/products/filter/chassis-mount-resistors/54?s=N4IgjCBcoExaBjKAzAhgGwM4FMA0IB7KAbXAAYyA2ATgHYR8wywbqHyYYBWNxqsgMwAOdmDGUKosABZaYXuDBCYlSqOllqVdWKFd1QiXEZcytLmpO0Bp0ZRjTK%2BxvaHUIL6RePhly57600oaibrQqotQCDmSRQtLSAuwwzPLSyWDCIfgwYOHUPpxcwrE5Ata0liDclAJiyfZc0oVO1NIe1dYCssnmeSI55gJmvaryozRVMJXhAdOUfb2VCUuqc7SV1FMbQnnJhpTj%2BMNkQkKlIMPDWuxXPFVXThfDjpQDl2SOdOxv7T6sGh%2B1Gou3Y4VSYJSXHo%2BHC3XSsPBAQ2MHKYNmMJAGwKPlo8TAPiEAlUCJAei4TXYwLomJkzAp6g2R3AFj8oRSegydS4HVRqmJIAAuvgAA4AFygIAAymKAE4ASwAdgBzEAAXxyp300BASEgaCweEIJHAAAIAPIACwAtpghaKJZAQABVRXysXm5AAWWwqEwAFdZdh1RqQGodfKACaSnziyUyhUq9higCeIuDTr9SDVaqAA


The equations are all the same.  But you have to apply them
correctly.  Maybe I don\'t understand your setup, but my mental image
is a resistance heater built into a pot of some sort.  You want to
heat the pot at half power.  Your calculations are figuring the power
in the entire load.  Only the power in the pot heater is useful.  The
power in the added resistors is waste heat, no?

My calculations give you half power in the pot heater.  Please
remember that the added resistor will cut both the voltage and the
current to the pot heater.  If you are trying to do something else, I
have no understanding of it at this point.

It\'s absolutely clear to me, and no doubt to many others on here that
you have no idea. Which part of 3kW heater running off 250V don\'t you
understand ? I want to halve the power in the 3kW heater. Show me the
maths...

The communication hasn\'t worked so far, perhaps it\'s been a bit
unclear. I\'ll try a bit differently. The key point is that doubling
the resistance does NOT halve the power.

Take the resistance of your heater (HR), which is about 20.8 ohms,
and figure what voltage needs to be applied to it to run it at 1500
watts. Here\'s the math:
Solve for heater resistance (HR):
P=E^2/HR so HR=E^2/P so HR=250*250/3000 so HR=62500/3000 = 20.83

Now what voltage must be applied to HR to equal 1500 watts?
1500 = E*E/20.83 so 20.83 * 1500 = E^E so 31250 = E*E so
E = sqroot 31250 so E = 176.77volts

Ok, once you know that voltage you can solve for the rest.
We need to add a series resistance (AR) to drop the voltage
across HR from 250 to 176.77volts

Compute the current through the series string of HR plus AR

Solve for I through HR at 1500 watts:
P=E*I so 1500 = 176.77 * I so I = 1500/176.77 = 8.485amps

The total voltage (250) minus VHR (176.77) equals VAR, the
voltage across the (AddedResistance) AR

250-176.77 = 73.223volts

Solve for power dissipated in AR

P=I*E= 8.486*73.223=621.32 watts in AR

I hope this makes it a bit clearer.
Ed
 
Which part of 3kW heater running off 250V don\'t you
understand ? I want to halve the power in the 3kW heater. Show me the
maths...

I already did, but here it is again.

P = E^2 / Rh, you want to reduce the voltage on the heater by adding a resistor in series, i.e. replace Rh with Rh + Rs, where Rs is the added resistor. So, how large does Rs need to be for the power in Rh to be half the original value (1,500 W vs. 3,000 W)?

So, now we have Ph = Eh^2 / Rh. Since Ph is 1/2 * P from above, 2 * Eh^2 / Rh = E^2 / Rh.

Multiply by Rh / Eh^2 to get, √ 2 = E / Eh = 1.414, Eh = E * 0.707.

So now, we know the voltage needed on the heater for it to dissipate half the original power.

Easy to get the required added resistance, Es = E * Rs / (Rs + Rh), E * 0.293 = E * Rs / (Rs + Rh), 0.293 = Rs / (Rs + Rh). 0.293 Rs + 0.293 Rh = Rs, 0.293 Rh = 0.707 Rs, Rs = Rh * 0.293 / 0.707 = Rh * 0.414.

Rh can be found from P = E^2 / Rh, Rh = E^2 / P = 16.133 ohms, so Rh = 6.6861 ohms.

Was there any part you didn\'t follow?

None of it. You\'re over thinking it. Rh = Rs. Rh = ~18 Ohms. therefore
Rs = 18 ohms.Half the power = twice the resistance.Simple. 1500W into Rh
and 1500W into Rs.
I would point out that anyone familiar with using dB to compare power levels has likely discovered that -3 dB is half power, but 0.707 of the voltage and current. Most designers simply know this off the top of their heads. I take it you don\'t use such calculations very often.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
 
The communication hasn\'t worked so far, perhaps it\'s been a bit
unclear. I\'ll try a bit differently. The key point is that doubling
the resistance does NOT halve the power.

Take the resistance of your heater (HR), which is about 20.8 ohms,
and figure what voltage needs to be applied to it to run it at 1500
watts.  Here\'s the math:
Solve for heater resistance (HR):
P=E^2/HR so HR=E^2/P so HR=250*250/3000 so HR=62500/3000 = 20.83

Now what voltage must be applied to HR to equal 1500 watts?
1500 = E*E/20.83 so 20.83 * 1500 = E^E so 31250 = E*E so
E = sqroot 31250 so E = 176.77volts

Ok, once you know that voltage you can solve for the rest.
We need to add a series resistance (AR) to drop the voltage
across HR from 250 to 176.77volts

Compute the current through the series string of HR plus AR

Solve for I through HR at 1500 watts:
P=E*I so 1500 = 176.77 * I so I = 1500/176.77 = 8.485amps

The total voltage (250) minus VHR (176.77) equals VAR, the
voltage across the (AddedResistance) AR

250-176.77 = 73.223volts

Solve for power dissipated in AR

P=I*E= 8.486*73.223=621.32 watts in AR

I hope this makes it a bit clearer.
Ed
Too complicated...HR= 20 Ohms. Add another resistor in series = 20 Ohms
making Rt - 40 Ohms.
If I apply 250 V across 40 Ohms, I get 125V across each resistor.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
 
On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 6:09:30 PM UTC-4, TTman wrote:
Which part of 3kW heater running off 250V don\'t you
understand ? I want to halve the power in the 3kW heater. Show me the
maths...

I already did, but here it is again.

P = E^2 / Rh, you want to reduce the voltage on the heater by adding a resistor in series, i.e. replace Rh with Rh + Rs, where Rs is the added resistor. So, how large does Rs need to be for the power in Rh to be half the original value (1,500 W vs. 3,000 W)?

So, now we have Ph = Eh^2 / Rh. Since Ph is 1/2 * P from above, 2 * Eh^2 / Rh = E^2 / Rh.

Multiply by Rh / Eh^2 to get, √ 2 = E / Eh = 1.414, Eh = E * 0.707.

So now, we know the voltage needed on the heater for it to dissipate half the original power.

Easy to get the required added resistance, Es = E * Rs / (Rs + Rh), E * 0.293 = E * Rs / (Rs + Rh), 0.293 = Rs / (Rs + Rh). 0.293 Rs + 0.293 Rh = Rs, 0.293 Rh = 0.707 Rs, Rs = Rh * 0.293 / 0.707 = Rh * 0.414..

Rh can be found from P = E^2 / Rh, Rh = E^2 / P = 16.133 ohms, so Rh = 6.6861 ohms.

Was there any part you didn\'t follow?
None of it.

Yes, that\'s what I figured.


You\'re over thinking it. Rh = Rs. Rh = ~18 Ohms. therefore
Rs = 18 ohms.Half the power = twice the resistance.Simple. 1500W into Rh
and 1500W into Rs.

I\'m really sorry you were not willing to try to understand the math. Unfortunately, such simplistic talking about the problem, is not remotely the same as math. Once you learn how to do the math, come back and I\'ll be happy to discuss this with you. Meanwhile, you will find others agree with me, and not you. Try to recognize when there is something you need to learn.

--

Rick C.

+++ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+++ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 6:22:09 PM UTC-4, TTman wrote:
The communication hasn\'t worked so far, perhaps it\'s been a bit
unclear. I\'ll try a bit differently. The key point is that doubling
the resistance does NOT halve the power.

Take the resistance of your heater (HR), which is about 20.8 ohms,
and figure what voltage needs to be applied to it to run it at 1500
watts. Here\'s the math:
Solve for heater resistance (HR):
P=E^2/HR so HR=E^2/P so HR=250*250/3000 so HR=62500/3000 = 20..83

Now what voltage must be applied to HR to equal 1500 watts?
1500 = E*E/20.83 so 20.83 * 1500 = E^E so 31250 = E*E so
E = sqroot 31250 so E = 176.77volts

Ok, once you know that voltage you can solve for the rest.
We need to add a series resistance (AR) to drop the voltage
across HR from 250 to 176.77volts

Compute the current through the series string of HR plus AR

Solve for I through HR at 1500 watts:
P=E*I so 1500 = 176.77 * I so I = 1500/176.77 = 8.485amps

The total voltage (250) minus VHR (176.77) equals VAR, the
voltage across the (AddedResistance) AR

250-176.77 = 73.223volts

Solve for power dissipated in AR

P=I*E= 8.486*73.223=621.32 watts in AR

I hope this makes it a bit clearer.
Ed
Too complicated...HR= 20 Ohms. Add another resistor in series = 20 Ohms
making Rt - 40 Ohms.
If I apply 250 V across 40 Ohms, I get 125V across each resistor.

and... you get half the current, so each resistor will dissipate a quarter of the original power. The total power will be half of the original power, but if I understand your limitations on the design, the series resistor can not be used to heat the pot.

I\'m not going to continue to beat you over the heat to get you to pay attention to the equations. But here are equations for power, one more time.

P = E * I
P = E^2 / R
P = I^2 * R

Apply them to the appropriate devices, rather than just saying, \"twice the resistance, half the power\". Also, try solving for the actual current and the voltage on each device. This isn\'t hard, but sometimes it takes a bit of work to get used to it.

--

Rick C.

---- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
---- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top