ground-loop problems

  • Thread starter William Sommerwerck
  • Start date
If your equipment is designed for balanced operation it's quite
likely the unbalanced connections are an afterthought and the
screen connected to mains ground.

This is common. It is not generally considered poor design.
BIG WHOOPS! I wrote that in a rush.

Balanced inputs are commonly converted to unbalanced by grounding one
side -- to the SIGNAL ground (that is, zero volts in an amplifier with a
balanced power supply), NOT the mains ground.
 
"Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote:
And assuming it has the normal transformer supplying the DC - I'm not
sure why reversing the mains lead should have any effect - given an
isolating transformer of this type removes any reference from the supply -
even when one leg of the supply is grounded as in the UK.
Don't forget about capacitive coupling between the windings in the
mains transformer. Depending on transformer geometry, the coupling might
be stronger to one mains lead than to the other. So it is advantageous
to make the stronger coupled one ground.

Regards,
Michael Karcher
 
In article <h0qna0$74s$1@news.eternal-september.org>,
William Sommerwerck <grizzledgeezer@comcast.net> wrote:
Well they can't be 'better' since you're introducing extra electronics
to balance and unbalance the signal -- not many devices are balanced
internally.

This is not correct. Changing the circuit from an unbalanced input or
output to a balanced input or output does not add a gain stage.
Who said anything about gain? I said electronics. Usually done with just
an IC these days. In its simplest form it just requires the correct
transformer either end. But good transformers ain't cheap. But still the
best way to provide a 'bomb proof' balanced circuit.

However, to conform to balanced audio standards it should also use the
correct level which is rather higher than the usual unbalanced one found
in domestic equipment - so may indeed require more gain somewhere.

--
*When you've seen one shopping centre you've seen a mall*

Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
 
In article <h0qna0$74s$1@news.eternal-september.org>,
William Sommerwerck <grizzledgeezer@comcast.net> wrote:
You also have a balanced output radio tuner? Record deck? Etc?

The tuner does, but I use the unbalanced outputs. We were talking about
power amplifier connections, anyway.
Makes no difference in principle if both the tuner and amps are separate
from the pre-amp. Unless you feel there is some magic length where
balanced suddenly becomes essential?

Incidentally, I have an oddball capacitor mic made by Calrec which has
some 100 ft of unbalanced cable twixt mic and power supply (and output)
which works just fine under most circumstances. Not many domestic runs
between pre-amp and amp would exceed 100 ft.


If your equipment is designed for balanced operation it's quite likely
the unbalanced connections are an afterthought and the screen
connected to mains ground.

This is common. It is not generally considered poor design.
It is if you want to avoid hum loops. ;-)

--
*Procrastinate now

Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
 
In article <h0qpcd$h08$1@news.eternal-september.org>,
William Sommerwerck <grizzledgeezer@comcast.net> wrote:
If your equipment is designed for balanced operation it's quite
likely the unbalanced connections are an afterthought and the
screen connected to mains ground.

This is common. It is not generally considered poor design.

BIG WHOOPS! I wrote that in a rush.

Balanced inputs are commonly converted to unbalanced by grounding one
side -- to the SIGNAL ground (that is, zero volts in an amplifier with a
balanced power supply), NOT the mains ground.
Not much point in using a balanced line if you're going to 'unbalance' it
in this way. Use a transformer to do the job properly.

BTW, in most domestic equipment the mains and signal ground have a DC
connection. Check with your DVM if you don't believe me.

--
*It doesn't take a genius to spot a goat in a flock of sheep *

Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
 
In article <79c896F1pklpmU1@mid.uni-berlin.de>,
Michael Karcher <usenet@mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
"Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote:
And assuming it has the normal transformer supplying the DC - I'm not
sure why reversing the mains lead should have any effect - given an
isolating transformer of this type removes any reference from the
supply - even when one leg of the supply is grounded as in the UK.

Don't forget about capacitive coupling between the windings in the
mains transformer. Depending on transformer geometry, the coupling might
be stronger to one mains lead than to the other. So it is advantageous
to make the stronger coupled one ground.
Could be - although I've not come across this in practice. Of course in
the UK all domestic equipment must by law come fitted with our standard
'13 amp' plug, and this is polarised so cannot be reversed.

--
*If at first you do succeed, try not to look too astonished.

Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
 
Well they can't be 'better' since you're introducing extra electronics
to balance and unbalance the signal -- not many devices are balanced
internally.

This is not correct. Changing the circuit from an unbalanced input
or output to a balanced input or output does not add a gain stage.

Who said anything about gain? I said electronics.
bang... bang... bang... bang... [sound of William Sommerwerck banging his
head against a concrete wall] bang... bang... bang... bang...
 
In article <h0r3aj$emp$1@news.eternal-september.org>,
William Sommerwerck <grizzledgeezer@comcast.net> wrote:
Well they can't be 'better' since you're introducing extra
electronics to balance and unbalance the signal -- not many devices
are balanced internally.

This is not correct. Changing the circuit from an unbalanced input
or output to a balanced input or output does not add a gain stage.

Who said anything about gain? I said electronics.

bang... bang... bang... bang... [sound of William Sommerwerck banging his
head against a concrete wall] bang... bang... bang... bang...
So to you all electronics add gain? Talk about two peoples separated by a
common language.

--
*A fool and his money can throw one hell of a party.

Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
 
"Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote in message
news:5069bd628cdave@davenoise.co.uk...
In article <h0qna0$74s$1@news.eternal-september.org>,
William Sommerwerck <grizzledgeezer@comcast.net> wrote:

You also have a balanced output radio tuner? Record deck? Etc?

The tuner does, but I use the unbalanced outputs. We were talking
about power amplifier connections, anyway.

Makes no difference in principle if both the tuner and amps are separate
from the pre-amp. Unless you feel there is some magic length where
balanced suddenly becomes essential?
bang... bang... bang... bang... [repeated sounds of head banging against
concrete wall]

Mr. Plowman, are you aware that you repeatedly change or twist the subject,
without regard to what is actually being discussed? Because you do.

The "magic length" occurs when the power amp is far enough away to be on a
separate circuit. Even if it's on the same circuit, there's no guarantee
that the chassis grounds will be at the same potential. Which is, for me,
The Fundamental Issue (with regard to ground loops.)
 
Balanced inputs are commonly converted to unbalanced by grounding
one side -- to the SIGNAL ground (that is, zero volts in an amplifier
with a balanced power supply), NOT the mains ground.

Not much point in using a balanced line if you're going to 'unbalance' it
in this way. Use a transformer to do the job properly.
[More loud and anguished head-banging from yrs. truly.]

I "know people". I'm going to find someone who's a legitimate expert on
audio grounding, and try to get some sort of definitive answer.
 
In article <h0r47v$7bi$1@news.eternal-september.org>,
William Sommerwerck <grizzledgeezer@comcast.net> wrote:
Balanced inputs are commonly converted to unbalanced by grounding
one side -- to the SIGNAL ground (that is, zero volts in an amplifier
with a balanced power supply), NOT the mains ground.

Not much point in using a balanced line if you're going to 'unbalance'
it in this way. Use a transformer to do the job properly.

[More loud and anguished head-banging from yrs. truly.]

I "know people". I'm going to find someone who's a legitimate expert on
audio grounding, and try to get some sort of definitive answer.
I've already given you chapter and verse which you choose not to
understand. You could try re-reading it more carefully.

--
*I'm already visualizing the duct tape over your mouth

Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
 
"Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote in message
news:5069c9428edave@davenoise.co.uk...
In article <h0r47v$7bi$1@news.eternal-september.org>,
William Sommerwerck <grizzledgeezer@comcast.net> wrote:

Balanced inputs are commonly converted to unbalanced by grounding
one side -- to the SIGNAL ground (that is, zero volts in an amplifier
with a balanced power supply), NOT the mains ground.

Not much point in using a balanced line if you're going to 'unbalance'
it in this way. Use a transformer to do the job properly.

[More loud and anguished head-banging from yrs. truly.]
I "know people". I'm going to find someone who's a legitimate expert
on audio grounding, and try to get some sort of definitive answer.

I've already given you chapter and verse which you choose not to
understand. You could try re-reading it more carefully.
Almost everything you've said goes against what I believe to be correct --
and some of it is unquestionably wrong. I have not had any "Aha!" moments of
sudden clarity.

I've already asked two people for advice. I'm going to do some more research
on this, and eventually get back to the group. Case closed, for the time
being.
 
In article <h0r8e2$9sv$1@news.eternal-september.org>,
William Sommerwerck <grizzledgeezer@comcast.net> wrote:
I've already given you chapter and verse which you choose not to
understand. You could try re-reading it more carefully.

Almost everything you've said goes against what I believe to be correct
-- and some of it is unquestionably wrong.
Please quote those parts. If I have given wrong information I'd like to
know.

I have not had any "Aha!" moments of
sudden clarity.
Have you checked your power amps with a DVM set to continuity to see if
the mains ground is connected to the screen of the phono one? If not, why
not? It's the crux of the matter...

I've already asked two people for advice. I'm going to do some more
research on this, and eventually get back to the group. Case closed, for
the time being.
Well, pretty well all of the advice you've been given suggests checking
for *two* different DC paths - which are pretty easy to check for. Any
interconnect path - audio, video, RF or mains. It's that simple.

--
*Therapy is expensive, poppin' bubble wrap is cheap! You choose.

Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
 
In article <h0rc0r$8vr$1@reader1.panix.com>,
David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> wrote:
I dunno US electrics, but can't see why that would matter. As far as
audio - or video - is concerned there should be only one ground. And
that doesn't really matter what mains circuit things are fed from as
there will be an isolating transformer between it and the DC. Unless
it's some crappy design where it has to be grounded for safety reasons.

The Apollo 11 landing was almost aborted by such an issue.

The LM guidance computer was fielding all kinds of high priority data
from the landing radar and control inputs. It was also, unbeknownst to
the crew, also looking at the rendezvous radar as well. [This so an
immediate Abort to Orbit could be accomplished; if the landing was
abandoned.]

If the 2nd radar saw nothing, great, no data. BUT as it happens, it ran
off a different phase of the LM power system, and the little big of
noise between it and the landing radar was enough to be noticed. As a
result, the computer started spitting out 1201 alarms, which was palnned
for & acceptable, but disconcerting to everyone involved.
Do you routinely have different phases running audio equipment in the same
room in a house in the US? This smacks to me of bad practice and isn't
allowed in the UK. Nor would it happen in a pro audio installation in say
a TV etc studio - all the relevant equipment would be on the same phase -
leaving the others for power hungry devices like air con and lighting.

Of course a power hungry large computer system might well be different -
but the pitfalls of this are surely well known?

--
*The modem is the message *

Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
 
"Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> writes:

I'm not quite ready to put everything on one circuit. So I'm going to
call both Parasound and Pioneer to see what insights, if any, they have
to offer.

I dunno US electrics, but can't see why that would matter. As far as audio
- or video - is concerned there should be only one ground. And that
doesn't really matter what mains circuit things are fed from as there will
be an isolating transformer between it and the DC. Unless it's some crappy
design where it has to be grounded for safety reasons.

The Apollo 11 landing was almost aborted by such an issue.

The LM guidance computer was fielding all kinds of high priority data
from the landing radar and control inputs. It was also, unbeknownst to the
crew, also looking at the rendezvous radar as well. [This so an immediate
Abort to Orbit could be accomplished; if the landing was abandoned.]

If the 2nd radar saw nothing, great, no data. BUT as it happens, it ran
off a different phase of the LM power system, and the little big of noise
between it and the landing radar was enough to be noticed. As a result,
the computer started spitting out 1201 alarms, which was palnned for &
acceptable, but disconcerting to everyone involved.

<http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/a11.1201-pa.html>


--
A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
 
In article <5069d9c439dave@davenoise.co.uk>, "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote:
In article <h0rc0r$8vr$1@reader1.panix.com>,
David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> wrote:
I dunno US electrics, but can't see why that would matter. As far as
audio - or video - is concerned there should be only one ground. And
that doesn't really matter what mains circuit things are fed from as
there will be an isolating transformer between it and the DC. Unless
it's some crappy design where it has to be grounded for safety reasons.



The Apollo 11 landing was almost aborted by such an issue.

The LM guidance computer was fielding all kinds of high priority data
from the landing radar and control inputs. It was also, unbeknownst to
the crew, also looking at the rendezvous radar as well. [This so an
immediate Abort to Orbit could be accomplished; if the landing was
abandoned.]

If the 2nd radar saw nothing, great, no data. BUT as it happens, it ran
off a different phase of the LM power system, and the little big of
noise between it and the landing radar was enough to be noticed. As a
result, the computer started spitting out 1201 alarms, which was palnned
for & acceptable, but disconcerting to everyone involved.

Do you routinely have different phases running audio equipment in the same
room in a house in the US? This smacks to me of bad practice and isn't
allowed in the UK. Nor would it happen in a pro audio installation in say
a TV etc studio - all the relevant equipment would be on the same phase -
leaving the others for power hungry devices like air con and lighting.

Of course a power hungry large computer system might well be different -
but the pitfalls of this are surely well known?
No, but you can have 180 degree in phase situatuion
between the split 240 transformer, and have 240 volts potential going
to the audio setup. I always like to use only
one leg of the transformer split out on the pole or one breaker. In my opinion
there is a chance of more problems using both sides of the transformer
allthough some audio installations use a split transformer to
reduce posible noise. So its all in how you look at it.

greg
 
In article <h0rje0$l8s$1@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu>, zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com (GregS) wrote:
In article <5069d9c439dave@davenoise.co.uk>, "Dave Plowman (News)"
dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote:
In article <h0rc0r$8vr$1@reader1.panix.com>,
David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> wrote:
I dunno US electrics, but can't see why that would matter. As far as
audio - or video - is concerned there should be only one ground. And
that doesn't really matter what mains circuit things are fed from as
there will be an isolating transformer between it and the DC. Unless
it's some crappy design where it has to be grounded for safety reasons.



The Apollo 11 landing was almost aborted by such an issue.

The LM guidance computer was fielding all kinds of high priority data
from the landing radar and control inputs. It was also, unbeknownst to
the crew, also looking at the rendezvous radar as well. [This so an
immediate Abort to Orbit could be accomplished; if the landing was
abandoned.]

If the 2nd radar saw nothing, great, no data. BUT as it happens, it ran
off a different phase of the LM power system, and the little big of
noise between it and the landing radar was enough to be noticed. As a
result, the computer started spitting out 1201 alarms, which was palnned
for & acceptable, but disconcerting to everyone involved.

Do you routinely have different phases running audio equipment in the same
room in a house in the US? This smacks to me of bad practice and isn't
allowed in the UK. Nor would it happen in a pro audio installation in say
a TV etc studio - all the relevant equipment would be on the same phase -
leaving the others for power hungry devices like air con and lighting.

Of course a power hungry large computer system might well be different -
but the pitfalls of this are surely well known?


No, but you can have 180 degree in phase situatuion
between the split 240 transformer, and have 240 volts potential going
to the audio setup. I always like to use only
one leg of the transformer split out on the pole or one breaker. In my opinion
there is a chance of more problems using both sides of the transformer
allthough some audio installations use a split transformer to
reduce posible noise. So its all in how you look at it.
Really, if you feed two equipment from a separate
breaker, one on one side of the 240 volt transformer
and one on the other, with the transformer center tapped
and becoming neutral, the two sides of the voltage
cancel. Or at least the possible electrostatic
charge is neutralized to zero. But that
would onlt seem to work if both pieces of equipment
had identical power supplies in every respect.

greg
 
On Jun 11, 11:10 am, "Dave Plowman (News)" <d...@davenoise.co.uk>
wrote:
Do you routinely have different phases running audio equipment in
the same
room in a house in the US? This smacks to me of bad practice and
isn't
allowed in the UK. Nor would it happen in a pro audio installation
in say
a TV etc studio - all the relevant equipment would be on the same
phase -
leaving the others for power hungry devices like air con and
lighting.

Of course a power hungry large computer system might well be
different -
but the pitfalls of this are surely well known?

--
*The modem is the message *

    Dave Plowman        d...@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                  To e-mail, change noise into sound.
Not different as in 3 phase but split phase. It is very common to have
240 Volt service into the house from a center tapped transformer. The
high power devices like ovens, A/C, water heaters, clothes dryers get
the full 240 volts fromt the 2 outer feeds. The rest of the house gets
the center tap 'neutral' and one of the 2 outer feeds via a circuit
breaker. Because the loads may not be balanced across 2 'phases', the
neutral will not be the same between various outlets.There is your
'ground loop' when you plug in devices that tie the neutral to the
chassis.

Now tell me how the mains wiring is done in a typical UK residence. Do
you get 480 center tapped? My guess is 'no' but I have no certainty.
Do you get just 2 wires from the transformer. Is one end of the 240V
feed tied to earth? Does that earth lead build up voltage drops in the
building giving you essentially the same problem we have in the US ?

 
In article
<0110bd8a-c72d-4a02-8f6a-5a1e1aa883d1@i6g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>,
<stratus46@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Jun 11, 11:10 am, "Dave Plowman (News)" <d...@davenoise.co.uk
wrote:

Do you routinely have different phases running audio equipment in the
same room in a house in the US? This smacks to me of bad practice and
isn't allowed in the UK. Nor would it happen in a pro audio
installation in say a TV etc studio - all the relevant equipment would
be on the same phase - leaving the others for power hungry devices
like air con and lighting.

Of course a power hungry large computer system might well be
different -
but the pitfalls of this are surely well known?

Not different as in 3 phase but split phase. It is very common to have
240 Volt service into the house from a center tapped transformer. The
high power devices like ovens, A/C, water heaters, clothes dryers get
the full 240 volts fromt the 2 outer feeds. The rest of the house gets
the center tap 'neutral' and one of the 2 outer feeds via a circuit
breaker. Because the loads may not be balanced across 2 'phases', the
neutral will not be the same between various outlets.There is your
'ground loop' when you plug in devices that tie the neutral to the
chassis.
I don't know of any modern piece of equipment that ties the neutral to the
chassis. Ground, yes. Surely if you did tie the neutral to the chassis and
it's fed from a two pin reversible plug - which I assume you still have in
the US - and the plug is reversed, you then get the full 110v on the case?


Now tell me how the mains wiring is done in a typical UK residence. Do
you get 480 center tapped? My guess is 'no' but I have no certainty.
Do you get just 2 wires from the transformer. Is one end of the 240V
feed tied to earth? Does that earth lead build up voltage drops in the
building giving you essentially the same problem we have in the US ?
In most town situations, one transformer covers a large area - but that is
to step down the high distribution voltage to the 240 volts. This produces
three phases - all 240v - and neutral is ground. Between phases you get
440 volts. This three phase plus neutral (ground) is fed along the street,
and only one phase (usually 100 amp max) is fed to a house. Alternate
phases are use to other houses to balance the load. A very large house may
have a second phase - but electric heating isn't common in the UK due to
cost so up to 100 amps (25kW) is more than enough for most.

There are different ways of providing the safety ground - but on a modern
supply its usually by combining the neutral and house earth at the
termination point of the feeder cable. All metalwork in the house - water
pipes etc are bonded to this point too. Latest regs have a split load
central consumer unit ('fuse box') with each half having an RCD. Then MCBs
for the various circuits. Something like a four bedroom house would
normally have a 32 amp ring circuit for the power sockets in the kitchen,
another for the ground floor and another for everywhere else. There is no
limit to the number of outlets on a ring (in most circumstances) and each
can carry up to 13 amps ( 3kW approx) Now of course this sounds strange
since a 32 amp circuit would be limited to 3 fully loaded sockets and it
is common to have a great deal more - but anything which is permanently
installed like a water heater will have its own radial circuit. And most
of the things you plug in take only a small current. Apart from in a
kitchen - hence the fitting of one or two rings dedicated to it.

As regards a sound system, that will likely all be in one room so all on
the same circuit.

The earth loop impedance is tested at installation time and mustn't exceed
1.88 ohms for a 32 amp ring. In most cases it will be much lower. (The ECC
consists effectively of two 1.5mm˛ wires in parallel.

--
*I brake for no apparent reason.

Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
 
"Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote in
message news:506a2ca573dave@davenoise.co.uk...
In article
0110bd8a-c72d-4a02-8f6a-5a1e1aa883d1@i6g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>,
stratus46@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Jun 11, 11:10 am, "Dave Plowman (News)"
d...@davenoise.co.uk
Now tell me how the mains wiring is done in a typical UK
residence. Do
you get 480 center tapped? My guess is 'no' but I have no
certainty.
Do you get just 2 wires from the transformer. Is one end
of the 240V
feed tied to earth? Does that earth lead build up voltage
drops in the
building giving you essentially the same problem we have
in the US ?

In most town situations, one transformer covers a large
area - but that is
to step down the high distribution voltage to the 240
volts. This produces
three phases - all 240v - and neutral is ground. Between
phases you get
440 volts. This three phase plus neutral (ground) is fed
along the street,
and only one phase (usually 100 amp max) is fed to a
house. Alternate
phases are use to other houses to balance the load. A very
large house may
have a second phase - but electric heating isn't common in
the UK due to
cost so up to 100 amps (25kW) is more than enough for
most.
(snip)
Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk
London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
If there are indeed three phases, would not the phase to
phase voltage be 220v times sqrt(3) = 381v?

David
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top